Rheumatoid Arthritis: Morel J

Pham T, Fautrel B, Gottenberg JE, Goupille P, Hachulla E, Masson C, Morel J, Mouthon L, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Sibilia, Anonymous00011. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18708020 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Morel J, Berenbaum F. · Immunorheumatology Department and Inserm U454, CHU Lapeyronie Hospital, 371, avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier 5, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15589430 No free full text.

Abstract: Biotherapies and other new treatments introduced over the last few years have considerably enriched the therapeutic armamentarium for rheumatoid arthritis. Nevertheless, primary refractoriness or secondary escape phenomenon may occur, indicating a need for identifying new treatment targets. Promising candidates can be found among compounds involved in signal transduction pathways, most notably protein kinases (mitogen-activated protein kinase, MAPK and phosphatidylinositol-3 protein kinase, PI3) and transcription factors (nuclear factor kappa B, NF-kappaB; activating protein 1, AP-1; CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, C/EBP and signal transducer and activator of transcription, STAT). Inhibition of signal transduction pathways may be achievable via three main strategies: pharmacological inhibitors, anti-sense or more specific inhibitors such as oligionucleotides or interfering mRNA, and induced overexpression of naturally occurring inhibitors. Clinical trials are under way to evaluate pharmacological inhibitors such as p38 MAPK. Although the preliminary results are promising, proof of safety has not yet been obtained. Signal transduction pathways are involved in normal processes, whose inhibition might produce untoward effects.

Morel J, Combe B. · Department of Immunorheumatology, Hospital Lapeyronie, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5 and Inserm Unit 454, France. · Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15588975 No free full text.

Abstract: In early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the objectives of therapeutic strategies are to obtain remission and prevent joint destruction as early as possible. These goals may be reached with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with biological agents. In clinical practice, initial treatments are usually chosen according to the degree of disease activity at baseline, and adapted according to a step-up strategy. A more elegant therapeutic approach would be to choose the most appropriate treatment based on the prognosis of RA. Therefore, prognostic stratification could improve the relative roles and benefits of initial DMARD or biological therapy for early RA. For RA with a severe prognosis, a combination of DMARDs or biologicals could be initiated as the first-line therapy. However, we need to know how to predict outcome in early RA for this type of strategy. This review attempts to answer this question by reporting the most reliable prognostic factors and some predictive models proposed for classification into benign, mild and severe RA.

Bressolle F, Kinowski JM, Morel J, Pouly B, Sany J, Combe B. · Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique, Faculté de Pharmacie, CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10990220 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of repeated doses of folic acid on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We studied 20 patients (ages 30-78 years) who received MTX intramuscularly (10 mm/week). MTX was administered alone or after treatment with folic acid (5 mg tablet once daily) for 13 days. Plasma samples were collected 2 and 8 h after dose intake. MTX concentrations in plasma and ultrafiltrate samples were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. A Bayesian approach was used to determine individual MTX pharmacokinetic variables to minimize the number of samples collected. RESULTS: Folic acid supplementation led to reduced plasma MTX levels 2 and 8 h after MTX administration and reduced area under the plasma MTX concentration versus time curve (AUC) (about 20%; p < 0.02). Total clearance of MTX and Vd were higher when patients were also receiving folic acid than when they were taking MTX alone (p < 0.02). The plasma protein binding of MTX remains unchanged. CONCLUSION: The lower plasma MTX concentrations in patients taking folic acid supplements could be interpreted as increased cellular uptake of MTX; the folic acid supplements would promote the sequestering of MTX intracellularly. The decrease of MTX concentrations leads to reduced AUC; it is also possible that there are reduced AUC combined with increased intracellular folate levels. These results reopen the question of whether folic acid should be used immediately in all patients when MTX is begun.

Pham T, Claudepierre P, Constantin A, Fautrel B, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Goupille P, Hachulla E, Masson C, Morel J, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Sibilia J. · Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Conception, Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19560051 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To elaborate a how-to-use abatacept material intended to help physicians in the management of patients with inflammatory diseases treated with this drug in routine practice. METHODS: 1) Selection of the relevant domains by a rheumatologists' panel; 2) Search for published evidence in each domain; 3) Elaboration of the clinical tool guide with a 3-level gradation of evidence (evidence-based medicine EBM, official recommendations and expert's opinion). The experts were 11 academic rheumatologists with a large experience in prescribing abatacept and in managing rheumatoid arthritis. They were all members of the CRI (Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation), a section of the French Rheumatology Society dedicated to the inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Each fact sheet was reviewed by two other experts; 4) Regular updating based on medical literature and postmarketing surveillance data. RESULTS: Four domains were considered relevant: abatacept contraindications, management of side effects or associated diseases appearing during abatacept treatment, management of "practical situations" such as surgery or pregnancy, physician and patient information. After the literature analysis and discussion during an experts' meeting, a consensus was reached on: a pre-treatment checklist aimed at searching abatacept contraindications; a what-to-do document when facing side effects or associated diseases (autoimmune pathology, bacterial or viral infections, cardiovascular diseases, intolerance to abatacept, solid or haematological malignancy) or "practical situations" (surgery, pregnancy, vaccination, travel, drug-drug interactions); an example of standard information letter to be addressed to the attending physician (rheumatologist and general practitioner); an example of standard information letter to be addressed to the patient. CONCLUSION: Based on both an EBM approach and an expert's opinion approach, this abatacept clinical tool guide should provide assistance to all physicians attending patients treated with abatacept. For a better implementation in clinical practice, this tool guide will be available online at www.cri-net.com and regularly updated.

