Rheumatoid Arthritis: Massarotti E

Doan T, Massarotti E. · Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA. · Drugs Today (Barc). · Pubmed #16474854 No free full text.

Abstract: Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 molecule on the B-cell surface. It is the first antibody of its kind to be licensed for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Rituximab was found to be effective, well-tolerated and has a good safety profile, though its precise cellular effects are still not well understood. Rituximab has been shown to be of therapeutic benefit in various autoimmune diseases in which B lymphocytes play a role. This article summarizes the current literature regarding the use of rituximab in lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and other selected autoimmune diseases.

Doan T, Massarotti E. · Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA. · J Clin Pharmacol. · Pubmed #15951465 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by symmetric inflammation of synovial joints leading to progressive erosion of cartilage and bone. The aim of treatment is to mitigate joint destruction, preserve function, and prevent disability. The American College of Rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of RA recommend that newly diagnosed patients with RA begin treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) within 3 months of diagnosis. Methotrexate remains the most commonly prescribed DMARD and is the standard by which recent new and emerging therapies are measured. Increasing knowledge regarding the immunologic basis of RA and advances in biotechnology have resulted in new, targeted biological therapies against proinflammatory cytokines that have dramatically changed the treatment paradigm and outcomes of patients with RA. This article reviews the pharmacological rationale underlying RA therapy, with a focus on currently available biological therapies and new therapies in development.

Vera-Llonch M, Massarotti E, Wolfe F, Shadick N, Westhovens R, Sofrygin O, Maclean R, Yuan Y, Oster G. · Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA 02445, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18356179 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: We developed a simulation model to depict progression of disability [in terms of the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] in women aged 55-64 yrs with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX. At model entry, patients were assumed to receive either only MTX or MTX plus abatacept. Patients were then tracked from model entry until death. Future health-state utilities and medical-care costs (except study therapy) were estimated based on predicted values of the HAQ-DI. The model was estimated using data from a Phase III clinical trial of abatacept plus various secondary sources. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost (2006 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over alternatively 10 yrs and a lifetime. Costs and health effects were both discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Over 10 yrs, abatacept would yield 1.2 additional QALYs (undiscounted) per patient (4.6 vs 3.4 for MTX) at an incremental (discounted) cost of $51,426 ($103,601 vs $52,175, respectively); over a lifetime, corresponding figures were 2.0 QALYS (6.8 vs 4.8) and $67,757 ($147,853 vs $80,096). Cost-effectiveness was [mean (95% CI)] $47,910 ($44,641, $52,136) per QALY gained over 10 yrs and $43,041 ($39,070, $46,725) per QALY gained over a lifetime. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Abatacept is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX.

Vera-Llonch M, Massarotti E, Wolfe F, Shadick N, Westhovens R, Sofrygin O, Maclean R, Li T, Oster G. · From Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA 02445, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18634164 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists (anti-TNF). METHODS: We developed a simulation model to depict progression of disability [in terms of Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] in women aged 55-64 years with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to anti-TNF. At model entry, patients were assumed to receive either oral disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) only or oral DMARD plus abatacept. Patients were then tracked from model entry until death. Future health-state utilities and medical-care costs (except study therapy) were estimated based on predicted values of the HAQ-DI. The model was estimated using data from a Phase III clinical trial of abatacept plus secondary sources. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost (2006 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained alternatively over 10 years and a lifetime. Future costs and health effects were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Over 10 years, abatacept would yield 1.0 additional QALY (undiscounted) per patient (4.0 vs 3.0 for oral DMARD) at an incremental (discounted) cost of $45,497 (100,648 vs $55,151) respectively; over a lifetime, corresponding figures were 1.6 QALY (5.8 vs 4.2) and $64,978 ($140,714 vs $82,489). Cost-effectiveness was [mean (95% CI)] $50,576 ($47,056, $54,944) per QALY gained over 10 years, and $45,979 ($42,678, $49,932) per QALY gained over a lifetime. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Abatacept is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to an anti-TNF.

Lee HS, Irigoyen P, Kern M, Lee A, Batliwalla F, Khalili H, Wolfe F, Lum RF, Massarotti E, Weisman M, Bombardier C, Karlson EW, Criswell LA, Vlietinck R, Gregersen PK. · Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset, New York 11030, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17530703 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Recently, Swedish members of the Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (EIRA) provided evidence that smoking may trigger RA-specific immune reactions to citrullinated protein in carriers of HLA-DR shared epitope alleles. In an effort to confirm this interaction between smoking and shared epitope alleles, we performed a case-only analysis of 3 North American RA cohorts. METHODS: A total of 2,476 white patients with RA were studied, 1,105 from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) family collection, 753 from the National Inception Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (Inception Cohort), and 618 from the Study of New Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (SONORA). All patients were HLA-DRB1 typed, and tested for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor. Information about smoking history was obtained by questionnaire. RESULTS: A significant association was found between smoking and the presence of anti-CCP in the NARAC and the Inception Cohort, but not in the SONORA. The shared epitope alleles consistently correlated with anti-CCP in all 3 populations. Using multiple logistic regression analyses, shared epitope alleles were still the most significant risk factor for anti-CCP positivity. Weak evidence of gene-environment interaction between smoking and shared epitope alleles for anti-CCP formation was found only in the NARAC. CONCLUSION: Unlike the EIRA data, we could not confirm a major gene-environment interaction for anti-CCP formation between shared epitope alleles and smoking in 3 North American RA cohorts. Our data indicate a need for further studies to address the full range of environmental factors other than smoking that may be associated with citrullination and RA.

