Rheumatoid Arthritis: Sztajnbok F

Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Quartier P, Paz E, Rubio-Pérez N, Silva CA, Abud-Mendoza C, Burgos-Vargas R, Gerloni V, Melo-Gomes JA, Saad-Magalhães C, Sztajnbok F, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Scheinberg M, Penades IC, Fischbach M, Orozco J, Hashkes PJ, Hom C, Jung L, Lepore L, Oliveira S, Wallace CA, Sigal LH, Block AJ, Covucci A, Martini A, Giannini EH, Anonymous00184, Anonymous00185. · IRCCS G Gaslini, PRINTO, Genoa, Italy. · Lancet. · Pubmed #18632147 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Some children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis either do not respond, or are intolerant to, treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who had failed previous treatments. METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised controlled withdrawal trial between February, 2004, and June, 2006. We enrolled 190 patients aged 6-17 years, from 45 centres, who had a history of active juvenile idiopathic arthritis; at least five active joints; and an inadequate response to, or intolerance to, at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. All 190 patients were given 10 mg/kg of abatacept intravenously in the open-label period of 4 months. Of the 170 patients who completed this lead-in course, 47 did not respond to the treatment according to predefined American College of Rheumatology (ACR) paediatric criteria and were excluded. Of the patients who did respond to abatacept, 60 were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg/kg of abatacept at 28-day intervals for 6 months, or until a flare of the arthritis, and 62 were randomly assigned to receive placebo at the same dose and timing. The primary endpoint was time to flare of arthritis. Flare was defined as worsening of 30% or more in at least three of six core variables, with at least 30% improvement in no more than one variable. We analysed all patients who were treated as per protocol. This trial is registered, number NCT00095173. FINDINGS: Flares of arthritis occurred in 33 of 62 (53%) patients who were given placebo and 12 of 60 (20%) abatacept patients during the double-blind treatment (p=0.0003). Median time to flare of arthritis was 6 months for patients given placebo (insufficient events to calculate IQR); insufficient events had occurred in the abatacept group for median time to flare to be assessed (p=0.0002). The risk of flare in patients who continued abatacept was less than a third of that for controls during that double-blind period (hazard ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.95). During the double-blind period, the frequency of adverse events did not differ in the two treatment groups. Adverse events were recorded in 37 abatacept recipients (62%) and 34 (55%) placebo recipients (p=0.47); only two serious adverse events were reported, both in controls (p=0.50). INTERPRETATION: Selective modulation of T-cell costimulation with abatacept is a rational alternative treatment for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Filocamo G, Sztajnbok F, Cespedes-Cruz A, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Viola S, Ruperto N, Buoncompagni A, Loy A, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17665481 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new short and simple measure of physical function in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The Juvenile Arthritis Functionality Scale (JAFS) is a 15-item questionnaire that explores physical function in 3 body areas (lower limbs, hand/wrist, and upper segment). Validation of the Italian version of the instrument was accomplished by evaluating 211 consecutive JIA patients ages 2.2-18 years. The instrument's feasibility, face and content validity, construct and discriminative ability, internal consistency, interrater reliability, and responsiveness to clinical change were examined. JAFS psychometric properties were compared with those of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ). RESULTS: The JAFS was found to be feasible and to possess both face and content validity. The JAFS score correlated with most of the other JIA outcome measures in the range predicted, thereby demonstrating good construct validity, and discriminated well among different levels of disability. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.82. The intraclass correlation coefficients between raters (mothers, fathers, and children) and between reported and observed level of function ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The JAFS revealed fair responsiveness, with a standardized response mean ranging from 0.42 to 0.56. Comparison with the C-HAQ indicated that the JAFS may be superior in terms of construct validity and reliability, and at least as good in terms of discriminant validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The JAFS exhibited good reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability and fair responsiveness, and is therefore a valid instrument for the assessment of physical function in children with JIA.

Sztajnbok F, Coronel-Martinez DL, Diaz-Maldonado A, Novarini C, Pistorio A, Viola S, Ruperto N, Buoncompagni A, Martini A, Ravelli A. · Pediatria II, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16782733 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discrepancy between physician's and parent's global assessments of disease status and the factors explaining discordance in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The mothers of 197 patients with JIA rated the child's overall well-being on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and the attending physician rated the child's overall disease activity on a 10 cm VAS. A discordance score was calculated by subtracting the physician's global assessment from that of the parent's, leading to the definition of three patient groups: (1) no discordance, when physician's and parent's assessments were within 1 cm of each other; (2) negative discordance, when parent's assessment was underrated relative to the physician; and (3) positive discordance, when parent's assessment was over-rated relative to the physician. Negative and positive discordance was defined as 'marked' when the difference between the two assessments was greater than 3 cm. RESULTS: No discordance was found in 40.6% of the patients. Negative discordance was found in 51.3% of the patients, with 34% showing marked discordance. Positive discordance was found in 8.1% of the patients, with 2% showing marked discordance. Significant differences between groups included a shorter disease duration among patients with a markedly positive discordance (P = 0.02) and a greater frequency of ongoing second-line drug therapy among patients with no discordance or with positive discordance (P = 0.008). Patients with no discordance or with marked positive discordance had a significantly lower joint counts (P = 0.02-0.004). CONCLUSION: Parents and physicians often perceive the health status of children with JIA differently, with parents providing most frequently lower rating.

Machado CS, Ruperto N, Silva CH, Ferriani VP, Roscoe I, Campos LM, Oliveira SK, Kiss MH, Bica BE, Sztajnbok F, Len CA, Melo-Gomes JA, Anonymous00059. · Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP, Departamento de Pediatria, 18618-970 Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11510326 No free full text.

Abstract: We report the cross-cultural adaptation and validation into Brazilian-Portuguese of the parent's version of two health related quality of life instruments. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is a disease specific health instrument that measures functional ability in daily living activities in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) is a generic health instrument designed to capture the physical and psychosocial well-being of children regardless the underlying disease. The Brazilian CHAQ was revalidated, while the CHQ has been derived from the Portuguese version. A total of 471 subjects were enrolled: 157 patients with JIA (27% systemic onset, 38% polyarticular onset, 9% extended oligoarticular subtype, and 26% persistent oligoarticular subtype) and 314 healthy children. The CHAQ discriminated clinically healthy subjects from JIA patients, with the systemic, polyarticular and extended oligoarticular subtypes having a higher degree of disability, pain, and lower overall well-being scores when compared to their healthy peers. Also the CHQ discriminated clinically healthy subjects from JIA patients, with the systemic onset, polyarticular onset and extended oligoarticular subtypes having a lower physical and psychosocial well-being score when compared to their healthy peers. In conclusion the Brazilian versions of the CHAQ-CHQ are reliable and valid tools for the combined physical and psychosocial assessment of children with JIA.