Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pavelka K

Becvár R, Vencovský J, Nĕmec P, Suchý D, Procházková L, Pavelka K, Anonymous00264. · Revmatologický ustav Praha. · Vnitr Lek. · Pubmed #18390121 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology characterized by presence of chronic symmetric synovitis, which leads to the formation of joint erosions. Generally recommended method for activity assessment of RA is so called Disease Activity Score (DAS). In early RA when low disease activity is present with oligo- or monoarthritis antimalarials are drugs of choice, while sulfasalazine (SAS) is recommended in cases with medium activity without erosions. Initial treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) should be applied in a very active polyarthritis with a rapid development of erosions. MTX is often combined with other disease modifying drugs (DMARD) and the blockers of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). LEF is to be administered to the patients in whom the other DMARD are contraindicated or not tolerated. In established RA with oligo- or monoarthritis with permanent low activity SAS is DMARD of choice. In cases with insufficient response and medium activity MTX is used and if it is inefficient LEF or combination of DMARD should be considered. In a very active disease with a rapid evolution of erosions high doses of MTX or LEF are recommended. When extraarticular symptoms of RA are present azathioprine is to be applied and in case of involvement of vital organs cyclophosphamide should be used. When DMARD are failing or contraindicated TNF-alpha blockers are to be applied. When one TNF-alpha blocker is inefficient it should by replaced by another one from the same group or another biological should be used. For indication of biologicals the activity limit is DAS28 5.1 and the decrease of DAS28 more than 1.2 is an efficacy criterion. Nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs are an important part in the management of RA, and also corticosteroids are often of used in oral or parenteral form. To the complex therapy of RA nonpharmacological means are usually implemented--different physical procedures and various surgeries.

Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Kaklamanis P, Kloppenburg M, Lohmander LS, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Watt I, Zimmermann-Gorska I, Anonymous00031. · Dr W Zhang, Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18250111 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The multidisciplinary guideline development group, representing 15 European countries, generated 10 key propositions regarding diagnosis using a Delphi consensus approach. For each recommendation, research evidence was searched for systematically. Whenever possible, the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated; relative risk and odds ratios were estimated for risk factors for hand OA. Quality of evidence was categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) hierarchy, and strength of recommendation was assessed by the EULAR visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Diagnostic topics included clinical manifestations, radiographic features, subgroups, differential diagnosis, laboratory tests, risk factors and comorbidities. The sensitivity, specificity and LR varied between tests depending upon the cut-off level, gold standard and controls. Overall, no single test could be used to define hand OA on its own (LR <10) but a composite of the tests greatly increased the chance of the diagnosis. The probability of a subject having hand OA was 20% when Heberden nodes alone were present, but this increased to 88% when in addition the subject was over 40 years old, had a family history of nodes and had joint space narrowing in any finger joint. CONCLUSION: Ten key recommendations for diagnosis of hand OA were developed using research evidence and expert consensus. Diagnosis of hand OA should be based on assessment of a composite of features.

Pavelka K, Anonymous00140. · Revmatologický ústav, Praha. · Vnitr Lek. · Pubmed #16967606 No free full text.

Abstract: Team of fourteen prominent rheumatologists created the "Recommendations for the therapy of early arthritis" based on standard operating procedures. This publication was made on the basis of analysis of previously published double-blind studies (the so-called evidence based procedure) and mutual consensus of the authors.

Senolt L, Grigorian M, Lukanidin E, Michel BA, Gay RE, Gay S, Pavelka K, Neidhart M. · Center of Experimental Rheumatology, Univ Hosp Zürich, Gloriastrasse 25, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. · Autoimmun Rev. · Pubmed #16431343 No free full text.

Abstract: S100A4 (Mts1) belongs to the S100 family of calcium binding proteins, which are involved in diverse biological regulatory activities. An association between S100A4 and tumor progression has been demonstrated in several studies. S100A4 binds to distinct intracellular target proteins and regulates specific functions involved in tumor progression such as cell motility, proliferation and apoptosis as well as remodelling of the extracellular matrix. Once released from the tumor or tumor-activated stromal cells, it may influence certain functions of target cells towards a more aggressive phenotype. Extracellular S100A4 has been demonstrated to contribute to angiogenesis and the increased production of matrix-degrading enzymes by both endothelial and tumor cells. Moreover, S100A4 might be responsible for TCRgammadelta T-cell mediated lysis and negative regulation of matrix mineralization. Increased expression of S100A4 mRNA has recently been found in proliferating rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts and synovial tissues from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Synovial hyperplasia in rheumatoid arthritis consists of inflammatory cells and activated synovial lining cells which contribute to the progressive destruction of the joints during the disease. Since several phenomena are similar between rheumatoid arthritis and malignant tumors it can be hypothesized that S100A4 contributes to the invasive and tumor-like behavior of rheumatoid arthritis synovium.

