Rheumatoid Arthritis: Maillefert JF

Maillefert JF. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16563844 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Jorgensen C, Maillefert JF. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #10773963 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Fromont A, De Seze J, Fleury MC, Maillefert JF, Moreau T. · Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Dijon, 21000 Dijon, France. · Cytokine. · Pubmed #19109035 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) is an inflammatory cytokine involved in certain inflammatory diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and Crohn's disease. The anti-TNF-alpha treatments used for RA may be associated with inflammatory demyelinating events affecting the central nervous system and may possibly aggravate known MS. OBJECTIVE: We report here three new cases of inflammatory demyelinating events of the central nervous system following treatment with anti-TNF-alpha. RESULTS: The neurological symptoms appeared on average 5 months after initiation of the treatment. For all patients, the inflammatory process was confirmed by brain magnetic resonance imaging. The symptoms totally or partially regressed as soon as anti-TNF-alpha treatment was stopped except for one patient who developed clinically defined MS. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system may be associated with the use of anti-TNF-alpha. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with these treatments should benefit from a follow-up which includes brain MRI.

Ornetti P, Chevillotte H, Zerrak A, Maillefert JF. · Department of Rheumatology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, FranceUniversity of Burgundy, Dijon, France. · Drugs Aging. · Pubmed #17109564 No free full text.

Abstract: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha represents a major advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. It is usually well tolerated, but a potential increase in the incidence of some infections in patients taking anti-TNFalpha agents has been reported.Compared with younger people, elderly patients have more co-morbidities and are likely to be taking more medications. Moreover, the aging process induces an increase in the rate of infections. Nevertheless, in recent studies analysing the databases of etanercept trials, the normalised incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, medically important infections and deaths was not increased in patients aged >or=65 years. However, these trials included patients who might have been healthier than elderly RA patients in the general population and therefore not truly representative. Conflicting results have been reported in several 'real-life' observational studies.Taken together, the available data are reassuring for carefully selected populations, at least for etanercept, but it is not possible to claim that anti-TNFalpha agents do, or do not, pose a particular risk for the general population of older patients. Additional studies aiming at determining the safety and benefit-risk ratio of anti-TNFalpha agents in elderly patients are needed. In addition, since the benefit-risk ratio of anti-TNFalpha agents might be different in patients aged 65, 75 or >80 years, when possible, subgroup analysis might also be useful.

Sharp JT, van der Heijde D, Angwin J, Duryea J, Moens HJ, Jacobs JW, Maillefert JF, Strand CV, Anonymous00377. · University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16331786 No free full text.

Abstract: Measurement of radiographic abnormalities in metric units has been reported by several investigators during the last 15 years. Measurement of joint space in large joints has been employed in a few trials to evaluate therapy in osteoarthritis. Measurement of joint space width in small joints has been reported by several investigators but has not yet found a place in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. We review methods for measuring joint space width in finger, toe, and wrist joints; special attention is given to how the joint edges are found, the method used to measure distance between joint margins, size of an area of the sampled joint, and reproducibility of measurements. Methods for measurement of erosion size, which have had less attention, are briefly discussed.

