Rheumatoid Arthritis: Reed G

Greenberg JD, Harrold LR, Bentley MJ, Kremer J, Reed G, Strand V. · Department of Rheumatology, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY 10003, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19395544 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate composite measures of response without acute-phase reactants in RA patients. Specifically, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-derived response criteria were compared with the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the modified ACR (mACR) response criteria were compared to the ACR response criteria. METHODS: Data from 10 108 RA patients enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry were examined, including 649 patients initiating DMARD therapy. CDAI cut-off points for disease activity levels and responses were derived using receiver operating characteristic curves with the DAS28 and EULAR response criteria as gold standards. The kappa-statistics were applied to assess agreement between CDAI-derived and EULAR-defined responses, as well as ACR20 and ACR50 with mACR20- and mACR50-defined responses, respectively. RESULTS: For the components of the EULAR response, the derived CDAI cut-off points for DAS28 levels of 3.2 and 5.1 were 7.6 and 19.6, respectively. The derived CDAI cut-off points were 4.3 and 10.0 for DAS28 changes of 0.6 and 1.2, respectively. There were moderate to substantial agreements between CDAI-derived and EULAR responses (kappa = 0.57-0.71). Agreement of ACR20 and ACR50 with mACR20 and mACR50 responses, respectively, was excellent (kappa = 0.88-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between composite measures of response without acute-phase reactants and standard measures ranged from moderate to excellent. The mACR20 and mACR50 criteria as well as CDAI-derived response criteria, can serve as composite measures of response in clinical practice and research settings without access to acute-phase reactants.

Coulson KA, Reed G, Gilliam BE, Kremer JM, Pepmueller PH. · Division of Rheumatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. · J Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19363452 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This study examined a wide array of clinical factors to evaluate their influence on fracture risk and T scores in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and determine if women with RA who are at risk for osteoporosis (OP) are adequately treated with OP medications. METHODS: Data from 8419 female RA patients participating in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry from March 02, 2006 to August 15, 2006 was evaluated. Covariates included medication subgroups, demographic, and clinical parameters. Lumbar spine and hip T scores and fracture rates were studied in relation to the variables. Use of OP medications in patients with OP risk factors was also evaluated. RESULTS: Postmenopausal status and higher modified health assessment questionnaire score (mHAQ) had a negative effect on lumbar spine score,while marriage, education, and body mass index had a positive effect. A similar trend was found with hip T scores. Increase in overall fracture risk correlated with postmenopausal status, mHAQ, and prednisone use, while tumor necrosis factor monotherapy was associated with decreased overall fracture risk. mHAQ was also associated with nonhip/nonspine fractures. Eighty percent of patients had at least 1 risk factor for OP, but only 32% were on OP medications. Only 54% of patients with 3 risk factors were on OP medication. CONCLUSIONS: In RA, postmenopausal status, mHAQ, and prednisone use were associated with a higher overall fracture risk. Women with RA who were at risk for OP may have been inadequately treated with OP medications.

Aizer J, Reed G, Onofrei A, Harrison MJ. · Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. · Rheumatol Int. · Pubmed #19104820 No free full text.

Abstract: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of low bone density and fractures. This study identifies predictors of initiation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing in RA. We identified RA patients from the CORRONA registry with >or=1 year follow-up without reported DXA at study entry. The primary outcome was report of DXA in the first year of follow-up (DXA initiation). Variables associated with DXA initiation were considered for the multivariate model. Stepwise logistic regression identified independent predictors. Of the 2,717 RA patients without DXA documented at enrollment, 297 (11%) reported DXA initiation. Independent predictors of DXA initiation included age, female sex, history of fracture, steroid use, and physician's assessment of RA activity. In conclusion, DXA initiation in RA patients in the CORRONA cohort is low despite increased risk of osteoporosis. Predictors of DXA initiation include fracture, common risk factors for osteoporosis, and RA-associated factors.