Keystone E, Heijde D, Mason D, Landewé R, Vollenhoven RV, Combe B, Emery P, Strand V, Mease P, Desai C, Pavelka K. · University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18975346 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosage regimens of lyophilized certolizumab pegol (a novel PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor agent) as adjunctive therapy to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to MTX therapy alone. METHODS: In this 52-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 982 patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive treatment with subcutaneous certolizumab pegol at an initial dosage of 400 mg given at weeks 0, 2, and 4, with a subsequent dosage of 200 mg or 400 mg given every 2 weeks, plus MTX, or placebo plus MTX. Co-primary end points were the response rate at week 24 according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20) and the mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score at week 52. RESULTS: At week 24, ACR20 response rates using nonresponder imputation for the certolizumab pegol 200-mg and 400-mg groups were 58.8% and 60.8%, respectively, as compared with 13.6% for the placebo group. Differences in ACR20 response rates versus placebo were significant at week 1 and were sustained to week 52 (P < 0.001). At week 52, mean radiographic progression from baseline was reduced in patients treated with certolizumab pegol 200 mg (0.4 Sharp units) or 400 mg (0.2 Sharp units) as compared with that in placebo-treated patients (2.8 Sharp units) (P < 0.001 by rank analysis). Improvements in all ACR core set of disease activity measures, including physical function, were observed by week 1 with both certolizumab pegol dosage regimens. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: Treatment with certolizumab pegol 200 or 400 mg plus MTX resulted in a rapid and sustained reduction in RA signs and symptoms, inhibited the progression of structural joint damage, and improved physical function as compared with placebo plus MTX treatment in RA patients with an incomplete response to MTX.

Senolt L, Pavelka K, Housa D, Haluzík M. · Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 12850 Prague 2, Czech Republic. · Cytokine. · Pubmed #17079158 No free full text.

Abstract: Adiponectin has been shown to exert insulin-sensitizing, anti-atherogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties in metabolic diseases. It has been suggested that adiponectin may play a role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To assess adiponectin in serum and synovial fluid from patients with RA and osteoarthritis (OA), and in serum from healthy controls. Adiponectin and CRP levels were analyzed by ELISA. The clinical activity of RA patients was assessed according to the 28 joint count Disease Activity Score. Synovial fluid adiponectin was significantly higher in RA than in OA patients (p<0.001). Adiponectin was negatively associated with the leukocyte count in RA synovial fluid (r=-0.45, p<0.05). Serum adiponectin was higher in RA compared to healthy controls (p<0.02), however comparable to OA patients. Serum adiponectin was higher than in synovial fluid in both diseases (p<0.001). In general, women had higher adiponectin levels than men. Adiponectin was not related to age, disease duration, body mass index, or disease activity of RA patients. Adiponectin is decreased in synovial fluid compared to serum indicating that peripheral fat stores are major producers of adiponectin into the blood stream. However, increased synovial fluid adiponectin in RA patients may counterpart the local inflammatory process.

Le Loët X, Pavelka K, Richarz U. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Hôpitaux Rouen, Rouen, France. · BMC Musculoskelet Disord. · Pubmed #15958159 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the utility of transdermal fentanyl (TDF, Durogesic) for the treatment of pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip, which was not adequately controlled by non-opioid analgesics or weak opioids. The second part of the trial, investigating TDF in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is reported separately. METHODS: Current analgesia was optimised during a 1-week run-in. Patients then received 28 days treatment with TDF starting at 25 microg/hr, with the option to increase the dose until adequate pain control was achieved. Metoclopramide was taken during the first week and then as needed. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients recruited, 75 with OA knee and 44 with OA hip completed the treatment phase, 30 knee and 18 hip patients entered the one-week taper-off phase. The most frequently used maximum dose of TDF was 25 microg/hr. The number of patients with adequate pain control increased during the run-in period from 4% to 27%, and further increased during TDF treatment to 88% on day 28. From baseline to endpoint, there were significant reductions in pain (p < 0.001) and improvements in functioning (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p < 0.05) health. Scores for 'pain right now' decreased significantly within 24 hours of starting TDF treatment. TDF was assessed favourably and 84% of patients would recommend it for OA-related pain. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events (reported by 32% and 26% of patients respectively), despite prophylaxis with metoclopramide, which showed limited efficacy in this setting. CONCLUSION: TDF significantly increased pain control, and improved functioning and quality of life. Metoclopramide appeared to be of limited value in preventing nausea and vomiting; more effective anti-emetic treatment may enable more people to benefit from strong opioids such as TDF. This study suggests that four weeks is a reasonable period to test the benefit of adding TDF to improve pain control in OA patients and that discontinuing therapy in cases of limited benefit creates no major obstacles.

