Rheumatoid Arthritis: Viola S

Ravelli A, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Besana C, Foti T, Ruperto N, Viola S, Martini A. · Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatrics II, University of Genoa, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #15870661 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop diagnostic guidelines for macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (S-JIA). STUDY DESIGN: We followed the classification criteria approach that is based on the comparison of patients with the index disease with patients with a "confusable" disease. The former group included 74 patients with S-JIA-associated MAS reported in the literature or seen by the authors; the latter group included 37 patients with S-JIA who had 51 instances of "high disease activity" seen by the authors. The relative power of clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic variables in discriminating patients with MAS from patients with high disease activity was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity rate, specificity rate, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The combinations of variables that led to best separation between patients and control subjects were identified through "the number of criteria present" method. RESULTS: The strongest clinical discriminators were hemorrhages (DOR = 67) and central nervous system dysfunction (DOR = 63); the strongest laboratory discriminators were decreased platelet count (DOR = 1092), increased aspartate aminotransferase (DOR = 247), leukopenia (DOR = 70), and hypofibrinogenemia (DOR = 165). The best separation between patients and control subjects occurred when any 2 or more laboratory criteria (DOR = 1309) were simultaneously present; the second best performance was provided by the presence of any 2, 3, or more clinical and/or laboratory criteria (DOR = 765 and 743, respectively). CONCLUSION: We identified preliminary diagnostic guidelines for MAS complicating S-JIA. These guidelines deserve prospective validation.

Bartoli M, Tarò M, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Traverso F, Viola S, Magnani A, Gasparini C, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17660217 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the magnitude of clinical response in the first 6 months of methotrexate (MTX) therapy and long-term outcome in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The clinical charts of 125 JIA patients who were started with MTX and then followed for at least 5 years were reviewed. Based on the level of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric response at 6 months, patients were divided in four mutually exclusive groups: (1) non-responders, (2) responders at 30%, (3) responders at 50%, and (4) responders at 70%. The long-term outcome in each response group was evaluated by calculating the percentage change in active and restricted joint counts from baseline to 1, 2 and 5 years and the frequency of inactive disease at 5 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, 42 patients were classified as non-responders, 24 as 30% responders, 26 as 50% responders, and 33 as 70% responders. Patients who had achieved a 70% response showed a significantly greater percentage improvement in active joint count between baseline to 5 years compared with non-responders and 30% responders, and a significantly greater percentage improvement in restricted joint count between baseline to 5 years compared with 30% responders. The 70% responders also had a greater frequency of inactive disease at 5 years compared with 30% responders, CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the achievement of an ACR Pediatric 70 response at 6 months after start of MTX therapy predicts a more favorable long-term outcome of patients with JIA.

Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Falcini F, Lepore L, Buoncompagni A, Gerloni V, Bardare M, Cortis E, Zulian F, Sardella ML, Giovanni Strano C, Alessio M, Alpigiani MG, Migliavacca D, Pistorio A, Viola S, Martini A. · Laboratorio di Informatica Medica, IRCCS S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10342633 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the responsiveness of the disease activity measures more commonly used in juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) clinical trials. METHODS: Data were obtained from an open-label, non-controlled, multicentre trial designed to investigate the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in children with JCA. Outcome measures, including physician and parent global assessments, functional ability measures, articular variables, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation, were assessed at baseline and after 6 months of MTX treatment in 132 patients. Responsiveness of endpoint variables was evaluated by assessing the effect size (ES) and the standardized response median (SRM). RESULTS: Physician and parent global assessments were the more responsive instruments, showing ES and SRM above 1.0. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, functional status measures and articular variables showed intermediate responsiveness. Morning stiffness, haemoglobin and platelet count were the least responsive instruments. CONCLUSION: The results of our analysis indicate that subjective estimations of the disease activity, either by the physician or parents, are the most responsive instruments in the assessment of the therapeutic response in children with JCA. The responsiveness of outcome measures in JCA should be further investigated in prospective controlled studies.