Ranganath VK, Paulus HE, Onofrei A, Khanna D, Reed G, Elashoff DA, Kremer JM, Furst DE. · Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, UCLA Rehabilitation Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1670, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18785317 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationships of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), disease duration (DD), number of previous disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), and frequency of DMARD changes, with regard to changes in function in patients with RA evaluated by modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) after the start of a new DMARD. METHODS: In total, 889 patients with active RA from the CORRONA database [patients had mHAQ>or=0.5 and/or Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28)>or=1.6] started a new DMARD (baseline) and had at least one followup visit 6-12 mo later. Change in mHAQ from baseline to followup visit was modeled using univariate/multivariate linear regression analysis. Due to colinearity, separate multivariate regression models were performed including/excluding the predictors disease duration, number of prior DMARD, and frequency of DMARD changes. RESULTS: Baseline age, mHAQ, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), DAS28, and number of prior DMARD differed across DD groups. The univariate linear regression model showed that higher baseline values of mHAQ, DAS28, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), ESR, physician global assessment, prednisone use, and subsequent addition/discontinuation of DMARD were associated with improvement of the mHAQ at followup (p=0.05). Multivariate linear regression models showed that mHAQ improvement was associated with shorter DD, higher baseline mHAQ, addition of subsequent DMARD, and the DMARD frequency index (no. previous DMARD/yrs of DD) (p<0.05). Number of DMARD patients used previously was not associated with change of mHAQ in either model. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that in clinical rheumatologic practices, more frequent changes in DMARD are associated with greater improvement in function (by mHAQ). It does not support the idea that number of previous DMARD used predicts response. Indirectly, these data support the concept that DMARD should be changed if optimal responses are not achieved within a specified time.

Greenberg JD, Kishimoto M, Strand V, Cohen SB, Olenginski TP, Harrington T, Kafka SP, Reed G, Kremer JM, Anonymous00054. · New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY 10003, USA. · Am J Med. · Pubmed #18501236 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to investigate responsiveness according to whether patients satisfy eligibility criteria from randomized controlled trials of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in a multicentered US cohort. METHODS: Biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were prescribed TNF antagonists (n=465) in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry were included. Patients were stratified by whether they met eligibility criteria from 3 major TNF antagonist trials. Two cohorts were examined: Cohort A (n=336) included patients with complete American College of Rheumatology response criteria except acute phase reactants, and cohort B (n=129) included patients with complete response criteria. Study outcomes included modified American College of Rheumatology 20% and 50% improvement responses (cohort A) and standard American College of Rheumatology improvement (cohort B). RESULTS: A minority of patients (5.4%-19.4%) prescribed TNF antagonists met trial eligibility criteria and predominantly had high disease activity (78.5%-100%). For patients who met eligibility criteria in cohort A, rates of 20% improvement (52.3%-63.6%) and 50% improvement (30.8%-45.5%) were achieved. Among patients failing to meet eligibility criteria, rates of 20% improvement (16.2%-20.4%) and 50% improvement (8.9%-10.8%) were consistently inferior (P<.05 all comparisons). For cohort B, similar differences were observed. CONCLUSION: This multicentered US cohort study demonstrates that the majority of patients receiving TNF antagonists would not meet trial eligibility criteria and achieve lower clinical responses. These findings highlight the tradeoff between defining treatment responsive populations and achieving results that can be generalized for broader patient populations.