Pavelka K, Le Loet X, Bjorneboe O, Herrero-Beaumont G, Richarz U. · Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic. · Curr Med Res Opin. · Pubmed #15701214 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) for the treatment of pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (OA), which was not adequately controlled by non-opioid analgesics and/or weak opioids. METHODS: The study design incorporated a 1-week run-in period when current analgesic medications were optimised, a 28-day treatment period and a 1-week taper-off period. Patients with RA (n = 104) and OA (n = 159) started treatment with TDF 25 microg/h. Patches were replaced every 72 h, with the option to up-titrate until adequate pain control was achieved. Metoclopramide was taken during the first treatment week and as needed thereafter. RESULTS: 203 patients completed the treatment phase, 90 entered the taper-off phase. 25 microg/h was the most frequently used maximum dose (51%). Pain control was increased from 4% to 29% of patients during run-in. The number of patients reaching adequate pain control in the first treatment week was increased to 75%, and increased further to 88% on day 28 and to 80% at endpoint. From baseline (screening) to endpoint, there were significant reductions in pain (p < 0.001) on the Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory, and significant improvements in quality of life (Short-Form-36: physical p < 0.001; mental health p < 0.05). Eighty per cent of the patients (n = 134) assessed the treatment favourably; nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events, mainly occurring at treatment initiation. Efficacy of metoclopramide appeared limited. TDF could be initiated in patients pre-treated with non-opioid analgesics or weak opioids and tapered off without major complications. CONCLUSIONS: TDF significantly improved pain control and quality of life, and was well tolerated in patients with RA or knee/hip OA who continued to experience pain on their current analgesic treatment. Treatment could be discontinued without issues. Nausea and vomiting was usually mild during treatment initiation. Patients' well being could be further accommodated by optimising prophylactic treatment.