Consolaro A, Ruperto N, Bazso A, Pistorio A, Magni-Manzoni S, Filocamo G, Malattia C, Viola S, Martini A, Ravelli A, Anonymous00061. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genoa, and the Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19405003 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS). METHODS: The JADAS includes 4 measures: physician global assessment of disease activity, parent/patient global assessment of well-being, active joint count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. These variables are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30), Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 criteria for improvement. Validation analyses were conducted on >4,500 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change. Three versions of the JADAS were tested based on 71-joint (range 0-101), 27-joint (range 0-57), or 10-joint (range 0-40) counts. Statistical performances of the JADAS were compared with those of 2 rheumatoid arthritis composite scores, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS: The JADAS demonstrated good construct validity, yielding strong correlations with JIA activity measures not included in the score and moderate correlations with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire. Correlations obtained for the 3 JADAS versions were comparable, but superior to those yielded by the DAS28 and CDAI. The area under the curve of the JADAS predicted long-term disease outcome, measured as radiographic progression over 3 years. In 2 clinical trials, the JADAS discriminated well between ACR Pedi 30, Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 response and revealed strong responsiveness to clinical change. CONCLUSION: The JADAS was found to be a valid instrument for assessment of disease activity in JIA and is potentially applicable in standard clinical care, observational studies, and clinical trials.

Bazso A, Consolaro A, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Viola S, Magni-Manzoni S, Malattia C, Buoncompagni A, Loy A, Martini A, Ravelli A, Anonymous00093. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19208532 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and test reduced joint counts in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Four reduced joint counts including 45, 35, 27, and 10 joints were devised by a panel of experienced pediatric rheumatologists, who selected the joints to be included based on the ease of technical assessment, functional relevance, and frequency of involvement. Three large samples of patients with JIA (total n=4353) who had a detailed joint assessment available were used to develop and test reduced joint counts. Performance of reduced counts was examined by comparing their Spearman correlation with the standard (i.e., complete) joint count. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating Spearman correlation with other JIA outcome measures. Responsiveness to clinical change was determined through the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Spearman correlations of reduced joint counts with the whole joint count and with the other JIA outcome measures were comparable, revealing that they had similar ability to serve as surrogate for the whole joint count and construct validity. Responsiveness to clinical change was also comparable across reduced counts (SRM 0.83-1.09 for active joint counts and 0.63-0.81 for restricted joint counts). Based on these results and considering the relative feasibility of the different counts, the 27-joint reduced count is proposed for use in JIA. This joint count includes the cervical spine and the elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (from first to third), proximal interphalangeal, hip, knee, and ankle joints. CONCLUSION: Reduced joint counts appear to be as reliable as standard joint counts in assessment of the severity of joint disease and its change over time in children with JIA.

Malattia C, Damasio MB, Magnaguagno F, Pistorio A, Valle M, Martinoli C, Viola S, Buoncompagni A, Loy A, Ravelli A, Tomà P, Martini A. · Istituto G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19035414 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), conventional radiography, and ultrasonography in identifying bone erosions in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to determine the validity and reliability of an MRI scale in detecting and grading joint damage. METHODS: In 26 JIA patients, the clinically more affected wrist was studied with MRI, radiography, and ultrasonography, coupled with standard clinical assessment and biochemical analysis. MR images were assessed independently by 2 readers according to an apposite devised scoring system. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 25 (96.1%) had 1 or more erosions as detected by MRI, whereas conventional radiography and ultrasonography revealed erosions in 13 (50%) of 26 and 12 (50%) of 24 patients, respectively. The ability of MRI to detect erosive changes was significantly higher with respect to conventional radiography (P = 0.002 with Bonferroni correction [P(B)]) and ultrasonography (P(B) = 0.0002) in the group of patients with <3 years' disease duration. Ultrasonography and conventional radiography were of equivalent value for the detection of destructive changes. Wrist MRI score correlated highly with radiographic erosion score (r(s) = 0.82) and with wrist limited range of motion score (r(s) = 0.69). The interreader intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for MRI score was excellent (0.97); intrareader ICCs were good for both investigators (0.97 and 0.79). CONCLUSION: MRI seems to be a powerful tool to detect early structural damage in JIA. The proposed MRI scale for bone erosions appears promising in terms of reliability and construct validity. The pathophysiologic meaning and the prognostic value of bone erosions revealed only by MRI remain to be established in longitudinal studies.