Figueiredo IT, Morel J, Sany J, Combe B. · Department of Immuno-Rheumatology, Teaching Hospital Lapeyronie, and University of Montpellier 1, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18328142 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the maintenance, tolerability and safety of infliximab in an unselected cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two RA patients receiving at least one course of infliximab between 2000 and 2003 were included in this study. Response to treatment and safety were assessed through recording adverse events, physical examinations and standard laboratory tests. The dosage of infliximab was patient specifically modified, when therapeutic response was judged inadequate by the assessment of a physician. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 401 days (85-1221). One hundred and twenty-two patients (78%) continued to receive infliximab after one year. 40 patients (26.3%) stopped infliximab therapy: 14 (9.2%) for inefficacy, 21 (13.8%) for adverse events. Fifty nine patients (38.8%) required an increase of the dosage (n=23, 15%) or a shortening of the interval between the infusions (n=20, 13.2%), or both (n=16, 10.5%) for symptomatic control. Infliximab discontinuation tended to be more frequent in smokers (p=0.055). Ninety-four patients (62%) reported at least one adverse event during the study: 64 infections (43%), 35 infusion reaction events (23%) which led to a discontinuation for 10 patients. Infusion reactions were more frequent in patients with a history of allergy. Three cases of tuberculosis and 1 breast carcinoma were reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Adjustments in the treatment of RA patients treated with recommended doses of infliximab were common (38.8% of the treated patients). Furthermore, the observed rate of infections (43%), including three cases of tuberculosis, should alert physicians to be vigilant in the routine care of patients treated with infliximab.

Audo R, Deschamps V, Hahne M, Combe B, Morel J. · Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, 1919 route de Mende, CNRS UMR5535, Montpellier, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #18076767 links to  free full text

Abstract: Synovial hyperplasia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with apoptosis deficiency of RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs). Celecoxib is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that has been demonstrated to induce apoptosis in some cellular systems. We have therefore examined the dose- and time-dependent effects of celecoxib on RA FLS viability. Treatment of RA FLSs with celecoxib for 24 hours reduced their viability in a dose-dependent manner. Analysis of celecoxib-treated RA FLSs for their content of apoptotic and necrotic cells by Annexin V staining and TO-PRO-3 uptake displayed only few apoptotic cells. Caspase 3, a key mediator of apoptosis, was not activated in celecoxib-treated RA FLSs, and the presence of specific caspase 3 or pan-caspase inhibitors did not affect celecoxib-induced cell death. Moreover, we could not detect other signs of apoptosis, such as cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, caspase 8 or 9, or DNA fragmentation. We therefore conclude that apoptosis is not the major death pathway in celecoxib-treated RA FLSs.

Morel J, Deschamps V, Toussirot E, Pertuiset E, Sordet C, Kieffer P, Berthelot JM, Champagne H, Mariette X, Combe B. · Department of Immuno-Rheumatology, Montpellier I University and Lapeyronie Teaching Hospital, 34295 Montpellier, Cedex 5 France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17604284 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To date, only a few series of patients with paraneoplastic arthritis have been published. The charts of patients with cancer-associated arthritis were collected in order to describe characteristics of this rheumatism. METHODS: A questionnaire was created for this study and validated by experts based on specific criteria of inclusion and exclusion. Histology of neoplasia was included. RESULTS: In all, 16 males and 10 females with a mean (range) age of 57.5 years (28-85) were recruited from 17 nationwide centres in France. Patients presented with symmetric polyarthritis involving wrists and hands (85%) and extra-articular symptoms were frequent (84%). There was no specific biologic or radiographic feature. The mean (range) delay between the diagnosis of rheumatism and neoplasia was 3.6 months (0-21.2). Tumours were usually diagnosed after articular symptoms occurred (88.5%). Twenty patients had a solid cancer, and six a haematological malignancy. Adenocarcinoma of the lungs was the most frequent type of solid cancer (60%). Tumours were diagnosed at an early stage, which may explain the good median survival of 1.21 years (range 0.64-present) with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years (range 0.16-10). The percentage of articular symptoms resolution was significantly higher in patients with solid tumours, as compared to patients with haemopathy (p = 0.007). In cases of tumour relapse, rheumatic symptoms did not recur for 75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Underlying neoplasia should be considered in male patients with new onset polyarthritis, smokers, and particularly in patients chronically ill. Additional investigations should then be performed to diagnose cancer at an early stage.

