Rheumatoid Arthritis: Merkesdal S

Merkesdal S, Zeidler H. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany. · Curr Rheumatol Rep. · Pubmed #16045826 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Mittendorf T, Zeidler H. · Hannover Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #15330726 No free full text.

Abstract: The current literature covering cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of biological treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are reviewed in order to discuss options and limitations for future application of these highly priced drugs in routine clinical practice. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios of the studies analysed are converted into the corresponding Euros of the publication year. Etanercept treatment achieved a cost-effectiveness ratio of 44,300 Euros (2002)/ACR 20 (20% response according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) and 43,100 Euros (2002)/ACR 70WR (ACR 70 weighted response) compared with sulfasalazine and methotrexate, respectively, in methotrexate-naive RA. In methotrexate-resistant RA, the combination of etanercept and methotrexate is compared to a combination therapy of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine revealing costs of 46,100 Euros (2000)/ACR 20, and 37,700 Euros/ACR 70WR. The cost-utility ratios for infliximab treatment range from 16,000 Euros to almost 166,000/QALY (quality adjusted life-year) gained, the studies investigating etanercept treatment show a ratio of approximately 25,000 Euros and 120,000/QALY gained. No substantial differences of cost-utilities of infliximab and etanercept were found. The administration of these drugs as third-line therapy is regarded cost-effective compared to other well-accepted therapies with comparable cost-utility ratios of < 50,000 Euros/QALY gained. Still, data on economic outcomes of RA trials are sparse and further cost-effectiveness and cost-utility evaluations are needed.

Zeidler H, Merkesdal S, Hülsemann JL. · Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #14969060 No free full text.

Abstract: Early arthritis is challenging because the clinical picture often does not allow a distinction between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), self-limiting disease, and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. In Germany the first early synovitis clinic and several inception cohorts of patients with early RA were initiated and evaluated during the 1980s and 1990s to learn more about diagnostic classification, psycho-social problems and socio-economical status including sick-leave, work loss, and indirect costs of patients with early arthritis and early RA. Unclassified arthritis was described as the most frequent diagnosis and the term "undifferentiated arthritis" was chosen to underline the heterogeneity of theses arthritides and the preliminary state of this classification as a working diagnosis. A large National Databank of the German Regional Collaborative Arthritis Centres has been established over the last 10 years. In total, there are some 170,000 cases in the database. Moreover, a prospective multicentre inception cohort of early RA of less than 1 year's disease duration has been started recently to evaluate parameters of potential relevance for the pathogenesis of RA and eventually for the prediction of erosive disease. Studies are in progress to test the diagnostic performance of specific antibodies and antibody patterns for RA. Another topic of research addresses the identification of bacterial DNA in synovial fluid and synovial tissues to improve the differentiation of patients with reactive arthritis from those with early RA and to narrow the working diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Mittendorf T, Mau W, Zeidler H. · Abteilung für Rheumatologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Carl-Neuberg Str. 1 30625 Hannover, Germany. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11974488 No free full text.

Abstract: Costs of illness are of major economic relevance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as in other chronic diseases. Overall costs of 15,000 Euro/year: 10,000 Euro indirect costs, and 5000 Euro direct costs are estimated, respectively. A further detailed analysis of direct costs underlines that inpatient care (50%) is the most prominent cost driver. Medication costs are also evaluated in detail since they are expected to gain importance with the introduction of the more expensive biologicals. While annual costs for regular disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) vary from 160 to 5000 Euro per patient, costs for the new biologicals amount up to 20,000 Euro (100-125% of the current estimated overall costs). For a comparison of different therapeutic strategies, costs are related to effectiveness in cost-effectiveness analyses. Based on present clinical trials, the ratios of medication costs and response according to the ACR 20-criteria of various DMARDs and biologicals are compared. The most cost-effective medication is sulfasalzine, followed by methotrexate, and leflunomide. Combining etanercept and methotrexate is preferable to methotrexate monotherapy and the combination of infliximab and methotrexate. This review shows that important economic issues in RA have already been addressed by applying cost-of-illness analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. However, the knowledge about cost-effective therapeutic options is still scarce. Thus, primary data will have to be obtained using standardized approaches. These economic findings can be taken into account in the development of disease-management recommendations for RA-therapy.