van Holten J, Pavelka K, Vencovsky J, Stahl H, Rozman B, Genovese M, Kivitz AJ, Alvaro J, Nuki G, Furst DE, Herrero-Beaumont G, McInnes IB, Musikic P, Tak PP. · Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15242865 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of interferon beta (IFN beta) in combination with methotrexate in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 209 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, who had been on methotrexate for at least six months and at a stable dose for four weeks before study entry, were randomised in double blind fashion to receive placebo (0.05 ml or 0.5 ml), IFN beta 2.2 microg (0.05 ml), or IFN beta 44 microg (0.5 ml), given subcutaneously three times weekly for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was a change in radiological scores at week 24. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who met the ACR 20% improvement criteria at the end of the study. Synovial biopsy specimens were obtained before and after treatment from a subset of patients. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the presence of inflammatory cells and the results were measured by digital image analysis. Collagen crosslinks were measured in urine at different times throughout the study. RESULTS: Analysis of radiological scores and clinical variable showed no changes in any of the groups, and there were no differences between the groups. On microscopic analysis of synovial tissue there was no significant change in the scores for infiltration by inflammatory cells after IFN beta treatment. Urinary levels of collagen crosslinks were unchanged between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: At the doses tested, treatment with IFN beta three times weekly in combination with methotrexate did not have a clinical or radiological effect in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M, Martín Mola E, Pavelka K, Sany J, Settas L, Wajdula J, Pedersen R, Fatenejad S, Sanda M, Anonymous00113. · Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute/Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm 17176, Sweden. · Lancet. · Pubmed #15001324 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Etanercept and methotrexate are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis but no data exist on concurrent initiation or use of the combination compared with either drug alone. We aimed to assess combination treatment with etanercept and methotrexate versus the monotherapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomised, clinical efficacy, safety, and radiographic study, 686 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated to treatment with etanercept 25 mg (subcutaneously twice a week), oral methotrexate (up to 20 mg every week), or the combination. Clinical response was assessed by criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The primary efficacy endpoint was the numeric index of the ACR response (ACR-N) area under the curve (AUC) over the first 24 weeks. The primary radiographic endpoint was change from baseline to week 52 in total joint damage and was assessed with the modified Sharp score. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Four patients did not receive any drug; thus 682 were studied. ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks was greater for the combination group compared with etanercept alone and methotrexate alone (18.3%-years [95% CI 17.1-19.6] vs 14.7%-years [13.5-16.0], p<0.0001, and 12.2%-years [11.0-13.4], p<0.0001; respectively). The mean difference in ACR-N AUC between combination and methotrexate alone was 6.1 (95% CI 4.5-7.8, p<0.0001) and between etanercept and methotrexate was 2.5 (0.8-4.2, p=0.0034). The combination was more efficacious than methotrexate or etanercept alone in retardation of joint damage (mean total Sharp score -0.54 [95% CI -1.00 to -0.07] vs 2.80 [1.08 to 4.51], p<0.0001, and 0.52 [-0.10 to 1.15], p=0.0006; respectively). The mean difference in total Sharp score between combination and methotrexate alone was -3.34 (95% CI -4.86 to -1.81, p<0.0001) and between etanercept and methotrexate was -27 (-3.81 to -0.74, p=0.0469). The number of patients reporting infections or adverse events was similar in all groups. INTERPRETATION: The combination of etanercept and methotrexate was significantly better in reduction of disease activity, improvement of functional disability, and retardation of radiographic progression compared with methotrexate or etanercept alone. These findings bring us closer to achievement of remission and repair of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Pavelka K, Recker DP, Verburg KM. · Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #12810937 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety of valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg daily with those of diclofenac 75 mg slow release (SR) twice daily in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Seven hundred and twenty-two patients with adult-onset RA were enrolled into this 26-week, randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study (246 in the valdecoxib 20 mg daily arm, 237 in the valdecoxib 40 mg daily arm and 239 in the diclofenac 75 mg SR daily arm). Acetylsalicylic acid use (< or =325 mg per day) was similar across all groups: 5.4% in the diclofenac group, 5.7% in the valdecoxib 20 mg group and 5.9% in the valdecoxib 40 mg group. Efficacy was measured by the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain [visual analogue scale (VAS)] and the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at baseline and at weeks 2, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 of treatment, or at early termination. Upper GI safety was evaluated by endoscopy at the end of treatment, which took place no more than 2 days after the last dose of study medication or at early termination. RESULTS: Valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg daily were comparable to diclofenac 75 mg SR twice daily in treating the signs and symptoms of RA. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to mean changes from baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS) or mHAQ. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving valdecoxib 20 mg daily (6%) and valdecoxib 40 mg daily (4%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in patients receiving diclofenac 75 mg SR twice daily (16%). Valdecoxib 20 mg daily was also associated with significantly improved GI tolerability (P = 0.035) compared with diclofenac. CONCLUSIONS: Single daily doses of valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg provided efficacy comparable to that of diclofenac, with a superior upper GI safety profile in the long-term treatment of RA patients.

Pavelka K, Jarosová K, Suchý D, Senolt L, Chroust K, Dusek L, Vencovský J. · Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #19351624 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infliximab dose escalation in incomplete responders in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: 141 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab for 12 months (3 mg/kg; intervals 0, 2, 6 and then 8 weeks) who responded to the drug (disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) decrease >1.2) but who were not in remission (DAS28 >2.6) were enrolled into the study. Patients were randomly assigned into arm A, 3 mg/kg, and arm B, 5 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks. Outcome measures included the DAS28, its components and C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in changes in the DAS28, its components, or CRP in patients in arms A and B during the 12 months of treatment. All patients showed a DAS28 decrease greater than 0.6 after 28 weeks. Eleven patients interrupted therapy in arm A and 14 in arm B. Infusion reactions and non-serious adverse events were observed in 4.2% and 28.2% of arm A patients and in 7.2% and 47.8% of arm B patients. The frequency of serious adverse events was comparable between arms A and B (16.9% and 15.9%, respectively), and the frequency of serious infections was not significantly greater in the higher dose group (5.8%) than in the lower dose group (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, increasing the infliximab dose from 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg in RA patients with residual disease activity did not improve efficacy but moderately increased toxicity. These data indicate that a switch to another biological treatment would be a more appropriate strategy in incomplete responders.