Irigoyen P, Lee AT, Wener MH, Li W, Kern M, Batliwalla F, Lum RF, Massarotti E, Weisman M, Bombardier C, Remmers EF, Kastner DL, Seldin MF, Criswell LA, Gregersen PK. · North Shore-Long Island Jewish Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York 11030, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16320316 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between HLA-DRB1 alleles and the production of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied 1,723 Caucasian RA patients enrolled in the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) family cohort and the Study of New Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (SONORA) cohort. All patients were tested for anti-CCP antibodies (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), RF (by nephelometry), and HLA-DR genotype (by polymerase chain reaction and sequence-specific oligonucleotide hybridization). RESULTS: When controlled for the presence of RF, anti-CCP positivity was strongly associated with the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE). In RF+ patients, the presence of the SE was very significantly associated with anti-CCP positivity, with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.8 and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 4.1-8.3. This relationship was also seen in RF- patients (OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.8-5.3]). In contrast, RF positivity was not significantly associated with presence of the SE independently of anti-CCP antibodies. Strikingly, HLA-DRB1*03 was strongly associated with reduced anti-CCP titers, even after controlling for the presence of the SE and restricting the analysis to anti-CCP+ patients. HLA-DR3 was also associated with anti-CCP- RA in our population. CONCLUSION: The HLA-DRB1 SE is strongly associated with the production of anti-CCP antibodies, but not RF. In contrast, HLA-DR3 alleles are associated with anti-CCP- disease and with lower levels of anti-CCP antibodies, even when controlling for the SE. These data emphasize the complexity of the genetic effects of the major histocompatibility complex on the RA phenotype.

Ollendorf DA, Massarotti E, Birbara C, Burgess SM. · PharMetrics Inc., 311 Arsenal St., Watertown, MA 02472, USA. · J Manag Care Pharm. · Pubmed #15934797 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine dosing patterns and costs among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients newly treated with infliximab in a large national health care claims database. METHODS: Using data from a proprietary database of pharmacy and medical claims for 75 U.S. health plans, RA patients newly treated with infliximab between June 2000 and June 2002 were selected and assigned an .index date. based on the first infusion. A pretreatment period of 6 months was created; patients were also followed for a minimum of 6 months after the initial infusion. Follow-up was allowed to vary beyond this minimum 6 months in order to preserve all available patient data. A maintenance number of infliximab vials was determined as of the second infusion; patients with 1 subsequent increase in vials used or 2 intervals between infusions of <49 days were considered to have had an upward dose adjustment. Differences (i.e., between those with upward dose adjustment and those with no upward dose) in patient characteristics were examined using descriptive statistics. In addition, time to upward dose adjustment and factors influencing its likelihood were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards techniques. Finally, differences in RA-related and unrelated costs (medication, outpatient, inpatient, and total, expressed in 2003 dollars) were examined using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and were also stratified by a number of patient characteristics found to differ between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,236 patients met all study entry criteria and were included in these analyses. One or more upward dose adjustments were experienced by 61.7% (N=762) of patients during an average of 15 months of follow-up (median =13 months, range=6 to 31 months). The majority (63.3%) of upward dose adjustments were due to increases in the number of billed vials. Median time to upward dose adjustment was 254 days and declined steadily based on year of initiation (from 330 days in 2000 to 224 days in 2002). Factors significantly influencing upward dose adjustment included pretreatment use of leflunomide, comorbid Crohn.s disease, and pretreatment liver function testing. During followup, patients in the upward dose adjustment group used a mean (SD) of 30.28 (20.90) vials of infliximab, compared with 15.90 (14.28) among those not adjusting dose (P<0.001). Annualized (i.e., standardized to a 365-day rate) RA-related costs were higher by more than 50% among patients with upward dose adjustment (SD $22,283 [$20,517] versus $14,425 [$10,828] for those without upward dose adjustment; P<0.001); differences were driven almost entirely by the costs of infliximab itself ($16,336 [$9,490] versus $9,573 [$6,790], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of managed care members with RA, upward dose adjustment with infliximab was frequent and appeared to occur earlier in the drug therapy in 2002 compared with 2000. Upward dose adjustment was associated with significant increases in drug treatment costs; therefore, payers and providers should consider the impact of current dosing trends when monitoring the use of biologics for autoimmune diseases.