Ruof J, Merkesdal S, Huelsemann JL, Schoeffski O, Maetzel A, Mau W, Zeidler H. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Forschungsstelle Gesundheitsökonomie, Universität Hannover, Germany. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11296978 No free full text.

Abstract: We compared the major characteristics of internationally applied cost assessment instruments (CAI) in rheumatic conditions. Fifteen utilization questionnaires were identified and assessed using a structured approach. The forms differed considerably with respect to applied characteristics: length (3-113 items), recall period (between 1 week and 1 year), format (2 interview, 13 self-administered), response categories, cost units (physical vs monetary), and cost domains covered. While all included a gross assessment of outpatient and inpatient costs, the level of disaggregation differed. Only a few CAI included an assessment of other direct disease related costs (e.g., home remodeling or home health care services) and out-of-pocket expenditure. Productivity costs were included in all but 2 CAI. Efforts to further standardize the applied CAI should (1) be based on sound psychometric data, (2) define a required core set of cost domains covered, (3) discriminate between generic and relevant disease related cost components, and (4) examine the feasibility of developing international standards for cost data.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Huelsemann JL, Schoeffski O, Maetzel A, Mau W, Zeidler H. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Center for Health Economics, University of Hannover, Germany. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11296977 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of our study was to comprehensively review and critically appraise the cost domains used in economic evaluations of the rheumatic diseases and to use this information to propose standardization of cost domains. The literature search identified 210 abstracts, 32 of which included original cost data. The listed cost categories were grouped into 3 major areas: (direct) health care costs, other (direct) disease related costs, and productivity costs (indirect costs). The number of individual cost categories was reduced by considering the following criteria: (1) inclusion of all relevant cost domains; (2) avoidance of double counting; (3) summarizing of related categories under one representative heading; (4) feasibility of level of aggregation. After adjustment for synonymous labeling, 38 cost categories remained. The subsequent development of a classification scheme of cost categories led to a set of 19 separate cost domains including 7 outpatient, 3 inpatient, 6 other disease related, and 3 productivity cost domains. This literature review indicates that cost assessment in economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis lacks standardization. A preliminary scheme to categorize cost assessment in rheumatic conditions is presented. The adoption of standards for economic evaluation would greatly facilitate national and international comparisons.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Huelsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Handelmann S, Mau W, Zeidler H. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15818718 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To render information on the accuracy of patient-reported indirect cost data compared with payer-derived data of the real indirect costs on a patient-by-patient basis concerning disease-related productivity losses in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The assessment of indirect cost data was part of a clinical, multicenter, randomized RA trial. A total of 234 patients of working age with a diagnosis of RA (according to 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria) were recruited. Demographics of the cohort were mean age 53 years, mean disease duration 8 years, 76% were women, and all had membership in the regional statutory health insurance plan. Every 3 months corresponding indirect cost data were derived for the cohort from a health economic questionnaire for cost assessment in patients with RA and the payer's database over a period of 18 months. Comparative statistical analyses were performed between patient-reported and insurance claims data. RESULTS: The mean annual productivity losses due to sick leave amounted to 14 and 17 days per patient (questionnaire versus payer data), and productivity losses due to work disability amounted to 3 days (both); monetary valuation renders overall costs of 1,240 and 1,590, respectively. The difference of 17% in overall productivity losses is not significant. Comparison of productivity losses reveals a strong correlation of r = 0.83 in those due to sick leave and of kappa = 0.84 in those due to work disability between questionnaire and payer data. CONCLUSION: The comparison of questionnaire and payer data shows that RA patients report their productivity losses adequately. Indirect cost assessment should therefore be included in further RA trials and observational studies.