Combe B, Codreanu C, Fiocco U, Gaubitz M, Geusens PP, Kvien TK, Pavelka K, Sambrook PN, Smolen JS, Khandker R, Singh A, Wajdula J, Fatenejad S, Anonymous00051. · Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18794178 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of etanercept and etanercept plus sulfasalazine versus sulfasalazine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite sulfasalazine therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to etanercept (25 mg twice weekly; sulfasalazine was discontinued at baseline), etanercept plus sulfasalazine (unchanged regimen of 2-3 g/day) or sulfasalazine in a double-blind, randomised, 2-year study in adult patients with active RA despite sulfasalazine therapy. Efficacy was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology criteria, disease activity scores (DAS) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). RESULTS: Demographic variables and baseline disease characteristics were comparable among treatment groups; mean DAS 5.1, 5.2 and 5.1 for etanercept (n = 103), etanercept plus sulfasalazine (n = 101) and sulfasalazine (n = 50), respectively. Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was highest with sulfasalazine (26 (52%) vs 6 (6%) for either etanercept group, p<0.001). Patients receiving etanercept or etanercept plus sulfasalazine had a more rapid initial response, which was sustained at 2 years, than those receiving sulfasalazine: mean DAS 2.8, 2.5 versus 4.5, respectively (p<0.05); ACR 20 response was achieved by 67%, 77% versus 34% of patients, respectively (p<0.01) Overall, PRO followed a similar pattern; a clinically significant improvement in health assessment questionnaire was achieved by 76%, 78% versus 40% of patients, respectively (p<0.01). Commonly reported adverse events occurring in the etanercept groups were injection site reactions and pharyngitis/laryngitis (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Etanercept and etanercept plus sulfasalazine are efficacious for the long-term management of patients with RA. The addition of etanercept or substitution with etanercept should be considered as treatment options for patients not adequately responding to sulfasalazine.

Pavelka K, Gatterová J, Tegzová D, Jarosová K, Tomasová Studýnková J, Svobodník A, Svihálek J, Dusek L, Vencovský J. · Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17888209 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical status and radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) being followed by the Czech National Registry of biological treatments. METHODS: Patients who failed at least two disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and had high disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1) were treated with infliximab. Radiographic progression was measured with a modified version of the Sharp score (TSS) after 54 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients with an average disease duration of 13.7 years were enrolled. The DAS28 dropped from 6.66 to 4.07 (p < 0.001). Before treatment the mean TSS was 90.1 and the mean estimated yearly disease progression was 8.56. After 54 weeks of infliximab, radiographic progression was 4.15 times slower than the estimated rate before treatment and 63 patients did not show any radiographic progression at all. In the remaining 36 patients, the progression rate slowed to 3.8 +/- 0.9 from the estimated TSS of 10.9 +/- 6.9 before the initiation of treatment (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Data derived from the Czech National Registry, which reflect general clinical practice, show a significant retardation of radiographic progression in patients treated with anti-TNF and the magnitude of the improvement seen is similar to results from clinical trials.

Klingelhöfer J, Senolt L, Baslund B, Nielsen GH, Skibshøj I, Pavelka K, Neidhart M, Gay S, Ambartsumian N, Hansen BS, Petersen J, Lukanidin E, Grigorian M. · Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17328050 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the involvement of the metastasis-inducing protein S100A4 (Mts-1) in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Synovial tissue, synovial fluid, and plasma were obtained from RA and osteoarthritis (OA) patients who were undergoing joint surgery. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analyses and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to determine the locations and concentrations of S100A4. The conformational structure of S100A4 in plasma and synovial fluid was determined after fractionation by size-exclusion chromatography, protein separation by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blot analysis. Expression of various S100 proteins in RA synovium was determined by immunofluorescence and double-staining using specific anti-S100 antibodies. RESULTS: We found an up-regulation of S100A4 in cells infiltrating RA synovial tissue. Most cell types identified by cell-specific markers (fibroblasts, immune cells, and vascular cells) contributed to the production of S100A4 in RA synovial tissue. The pattern of S100A4 expression differed significantly from that of the proinflammatory proteins S100A9 and S100A12, which were restricted to phagocytes and granulocytes. The up-regulation of S100A4 in RA synovial tissue was consistent with the high concentrations of the protein in RA versus OA plasma (mean 1,100 versus 211 ng/ml) and synovial fluid (mean 1,980 versus 247 ng/ml). Moreover, we found that S100A4 in RA plasma and synovial fluid was present in bioactive multimeric (M-S100A4) conformations, whereas in OA, the majority of extracellular S100A4 was detected as the less active dimeric form. Consistent with our observations in tumor models, extracellular S100A4 stabilized the p53 tumor suppressor in RA synovial fibroblast-like cells and affected the regulation of p53 target genes, including Bcl-2, p21(WAF), and Hdm-2, as well as matrix metalloproteinases. CONCLUSION: Overexpression of S100A4 in RA synovial tissue and its release as M-S100A4 can influence p53 function and modulate the expression of several genes that are potentially implicated in the disease process. Thus, S100A4 might play an important role in the pathogenesis of RA and might represent a new target for the treatment of RA.

Senolt L, Braun M, Vencovský J, Sedová L, Pavelka K. · Institute of Rheumatology, Charles University, First Medical Facility, Prague, Czech Republic. · Physiol Res. · Pubmed #17298211 links to  free full text

Abstract: Advanced glycation end-product (AGE) pentosidine has previously been demonstrated in different tissues and body fluids. It was suggested as a novel marker for evaluating the pathologic activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study we analyzed the relation between pentosidine and markers of inflammation, cartilage turnover, immune response, and disease status of RA. Using HPLC, we analyzed pentosidine in serum and synovial fluid from 39 patients with RA and in serum from 38 healthy controls. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and antibodies to CCP (anti-CCP) were measured by ELISA. Clinical disease status was assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) and functional status by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). We demonstrated significantly higher serum levels of pentosidine in RA patients in comparison with controls. Pentosidine in serum significantly correlated with pentosidine in synovial fluid. Serum pentosidine levels were associated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<0.03) but not with CRP, COMP, anti-CCP antibodies, DAS 28, or HAQ. In contrast to previous studies, we could not show any correlation of pentosidine levels with inflammatory status, clinical disease activity, markers of immune response, or cartilage breakdown. However, AGEs can be suggested as important players participating in joint destruction rather than markers of disease activity.

Hanova P, Pavelka K, Dostal C, Holcatova I, Pikhart H. · Institute of Rheumatology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17181917 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile arthritis (JIA) and gout in a population based study in two regions of the Czech Republic with total population of 186,000 inhabitants. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Town of Ceske Budejovice and district of Cheb in the Czech Republic (with a total population of 186,000 inhabitants) in the years 2002 and 2003. Incident cases were registered on condition that the definite diagnosis was confirmed according to existing classification criteria during the study period. Prevalence was studied on the basis of identification of established diagnosis from registers of patients of participating rheumatologists and other specialists. They were asked to report all living patients who had been diagnosed before 1st March 2002. Patients were only included in the study if their permanent address was in the selected study area. RESULTS: Overall, we found 48 incident and 947 prevalent cases of RA among adults (16+ years), 4 incident and 43 prevalent cases of JIA among children (less than 16 years old), and 64 incident and 425 prevalent cases of gout among adults (16+ years). The total annual incidence of RA was 31/100,000 in the adult population aged 16 years and more (95% CI 20 to 42/100,000). The prevalence of RA was 610/100,000 (95% CI 561 to 658/100,000) in the adult population. An annual incidence of gout in adults was 41/100,000 (95% CI 28 to 53/100,000). The prevalence of gout was 300/100,000 (95% CI 266 to 334/100,000). The annual incidence of JIA was 13/100,000 in children less than 16 years old (95%CI 1 to 20/100,000). The prevalence of JIA in children was 140/100,000 (95% CI 117 to 280/100,000). CONCLUSION: This study estimates the annual incidence and prevalence rates of RA, gout and JIA in the first population-based survey in the Czech Republic. The rates of RA and JIA compare well with figures reported from other countries; figures in gout seem to be lower than reported elsewhere.

Senolt L, Grigorian M, Lukanidin E, Simmen B, Michel BA, Pavelka K, Gay RE, Gay S, Neidhart M. · Center for Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zürich, Gloriastrasse 25, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17105852 No free full text.

Abstract: The metastasis-associated protein S100A4 promotes the progression of cancer by regulating the remodelling of the extracellular matrix. The expression of S100A4 in vivo is shown and the functional role of S100A4 in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritisis is explored. The expression of S100A4 in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and normal synovial tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry. The expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) mRNA was measured in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis synovial fibroblasts treated and untreated with S100A4 oligomer by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Levels of released MMPs were confirmed by ELISA in cell culture supernatants. S100A4 protein was expressed in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis synovial tissues, in contrast with normal synovium. S100A4 up regulated MMP-3 mRNA in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid, with a peak after 6 h. This resulted in release of MMP-3 protein. MMP-1, MMP-9 and MMP-13 mRNA were also up regulated in synovial fluid, but with different kinetics. MMP-14 mRNA showed no change. Thus, S100A4 protein is expressed in synovial tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in contrast with healthy people. It induces the expression and release of MMP-3 and other MMPs from synovial fluid. The data suggest that S100A4-producing cells could be involved in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, including pannus formation and joint destruction.

