Rheumatoid Arthritis: Shojania K

Reynolds J, Shojania K, Marra CA. · Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada · Pharmacotherapy. · Pubmed #18041889 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease that often leads to functional disability and reduced quality of life. The pathogenesis of synovial inflammation that is associated with this disease is thought to result from T-cell activation. To become fully activated, T cells require an antigen-specific signal through the T-cell receptor and a second signal through a costimulatory receptor. Abatacept is the first drug in a new class of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) known as selective costimulation modulators. Costimulation modulators block the second signal and decrease T-cell activation. Abatacept has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, slowing the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to at least one other DMARD, such as methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors. Randomized controlled trials have shown that abatacept improves both clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life in patients who have had an inadequate response to other DMARDs. Abatacept has been shown to be well tolerated. In clinical trials, however, abatacept treatment was associated with a higher rate of infections compared with placebo. This finding was compounded when abatacept was used with TNF-alpha inhibitors; thus, this combination should be avoided. Abatacept appears to be a useful treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have previously failed other DMARDs. However, additional clinical trials evaluating its long-term effect on patient safety and disease outcomes are needed.

Kherani RB, Shojania K. · Master of Health Professions Education Programme, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #17515588 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

de Gannes GC, Ghoreishi M, Pope J, Russell A, Bell D, Adams S, Shojania K, Martinka M, Dutz JP. · Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, The Skin Care Centre, 835 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4E8. · Arch Dermatol. · Pubmed #17310002 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: New onset or worsening of psoriasis has been reported in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors for a variety of rheumatologic conditions. There is mounting evidence that a key innate immune pathway for triggering common human autoimmune disease, including psoriasis, involves plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors (PDCs) and type 1 interferon (IFN) production. We present herein a case series with clinical and histopathologic evidence of psoriasis in patients with rheumatologic disease treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors. We propose that the cross regulation between TNF-alpha and IFN may have a role in the pathogenesis of this reaction. OBSERVATIONS: We observed new-onset psoriasis (n = 13) or severe exacerbation of psoriasis (n = 2) in 15 patients with a variety of rheumatologic conditions-rheumatoid arthritis (n = 13), psoriatic arthritis (n = 1), and seronegative arthritis (n = 1)-during treatment with etanercept (n = 6), infliximab (n = 5), and adalimumab (n = 4). Immunohistochemical staining of skin biopsy specimens for myxovirus-resistance protein A (MxA, a surrogate marker for lesional type 1 IFN activity) showed increased staining in TNF-alpha inhibitor-induced psoriasis compared with psoriasis vulgaris. CONCLUSIONS: New onset or severe exacerbation of psoriasis is a rare complication of TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy. The finding of increased production of IFN-alpha in TNF-alpha inhibitor-induced psoriasis is a possible pathophysiologic explanation for this reaction.

Bansback NJ, Regier DA, Ara R, Brennan A, Shojania K, Esdaile JM, Anis AH, Marra CA. · Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. · Drugs. · Pubmed #15733011 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory disease that affects approximately 0.5-1% of the adult population. The introduction of new disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as leflunomide, anakinra and the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab) have transformed the management of RA. In particular, the last class of agents has generated substantial controversy. Costing between 16,000 US dollars and 20,000 US dollars per patient-year (2001 values), the potential greater efficacy of treatment with TNFalpha antagonists comes at much higher drug costs, making these agents natural candidates for cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs).A MEDLINE search (until 31 January 2004) identified six original CEAs evaluating TNFalpha antagonists in RA. The aim of a CEA is to facilitate the allocation of scarce health resources and to inform policy decisions. However, to enhance the reliability and relevance of these analyses to policy makers, there must be similarity between the methodologies used. Recently, the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials) group produced a document to define such a reference case; the OMERACT document was used as a foundation to structure comparisons and highlight discrepancies.The methodologies employed in each analysis differed; in particular, disparate time horizons, comparators, quantities of drug and treatment sequences prohibit the comparison of cost effectiveness between studies. Outcomes also differed between the analyses. Most reported health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The QALYs metric was based on preference scores that were typically derived from linear regressions using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). However, models also used American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, as well as the disease activity score (DAS). Common to all studies was the lack of data from long-term randomised studies where efficacy and resource consumption in comparison with standard care has been investigated. As such, investigators combined short-term randomised control trial data with that of a long-term observational cohort, and modelled cost effectiveness over an appropriate time horizon. In addition, most analyses lacked rigorous sensitivity analysis to examine the impact of uncertainty in the parameters.Those analyses that examined time horizons of 6 months and 1 year published incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of 34,800 US dollars per ACR 70% response criteria (ACR70) weighted response (duration 6 months, 1999 values) and 96,166 US dollars (duration 1 year, 2002 values). Analyses that modelled costs and health outcomes beyond the first year reported ICER estimates ranging between 26,800 US dollars (patients' lifetime, 1998 values) and 40,308 US dollars (10 years, 2002 values). In terms of HR-QOL, the analyses reported incremental QALYs that ranged from 0.116 (over 19 years) to 1.6 (over 10 years). Discounted costs of therapy ranged from 30,362 US dollars (10 years, 2002 values) to 93,000 US dollars (22 years, 1998 values), and comparator costs ranged from 22,593 US dollars (10 years, 2002 values) to 84,000 US dollars (22 years, 1998 values).

