Rheumatoid Arthritis: Roudaut A

Devauchelle-Pensec V, Pennec Y, Morvan J, Pers JO, Daridon C, Jousse-Joulin S, Roudaut A, Jamin C, Renaudineau Y, Roué IQ, Cochener B, Youinou P, Saraux A. · Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHU Brest, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17330280 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: There is evidence to support a dominant role for B cells in the pathophysiology of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. METHODS: Sixteen patients who met the new American-European Consensus Group criteria for primary SS and scored >50 on at least 2 of 4 visual analog scales (VAS; 100 mm) evaluating global disease, pain, fatigue, and global dryness received infusions of low-dose rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) at weeks 0 and 1 without steroid premedication. RESULTS: Slow rituximab infusions (100 mg/hour) were well tolerated, with only 1 patient experiencing serum sickness-like disease. There was a dramatic reduction in B cells of the blood and salivary gland (SG). At week 12, VAS scores with respect to fatigue and dryness (P < 0.05), tender point count (P < 0.035), and quality of life as evaluated by the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36; P < 0.001) were significantly improved. At week 36, significant improvements were noted in the 4 VAS scores (P < 0.05), tender joint count (P = 0.017), tender point count (P = 0.027), and SF-36 (P < 0.03). Pulmonary manifestations were ameliorated in 1 patient. Patients with improvements on at least 3 of the 4 VAS scores at any visit (n = 11) had a shorter disease duration than the other patients (n = 5; mean +/- SD duration 3.8 +/- 5.4 versus 30.1 +/- 29.5 years; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Low-dose rituximab infusions were well tolerated without the benefit of steroids. Infusions induced a rapid depletion of B cells in the blood and SG and could improve primary SS. Controlled studies are needed.

Guennoc X, Samjee I, Jousse-Joulin S, Devauchelle V, Roudaut A, Saraux A. · Rheumatology Department, Brest Teaching Hospital, CHU de Brest, 29609 Brest, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17574895 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of patient information about fluoroscopy-guided rheumatologic procedures, and to look for an impact on the patient's experience of the procedure. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients completed questionnaires before and after undergoing fluoroscopy-guided interventions. We looked for associations between the information supplied by the rheumatologist who recommended the procedure and pain, anxiety, awareness of potential complications, and the match between patient expectations and actual experience. RESULTS: 62.8% of patients reported receiving information about the procedure. Only 20.5% reported receiving specific information about potential adverse events, although 80.9% felt this information would have been useful. Most patients (74.8%) would have liked to receive additional information. Only 10.1% patients were given written information. Mean (+/-SD) anticipated pain severity as assessed in the waiting room before the procedure on a 0-10 scale was 4.5+/-2.4 in women and 4.2+/-2.3) in men. Actual pain severity during the procedure as assessed on the same scale was 2.7+/-2.6 in women and 2.2+/-1.6 in men. The level of information about the procedure did not influence anticipated or actual pain severity. Anxiety was reported by 59.8% patients and was more common in women (P<0.001), in patients given written information (P=0.05), and in patients undergoing their first intervention (P=0.05). Information was perceived as alleviating anxiety by 69.9% patients, and 77.3% of patients felt they would experience less anxiety if they had the procedure a second time. Only 21.2% patients were able to name a potential adverse event, and this proportion was not influenced by receiving written information. A mismatch between expectations about the procedure or its duration and actual experience was reported by 17 (17/69, 24.6%) and 34 (34/98, 34.7%) patients, respectively, with no significant differences across study subgroups. CONCLUSION: Information about interventional rheumatology procedures is required for ethical principles and legislation. Patients increasingly expect detailed information, which may increase the likelihood that the procedure unfolds smoothly. Our results indicate a need for optimizing patient information. Standardized written material deserves to be evaluated as a means of better meeting the informational needs of patients.

Tubach F, Ravaud P, Salmon-Céron D, Petitpain N, Brocq O, Grados F, Guillaume JC, Leport J, Roudaut A, Solau-Gervais E, Lemann M, Mariette X, Lortholary O, Anonymous00158. · Université Paris 7, Faculté de Medecine, Paris, France. · Clin Infect Dis. · Pubmed #17051484 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists have an increased risk of infection, but infection due to Legionella pneumophila has rarely been described in patients receiving such therapy. METHODS: A registry involving 486 clinical departments in France was designed by a multidisciplinary group (Recherche Axée sur la Tolérance des Biothérapies [RATIO]) to collect data on opportunistic and severe infections occurring in patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists. All cases are reported to RATIO in accordance with national health authorities and validated by infectious disease experts. The legionellosis rate among patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists was compared with the rate in France overall. RESULTS: We report a 1-year consecutive series of 10 cases of L. pneumophila pneumonia in France in 2004, including 6 cases treated with adalimumab, 2 treated with etanercept, and 2 treated with infliximab. The median patient age was 51 years (range, 40-69 years). Eight patients were treated for rheumatoid arthritis, 1 was treated for cutaneous psoriasis, and 1 was treated for pyoderma gangrenosum. The median duration of TNF-alpha antagonist treatment at onset of infection was 38.5 weeks (range, 3-73 weeks). Eight patients were receiving concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, and 6 were receiving treatment with methotrexate. The relative risk of legionellosis when receiving treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist, compared with the relative risk in France overall, was estimated to be between 16.5 and 21.0. We also report a second episode of confirmed legionellosis following the reintroduction of infliximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: L. pneumophila pneumonia is a potentially severe but curable infection that might complicate anti-TNF-alpha therapy. In patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha who develop pneumonia, legionellosis should be systematically investigated, and first-line antibiotic therapy should be efficient against L. pneumophila.