Solari N, Viola S, Pistorio A, Magni-Manzoni S, Vitale R, Ruperto N, Ullmann N, Filocamo G, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18975357 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the disease outcomes of a cross-sectional sample of children with longstanding juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) seen between September 2002 and December 2006, and to provide a benchmarking of outcomes obtained with current treatment. METHODS: All consecutive patients were included if they met the following criteria: diagnosis of JIA, disease duration > or = 5 years, and informed consent. Outcome assessments included disease activity, inactive disease, minimal disease activity, pain, physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), auxometric measurements, and articular and extraarticular damage. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included. At study visit, patients had on average a low level of disease activity. However, only 21.8% met the criteria for inactive disease, and less than 50% met the definition of minimal disease activity. Additionally, 19.2% had moderate to severe Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire disability and 3.6% were in Steinbrocker class III-IV. Approximately 10% had major impairment in HRQOL. A total of 34.2% had damage in > or = 1 joint or joint group and 26.1% showed extraarticular damage. Of the 125 patients who underwent a wrist radiograph, 35.2% had significant structural damage and 8.7% had growth retardation. CONCLUSION: Our patients had on average a low level of disease activity, little or no physical disability, and a satisfactory HRQOL. However, a sizable proportion of patients had persistently active disease, impaired function, and damage. These findings underscore the critical need for treatments and treatment strategies that have the ability to better control disease activity and to reduce the development of disease-related morbidities.

Gattorno M, Piccini A, Lasigliè D, Tassi S, Brisca G, Carta S, Delfino L, Ferlito F, Pelagatti MA, Caroli F, Buoncompagni A, Viola S, Loy A, Sironi M, Vecchi A, Ravelli A, Martini A, Rubartelli A. · G. Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18438814 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical response to interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade and in vitro IL-1beta and IL-18 secretion in patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with systemic-onset JIA were treated with the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) anakinra. Monocytes from 18 patients and 20 healthy donors were activated by different Toll-like receptor ligands. Intracellular and secreted IL-1beta and IL-18 were analyzed by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Ten patients with systemic-onset JIA exhibited a dramatic response to anakinra and were classified as complete responders. Eleven patients had an incomplete response or no response, and 1 patient could not be classified in terms of response. Compared with patients who had an incomplete response or no response, complete responders had a lower number of active joints (P = 0.02) and an increased absolute neutrophil count (P = 0.02). In vitro IL-1beta and IL-18 secretion in response to various stimuli was not increased and was independent of treatment efficacy. Likewise, secretion of IL-1Ra by monocytes from patients with systemic-onset JIA was not impaired. An overall low level of IL-1beta secretion upon exposure to exogenous ATP was observed, unrelated to treatment responsiveness or disease activity. CONCLUSION: Two subsets of systemic-onset JIA can be identified according to patient response to IL-1 blockade. The 2 subsets appear to be characterized by some distinct clinical features. In vitro secretion of IL-1beta and IL-18 by monocytes from patients with systemic-onset JIA is not increased and is independent of both treatment outcome and disease activity.

Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Labò E, Viola S, Garcia-Munitis P, Panigada S, Visconti C, Buoncompagni A, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17965116 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe the longitudinal course of physical functioning in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and identify predictors of long-term functional impairment. METHODS: Between January 1987 and December 2002, 227 patients had two or more functional ability questionnaires completed by a parent. The total number of questionnaires was 1356 and the follow-up between first and last questionnaire administration was 949.7 patient years. At each questionnaire administration, patients were assigned to one of three functional disability states (1 = no disability; 2 = mild to moderate disability; 3 = severe disability), based on their functional ability score. Predictor variables included sex, onset age, JIA category, age at visit, disease duration, presence of antinuclear antibodies, joint counts, acute phase reactants and initial disability state. RESULTS: Despite patient variability in the course of physical functioning, the following three longitudinal patterns were observed: (1) a stable state of disability throughout the entire study period, with continued absence of disability in 27.8% of patients and persistently moderate disability in 3.5% of patients; (2) a steady improvement (22.9% of patients) or deterioration (5.7% of patients) in disability over time; (3) a fluctuating course of disability, with deterioration and improvement (40.1% of patients). Younger age at disease onset and a greater restricted joint count were the strongest predictors of long-term functional impairment. CONCLUSION: A wide within-patient and between-patient variability in the longitudinal course of functional disability was found. Children with early disease onset and a greater number of restricted joints had the highest risk of developing long-term physical disability.

Filocamo G, Sztajnbok F, Cespedes-Cruz A, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Viola S, Ruperto N, Buoncompagni A, Loy A, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17665481 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new short and simple measure of physical function in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The Juvenile Arthritis Functionality Scale (JAFS) is a 15-item questionnaire that explores physical function in 3 body areas (lower limbs, hand/wrist, and upper segment). Validation of the Italian version of the instrument was accomplished by evaluating 211 consecutive JIA patients ages 2.2-18 years. The instrument's feasibility, face and content validity, construct and discriminative ability, internal consistency, interrater reliability, and responsiveness to clinical change were examined. JAFS psychometric properties were compared with those of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ). RESULTS: The JAFS was found to be feasible and to possess both face and content validity. The JAFS score correlated with most of the other JIA outcome measures in the range predicted, thereby demonstrating good construct validity, and discriminated well among different levels of disability. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.82. The intraclass correlation coefficients between raters (mothers, fathers, and children) and between reported and observed level of function ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The JAFS revealed fair responsiveness, with a standardized response mean ranging from 0.42 to 0.56. Comparison with the C-HAQ indicated that the JAFS may be superior in terms of construct validity and reliability, and at least as good in terms of discriminant validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The JAFS exhibited good reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability and fair responsiveness, and is therefore a valid instrument for the assessment of physical function in children with JIA.

