Rheumatoid Arthritis: Olive P

Dougados M, Combe B, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Olive P, Schattenkirchner M, Meusser S, Paimela L, Rau R, Zeidler H, Leirisalo-Repo M, Peldan K. · Institut de Rhumatologie, Hardy B, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #10364900 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a combination therapy. METHODS: 205 patients fulfilling the ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not treated with disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs previously, with an early (< or = 1 year duration), active (Disease Activity Score (DAS) > 3.0), rheumatoid factor and/or HLA DR 1/4 positive disease were randomised between sulphasalazine (SASP) 2000 (maximum 3000) mg daily (n = 68), or methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 (maximum 15) mg weekly (n = 69) or the combination (SASP + MTX) of both (n = 68). RESULTS: The mean changes in the DAS during the one year follow up of the study was -1.15, -0.87, -1.26 in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively (p = 0.019). However, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of either EULAR good responders 34%, 38%, 38% or ACR criteria responders 59%, 59%, 65% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively. Radiological progression evaluated by the modified Sharp score was very modest in the three groups: mean changes in erosion score: +2.4, +2.4, +1.9, in narrowing score: +2.3, +2.1, +1.6 and in total damage score: +4.6, +4.5, +3.5, in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SASP + MTX group 91% versus 75% in the SASP and MTX group (p = 0.025). Nausea was the most frequent side effect: 32%, 23%, 49% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that an early initiation therapy of disease modifying drug seems to be of benefit. However, this study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant superiority of the combination therapy although several outcomes were in favour of this observation. The tolerability of the three treatment modalities seems acceptable.

Salerno A, Thomas E, Olive P, Blotman F, Picot MC, Georgesco M. · Unité d'explorations fonctionnelles neuro-musculaires, Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, 34295 Montpellier 5, Cedex, France. · Clin Neurophysiol. · Pubmed #10825705 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the motor cortex by single and double magnetic stimulation, in patients with fibromyalgia.Methods: Thirteen patients with fibromyalgia and 13 age-matched healthy subjects were examined. We evaluated, in both limbs, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency and amplitude and the MCA/MPA ratio, i.e. MEP cortical amplitude (MCA) /maximal peripheral amplitude of the M response (MPA), the central conduction time (TCC) and the length of the silent period (SP). With double magnetic stimulation, different time intervals between shocks were used: with delays between shocks of 4, 25, 55 and 85 ms, the intensities of the conditioning shock were 80% the relaxed threshold. With delays between shocks of 55, 85, 100, 155, 200, 255 and 355 ms, the intensities of the conditioning shocks were set at 150% the relaxed threshold. In all cases, the intensity of the test shock was 150% the relaxed threshold. The results were also compared with those obtained in 5 women affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Results: As compared to control, the cortical relaxed threshold was enhanced on both sides and limbs (P<0.05). The cortical silent period recorded with single magnetic stimulation was reduced in the upper limbs (P = 2.7x10(-11)) and lower limbs (both sides P = 3.6x10(-5)). The other parameters investigated were normal. With double magnetic stimulation, facilitatory phenomena were absent in fibromyalgic patients and the inhibitory responses recorded with a delay of 155 ms were reduced (P = 0.0052). No significant differences were noted between FM and RA patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrated motor cortical dysfunction in patients with fibromyalgia involving excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. This indicates motor cortical involvement and supports the hypothesis of aberrant central pain mechanisms. The absence of differences between FM and RA suggest that the lesions were not specific and could be related to chronic pain disorders within the central nervous system.