Rheumatoid Arthritis: Somerville M

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 3 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Arthritis, Rheumatoid," originating from Planet Earth —» Somerville M.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline BSR/BHPR guideline for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in consultation with the British Association of Dermatologists. 2008

Chakravarty K, McDonald H, Pullar T, Taggart A, Chalmers R, Oliver S, Mooney J, Somerville M, Bosworth A, Kennedy T, Anonymous00010, Anonymous00011. · Harold Wood Hospital, BHR NHS Trust, Romford, Essex RM7 OBE, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16940305 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

2 Clinical Conference Rituximab therapy in patients with resistant rheumatoid arthritis: real-life experience. free! 2007

Jois RN, Masding A, Somerville M, Gaffney K, Scott DG. · Department of Rheumatology, East block, Level-2, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #17384180 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Rituximab has recently been shown to be effective in suppressing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail anti-TNF therapy. We present our experience of treating patients with long-standing, multi-DMARD and anti-TNF resistant RA with rituximab in 'real-life' setting. METHODS: Patients with RA resistant to more than two anti-TNF drugs and with persistent disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1) were considered for treatment with rituximab (two infusions 1000 mg each, a fortnight apart). DAS28 and HAQ scores were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Response to rituximab was defined as per the EULAR response criteria. Re-treatment with a second cycle of rituximab was offered if they had responded to the earlier one but flared. RESULTS: Twenty patients received rituximab. Median disease duration was 16 yrs (range 5-39) and 90% were rheumatoid factor positive. Median number of biologics received pre-treatment was two (range 2-4). Rituximab treatment led to a significant reduction in DAS28 score (P < 0.0001) at 3 months and various other disease parameters. The benefit was sustained at 6 months. Moderate-to-good EULAR response was seen in 85% of patients at 3 months and 60% at 6 months. No significant side effects were observed. 50% of the patients flared and received re-treatment. Interval to re-treatment varied from 6 to 18 months. The majority of the RA patients responded to re-treatment with rituximab and no major side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Rituximab was effective in controlling disease activity in anti-TNF therapy resistant RA patients in 'real-life' setting. Rituximab was safe with no major side effects. Re-treatment with rituximab was safe and efficacy was maintained.

3 Article Maintaining and optimising anti-TNF therapy. 2007

Somerville M. · Rheumatology Unit, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK. · Musculoskeletal Care. · Pubmed #18050263 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.