Ruof J, Hülsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Handelmann S, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Merkesdal S. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12759292 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic set of German cost data in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based solely on valid healthcare payer's cost data sources. METHODS: Retrospectively one year cost data of 338 patients with RA were generated and analysed. The cost data were derived from a major statutory health insurance plan ("Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Niedersachsen") and the regional physicians' association ("Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Niedersachsen"). The recently published matrix of cost domains in RA was applied to structure the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The total direct costs for the 338 patients during one year (third quarter 2000 to second quarter 2001) were euro 3815 per patient-year. RA related direct costs were euro 2312 per patient-year. Outpatient costs accounted for 73.7%, inpatient costs for 24.0%, and other disease related costs for 2.3% of RA related direct costs. Outpatients cost drivers were RA related drugs (euro 1019 per patient-year), physician visits (euro 323 per patient-year), diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and tests (euro 185 per patient-year), and devices and aids (euro;168 per patient-year). 98 patients were retired prematurely owing to RA related work disability and incurred costs of euro;8358 per retired patient-year. 96 patients were gainfully employed and incurred sick leave costs of euro 2835 per employed patient-year. CONCLUSION: Micro-costing based on healthcare payer's data provides a relatively conservative albeit highly accurate estimate of costs in RA. Both RA related and non-RA related costs must be taken into account. In gainfully employed patients and in patients who receive RA related retirement payments productivity costs exceed direct costs.

Bräuer W, Merkesdal S, Mau W. · Arbeitsgruppe Rheumaepidemiologie und Rehabilitation, Abteilung Rheumatologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. · Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. · Pubmed #11536074 No free full text.

Abstract: This study examines the applicability of the questionnaire "Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Kontrollüberzeugungen zu Krankheit und Gesundheit - KKG" to patients with early course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or undifferentiated Arthritis (uA), and the relationship between the severity of the disease and locus of control by controlling for socio-demographic variables and personality characteristics. 326 patients with early RA or uA with a disease duration of less than 12 months (mean disease duration 6 months +/- 3.5, mean age 53 +/- 14) were assessed. Full clinical investigations were performed and patients questionnaires were administered at the outset of the study (T1), after 12 months (T2) and after 24 months (T3). The factor-solution of the KKG-questionnaire in patients with early course of RA/uA is not different from healthy controls. A marked influence on coping types can be demonstrated for the covariates sex, age, cognitive components of anxiety and the severity of RA. These results should be considered in education programs for RA applying special techniques of behaviour therapy. Such interventions in the early phase of RA might lead to a reduction of cognitive anxiety and thus to more active coping in patients with RA.

Huscher D, Merkesdal S, Thiele K, Zeidler H, Schneider M, Zink A, Anonymous00022. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16540552 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the direct and indirect costs of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to evaluate the effect of sex, disease duration and functional status on the various cost domains. METHODS: Data of outpatients, aged 18-65, with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4351), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 827), PsA (n = 908) or SLE (n = 844), who were enrolled in the national database of the German collaborative arthritis centres in 2002, were analysed. Data on healthcare consumption, out-of-pocket expenses and productivity losses were derived from doctors and patients. For the calculation of indirect costs, the human capital approach (HCA) and the friction cost approach (FCA) were applied. RESULTS: Mean direct costs amounted to 4737 euros a year in rheumatoid arthritis, 3676 euros in ankylosing spondylitis, 3156 euros in PsA and 3191 euros in SLE. By using the HCA, total costs were calculated at 15,637 euros in rheumatoid arthritis, 13,513 euros in ankylosing spondylitis, 11,075 euros in PsA and 14,411 euros in SLE, whereas with the FCA the numbers were 7899 euros, 7204 euros, 5570 euros and 6518 euros, respectively. Costs increased with disease duration and were strongly dependent on functional status. In patients with the highest disability (<50% of full function), the total costs on applying the HCA were 34,915 euros in rheumatoid arthritis, 29,647 euros in alkylosing spondylitis, 37,440 euros in PsA and 32,296 euros in SLE. CONCLUSION: The costs of illness are high in all four diseases, with a strong effect of functional status on total costs. Indirect costs differ by the factor 3, based on whether the HCA or the FCA is used.