Consolaro A, Vitale R, Pistorio A, Lattanzi B, Ruperto N, Malattia C, Filocamo G, Viola S, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17611978 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate discrepancies between physicians' and parents' ratings of inactive disease in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and the determinants of the discrepancy. METHODS: Study data were obtained from the clinical database generated at the study unit. Each patient visit included a standardized assessment of JIA outcome measures. One visit for each patient was selected for analysis. Three definitions of inactive disease were applied to the data: a physician-based definition (physician global assessment = 0); a parent-based definition (parent global assessment = 0); and a formal definition, based on fulfillment of newly developed criteria for inactive disease in JIA. RESULTS: Of 1237 visits made by 537 patients that included both physician and parent global assessments, 265 fulfilled the physician-based definition and/or the parent-based definition of inactive disease. Concordance between physicians and parents in rating the disease as inactive was seen in 40% of the visits, whereas in 60% of visits the 2 assessments were discordant. Parents tended to disagree with physicians in rating the disease as inactive if the child had pain or functional impairment, whereas physicians tended to disagree with parents in the presence of active joint symptoms. Only 2/3 of the 79 visits that fulfilled the formal definition of inactive disease also met the parent-based definition of inactive disease. CONCLUSION: We found frequent discordance between physicians' and parents' ratings of inactive disease in children with JIA, which suggests that the parent's rating of a child's disease activity should be considered for inclusion in the definition of clinical remission for JIA.

Sztajnbok F, Coronel-Martinez DL, Diaz-Maldonado A, Novarini C, Pistorio A, Viola S, Ruperto N, Buoncompagni A, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Pediatria II, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16782733 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discrepancy between physician's and parent's global assessments of disease status and the factors explaining discordance in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The mothers of 197 patients with JIA rated the child's overall well-being on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and the attending physician rated the child's overall disease activity on a 10 cm VAS. A discordance score was calculated by subtracting the physician's global assessment from that of the parent's, leading to the definition of three patient groups: (1) no discordance, when physician's and parent's assessments were within 1 cm of each other; (2) negative discordance, when parent's assessment was underrated relative to the physician; and (3) positive discordance, when parent's assessment was over-rated relative to the physician. Negative and positive discordance was defined as 'marked' when the difference between the two assessments was greater than 3 cm. RESULTS: No discordance was found in 40.6% of the patients. Negative discordance was found in 51.3% of the patients, with 34% showing marked discordance. Positive discordance was found in 8.1% of the patients, with 2% showing marked discordance. Significant differences between groups included a shorter disease duration among patients with a markedly positive discordance (P = 0.02) and a greater frequency of ongoing second-line drug therapy among patients with no discordance or with positive discordance (P = 0.008). Patients with no discordance or with marked positive discordance had a significantly lower joint counts (P = 0.02-0.004). CONCLUSION: Parents and physicians often perceive the health status of children with JIA differently, with parents providing most frequently lower rating.

Viola S, Felici E, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Buoncompagni A, Ruperto N, Rossi F, Bartoli M, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Università di Genova, IRCCS G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15986372 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical measure of articular and extraarticular damage in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index (JADI), which is derived from physical examination and a brief review of the patient's clinical history, is composed of 2 parts: assessments of articular damage (JADI-A) and extraarticular damage (JADI-E). Instrument validation was accomplished by evaluating 158 JIA patients with disease duration of at least 5 years, seen consecutively over 21 months. The instrument's feasibility, face and content validity, construct and discriminative ability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability were examined. RESULTS: Among the 158 JIA patients, 47% and 37% had articular and extraarticular damage, respectively. The JADI was found to be feasible and to possess both face and content validity. The JADI-A score correlated highly with the number of joints with limited range of motion (Spearman's r [r(S)] = 0.72) and correlated moderately with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire score (r(S) = 0.41), Steinbrocker functional classification (r(S) = 0.50), and Poznanski's score of radiographic damage (r(S) = -0.54), thereby demonstrating good construct validity. Correlations with the JADI-E score were lower, owing to the heterogeneity of its items. The JADI-A discriminated well among different levels of disability. The internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha) of the JADI-A and JADI-E was 0.93 and 0.59, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients between pairs of independent observers ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. CONCLUSION: The JADI exhibited good reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability and is therefore a valid instrument for the assessment of long-term damage in patients with JIA, in the context of both clinical management and research settings.

