Rheumatoid Arthritis: Wallenius M

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 3 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Arthritis, Rheumatoid," originating from Planet Earth —» Wallenius M.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Review Drug insight: Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory arthropathies during reproduction, pregnancy and lactation. 2007

Skomsvoll JF, Wallenius M, Koksvik HS, Rødevand E, Salvesen KA, Spigset O, Kvien TK. · Department of Obstetrics, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. · Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17334338 No free full text.

Abstract: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are widely used to reduce disease activity and joint damage, and to improve health-related quality of life in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic arthritis. To date, no increased risk of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity, or adverse pregnancy outcome (such as birth defects, premature birth, and low birth weight) has been reported in patients with inflammatory arthropathies treated with anti-TNF therapy, compared with the general population. However, the available data are limited, and methotrexate, which is commonly used in combination with anti-TNF drugs, is teratogenic. Until more data are available, no firm conclusions can be reached regarding the safety of anti-TNF therapy in pregnancy. Nevertheless, in selected cases where there is high disease activity, anti-TNF therapy might be recommended, depending on the results of individual risk-benefit analyses. Fully informed consent from the mother is needed in such cases. Anti-TNF agents are not usually used during lactation, although the risk of toxicity is probably negligible.

2 Article Comparison of work disability and health-related quality of life between males and females with rheumatoid arthritis below the age of 45 years. 2009

Wallenius M, Skomsvoll JF, Koldingsnes W, Rødevand E, Mikkelsen K, Kaufmann C, Kvien TK. · Department of Rheumatology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18991183 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare work disability (WD) and health status between males and females with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the age group 18-45 years, and to compare health status between patients with and without WD within each gender, and finally to identify factors independently associated with WD in this age group. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of RA patients at the time starting with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and/or biological treatment. Patients receiving a permanent, national WD pension corresponding to >or= 50% were defined as work disabled. We examined gender differences with regard to disease characteristics, health status and WD. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson's chi(2)-test were applied for group comparisons. Multiple logistic regression analyses with adjustments for duration of education, disease duration, age, erosive disease, disability score [using the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ)], Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28), the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental health score and gender were used to identify variables associated with WD. RESULTS: Out of 474 (372 females) patients, the number (%) of work-disabled females/males was 91 (24.7)/8 (8.1) (p<0.001). WD was associated with worse health status in both genders. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) [OR (95% CI)] for WD in females vs. males was 4.84 (1.85-12.65) in the multivariate analyses. Other factors independently associated with WD were worse mental health, disease duration and low level of education. CONCLUSION: Females with RA had a fourfold increased risk of WD compared to men. Low level of education, disease duration and worse mental health were also independently associated with WD.

3 Article [Clinical experience with TNF-alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis] free! 2005

Wallenius M, Rødevand E, Skomsvoll JF. · Klinikk for ortopedi og revmatologi, Revmatologisk avdeling, St. Olavs Hospital, 7006 Trondheim. · Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. · Pubmed #15976836 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Infliximab and etanercept, both tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, are proven to be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in randomised controlled trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were treated with infliximab (n = 29) or etanercept (n = 24) in clinical hospital practice. They were examined before and during treatment. All patients had tried at least one DMARD before. Details of disease activity were monitored by measuring tender and swollen joints, global and pain patient visual analogue scales, Disease Activity Index Score (DAS 28), the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, blood and urine samples, and adverse effects. The patients were monitored regularly for two years or until they stopped treatment. RESULTS: In the infliximab group we observed statistically significantly better values for all the registered variables after 6 weeks. At the other times of registration the variables were varying a lot; however, DAS 28 scores after baseline were all within the limits of moderate effect. In the etanercept group we observed statistically significantly better values for all the variables except for erythrocyte sedimentation rate after 6 weeks. At the other times of registration all the variables had significantly better values. Adverse effects were reported in 9 patients in the infliximab group and in 5 in the etanercept group, but no serious adverse effects were reported. 18 patients in the infliximab group (61%) and 10 in the etanercept group (42%) had stopped treatment within two years, either because of adverse effects or lack of effect. CONCLUSION: In this open study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, most experienced a rapid effect of infliximab, but a varying effect later on. In the etanercept group the patients experienced both a rapid and sustained effect among those who tolerated the medication. Compared to what several others have reported, a large number of patients stopped treatment; this may reflect limited experience.