Merkesdal S, Huelsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Zeh S, Zeidler H, Ruof J. · Abt. Rheumatologie, Medizinische Hochschule, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16534538 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Identification of predictors for the productivity cost components: (1) sick leave, and (2) work disability in gainfully employed and (3) impaired household productivity in unemployed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the societal perspective.METHODS: Investigation of productivity costs was linked to a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of clinical quality management in 338 patients with RA. The productivity losses were assessed according to the German Guidelines on Health Economic Evaluation. By means of multivariate logistic regression analyses, predictors of sick leave, work disability (employed patients, n=96), and for days confined to bed in unemployed patient (n=242) were determined.RESULTS: Mean annual costs of 970 EUR arose per person taking into consideration all patients (453 EUR sick leave, 63 EUR work disability, 454 EUR impaired productivity of unemployed patients). Disease activity, disease severity, and impaired physical function were global predictors for all of the cost components investigated. Sick leave costs were predicted by prior sick leave periods and the vocational status blue collar worker, work disability costs by sociodemographic variables (marital status, schooling), and the productivity costs of unemployed patients by impaired mental health and impaired physical functions.CONCLUSIONS: Interventions such as reduction in disease progression and control of disease activity, early vocational rehabilitation measures and vocational retraining in patients at risk of quitting working life, and self-management programs to learn coping strategies might decrease future RA-related productivity costs.

Mittendorf T, Merkesdal S, Zeidler H, Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Ruof J. · Forschungsstelle für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universität, Hannover. · Med Klin (Munich). · Pubmed #15902379 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In 2000, the Regional Cooperative Center for Rheumatic Conditions in Hannover, Germany, initiated a project to introduce and evaluate a case-based clinical quality management system to enhance the quality of care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Building on that, it was possible to combine all resource uses, as paid by the sickness funds, including those in ambulatory care. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to reach average "per-visit prices" for single physician visits, not only for rheumatologists, but also for other specialists as well as generalists. Those visits all had to be connected to the rheumatic condition of the patients. All ambulatory care visits for 1 year (2001) were evaluated. RESULTS: Due to the high number of physician visits of the 338 patients with clinically assured rheumatoid arthritis included in the study (rheumatologist visits 4,488, generalist visits 3,901), statistically significant subgroups could be built. The average costs per visit associated with rheumatoid arthritis are: rheumatologist euro 22.71; generalist euro 8.02; as well as other specialties ranging from euro 5.81 to euro 19.48. The low price for generalists care is due to the selection of the cohort, as all patients are under constant specialist care. The prices were further broken down to certain subgroups of care. CONCLUSION: The prices are calculated under the premises that no budgetary constraints apply to ambulatory care. This is not the reality in Germany. Hence, looking at the average frequency of rheumatologist visits in this cohort (13.2/year), the conclusion has to be that not all rheumatologic ambulatory care is being covered by the reimbursement system within the Statutory Health Insurance in Germany.

Hülsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Merkesdal S, Handelmann S, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Ruof J. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Hannover, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15800007 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine rheumatoid arthritis related out of pocket expenditure (OOPE) in Germany and to disaggregate the total OOPE into contributing cost domains. METHODS: Data for the cost analysis were drawn from a multicentre randomised controlled prospective trial to assess the effectiveness of clinical quality management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both payer sources and patient cost questionnaires were used to generate health care utilisation data. All cost domains of a recently published matrix were reviewed and potential sources of OOPE were determined. Health care utilisation data were developed throughout 2001. Co-payment regulations as per January 2004 were applied in order to indicate the most recent level of OOPE in Germany. Data were analysed in both physical and monetary units using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In all, 136 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included. Mean total OOPE per patient and year was 417.20 Euro (SEM 38.8, median 271.2). OOPE accounted for 15.3% of the total direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis. Total OOPE were further subdivided into cost domains: "non-physician service utilisation"' (194.40 Euro per patient and year; SEM 24.2), "medication" (99.00 Euro; 6.1), "transportation" (56.20 Euro; 17.4), "visits to physicians" (38.40 Euro; 0.6), "hospital facilities" (24.00 Euro; 5.6), and "devices and aids" (5.10 Euro; 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with substantial OOPE, imposing a considerable economic burden for patients. OOPE contribute significantly to the total health care expenditure in rheumatoid arthritis. The patient perspective has to be taken into account when calculating the overall direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis from a societal point of view.

