Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rehman Q

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 3 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Arthritis, Rheumatoid," originating from Planet Earth —» Rehman Q.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Review Starting a disease modifying antirheumatic drug or a biologic agent in rheumatoid arthritis: standards of practice for RA treatment. 2001

Wolfe F, Rehman Q, Lane NE, Kremer J. · National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases--Arthritis Research Center Foundation, Inc., Wichita, Kansas 67214, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11469485 No free full text.

Abstract: Our aim was to investigate the practices and standards by which disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and biologics are and have been prescribed. We reviewed the literature and examined data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) participating in a national cohort: the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases (NDB). Four pathways for DMARD prescription were identified: (1) A time-based pyramidal approach (the RA pyramid); (2) a severity-based pyramid in which the most effective treatment is given to those with more active disease; (3) a cost-based pathway in which the primary goal is cost containment--this pathway intertwines with the severity-based pathway; and (4) a patient preference pathway where treatment is geared to patient needs and wishes regardless of severity. Data show that the time-based and severity-based pathways are not generally used in contemporary expert practice, and that patients with all degrees of severity and disease duration are receiving DMARD and biologic treatment. With the abandonment of the pyramid and the development of effective therapy, rheumatic disease care has swung away from the imperative of time and severity-based treatment to the imperative of care based on patient preference. It is the standard of practice to treat patients with mild and early disease with aggressive therapy, with the goal of limiting subsequent damage and retarding progression, and with the realistic purpose of relieving symptoms. The standard may at times be in conflict with the goals of insurers, but there is no legitimate medical reason for such limitations.

2 Review Bone loss. Therapeutic approaches for preventing bone loss in inflammatory arthritis. free! 2001

Rehman Q, Lane NE. · University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. · Arthritis Res. · Pubmed #11438040 links to  free full text

Abstract: Inflammatory arthritides are commonly characterized by localized and generalized bone loss. Localized bone loss in the form of joint erosions and periarticular osteopenia is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis, the prototype of inflammatory arthritis. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-dependent osteoclast activation by inflammatory cells and subsequent bone loss. In this article, we review the pathogenesis of inflammatory bone loss and explore the possible therapeutic interventions to prevent it.

3 Review When to try COX-2-specific inhibitors. Safer than standard NSAIDs in some situations. 1999

Rehman Q, Sack KE. · Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, USA. · Postgrad Med. · Pubmed #10533511 No free full text.

Abstract: COX-2-specific inhibitors, by sparing COX-1 enzyme and its physiologic functions, are a safer option than regular NSAIDs in patients who are at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (e.g., patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, alcoholism, concomitant corticosteroid or anticoagulant use). They have been approved for use in arthritis, and their efficacy is comparable to that of other NSAIDs. Further clinical data are needed to establish the long-term safety profile of these newly introduced drugs.