Rheumatoid Arthritis: Stojanović S

Golusin Z, Poljacki M, Preveden R, Stojanović S, Rajić N. · Klinika za kozno-venericne bolesti, Medicinski fakultet, Klinicki centar, Novi Sad. · Med Pregl. · Pubmed #11214480 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Diaminodiphenylsulfone or dapsone is a chemical analogue of sulfapyridine, synthesized in 1908. Dapsone is a bacteriostatic agent that proved to be efficient in treating leprosy and malaria, but today it is used in treating dermatologic noninfectious inflammatory diseases. PHARMACOLOGY: Dapsone is orally used in a dose of 50-400 mg per day in treatment of dermatologic diseases, and also in a dose of 50-100 mg per day in leprosy treatment. Dapsone is mainly eliminated from the body by urine and smaller part by faeces. Pharmacological interaction was reported when it is used with rifampicin and probenecid. MECHANISM OF ACTION: The bacteriostatic effect of dapsone is well known. It involves inhibition of folic acid synthesis in susceptible organisms. The anti-inflammatory effect of dapsone, which proves to be efficient in treating noninfectious inflammatory diseases, has not been explained completely yet. There are some pieces of evidence that anti-inflammatory action is not connected with its antibacteriological action. CLINICAL USE: Based on previous studies about therapy efficiency of dapsone in treating some diseases, there are two groups of diseases: the group responding well to dapsone (leprosy, malaria, DH, linear IgA-dermatosis, erythema elevatum diutinum, bullous systemic lupus erythematosus) and a group responding with average good response to dapsone (pyoderma gangrenosum, bullous and cicatricial pemphigoid, acne conglobata, discoid cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subcorneal pustulosis dermatosis, granuloma faciale, rheumatoid arthritis, polychondritis, leucocytoclastic vasculitis). ADVERSE EFFECTS: Adverse effects depend on the dose and they rarely occur at doses less than 100 mg per day. They are mainly shown on skin, nervous system, digestive system, hepatobiliary system, and kidney and hematologic system. The most important adverse effects are hemolytic anaemia and methemoglobinemia. Hemolysis usually occurs at doses of 200 mg and more per day. In patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, hemolysis may be provoked by a dose less than 50 mg per day. For prevention, before using dapsone in therapy, clinical examination with history, blood parameters, liver and renal parameters and determination of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase level are recommended. CONCLUSION: The use of dapsone is absolutely indicated in DH treatment and erythema elevatum diutinum. Because of anti-inflammatory effects, dapsone can also be used in treating other inflammatory noninfectious dermatoses when one should take care about "therapy efficiency/adverse effect" balance using the correct dose, monitoring relevant clinical and laboratory parameters and educating patients.

Stojanović S, Dimić A, Stamenković B, Stanković A, Nedović J. · No affiliation provided · Srp Arh Celok Lek. · Pubmed #19459564 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: It has been well known that balneophysical therapy has a therapeutic effect on clinical and biological parameters of disease activity in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of balneophysical therapy on functional capacity, activity and quality of life of the patients with RA primarily treated with some of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: The study enrolled 73 patients with RA treated with some of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (Methotrexate in 85% of patients). During hospitalization at the Clinical Rheumatologic Department of the Institute "Niska Banja", the patients were treated, beside the medicamentous therapy, by hydrotherapy (oligomineral, homeothermic, low radioactive water), mineral peloid therapy, electrotherapy and kinesiotherapy. Before and after balneotherapy, the patients filled in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Quality of Life Rheumatoid Arthritis (QOL-RA) scale. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 was used to measure the disease activity before and after balneotherapy. A possible value of HAQ was from 0 to 3, and QOL-RA from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The mean value of the duration of balneophysical therapy was 14.7 +/- 4.8 days. We found significant improvement of functional capacity in the patients with RA. The average HAQ score before balneotherapy was 1.07 +/- 0.61, and 0.86 +/- 0.55 after balneotherapy, which was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05). DAS 28 after balneotherapy was also statistically significantly lower than DAS 28 before balneotherapy: the mean value of DAS 28 before therapy was 6.30 +/- 0.81 and after therapy 5.48 +/- 0.75 (p < 0.001). The quality of life significantly improved after balneophysical therapy: the mean value of QOL-RA scale before therapy was 5.38 +/- 1.62 and after therapy 7.35 +/- 1.81 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Balneophysical therapy, when properly dosed, is an effective, adjuvant therapy in the patients with RA of mild disease activity. Balneophysical therapy has a positive influence on disease activity, functional capacity and quality of life in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis.