Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pallot-Prades B

Marotte H, Pallot-Prades B, Grange L, Gaudin P, Alexandre C, Miossec P. · Hospices Civils de Lyon-bioMérieux Research Unit on Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hopital Edouard Herriot, place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #17597527 links to  free full text

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to record changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with methotrexate combined (or not combined) with infliximab. Included were 90 patients with RA who required anti-TNF-alpha therapy with infliximab because of persistent active disease despite treatment with methotrexate. The historical control group included 99 patients with RA who were treated with methotrexate at a time when anti-TNF-alpha treatment was not yet available. Lumbar and femoral neck BMD was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 1 year later. Osteocalcin, C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol were measured in plasma at baseline and 1 year later. At 1 year BMD had decreased in the control group at spine (P < 0.01) and femoral neck (P < 0.001). In contrast, BMD at spine and femoral neck did not change after 1 year of infliximab treatment. At the same time point, no change in bone remodelling markers was observed. No association was observed between clinical response and changes in BMD, indicating that even those who did not respond clinically did not lose bone over a 1-year period. These data confirm the BMD decrease observed in RA patients treated with methotrexate alone. This bone loss was prevented by infliximab therapy. Importantly, this beneficial effect was also observed in apparent nonresponders.

Tubach F, Salmon D, Ravaud P, Allanore Y, Goupille P, Bréban M, Pallot-Prades B, Pouplin S, Sacchi A, Chichemanian RM, Bretagne S, Emilie D, Lemann M, Lorthololary O, Mariette X, Anonymous00120. · Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot; INSERM U738; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Paris, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19565495 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy, but whether this association is drug-specific remains a concern. Our objective was to describe cases of TB associated with anti-TNF mAb therapy, identify risk factors, and estimate the incidence. METHODS: We conducted an incidence study and a case-control analysis to investigate the risk of newly diagnosed TB associated with the use of anti-TNF agents. As part of the French Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies (RATIO) registry, for 3 years we collected cases of TB among French patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy for any indication; for each case, 2 patients treated with anti-TNF agents served as control subjects. RESULTS: We collected 69 cases of TB in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 40), spondylarthritides (n = 18), inflammatory colitis (n = 9), psoriasis (n = 1) and Behçet's disease (n = 1) with infliximab (n = 36), adalimumab (n = 28), and etanercept (n = 5). None of the patients had received correct chemoprophylactic treatment. The sex- and age-adjusted incidence rate of TB was 116.7 per 100,000 patient-years. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 12.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 9.7-15.5) and was higher for therapy with infliximab and adalimumab than for therapy with etanercept (SIR 18.6 [95% CI 13.4-25.8] and SIR 29.3 [95% CI 20.3-42.4] versus SIR 1.8 [95% CI 0.7-4.3], respectively). In the case-control analysis, exposure to infliximab or adalimumab versus etanercept was an independent risk factor for TB (odds ratio [OR] 13.3 [95% CI 2.6-69.0] and OR 17.1 [95% CI 3.6-80.6], respectively). Other risk factors were age, the first year of anti-TNF mAb treatment, and being born in an endemic area. CONCLUSION: The risk of TB is higher for patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy than for those receiving soluble TNF receptor therapy. The increased risk with early anti-TNF treatment and the absence of correct chemoprophylactic treatment favor the reactivation of latent TB.

Berthelot JM, De Bandt M, Goupille P, Solau-Gervais E, Lioté F, Goeb V, Azaïs I, Martin A, Pallot-Prades B, Maugars Y, Mariette X, Anonymous00064. · Service de Rhumatologie, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU Nantes, 44093, Nantes Cedex 01, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19059799 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report on the outcome of 15 cases of pregnancies in women treated with anti-TNF drugs during conception or pregnancy METHODS: French rheumatologists connecting to the web-site of CRI site: http://www.cri-net.com were asked to fill in a structured questionnaire reporting the outcome of pregnancy in women still treated by a TNF blocker at the time of conception. RESULTS: Spondylarthropathies (n=8), rheumatoid arthritis (n=4), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n=2), and psoriatic arthritis (n=1) were treated by infliximab (n=3), adalimumab (n=2), or etanercept (n=10). Miscarriages occurred twice, and elective termination was preferred once. Anti-TNF had been administered during the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy in 12, three and two cases. The 12 babies were in good condition, without apparent malformation or symptoms of neonatal illnesses. CONCLUSION: The number of reported cases exceeds 300, but only 29 women were treated during their whole pregnancy. The rate of congenital malformations observed so far might appear reassuring compared to the general population for women exposed only during conception. Conversely, there are too few reports of exposure during pregnancy to allow any conclusion about the safety of TNF blockers, and additional long term follow-up of children would be welcome in order to rule out minor forms of VACTERL association that might have been overlooked at birth.