Mittendorf T, Merkesdal S, Huelsemann JL, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Ruof J. · Center for Health Economics, University of Hanover, Hanover, Germany. · Eur J Health Econ. · Pubmed #15609168 No free full text.

Abstract: We present a matrix of relevant resource utilization domains for use in standardizing applied cost assessment in musculoskeletal conditions. In addition,we highlight the importance of selecting cost categories during the development of an economic evaluation. A set of four steps was applied: (a) literature search identifying economic evaluations in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis, (b) listing and aggregation of cost categories mentioned in the identified articles, (c) development of a matrix of resource utilization domains, and (d) qualitative discussion regarding the generalizability of the matrix to other musculoskeletal conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. We examined 41 full-length articles (25 cost-of-illness studies or cost-comparisons, 14 cost-effectiveness analyses, and 2 cost-utility analyses), of which 16 studies focused on osteoarthritis and 25 on osteoporosis. The reviewed studies used a total of 151 different cost categories which, after adjustment for synonymous labeling, made up 34 cost categories. A matrix of 16 separate resource utilization domains was developed including seven outpatient, three inpatient, four other disease-related, and two productivity cost domains. We found that cost assessment in economic evaluation in the key musculo-skeletal diseases (osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis) is performed rather inhomogeneously. A generalized matrix of applicable resource utilization domains and a flowchart facilitating the development of appropriate resource utilization data have been developed.

Ruof J, Hülsemann JL, Mittendorf T, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Merkesdal S. · Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15517297 No free full text.

Abstract: Cost-of-illness studies in rheumatic conditions show an enormous variability in reported costs. Reasons are-among others-a lack of standardization with regards to relevant cost domains and the utilization of various insufficiently validated costing sources. A flow scheme is presented which may serve as a systematic basis for a valid costing analysis. The scheme includes: i) Selection of relevant cost domains. A comprehensive matrix of cost domains may be used as a framework. According to the specific aims of any costing study individual domains might be selected. ii) An adequate level of detail has to be determined taking into account factors such as the validity of the data collection and the feasibility. iii) Appropriate objective (i. e. usage of administrative data) or subjective (i. e. patient-derived) data sources have to be identified under consideration of respective strengths and weaknesses. While administrative sources provide a valid access to costing data accessibility and feasibility are important advantages of patient-derived costing procedures. iv) During data collection the potential bias due to protocol-driven costs and the differentiation of disease-related from other health care costs should be considered. v) The data analysis should support a transparent presentation of the costing data both in physical and monetary units. In summary, no 'gold standard' has been established for costing studies yet. However, valid costing approaches might follow the flow scheme presented in this analysis.