Maillefert JF, Sibilia J, Bertin P, Tavernier C. · Rheumatology Department, Dijon Teaching Hospital, France. · Rev Rhum Engl Ed. · Pubmed #10567971 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Martinot M, Sordet C, Soubrier M, Puéchal X, Saraux A, Lioté F, Guggenbuhl P, Lègre V, Jaulhac B, Maillefert JF, Zeisel M, Coumaros G, Sibilia J. · Service de Pathologies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Médicale A - Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg and Service de Médecine Interne et de Rhumatologie, Hopital Pasteur, Colmar, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15971417 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of serum and synovial procalcitonin (PCT) for bacterial arthritis and to determine the cellular origin of synovial PCT. METHODS: A prospective study enrolled 42 patients with acute arthritis including 11 bacterial arthritis, 18 rheumatoid arthritis and 13 crystal induced arthritis. Diagnostic values of serum and synovial PCT levels were determined by a immunoluminometric assay (Lumitest PCT) and compared to those of classical inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, synovial fluid cellularity and both serum and synovial IL-6 and TNF alpha). Using fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) cultures derived from rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4) and osteo-arthritis (n = 3) synovium, with or without stimulation by lipopolysaccharid or recombinant streptococcal protein 1/II, we attempted to determine whether synovial cells could be a source of PCT. RESULTS: Serum PCT was the best parameter to distinguish patients with acute bacterial arthritis from patients with crystal induced arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. In setting of an acute arthritis serum PCT (> 0.5 ng/mL) achieved 55% sensitivity and 94% specificity for the diagnosis of bacterial arthritis, while CRP (> 50 mg/L) had 100% sensitivity but poor specificity (40%). Serum PCT appeared to be higher in patients with septic arthritis resulting from "systemic infection" than in cases resulting from direct inoculation. Synovial PCT was not useful to discriminate between infectious and non infectious arthritis in clinical practice. PCT could not be detected at significant levels in the conditioned medium from fibroblast-like synoviocyte cultures. CONCLUSION: Serum PCT is a poorly sensitive but specific marker of bacterial arthritis. Use of serum PCT in association with CRP could nevertheless be useful in an emergency situation for the diagnosis of bacterial arthritis.

Maillefert JF, Combe B, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, and INSERM/ERIT-M 0207, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12860733 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early combined therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) during the first year in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induces long term beneficial effects, compared with monotherapy, when the further treatment strategy is a free choice. METHODS: Study design: five year multicentre prospective longitudinal trial. Participants: 146/205 patients with RA previously included in a one year prospective randomised trial comparing the effects of treatment with MTX, SSZ, or a combination of both. Criteria for inclusion: patients with early RA (< or =1 year duration). Follow up: between the end of years 1 and 5, patients were followed up and treated by their own rheumatologist, who was allowed to indicate any treatment. Outcome measures: disease activity score (DAS), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and Sharp/van der Heijde radiological score at baseline and after five years of follow up. Analysis: comparison of the five year follow up DAS, HAQ, and radiological scores in patients given combined and single treatment during the first year. RESULTS: At the end of the five years of follow up, the patients primarily receiving single or combined treatment had similar mean DAS, HAQ, and radiographic scores. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with early RA using combined therapy with MTX and SSZ during the first year did not influence the long term inflammatory status, or disability, or structural changes, compared with single disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment.

Fautrel B, Guillemin F, Meyer O, de Bandt M, Berthelot JM, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Wendling D, Saraux A, Combe B, Le Loët X, Anonymous00044, Anonymous00045, Anonymous00046. · Department of Rheumatology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19333993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To survey rheumatologists' preferences for the choice of a second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) after inadequate response with methotrexate (MTX) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Thirty-six rheumatologists stated their preferences for RA treatment after inadequate response with MTX therapy (optimal dose at least 6 months). From the initial scenario, we derived 54 vignettes varying by rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody presence, swollen joint count, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and structural damage. Respondents stated their preference among 5 therapeutic options: MTX continuation, switch to another conventional DMARD, addition of another conventional DMARD, addition of anakinra, or addition of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker. Presentation by pairs yielded 10 combinations of strategies for each variant, totaling 540 vignettes; participants evaluated a random sample of 180 vignettes. Determinants of each top-ranked option were analyzed by logistic regression. The compilation of these data served to define a therapeutic algorithm. RESULTS: The responses of 33 rheumatologists were analyzable. Therapeutic preferences corresponded to the top-ranked options. For patients with mild or moderately active RA, either a switch or step-up strategy to another conventional DMARD was top ranked. TNF blockers were preferred for RA patients with high disease activity or progressive structural damage. On the basis of these preferences, we developed a simple decision tree for use in daily clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our simple, easy-to-use decision tree developed from rheumatologists' preferences for therapy after failure of MTX therapy in RA treatment may guide rheumatologists in daily practice to choose a second-line DMARD.