Smolen JS, Keystone EC, Emery P, Breedveld FC, Betteridge N, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Ferraccioli G, Jaeger U, Klareskog L, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Anonymous00088. · Department of Rheumatology, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17068064 No free full text.

Abstract: A large number of experts experienced in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis were involved in formulating a consensus statement on the use of B cell-targeted treatment with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The statement was supported by data from randomised controlled clinical trials and the substantial literature on oncology. The statement underwent three rounds of discussions until its ultimate formulation. It should guide clinicians in the use of this newly approved biological agent in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Strand V, Balbir-Gurman A, Pavelka K, Emery P, Li N, Yin M, Lehane PB, Agarwal S. · Division of Immunology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #17062648 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term impact on physical function of a single course of rituximab in rheumatoid factor, seropositive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite ongoing methotrexate treatment. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial comparing rituximab alone [1,000 mg intravenously (iv) on days 1 and 15, n= 40], or in combination with cyclophosphamide (750 mg iv on days 3 and 7, n= 41) or oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg/week, n= 40) with placebo + methotrexate (> or =10 mg/week, n= 40), resulted in significant reductions in disease activity at weeks 24 and 48. Sustained improvements in physical function and standard effect sizes (SES) for changes in components of ACR and EULAR criteria were evaluated over 2 yrs. RESULTS: More patients receiving rituximab + methotrexate completed a 2-yr follow-up without further treatment than those receiving placebo + methotrexate (45% vs 15%, respectively), rituximab alone (10%) or rituximab + cyclophosphamide (22%). This reflected a higher percentage of patients receiving rituximab + methotrexate reporting improvements in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index > or = minimum clinically important difference at 1 and 2 yrs (68% and 30%, respectively) compared with placebo + methotrexate (28% and 15%), rituximab monotherapy (43% and 10%) or rituximab + cyclophosphamide (39% and 12%). SES were high in all rituximab groups and revealed differing patterns of response over time. CONCLUSION: A single course of rituximab with continuing methotrexate in patients with active RA provided clinically meaningful improvements in physical function over 2 yrs, with lower discontinuation rates and larger SES for improvements in ACR and EULAR criteria components.

Senolt L, Housa D, Vernerová Z, Jirásek T, Svobodová R, Veigl D, Anderlová K, Müller-Ladner U, Pavelka K, Haluzík M. · Institute of Rheumatology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Na Slupi 4, 12850 Prague 2, Czech Republic, and University Hospital Giessen, Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17040961 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Resistin is a newly identified adipocytokine which has demonstrated links between obesity and insulin resistance in rodents. In humans, proinflammatory properties of resistin are superior to its insulin resistance-inducing effects. OBJECTIVES: To assess resistin expression in synovial tissues, serum and synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and spondylarthropathies (SpA), and to study its relationship with inflammatory status and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. METHODS: Resistin expression and localisation in synovial tissue was determined by immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. Serum and synovial fluid resistin, leptin, interleukin (IL)1beta, IL6, IL8, tumour necrosis factor alpha, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels were measured. The clinical activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis was assessed according to the 28 joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28). RESULTS: Resistin was detected in the synovium in both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Staining in the sublining layer was more intensive in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with those with osteoarthritis. In rheumatoid arthritis, macrophages (CD68), B lymphocytes (CD20) and plasma cells (CD138) but not T lymphocytes (CD3) showed colocalisation with resistin. Synovial fluid resistin was higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than in those with SpA or osteoarthritis (both p<0.001). In patients with rheumatoid arthritis and SpA, serum resistin levels were higher than those with osteoarthritis (p<0.01). Increased serum resistin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis correlated with both CRP (r=0.53, p<0.02), and DAS28 (r=0.44, p<0.05), but not with selected (adipo) cytokines. CONCLUSION: The upregulated resistin at local sites of inflammation and the link between serum resistin, inflammation and disease activity suggest a role for resistin in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, Pavelka K, Bröll J, Balint G, Emery P, Raemen F, Petersen J, Smolen J, Thomson D, Kishimoto T, Anonymous00119. · Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Imperial College, London, UK. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16947782 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To establish the safety and efficacy of repeat infusions of tocilizumab (previously known as MRA), a humanized anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antibody, alone and in combination with methotrexate (MTX), for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study group comprised 359 patients with active RA in whom the response to MTX was inadequate. During a stabilization period, these patients received their current dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks. Following stabilization, they were randomized to 1 of 7 treatment arms, as follows: tocilizumab at doses of 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg, or 8 mg/kg either as monotherapy or in combination with MTX, or MTX plus placebo. RESULTS: A 20% response (improvement) according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20 response) was achieved by 61% and 63% of patients receiving 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab as monotherapy, respectively, and by 63% and 74% of patients receiving those doses of tocilizumab plus MTX, respectively, compared with 41% of patients receiving placebo plus MTX. Statistically significant ACR50 and ACR70 responses were observed in patients receiving combination therapy with either 4 mg/kg or 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab plus MTX (P < 0.05). A dose-related reduction in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints was observed from week 4 onward, in all patients except those receiving monotherapy with 2 mg/kg of tocilizumab. In the majority of patients who received 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab, the C-reactive protein level/erythrocyte sedimentation rate normalized, while placebo plus MTX had little effect on these laboratory parameters. Tocilizumab was mostly well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of other biologic and immunosuppressive therapies. Alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels followed a sawtooth pattern (rising and falling between infusions). There were moderate but reversible increases in the nonfasting total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and reversible reductions in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and neutrophil levels. There were 2 cases of sepsis, both of which occurred in patients who were receiving combination therapy with 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab plus MTX. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that targeted blockade of IL-6 signaling is a highly efficacious and promising means of decreasing disease activity in RA.