Magni-Manzoni S, Cugno C, Pistorio A, Garay S, Tsitsami E, Gasparini C, Viola S, Ruperto N, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università di Pavia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15971436 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of clinical measures in the assessment of disease flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The clinical records of all consecutive patients with JIA who were diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. In each patient, all visits made during follow-up were analyzed and those meeting the criteria for disease flare were recorded. The definition of flare was based on the therapeutic alterations made by the attending physician. Responsiveness of JIA clinical measures to relevant increase in disease activity (a flare) was evaluated by assessing the score change of each measure from a visit made 6 (+/- 3) months before a flare and the flare visit. Responsiveness statistics included the standardized response mean (SRM) and the effect size (ES). RESULTS: A total of 115 patients, who were followed for 0.5 to 6.2 years (mean 2.8 years), were studied. During follow-up, 51 patients (44%) experienced 1 or more disease flares, with the total number of flares being 75. Strong responsiveness (ES and SRM > or = 0.8) to increase in disease activity was demonstrated by the physician's and parent's global assessments, the global articular severity score, and the morning stiffness. The active, swollen and painful joint counts, the swelling, pain on motion/tenderness and limited range of motion (LROM) scores, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate revealed moderate responsiveness (ES and SRM > or = 0.5). The poorest performances (ES and/or SRM < 0.5) were provided by the parent's assessment of pain, the functional ability tool, the number of joints with LROM, the LROM score, the C-reactive protein, the white blood cell and platelet count, and the hemoglobin level. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that the swollen or painful joint counts are better suited than the count of joints with LROM for the assessment of disease flare in patients with JIA.

Ravelli A, Felici E, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Novarini C, Bozzola E, Viola S, Martini A. · IRCCS G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. <> · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15751057 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We recently hypothesized that in the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the presumably homogeneous patient group characterized by early onset of disease, a female predilection, the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), asymmetric arthritis, and the risk for iridocyclitis is classified into different categories. We sought to investigate whether ANA-positive patients belonging to the ILAR categories of oligoarthritis and rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarthritis share homogeneous features and to compare these features with those of ANA-negative patients with JIA in the same categories. METHODS: We identified patients who were followed up during a 15-year period. All patients had JIA according to the ILAR criteria, with oligoarticular or polyarticular onset. ANA positivity was defined as 2 or more positive results at a titer of >or=1:160. Demographic and clinical features, including the number of joints involved over time and measures of JIA severity at the last followup visit, were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were included: 190 were ANA positive (109 had persistent oligoarthritis, 48 had extended oligoarthritis, and 33 had RF-negative polyarthritis), and 66 were ANA negative (35 had RF-negative polyarthritis, and 31 had oligoarthritis). All patients who were positive for ANA were similar in terms of age at disease presentation, female-to-male ratio, and frequency of symmetric arthritis and iridocyclitis. Compared with ANA-positive patients with polyarticular disease, ANA-negative patients with polyarticular arthritis were older at disease presentation and had a lower frequency of iridocyclitis, a higher frequency of symmetric arthritis, a greater cumulative number of joints affected over time, and a different pattern of joint disease, with a greater frequency of shoulder and hip involvement. The strong relationship between the presence of ANA and younger age at disease presentation, asymmetric arthritis, and development of iridocyclitis was confirmed by multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results support the hypothesis that patients with similar characteristics are currently classified into different JIA categories. The value of ANA positivity as a possible modifier of the current classification system deserves consideration.

Moretti C, Viola S, Pistorio A, Magni-Manzoni S, Ruperto N, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università di Pavia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattiere Scientifico, Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15647433 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative responsiveness of condition specific measures with that of a generic health status instrument for outcome assessment of intra-articular corticosteroid (IAC) injection in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: We examined 44 consecutive patients with oligoarticular JIA before an IAC injection and after 6 months. Condition specific measures included physician's and parent's global assessments, the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), the articular indices, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation. The generic health status instrument was the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), which was divided into two parts: the physical score (PhS) and the psychosocial score (PsS). Responsiveness statistics were the standardised response mean, the effect size, and Guyatt's method. The discriminative ability of the clinical measures in distinguishing improved from non-improved patients was evaluated with the correlation and the receiver operating characteristic methods, using the physician's and the parent's judgements of the treatment outcome as external criteria. RESULTS: All responsiveness statistics and discriminative ability assessments consistently ranked the physician's global assessment of the disease activity as the most responsive measure. The CHQ-PhS revealed superior ability in detecting baseline versus 6 month change compared with the CHAQ and the CHQ-PsS; both summary scales of the CHQ revealed better discriminative ability than the CHAQ. CONCLUSIONS: The physician's global assessment of the disease activity proved the most responsive outcome measure in our patients with JIA. The relative evaluative properties of the generic health status instrument and the CHAQ should be further investigated.