Greenberg JD, Bingham CO, Abramson SB, Reed G, Kishimoto M, Hinkle K, Kremer J. · New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York 10003, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16874798 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor (coxib) utilization by rheumatologists for patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prior to the coxib market withdrawals. METHODS: A prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry was performed. RESULTS: Of 1,833 patients receiving prescription NSAIDs, 1,380 (75.3%) received gastroprotection, defined as either coxib monotherapy and/or gastroprotective agent (GPA) cotherapy, and 1,207 (65.8%) received coxibs. The distribution of gastroprotective strategies included 860 (46.9%) patients who were prescribed coxib monotherapy, 347 (18.9%) prescribed dual coxib plus GPA cotherapy, 173 (9.4%) prescribed a nonselective NSAID (NS-NSAID) plus GPA cotherapy, and 453 (24.7%) prescribed an NS-NSAID without GPA cotherapy. For patients with 0, 1, and > or =2 identifiable gastrointestinal (GI) risk factors, coxib prescribing rates as a proportion of NSAID agents were 64.1%, 66.4%, and 68.6%, respectively; among dual aspirin/NSAID users, coxib prescribing rates were 66.2%, 78.3%, and 68.5% of NSAID prescriptions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The majority of NSAID users were prescribed a gastroprotective strategy, primarily attributable to coxib utilization. Coxib utilization rates were consistently high across all levels of GI risk, including patients without identifiable risk factors. These data indicate that rheumatologists broadly adopted the coxib class of NSAIDs in a nonselective manner with respect to underlying GI risk and concomitant aspirin use. As novel therapeutic classes are introduced, early evaluation of prescribing patterns using arthritis registries can determine the appropriateness of prescribing patterns and may improve patient outcomes.

Tutuncu Z, Reed G, Kremer J, Kavanaugh A. · Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0943, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16414968 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis among elderly people is an increasingly important health concern. Despite several cross-sectional studies, it has not been clearly established whether there are important clinical differences between elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA). The aim of this study was to compare disease activity and treatment in EORA and YORA, using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) registry, a database generated by rheumatologist investigators across the USA. From the CORRONA registry database of 9381 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 2101 patients with disease onset after the age of 60 years (EORA) were matched, on the basis of disease duration, with 2101 patients with disease onset between the ages of 40 and 60 years (YORA). The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients on methotrexate, multiple disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and biological agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab and kineret) in each group. Disease activity and severity differed slightly between the EORA and YORA groups: Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire: 0.30 v 0.35; tender joint count: 3.7 v 4.7; swollen joint count: 5.3 v 5.2; Disease Activity Score 28: 3.8 v 3.6; patient global assessment: 29.1 v 30.9; physician global assessment: 24.9 v 26.3; patient pain assessment: 31.4 v 34.9. Regarding treatment, the use of methotrexate use was slightly more common among patients with EORA (63.9%) than among those with YORA (59.6%), although the mean methotrexate dose among the YORA group was higher than that in the EORA group. The percentage of patients with EORA who were on multiple DMARD treatment (30.9%) or on biological agents (25%) was considerably lower than that of patients with YORA (40.5% and 33.1%, respectively; p<0.0001). Toxicity related to treatment was very minimal in both groups, whereas toxicities related to methotrexate were more common in the YORA group. Patients with EORA receive biological treatment and combination DMARD treatment less frequently than those with YORA, despite identical disease duration and comparable disease severity and activity.

Greenberg JD, Bingham CO, Abramson SB, Reed G, Sebaldt RJ, Kremer J. · New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15696570 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cardiovascular comorbidities and aspirin coprescription on cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor (coxib) prescribing patterns among rheumatologists. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry. Medication and comorbidity data were obtained prospectively from physician and patient questionnaires between March 2002 and September 2003. Multivariate adjusted associations between coxib use and specific cardiovascular variables, including aspirin use, were examined. RESULTS: A total of 3,522 arthritis patients were included. COX inhibitors, including coxibs, nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and meloxicam, were prescribed to a larger proportion of osteoarthritis patients (68.4%) than rheumatoid arthritis patients (47.1%) in our study (P < 0.001). COX inhibitors were prescribed to the majority of aspirin users (51.5%) and a similar proportion of nonusers (49.8%). In multivariate analyses, independent predictors of coxib use versus nonselective NSAID use included diagnoses of osteoarthritis (odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.81-3.52) and diabetes (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.06-2.51). Conversely, aspirin use independently predicted selection of a nonselective NSAID rather than a coxib (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98). Neither a history of myocardial infarction nor stroke predicted utilization of a coxib. Similarly, cardiovascular variables did not predict the use of rofecoxib versus celecoxib. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that COX inhibitor coprescription among aspirin users is frequent. Despite cardiovascular concerns regarding the coxibs, our data suggest that aspirin use, but not cardiovascular comorbidities, predicted the selection of nonselective NSAIDs over coxibs.