Fautrel B, Constantin A, Morel J, Vittecoq O, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Dougados M, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Pham T, Puéchal X, Sibilia J, Soubrier M, Ravaud P, Anonymous00369. · Service de Rhumatologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, UFR de Médecine, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie-Paris-VI, 83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16798046 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for TNFalpha-antagonist therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, under the aegis of the French Society for Rheumatology. METHOD: We used the methods recommended by the French Agency for Healthcare Accreditation and Evaluation, the AGREE collaboration, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR). The recommendations focus on patient selection, monitoring, and treatment adjustments. RESULTS: Criteria for selecting patients eligible for TNFalpha-antagonist treatment of RA include: 1) a definitive diagnosis of RA; 2) disease activity for longer than 1 month, including presence of objective signs of inflammation; or radiographic progression; 3) previous failure of methotrexate in the highest tolerated dosage or of another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with contraindications to methotrexate; 4) absence of contraindications to TNFalpha-antagonist therapy. When starting TNFalpha-antagonist therapy 1) a thorough baseline evaluation should be conducted; 2) any of the three available agents can be used, as no differences in efficacy have been identified in patient populations; 3) concomitant methotrexate therapy is recommended regardless of the TNFalpha antagonist used; and 4) patients should receive standardized follow-up at regular intervals. Treatment adjustments should be based on the following: 1) the treatment objective is achievement of a EULAR response; 2) when such a response is not achieved, the dosage or dosing interval can be changed, or the patient can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist; 3) in patients who experience intolerance to a TNFalpha antagonist, another TNFalpha antagonist may be tried, depending on the nature of the adverse event; 4) occurrence of a remission should lead to a reduction in symptomatic medications, most notably glucocorticoids where used; in the event of a prolonged remission, either the TNFalpha antagonist or the concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drug may be reduced. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are intended to help physicians use TNFalpha antagonists in their everyday practice with RA patients. They do not constitute regulations.

Morel J, Combe B. · Service d'immuno-rhumatologie, centre hospitalier universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier. · Rev Prat. · Pubmed #16729550 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Lesnik A, Bolivar J, Morel J, Taourel P. · Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier 34295, France. · AJR Am J Roentgenol. · Pubmed #16714678 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Morel J, Audo R, Hahne M, Combe B. · INSERM Unit 454, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Arnaud de Villeneuve, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, 34295 Montpellier, France. · J Biol Chem. · Pubmed #15684417 links to  free full text

Abstract: A hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the pseudo-tumoral expansion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs), and the RA FLS has therefore been proposed as a therapeutic target. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been described as a pro-apoptotic factor on RA FLSs and, therefore, suggested as a potential drug. Here we report that exposure to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a portion (up to 30%) of RA FLSs within the first 24 h. In the cells that survived, TRAIL induced RA FLS proliferation in a dose-dependent manner, with maximal proliferation observed at 0.25 nm. This was blocked by a neutralizing anti-TRAIL antibody. RA FLSs were found to express constitutively TRAIL receptors 1 and 2 (TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2) on the cell surface. TRAIL-R2 appears to be the main mediator of TRAIL-induced stimulation, as RA FLS proliferation induced by an agonistic anti-TRAIL-R2 antibody was comparable with that induced by TRAIL. TRAIL activated the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK and p38, as well as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway with kinetics similar to those of TNF-alpha. Moreover, TRAIL-induced RA FLS proliferation was inhibited by the protein kinase inhibitors PD98059, SB203580, and LY294002, confirming the involvement of the ERK, p38, and PI3 kinase/Akt signaling pathways. This dual functionality of TRAIL in stimulating apoptosis and proliferation has important implications for its use in the treatment of RA.

