Rheumatoid Arthritis: Ting G

Cabral D, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Ting G, Avorn J, Solomon DH. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15696560 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of indicators for assessing the severity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through medical records. METHODS: A list of 47 potential indicators of RA was reviewed by an expert Delphi panel of 6 rheumatologists. The Delphi method is a formal approach for gathering expert opinion. The 47 potential indicators included items from the following 5 categories: radiologic and laboratory findings, clinical and functional status measures, extraarticular manifestations, prior surgical history, and medications. The panelists rated the potential indicators' relationship to RA disease severity. Each panelist rated each indicator on a scale of 0-6, in which 0 indicated no relationship at all with severe RA and 6 indicated a perfect relationship with severe RA. After a baseline set of ratings, a literature review was distributed to the panelists along with the panel's initial mean ratings and the ranges. The panelists then met to discuss the literature and rerate all indicators. RESULTS: After repeat ratings and review of relevant literature, the panel rated 28 of 47 (60%) potential indicators as having a strong or very strong relationship to severe RA. These 28 indicators were drawn from all 5 categories of potential indicators. There was agreement among the panelists on ratings for 41 of 47 indicators. Agreement was defined as a range of scores among the panelists </=3. CONCLUSION: A Delphi panel of rheumatologists agreed that data generally available in medical records may serve as potential indicators of severe RA.

Ting G, Schneeweiss S, Scranton R, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Young M, Avorn J, Solomon DH. · Department of Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #18717997 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Health care utilisation ('claims') databases contain information about millions of patients and are an important source of information for a variety of study types. However, they typically do not contain information about disease severity. The goal of the present study was to develop a health care claims index for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) severity using a previously developed medical records-based index for RA severity (RA medical records-based index of severity [RARBIS]). METHODS: The study population consisted of 120 patients from the Veteran's Administration (VA) Health System. We previously demonstrated the construct validity of the RARBIS and established its convergent validity with the Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Potential claims-based indicators were entered into a linear regression model as independent variables and the RARBIS as the dependent variable. The claims-based index for RA severity (CIRAS) was created using the coefficients from models with the highest coefficient of determination (R2) values selected by automated modelling procedures. To compare our claims-based index with our medical records-based index, we examined the correlation between the CIRAS and the RARBIS using Spearman non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The forward selection models yielded the highest model R2 for both the RARBIS with medications (R2 = 0.31) and the RARBIS without medications (R2 = 0.26). Components of the CIRAS included tests for inflammatory markers, number of chemistry panels and platelet counts ordered, rheumatoid factor, the number of rehabilitation and rheumatology visits, and Felty's syndrome diagnosis. The CIRAS demonstrated moderate correlations with the RARBIS with medication and the RARBIS without medication sub-scales. CONCLUSION: We developed the CIRAS that showed moderate correlations with a previously validated records-based index of severity. The CIRAS may serve as a potentially important tool in adjusting for RA severity in pharmacoepidemiology studies of RA treatment and complications using health care utilisation data.

Sato M, Schneeweiss S, Scranton R, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Avorn J, Ting G, Shadick NA, Solomon DH. · Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #16542499 links to  free full text

Abstract: The objective of this work was to assess the convergent validity of a previously developed rheumatoid arthritis medical records-based index of severity (RARBIS) by comparing it with the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). This study was conducted in subjects within the Brigham and Women's Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study (BRASS). We selected 100 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the BRASS with DAS28 scores equally distributed in four quartiles. The medical records were reviewed to calculate the RARBIS, which includes indicators from the following categories: prior surgical history, radiologic and laboratory findings, clinical and functional status, and extra-articular manifestations. The Spearman correlation between the RARBIS and the DAS28 was assessed in the total study population and in relevant subgroups. We re-weighted on subscales and recalculated the RARBIS score. This was performed based on findings of correlations between the DAS28 and subscales; and also the result from a multiple linear regression with the DAS28 (as a dependent variable) and five subscales (as independent variables). The mean RARBIS was 4.36 (range 0-11). Among the total study cohort, the RARBIS was moderately correlated with the DAS28 (r = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.56). In subgroup analyses, including age, gender, rheumatoid factor status, and disease duration, we found no statistically significant differences in the correlations. After re-weighting, the correlation between the RARBIS and the DAS28 was somewhat improved (r = 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.62). In conclusion, the RARBIS correlated moderately well with the DAS28 in this population. The RARBIS has both face and convergent validity for patients with RA and relevant subgroups and may have application for medical records studies in patients with RA.

Ting G, Schneeweiss S, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Cabral D, Scranton RE, Solomon DH. · Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16142860 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) records-based index of severity (RARBIS) developed by a Delphi panel process in a cohort of patients with RA. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 120 RA patients from the New England Veteran's Administration (VA) Healthcare System and collected data on markers of RA disease severity. Markers were refined through a Delphi panel process before developing the RARBIS based on chart review. The RARBIS includes 5 subscales on surgery, radiography, extraarticular manifestations, clinical status, and laboratory values. Factors that were regarded by the Delphi panel as highly related to severity of RA were assigned higher points on the index. We assessed the validity of the RARBIS by comparing it to the intensity of the actual RA treatment that these patients received: low, neither biologic nor disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use; moderate, therapy with DMARD such as hydroxychloroquine, gold, or sulfasalazine; high, treatment with stronger DMARD such as methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, and cyclosporine; and very high, use of any biologics. RESULTS: The RARBIS had a range of 0 to 8. All subscales except extraarticular manifestations were statistically significantly related to intensity of RA treatment (chi-square test p <or= 0.015); the overall index was linearly correlated with intensity of RA treatment (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.55). After adjusting for age and sex in a linear regression, the RARBIS was found to be an independent predictor of intensity of treatment (beta for 1-point increase in score = 0.16, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: A medical records-based index of RA severity was developed with attention to face and criterion validity that correlated moderately with RA treatment intensity (construct validity) in a VA population. Further tests of the RARBIS are recommended before it can be used as a tool to adjust for RA disease severity in performing epidemiologic studies on the safety of drugs.

Wang SJ, Lin WY, Chen MN, Chen JT, Ho WL, Hsieh BT, Huang H, Shen LH, Ting G, Knapp FF. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Veterans General Hospital, Taichung and National Yang-Ming University, 160 Taichung Harbor Road, Section 3, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. · Nucl Med Biol. · Pubmed #11518655 No free full text.

Abstract: Rhenium-188 microsphere is a relatively new radiation synovectomy agent developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It has been shown that the levels of unwanted extra-articular radiation are negligible with this agent. A histologic study was conducted to assess the effect of radiation synovectomy on synovium and articular cartilage after intra-articular injection of various doses of Re-188 microspheres into the knee joints of rabbits. Intra-articular injection of Re-188 microspheres into rabbit knee joints resulted in mild reactive inflammation and thrombotic occlusion of vessels which subsided rapidly. Sclerosis of subsynovium could be seen 12 weeks after injection. No evidence of damage to articular cartilage was noted. There was no significant difference in the articular pattern after injection of 0.3 or 0.6 mCi Re-188 microspheres. This study suggests that a treatment dose of Re-188 microspheres causes transient inflammation of synovium without any detectable damage to the articular cartilage of knee joint.