Ruof J, Huelsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Handelmann S, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Aultman R, Merkesdal S. · Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15478161 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of detail required in self-reported health care utilization questionnaires for administration to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A preliminary questionnaire was developed on the basis of existing tools for use in rheumatic conditions and in-depth interviews with 10 RA patients. Data gathered over 1 year of administration in a clinical setting were then matched to a comprehensive database of payer-reported information. Kappa statistics were calculated for each health care utilization domain. For domains where disaggregation into metric data was potentially preferable, histograms of difference were assessed visually and the strength of association examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Patients (n = 136) included in the base case analysis determined the preferred levels of detail for each domain. Physician visits: occurrence of physician visits (yes/no; kappa not applicable) and their number (r = 0.42, P < 0.001). Medication use of the following drug classes (yes/no): disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD; kappa = 0.68), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (kappa = 0.64), osteoporosis medication (kappa = 0.56), analgesic (kappa = 0.38), and steroid (kappa = 0.83). Further disaggregation into different DMARD classes was recommended (kappa ranging between 1 [use of biologics: yes/no] and 0.67 [use of azathioprine: yes/no]. Imaging: imaging of bones and chest (yes/no; kappa = 0.20). Hospitalization: inpatient episodes (yes/no; kappa = 0.64) and number of inpatient days (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). Transport: costs incurred (yes/no; kappa = 0.13) and amount (r = 0.39, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of highly aggregated items to assess health care utilization in RA is supported. Dichotomous assessment (yes/no) was the preferred level of detail for items in the domains covering medication and diagnostic procedures or tests. Metric data is appropriate in 3 areas: number of physician visits, number of inpatient days, and total expenditure on transportation.

Ruof J, Hülsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Handelmann S, Aultman R, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Merkesdal S. · Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. · Eur J Health Econ. · Pubmed #15452767 No free full text.

Abstract: Accurate estimation of medical care costs raises a host of challenging issues. We examined whether pure administrative claims data without clinical validation of diagnosis allow reasonable estimation of disease-related costs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Three patient groups were examined: patients with clinically confirmed RA (group A, n=338), patients with likely RA (administrative claims data reported the diagnosis of RA and patients were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, DMARDs; group B, n=303), and patients with possible RA (same as group B but patients had no DMARD treatment; group C, n=685). The payer's perspective was taken for this analysis. Only direct costs were included in the analysis. Cost data and data for several covariates were obtained from a major German statutory health insurance plan, the AOK Niedersachsen. A patient-per-patient microcosting approach was performed. A repeated measures, fixed effects model was applied to examine differences between the three study groups. Mean+/-SEM annual RA-related direct costs were euro 2,017+/-183 per patient-year in group A, euro 1,763+/-192 in group B, and euro 805+/-58 in group C. Outpatient (inpatient) costs were euro 1,636 (328) in group A, euro 1344 (340) in group B, and euro 546 (136) in group C. DMARD costs were by far the single most important cost driver in groups A and B. The difference in total RA-related direct cost between groups A and B was not significant whereas the differences between groups A and C (group B and C respectively), were significant. Pure administrative claims data allowed for an accurate estimate of disease-related costs in RA patients that received DMARD therapy. However, the high number of patients for whom administrative claims data listed the diagnosis RA, but no DMARD treatment was given poses a challenge for further research.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J. · Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Abt. Rheumatologie, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12491120 No free full text.

Abstract: Facing increasing health-related costs and limited health care resources, the assessment of cost effectiveness (CE) of medical procedures is also gaining considerable importance in the field of rheumatology. Since high annual therapy costs of 17,000-21,000 Euro are related to the employment of TNF-alpha blocking agents such as etanercept and infliximab (compared to annual costs of 350-5000 Euro of other disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)), their CE has become an important issue. The present investigation summarizes economic evaluations of cost and effectiveness of TNF-alpha blocking agents and compares the results to those of traditional DMARD therapies in patients with RA. The implications of these economic results on the further use of TNF-alpha blocking drugs and methodological improvements of their economic evaluation are discussed. The current literature provides evidence for the CE of the combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and sulfasalazine (SASP). In comparison to this finding, the use of etanercept and MTX yields much higher costs, although the highest rate of ACR20 responses is achieved by this combination (additional costs of $42,000 per ACR20 response compared to combination of MTX, HCQ, and SASP). Two recent studies show more promising results of about $12,000/QUALY and even cost savings per QUALY administering etanercept and infliximab, respectively. The wide range of the CE ratios is mainly explained by different methodological approaches. Whether the wider employment of TNF-alpha blocking drugs (comprising not only selected patients) proves to be economically effective, remains to be investigated by further economic analyses. In contrast to the initial disappointing results of the comparison of established DMARD therapies and TNF-alpha blocking drugs in terms of CE, recently published data renders evidence that the CE of the TNF-alpha blocking drugs is comparable to other accepted therapies in internal medicine.