Combe B, Codreanu C, Fiocco U, Gaubitz M, Geusens PP, Kvien TK, Pavelka K, Sambrook PN, Smolen JS, Wajdula J, Fatenejad S, Anonymous00033. · Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16606651 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept and sulfasalazine, alone and in combination, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite sulfasalazine treatment. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised study in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable sulfasalazine (2-3 g/day) treatment. The primary end point was a 20% response by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, the three treatment groups (sulfasalazine, n = 50; etanercept, n = 103; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n = 101) were comparable for demographic variables and disease activity. Lack of efficacy was the primary reason for discontinuation (sulfasalazine, n = 12; etanercept, n = 1; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n = 4; p<0.001). Significantly more patients receiving etanercept, alone or in combination (74% for each), achieved ACR 20 responses at 24 weeks than those receiving sulfasalazine (28%; p<0.01). Similarly, more patients in the etanercept groups achieved ACR 50 and ACR 70 responses than those in the sulfasalazine group (p<0.01). In the groups receiving etanercept, significant differences in the ACR core components were observed by week 2 compared with those receiving sulfasalazine alone (p<0.01). The incidences of several common adverse events (headache, nausea, asthenia) were lower with etanercept alone than with the combination (p<0.05), but infections and injection site reactions were higher with etanercept alone (p<0.05). The safety profiles of both etanercept treatment groups were comparable with previous experience of etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: For all efficacy variables assessed, etanercept alone or in combination with sulfasalazine resulted in substantial and similar improvement in disease activity from baseline to week 24 compared with sulfasalazine alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite their sulfasalazine treatment. All three treatments were generally well tolerated.

Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, van Vollenhoven R, Sharp J, Perez JL, Spencer-Green GT. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, C4-R Postbox 9600, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16385520 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score. RESULTS: Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission.

Dostal C, Pavelka K, Zvárová J, Hanzlícek P, Olejárová M. · Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 2, 128 50 Prague 2, Czech Republic. · Int J Med Inform. · Pubmed #16169767 No free full text.

Abstract: According to the World Health Organisation, rheumatic diseases are likely to go on occupying a prominent place worldwide. As to US statistics, rheumatic diseases are currently the most frequent chronic disorders and leading cause of disability. The development of functional clinical database or rheumatic diseases represents an essential condition how to acquire necessary epidemiological and other information on disorders under study. In 1999-2003, Institute of Rheumatology in cooperation with EuroMISE have developed clinical database/national register of selected systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases inclusive of bank of sera and DNA. Aims of this phase of the pilot research have been formulated into following relevant and time borders: to gather clinical, laboratory, genetic but also pharmaco- and socio-economic data in a representative sample of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease; rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile chronic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and reactive arthritis. The data about patients entering the register are differentiated according to the disease of the patient. However, many diseases have several data in common. Therefore, a simple common data structure for examination of all monitored diseases was chosen. In 2002, the preset number of over 2000 registered patients had been achieved with collaboration of 34 territorial and 20 institutional rheumatologists in the whole covering the majority of the Czech Republic. Some first acquired information inclusive comparison with German database is demonstrated.