| 1 |
Review [Rheumatoid arthritis: a general disease and local diseases] 2005
Bouysset M, Noël E, Tebib JG. · Service de rhumatologie, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite. · Rev Prat. · Pubmed #16544923 No free full text.
Abstract: The rheumatoid synovitis affects the joints by destroying the cartilage, the sub-chondral bone and the articular capsule. The tendons and ligaments can be degraded by proximity or by the means of the affected synovial sheaths. This conjunction of effects involves a foreseeable degradation on the complex articulations whose clinician must know the stages to interfere effectively into a preventive way by local interventions when the general treatments of the disease are insufficient and before recourse to the repairing surgery. This management can only be considered with a team where the general practitioner has a central place of alarm. Extraarticular symptoms (Sjogren's syndrome, cardiac, pulmonary or renal involvement) are specific local diseases and should be managed appropriately by the general practitioner and referred specialists.
|
| 2 |
Review The rheumatoid shoulder: current consensus on diagnosis and treatment. 2006
Thomas T, Noël E, Goupille P, Duquesnoy B, Combe B, Anonymous00114. · Rheumatology Department, St-Etienne University Hospital, Boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16213772 No free full text.
Abstract: Shoulder involvement is usually inconspicuous in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the clinical manifestations are nonspecific. Nevertheless, shoulder involvement should be sought routinely and detected early. Range of motion at the shoulder should be evaluated. Although normal radiographic findings do not rule out shoulder involvement, radiographs are crucial for detecting micro- and macro-geodes during follow-up. The development of glenohumeral joint space narrowing is a turning point that indicates a risk of rapid joint destruction. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing the lesions and guiding the treatment strategy. Stepwise use of local interventions as indicated by imaging findings is recommended. Joint replacement should not be left too late, and surgical procedures on the shoulder should be built into the overall treatment plan.
|
| 3 |
Article Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. 2001
Poiraudeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Flippo RM, Lioté F, Noël E, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fermanian J, Revel M, Rhumato R. · The Réseau Rhumato Group, Paris, France. · Osteoarthritis Cartilage. · Pubmed #11520171 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional scale in hand osteoarthritis (OA). BACKGROUND: The Cochin hand functional disability scale has been validated in rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Patients with hand OA according to Altman's criteria were included. Impairment outcome measures (VAS of pain, hand score of tenderness, clinical hand score of impairment, Kallman's radiographic scale), functional disability measures [Cochin scale, Revel's functional index (RFI), Dreiser's functional index (DFI)] and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded twice, at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up visit. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. Sensitivity to change was assessed using the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM), and the non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the correlation between quantitative variable changes and patient's overall opinion. RESULTS: 89 patients (8 males, mean age 63 years) were included. Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC=0.96). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Correlations of the Cochin scale score with RFI (r=0.86), DFI (r=0.87), VAS of handicap (r=0.67), VAS of pain (r=0.54), tenderness (r=0.51), clinical impairment (r=0.32), and Kallman's radiographic scale (r=0.13) indicated a good construct validity. Factor analysis extracted four main factors, accounting for 65% of the total variance. 51 patients were evaluated at the 6-month visit. The Cochin scale score had worsened with SRM and ES values of -0.26 and -0.17 respectively. Changes in the score had one of the highest correlation (r=0.47) with the patient's overall opinion. CONCLUSION: The Cochin hand functional disability scale which was first developed to assess the rheumatoid hand can be used to evaluate functional disability in hand OA.
|
|
|