Magni-Manzoni S, Rossi F, Pistorio A, Temporini F, Viola S, Beluffi G, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #14674002 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of radiographic progression and identify prognostic factors of radiographic progression, radiographic damage, and physical disability in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Ninety-four JIA patients with a median disease duration of 1.1 years were followed up prospectively for a median of 4.5 years. Bilateral wrist radiographs were obtained at baseline, at 1 year, and at the last followup visit. Radiographic damage was assessed by the carpal length (Poznanski score), and physical disability by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ). Yearly radiographic progression, the Poznanski score at the final visit, and the C-HAQ score at the final visit were used as outcome measures. Baseline parameters included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD Poznanski score was -1.2 +/- 1.3 at baseline, -1.7 +/- 1.8 at the 1-year visit, and -1.9 +/- 2.2 at the final visit (P < 0.0001). Radiographic progression was greater during the first year (mean +/- SD -0.5 +/- 1.1) than between the 1-year visit and the final visit (-0.2 +/- 1.3). The mean yearly radiographic progression during the entire study period was -0.1 +/- 0.4. Logistic regression analysis revealed that radiographic progression during the first year was the only baseline parameter that was predictive of all 3 study outcomes. The final Poznanski score was also predicted by the baseline Poznanski score, whereas female sex was protective against radiographic progression. CONCLUSION: We identified the prognostic factors for poorer outcome in polyarticular-course JIA. The changes in the early Poznanski score can be used to predict long-term joint damage and physical disability.

Tsitsami E, Bozzola E, Magni-Manzoni S, Viola S, Pistorio A, Ruperto N, Martini A, Ravelli A. · IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12910554 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: In the 1997 revision of the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), a family history of psoriasis is an exclusion for the oligoarthritis category. We investigated whether psoriasis in a first or second degree relative influences the clinical expression and course of JIA patients with oligoarthritis. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, consecutive oligoarticular-onset JIA patients were investigated. Clinical evaluations included confirmation of a family history of psoriasis and assessment of nail abnormalities, dactylitis, psoriatic rash, variables of JIA activity, and laboratory indicators of inflammation. Retrospective assessments included sex, onset age, disease duration, antinuclear antibodies, HLA-B27, uveitis, ocular complications, second-line therapies, intraarticular corticosteroid injections, radiographic joint lesions, joint involvement over time, and laboratory investigations at disease presentation and first observation. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included. Thirty-three had a positive family history of psoriasis (group 2) and 139 did not (group 1). Thirteen patients fulfilled the ILAR criteria for juvenile psoriatic arthritis (group 3). Patients in groups 1 and 2 were comparable for all parameters, except for a higher frequency of females in group 1 (P = 0.04). As compared with group 2, patients in group 3 were less frequently antinuclear antibody positive and had a more severe arthritis and a different distribution of joint involvement. CONCLUSION: We found close similarities in the clinical features and course among patients with oligoarthritis who had a positive family history for psoriasis and those who did not. These findings argue against the exclusion of the former patients from the oligoarthritis category of JIA.

Massa M, Mazzoli F, Pignatti P, De Benedetti F, Passalia M, Viola S, Samodal R, La Cava A, Giannoni F, Ollier W, Martini A, Albani S. · IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12384932 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether abnormal T cell recognition may be generated by exposure to exogenous antigens presenting sequence homology with epitopes contained in self HLA alleles, and if such recognition may be part of the mechanisms that fuel inflammation in autoimmune diseases associated with certain HLA alleles. METHODS: Cytotoxic responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to 9-mer peptides derived from HLA molecules (DRB1*1101, DRB1*0801, or DPB1*0201) associated with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or homologous peptides derived from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) proteins (Bolf1 or Balf2) were analyzed in patients with oligoarticular JIA and in healthy controls matched for HLA-DRB1*1101, DRB1*0801, or DPB1*0201. Production of proinflammatory cytokines in culture supernatants was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: T cell cytotoxic responses and production of proinflammatory cytokines in response to stimulation with self HLA-derived peptides were found only in patients with oligoarticular JIA, and not in controls. Patients with oligoarticular JIA, but none of the healthy controls, had EBV-self HLA cross-reactive T cells. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a disease- and allele-specific mechanism of autoimmunity in oligoarticular JIA. This mechanism may be part of the pathogenesis of the disease, and could be the basis of one of the likely multiple candidates for antigen-specific immunotherapy approaches in the future.