Morel J, Roch-Bras F, Molinari N, Sany J, Eliaou JF, Combe B. · Department of Immuno-Rheumatology, Hospital Lapeyronie 34295, Montpellier cedex 5, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15547082 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HLA-DM alleles as markers for disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two distinct cohorts of patients with RA were oligotyped for HLA-DB1 and HLA-DM genes using PCR amplified genomic DNA with sequence specific oligonucleotide probes. Cohort 1 comprised 199 unselected patients with RA (mean (SD) age 45.5 (13.5) years; disease duration 11.9(8.8) years), whose disease severity was assessed using Larsen score on hand and foot radiographs. Cohort 2 comprised 95 patients with severe RA and 70 patients with benign RA according to the Larsen method. RESULTS: In cohort 1, after stratification according to DRB1 genotypes, patients positive for HLA-DMA*0103 and negative for HLA-DRB1*04 tended to have greater articular damage on hands and wrists (p = 0.07 by Mann-Whitney U test) and reached statistical significance for the Larsen score per year (p = 0.05). This association between HLA-DMA*0103 and articular damage was especially observed in patients with HLA-DRB1*01. Similarly, HLA-DMB*0104 positive patients had higher Larsen score on hands and wrists (p = 0.02). This association was even stronger in DRB1*04 positive patients (p = 0.005). In cohort 2, HLA-DMA*0103 was associated with severe RA in patients negative for HLA-DRB1*04 (OD = 5.4; p = 0.014). HLA-DMB*0104 allele frequency tended to be higher in patients with severe RA but without reaching significance. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating the role of HLA-DM genes in the severity of RA. Our results suggest that HLA-DMA*0103 and HLA-DMB*0104 alleles may represent new genetic markers of RA severity. The HLA-DMA*0103 allele tends to be associated with patients with RA negative for DRB1*04 and could predict a more severe form of disease especially in HLA-DRB1*01 positive patients. The HLA-DMB*0104 allele could have an additive effect in HLA-DRB1*04 patients. Combined determination of HLA-DM and HLA-DRB1 alleles could facilitate identification of patients likely to have a poor disease course.

Louis-Plence P, Kerlan-Candon S, Morel J, Combe B, Clot J, Pinet V, Eliaou JF. · Laboratoire d'Immunologie de Montpellier, Unité de Recherche Immunopathologie des Maladies Tumorales et Autoimmunes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 475, Montpellier, Cedex, France. · J Immunol. · Pubmed #11046010 links to  free full text

Abstract: HLA-DM molecule, a class II-like heterodimer, is a critical factor of HLA class II-dependent Ag presentation. It acts as a molecular chaperone and also functions as a peptide editor favoring the presentation of high-stability peptides. Thus, it appears to skew the peptide repertoire presented to T cells. Variation in HLA-DM expression has considerable effect on Ag presentation and regulation of these genes is likely to be a prerequisite to prevent autoimmunity. In this study, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was chosen as a model of human autoimmune disease since its genetic susceptibility is known to be associated with the HLA-DR and -DM components. We described a limited nucleotide polymorphism in the HLA-DM promoters with functional impact on basal transcriptional activity and IFN-gamma induction as assessed in vitro. However, no difference of allele frequencies was found between controls and RA patients. Despite of this lack of association, expression of HLA-DM molecules was also investigated. Interestingly, an underexpression of HLA-DM transcripts and protein was shown in peripheral blood B cells from RA patients compared with controls or inflammatory arthritis patients. This underexpression does not affect HLA-DR genes and is responsible for a decrease of the DM:DR ratio in RA patients. This specific HLA-DM down-regulation is likely to have important consequences on Ag presentation and could participate in the autoimmune process in RA.

Morel J, Legouffe MC, Bozonat MC, Sany J, Eliaou JF, Daurès JP, Combe B. · Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #10773968 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes in patients with onset within the last year of peripheral inflammatory arthritis that does not meet classification criteria for any specific disease. METHODS: Symptoms and laboratory tests were evaluated at baseline and 14 to 60 months later in 43 patients, 32 women and 11 men, with a mean age of 50 years. RESULTS: At baseline, a presumptive clinical diagnosis was made in 16 of the 43 patients. Diagnoses at last follow-up were undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in seven cases, mild rheumatoid arthritis in 18, psoriatic arthritis in two, Sjögren's syndrome in two, lupus in one, and paraneoplastic syndrome in one. The remaining 12 patients were free of inflammatory joint symptoms; three had symptoms of osteoarthritis and nine were asymptomatic. Factors present at baseline and predictive of progression to definite rheumatoid arthritis were a positive test for rheumatoid factor, presence of an HLA DRB1*04 allele, and a presumptive clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSION: 55% of our patients developed a specific inflammatory joint disease, and 42% developed rheumatoid arthritis, which was consistently mild. Resolution of all inflammatory joint symptoms occurred in 28% of cases. A number of clinical laboratory, and genetic findings of use for predicting the outcome of undifferentiated arthritis were identified.