Nahar IK, Shojania K, Marra CA, Alamgir AH, Anis AH. · Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. · Ann Pharmacother. · Pubmed #12921510 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic impact of infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Pre-MEDLINE (1966-June 2002) and manufacturer prescribing literature were employed to find English-language articles on infliximab. Additional studies and abstracts were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature and conference proceedings. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. Information regarding basic pharmacology was collected from studies in animals. Pharmacokinetic data were collected from human trials. Safety data were extracted from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for the assessment of efficacy. All available economic evaluations were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Infliximab is a new monoclonal antibody that appears to work by a unique mechanism: inhibiting the action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Infliximab is administered by intravenous infusion. In clinical trials in CD, infliximab significantly decreased the CD activity index compared with placebo in treatment-resistant disease and significantly reduced the number of draining fistulas in fistulizing disease. In RA, when infliximab was added to methotrexate (MTX), it resulted in a significant improvement in most disease outcome measures when compared with MTX plus placebo. Few major adverse effects were reported in the clinical trials; however, serious adverse events, including malignancy and demyelination, have been reported in postmarketing surveillance. Also, increased susceptibility to infections (including tuberculosis) has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is an effective new agent for the treatment of CD and RA. Its apparent unique mechanism of action makes infliximab an important addition to therapy. Caution should be exercised when considering infliximab for individuals who have chronic or recurrent infections, mild congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class I/II), nervous system disorders, or live or have lived in an area endemic for histoplasmosis. Infliximab is contraindicated for patients with a clinically important, active infection, moderate to severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III/IV), or an allergy to mouse proteins or any of the ingredients in infliximab. Further long-term efficacy, safety, and economic data on infliximab are required. Also, for the treatment of RA, the burden of administering infliximab (as a 2-hour supervised infusion) has to be considered when choosing among anti-TNF-alpha medication (as the other 2 approved agents, etanercept and adalimumab, can be self-administered by subcutaneous injection).

Maksymowych WP, Mallon C, Morrow S, Shojania K, Olszynski WP, Wong RL, Sampalis J, Conner-Spady B. · Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18524792 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Enthesitis is a recommended core domain for assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but no measurement has yet been validated according to Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) criteria. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to seek to validate an enthesitis index for patients with AS according to OMERACT criteria. METHODS: An enthesitis index was validated in two AS patient cohorts: (1) a longitudinal cohort (n = 223) and (2) 22 patients from three Canadian sites participating in a 24-week randomised placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab in AS. Construct validity was evaluated by correlation analysis with the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) and quality of life instruments. Reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and responsiveness was assessed by Guyatt's effect size and standardised response mean. RESULTS: The most frequently affected sites were the greater trochanter and supraspinatus insertion ( approximately 20%). Patients with enthesitis had significantly greater scores for the BASDAI, BASFI, patient global, AS-specific quality of life index (ASQOL) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) General Health Survey (p<0.001). The enthesitis score contributed significantly to variance in the BASDAI and BASFI. Interobserver ICCs were 0.96 in the longitudinal cohort and 0.89 and 0.77 in the adalimumab clinical trial cohort (for status and change score, respectively). Significant differences in change scores were evident for all patients after 24 weeks of adalimumab treatment, (p = 0.04), this being more significant when a subset of the most commonly affected entheses were analysed (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: AS patients with enthesitis constitute a more severe subset of disease, and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index is feasible and reliable for measurement of this condition. Discrimination requires further study in larger trials.

Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, Shojania K, Offer R, Brazier JE, Esdaile JM, Anis AH. · Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 717-828 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6. · Soc Sci Med. · Pubmed #15652688 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common, chronic disease where health-related quality of life (HRQL) is one of the main goals of therapy. As such, instruments used to measure HRQL in RA must be able to discriminate across RA severity. The two basic categories of instruments used to measure HRQL are generic instruments and disease-specific instruments. Generic instruments can be further subdivided into preference-based measures which yield both single and multi-attribute utility values anchored at zero (death) and 1.00 (perfect health) as a measure of HRQL. The scores from these types of instruments can be integrated into cost-utility analyses as the weightings for quality adjusted life years. We assessed the construct validity of utility scores from four generic preference-based measures (the Health Utilities Index 2 and 3 (HUI2, HUI3), the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), and the Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) and disease specific measures (the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQoL) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) in a sample of 313 RA patients in British Columbia, Canada. We also estimated the minimally important differences (MID) for each of the measures. Generally, as anticipated, the disease-specific measures were better able to discriminate across groups with higher RA severity; however, utility scores from each of the scales also appeared to discriminate well across RA severity categories. The MID values agreed with those previously reported in the literature for the HUI2, SF-6D and the HAQ and provided new information for the HUI3, EQ-5D and the RAQoL. We conclude that the all of the preference-based utility measures that were evaluated appear to adequately discriminate across levels of RA severity.

Shojania K, Koehler BE, Elliott T. · Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #9918262 No free full text.

Abstract: A 77-year-old man with type II diabetes taking a stable dose of subcutaneous, twice daily human insulin developed symmetrical, inflammatory, rheumatoid factor positive polyarthritis. Within 2 weeks of starting therapy with prednisone 5 mg daily and hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily he had 2 episodes of severe hypoglycemic coma requiring emergency care. His blood glucose became controlled again when his insulin was decreased by 37%. There are no reported cases of hypoglycemia in diabetic or nondiabetic patients treated with hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine has been reported to reduce insulin requirements in refractory type II diabetes by an average of 30%. When hydroxychloroquine is initiated for the treatment of polyarthritis in a type II diabetic requiring insulin or sulfonylurea treatment, blood glucose levels should be monitored closely and the insulin dose may need to be reduced.