Ravelli A, Manzoni SM, Viola S, Pistorio A, Ruperto N, Martini A. · Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche dell'Università, Clinica e Biometria, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11550981 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine in a prospective analysis whether baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables predict the outcome of intraarticular corticosteroid (IAC) injection of the knees in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who met the criteria for the diagnosis of JIA and received their initial injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide in one or both knees. Predictor variables included sex, age, age at onset of JIA, onset subtype, disease duration, drug therapy at the time of IAC injection, physician and parent global assessment of disease status, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, involvement of other joints besides knees, amount of fluid aspirated, and dose of IAC injected. The primary outcome measure was persistence of complete clinical response at 6 months, i.e., no evidence of synovitis clinically. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were available for analysis. At 6 months after the IAC injection, 65 (69%) patients showed a sustained complete clinical response, whereas 29 (31%) had had a recurrence of joint inflammation. Univariate statistical analyses showed that patients who had a sustained clinical response had a significantly higher ESR than those who did not (p = 0.023). The ESR was the only variable that remained in the best-fit model from multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 2.61, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with JIA who have a higher ESR are more likely to benefit from IAC injection of the knees.

Ravelli A, Viola S, Migliavacca D, Pistorio A, Ruperto N, Martini A. · Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche dell'Università, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #11511761 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of agreement between parents and clinicians in rating dysfunction in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: A parent of each patient completed the Italian version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Subsequently, an examiner assessed, in a specially equipped room, the child's performance of tasks as described by the CHAQ. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive JIA patients and their parents were included. The mean proxy-reported and observed CHAQ score was 0.64+/-0.53 and 0.47+/-0.62 respectively, the difference ranging from -1.75 to 1.5. There were 30 cases (43%) of agreement (difference < or =0.25 CHAQ units) between the parent's and clinician's ratings, whereas in 40 cases (57%) there was discordance (difference >0.25 CHAQ units). In 30 cases the parent rated the child's functional ability as worse than that observed by the clinician (i.e. the parent underestimated the child's function), whereas in 10 cases the parent rated the child's functional ability as better than that observed by the clinician (i.e. overestimated the child's function). Multivariate regression analysis showed that children's functional ability was overestimated by parents with increasing erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global articular severity score and underestimated with increasing level of pain. Among the functional areas of the CHAQ, the level of agreement was poorest in the areas of eating and hygiene and was best for activities. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between proxy-reported and observed functional ability was frequent in our patients with JIA. The children's functional ability was overestimated by parents as the severity of arthritis increased and underestimated as the level of pain increased.

Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, Malattia C, Viola S, Cavuto S, Alessio M, Alpigiani MG, Buoncompagni A, Corona F, Cortis E, Falcini F, Gerloni V, Lepore L, Sardella ML, Strano CG, Zulian F, Gado-West L, Tortorelli A, Fantini F, Martini A, Anonymous00072. · Laboratorio di Informatica Medica, IRCCS S. Matteo, Università di Pavia, Italy. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11510339 No free full text.

Abstract: We report herein the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation into the Italian language of the parent's version of two health related quality of life instruments. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is a disease specific health instrument that measures functional ability in daily living activities in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) is a generic health instrument designed to capture the physical and psychosocial well-being of children independently from the underlying disease. The Italian CHAQ was already published in the literature and was therefore revalidated while the Italian CHQ was fully cross culturally adapted with 3 forward and 3 backward translations, and than validated. A total of 1,192 subjects were enrolled: 404 patients with JIA (16% systemic onset, 31% polyarticular onset, 21% extended oligoarticular subtype, and 32% persistent oligoarticular subtype) and 788 healthy children. The CHAQ clinically discriminated between healthy subjects and JIA patients, with the systemic, polyarticular and extended oligoarticular subtypes having a higher degree of disability, pain, and a lower overall well-being when compared to their healthy peers. Also the CHQ clinically discriminated between healthy subjects and JIA patients, with the systemic onset, polyarticular onset and extended oligoarticular subtypes having a lower physical and psychosocial well-being when compared to their healthy peers. In conclusion the Italian version of the CHAQ-CHQ are reliable, and valid tools for the functional, physical and psychosocial assessment of children with JIA.