Trocmé C, Marotte H, Baillet A, Pallot-Prades B, Garin J, Grange L, Miossec P, Tebib J, Berger F, Nissen MJ, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. · GREPI CNRS UMR 5525, INSERM IFR 130, Université J Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18664547 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The use of biologicals such as infliximab has dramatically improved the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors predictive of therapeutic response need to be identified. A proteomic study was performed prior to infliximab therapy to identify a panel of candidate protein biomarkers of RA predictive of treatment response. METHODS: Plasma profiles of 60 patients with RA (28 non-responders (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)) negative and 32 responders (ACR70 positive) to infliximab) were studied by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) technology on two types of arrays, an anion exchange array (SAX2) and a nickel affinity array (IMAC3-Ni). Biomarker characterisation was carried out using classical biochemical methods (purification by ammonium sulfate precipitation or metal affinity chromatography) and identification by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis. RESULTS: Two distinct protein profiles were observed on both arrays and several proteins were differentially expressed in both patient populations. Five proteins at 3.86, 7.77, 7.97, 8.14 and 74.07 kDa were overexpressed in the non-responder group, whereas one at 28 kDa was increased in the responder population (sensitivity>56%, specificity>77.5%). Moreover, combination of several biomarkers improved the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of patient response to over 97%. The 28 kDa protein was characterised as apolipoprotein A-I and the 7.77 kDa biomarker was identified as platelet factor 4. CONCLUSIONS: Six plasma biomarkers are characterised, enabling the detection of patient response to infliximab with high sensitivity and specificity. Apolipoprotein A-1 was predictive of a good response to infliximab, whereas platelet factor 4 was associated with non-responders.

Bruyère P, Maritan C, Ellow S, Pallot-Prades B, Peyrard P, Thomas T. · CHU de Saint-Etienne. · Rev Infirm. · Pubmed #18318296 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Marotte H, Pallot-Prades B, Grange L, Tebib J, Gaudin P, Alexandre C, Blond JL, Cazalis MA, Mougin B, Miossec P. · Clinical Immunology Unit, Departments of Immunology and Rheumatology, Hôpital Edouard Hérriot, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16096333 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether joint destruction, indication for, and response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis are associated with the shared epitope (SE) or selected cytokine gene polymorphisms (interleukin (IL) 1B, IL1-RN, and tumour necrosis alpha). METHODS: In a large rheumatoid arthritis population of 930 patients from the same area (Rhône-Alpes, France), patients with (n = 198) or without infliximab treatment (n = 732) were compared according to their genetic status. Clinical, biological, and radiological data were collected. Typing for SE status and cytokine polymorphisms was carried out using enzyme linked oligosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was by chi(2) testing and calculation of odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: A dose relation was observed between the number of SE copies and joint damage in the whole rheumatoid population (OR, 1 v 0 SE copy = 2.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.77 to 3.19), p<0.001; OR 2 v 0 SE copy = 3.92 (2.65 to 5.80), p<0.001. The SE effect increased with disease duration but was not significant before two years. Selection for infliximab treatment (n = 198) was associated with increased disease activity, joint damage, and the presence of the SE with a dose effect. In all, 66.2% patients achieved an ACR20 improvement. No clinical or genetic factors were able to predict the clinical response to infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: This post-marketing study in a large cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients indicates a linkage between rheumatoid arthritis severity, selection for treatment with infliximab, and the presence and dose of the SE.

Misery L, Perrot JL, Gentil-Perret A, Pallot-Prades B, Cambazard F, Alexandre C. · No affiliation provided · Br J Dermatol. · Pubmed #11903255 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.