Bräuer W, Merkesdal S, Mau W. · Abt. Rheumatologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1 30623 Hannover, Germany. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12426848 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Work disability (WD) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been extensively evaluated in Germany. Therefore, the occurrence of WD pension within the first seven years of RA and prognostic indicators of the first year including the duration of sick leave (SL) were analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the first year of RA according to the ACR 1987 criteria, 141 gainfully employed patients were entered into a prospective multicenter study (61% females, mean age 47 +/- 9 years, mean disease duration 6 +/- 3.5 months). One hundred and ten patients (78%) participated in a reevaluation (postal questionnaire) after a mean follow-up of 6.1 +/- 0.4 years. Predictors of WD pension were identified in univariate analyses and in backward multivariate Cox regression analyses (p < 0.05) with Hazard-ratios [H-R] as measures of WD risk. RESULTS: Of 110 patients 53 (48%) were still employed at reexamination. WD due to RA occurred in 5% after one year disease duration, in 15% after 2 years, in 20% after 3 years, and in 28% after 6.5 years. Other reasons for leaving the labor force were found in 24%. High pain intensity, radiographic erosions, comorbidity and the pain behavior of avoidance were associated with WD only in univariate analyses. Age > 45 years [H-R 6.3] and the following job-related prognostic indicators were identified in the multivariate analyses: working under pressure of time [H-R 9.0], limited joint motion interferring with job tasks [H-R 5.9], feeling overworked [H-R 3.8] and work status (unskilled blue-collar workers vs white-collar professionals and self-employed persons) [H-R 3.4]. In an alternative final Cox-regression model the variables feeling overworked and work status were replaced by SL duration > 8 weeks within the first year of RA [H-R 7.1]. CONCLUSIONS: Since WD frequently occurs already within the first 3 years (20%) adequate interventions resulting from the prognostic indicators have to begin early in the course of RA. Apart from the rheumatological treatment and rehabilitation focusing on the reduction of pain, improved coping with pain, reduced joint destruction and improved mobility particularly working under pressure of time should be avoided and the work place has to be adjusted in case of limited joint motion interferring with job tasks. SL of several weeks duration already within the first year of RA is a red flag for impending WD.

Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Schöffski O, Bernitt K, Zeidler H, Mau W. · Hannover Medical School, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11263766 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate 1) the magnitude of indirect costs, 2) changes in cost components, and 3) correlations between changes in cost and social, clinical, and occupational variables within the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We evaluated the indirect costs per person-year in 133 consecutive gainfully employed out-patients with early RA, in a prospective multicenter followup study. Costs due to RA-related sick leave, work disability, and other work loss were assessed using the human capital approach. Variables associated with reduction in lost productivity were tested by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM annual indirect costs were $11,750 +/- 1,120 per person. During the 3-year period of observation, a marked reduction in the costs associated with sick leave was seen, which exceeded the increase in costs due to work disability and other work loss. This phenomenon resulted in an overall reduction in indirect costs of 21%. The final logistic regression model of reduced loss of productivity included 3 variables: no problems with standing (odds ratio [OR] 7.1), no problems with working speed (OR 4.1), and no problems with outdoor work (OR 3.1). CONCLUSION: High indirect costs in early RA were demonstrated. An overall decrease of costs can be seen in the first 3 years, due to the reduction in sick leave. Since the absence of problems due to strenuous working conditions was found to be associated with a reduction in indirect costs, it is assumed that early intensified vocational rehabilitation, apart from controlling disease activity by adequate treatment, might help to reduce indirect costs.