Ravelli A, Migliavacca D, Viola S, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Martini A. · Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche dell'Università, Pavia, Italy. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10544851 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of folinic acid in reducing the side effects associated with methotrexate (MTX) therapy in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to determine whether folate supplementation may reduce the benefit of MTX administration. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-controlled study. Inclusion criteria were: 1) diagnosis of JIA according to the Durban 1997 criteria; 2) treatment with low to intermediate doses of MTX (10-20 mg/m2/week) as the sole second-line agent for at least 6 mos.; and 3) supplementation with folinic acid (2.5-7.5 mg) in a single weekly dose 24 hrs after MTX administration. All patients were started on folinic acid only after the development of a side effect. Exclusion criteria were: treatment with higher doses of MTX (> 20 mg/m2/week). The outcomes investigated were: hepatotoxicity (liver transaminase increase), gastrointestinal toxicity, disease flare, and clinical remission. The number of episodes per patient-year of MTX treatment of each outcome before and after folinic acid supplementation was compared by the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. RESULTS: A total of 43 children with JIA were included in the study. The mean duration of treatment before and after folinic acid supplementation was 1.1 years and 1.8 years, respectively. After the start of folinic acid supplementation, the mean number of episodes per patient-year of hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity decreased from 2.30 to 0.32 (p < 0.001) and from 1.09 to 0.29 (p = 0.002), respectively. The mean number of disease flares and clinical remissions per patient-year did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: In our JIA patients, folinic acid supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in the most common side effects of MTX, without affecting the clinical efficacy of the drug.

Ravelli A, Viola S, Migliavacca D, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Martini A. · Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche dell'Università, Laboratorio di Informatica Medica, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico, San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #10484796 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables measurable at baseline predict the clinical efficacy or major toxic effects of methotrexate (MTX) therapy in children with chronic arthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Patient eligibility criteria: (1) monitored in our unit between 1986 and 1996 with a diagnosis of chronic arthritis and (2) treatment with MTX as the sole second-line agent and for at least 6 months. Outcomes investigated: (1) short-term (6-month) clinical response, (2) complete disease control, (3) disease relapse after MTX discontinuation after complete disease control, (4) aminotransferase elevation, (5) gastrointestinal toxicity. Independent variables that showed significant results with univariate tests or were clinically relevant for each outcome underwent multiple logistic or Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Eighty patients were available for analysis. The disease onset subtype was systemic in 37 patients, polyarticular in 20 patients, and oligoarticular in 23 patients (all with polyarticular course: extended oligoarticular subtype). The extended oligoarticular subtype was the best predictor for both the short-term clinical response (odds ratio 6.80, P =.02) and, together with a better functional ability, the complete disease control (rate ratio 3.85, P =.03 and rate ratio 3.29, P =.006, respectively). Patients with this subtype of chronic arthritis tended to have earlier, and more frequently, a disease relapse after MTX discontinuation. Thrombocytosis was the only significant risk factor for liver biochemical abnormalities (rate ratio 2.94, P =.008), whereas no variable yielded significant results for gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION: Patients with extended oligoarticular chronic arthritis were more likely to benefit from MTX therapy and to have a relapse after treatment discontinuation, suggesting that MTX is distinctly more effective in this subset of chronic arthritis.

Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Migliavacca D, Viola S, Pistorio A, Duarte C, Martini A. · Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche dell'Università, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10451084 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative responsiveness of outcome measures in children with oligoarticular course juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive children with JCA and < or =4 joints involved were assessed at admission and after 3 months of followup. Outcome measures included physician and parent global assessments, functional ability as measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), articular variables, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation. Responsiveness was calculated with the standardized response median, the effect size, and the Guyatt method. RESULTS: The physician global assessment of disease activity, the active joint count, the global articular severity score, and the number and score of swollen joints proved consistently more responsive with either responsiveness measure used. The parent global assessment of the child's well being, the scores of joints with pain/tenderness and limited range of motion, and the number of joints with limited range of motion showed intermediate responsiveness. The CHAQ, morning stiffness, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation were the least responsive measures. CONCLUSION: The subjective estimation of disease activity by the physician and the articular variables were the more responsive outcome measures in children with oligoarticular JCA. The assessment of functional ability as measured by the CHAQ showed a poor sensitivity to clinical change in this subset of patients with JCA.