Sokka T, Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Maillefert JF, Toloza S, Mørk Hansen T, Calvo-Alen J, Oding R, Liveborn M, Huisman M, Alten R, Pohl C, Cutolo M, Immonen K, Woolf A, Murphy E, Sheehy C, Quirke E, Celik S, Yazici Y, Tlustochowicz W, Kapolka D, Skakic V, Rojkovich B, Müller R, Stropuviene S, Andersone D, Drosos AA, Lazovskis J, Pincus T, Anonymous00085. · Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18163412 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Regular physical activity is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been advised to limit physical exercise. We studied the prevalence of physical activity and associations with demographic and disease-related variables in patients with RA from 21 countries. METHODS: The Questionnaires in Standard Monitoring of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (QUEST-RA) is a cross-sectional study that includes a self-report questionnaire and clinical assessment of nonselected consecutive outpatients with RA who are receiving usual clinical care. Frequency of physical exercise (>or=30 minutes with at least some shortness of breath, sweating) is queried with 4 response options: >or=3 times weekly, 1-2 times weekly, 1-2 times monthly, and no exercise. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and April 2007, a total of 5,235 patients from 58 sites in 21 countries were enrolled in QUEST-RA: 79% were women, >90% were white, mean age was 57 years, and mean disease duration was 11.6 years. Only 13.8% of all patients reported physical exercise>or=3 times weekly. The majority of the patients were physically inactive with no regular weekly exercise: >80% in 7 countries, 60-80% in 12 countries, and 45% and 29% in 2 countries, respectively. Physical inactivity was associated with female sex, older age, lower education, obesity, comorbidity, low functional capacity, and higher levels of disease activity, pain, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: In many countries, a low proportion of patients with RA exercise. These data may alert rheumatologists to motivate their patients to increase physical activity levels.

Meyer O, de Bandt M, Berthelot JM, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Saraux A, Wendling D, Guillemin F, Le Loët X, Anonymous00174. · Department of Rheumatology, AP-HP, Bichat Paris 7 University Hospital, CHU Bichat, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17194614 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The objective was to develop a clinical practice format for choosing a second-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) after a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD in patients with early RA. METHODS: A panel of 34 experts selected treatment option from various scenarios using the Thurstone pairwise method. The experts had to choose between two proposed DMARDs without proposing other options. The scenarios were obtained using the three items: DAS28, rheumatoid factor status and radiographic structural damage. A sample of 240 among 480 scenarios for each expert was taken at random. Responses given by at least 20% of the experts were considered pertinent. RESULTS: Recommendations for choosing a second DMARD for early RA after failure of a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD were established according to 4 parameters: type of first-line DMARD, activity, RF status and radiographic joint damage. The results of this study suggest that in patients with early RA who fail a 6-month course of first-line DMARD therapy, the best options may be addition of corticosteroid when disease activity is moderate to high and switching to a biologic agent when further radiographic joint damage occurs, particularly in patients with positive tests for RF. CONCLUSION: Although our scenarios did not include step-up (add instead of substitute) strategies, except for corticosteroids, we feel that the format presented here can optimise the management of patients with early RA seen in clinical practice.

Laroche D, Ornetti P, Thomas E, Ballay Y, Maillefert JF, Pozzo T. · INSERM-ERM 207 Motricité & Plasticité, Université de Bourgogne, BP 27877, 21078, Dijon Cedex, France. · Exp Brain Res. · Pubmed #16915399 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a leading cause of disability, which affects primarily the forefoot. Moreover, the forefoot is the final ground body interface for transmitting forces produced by the plantar flexors in order to move the body forward. Therefore, a dysfunction in patients with arthritis might induce important changes in gait, such as modifications in the coordination between legs to correct a reduced range of motion (ROM) and to produce smooth stride motions. First, we wanted to investigate the modifications of gait parameters in order to get a deeper understanding of the locomotor adaptation after a distal joint impairment. Second, we wanted to extract the mechanisms used to compensate for these impairments. In order to carry out this study, RA patients with forefoot impairment and healthy subjects were asked to walk along a straight line at two different velocities and were recorded by a motion analysis system. Patients were able to produce an efficient pattern despite a reduction of the ROM of the forefoot. At normal speed, the substantial modification of the locomotor pattern was linked to the adaptation of the lower-limb segment coordination and to the loss of ROM. Compensative mechanisms are the results of an efficient adaptation that offset the effect of the lesions. In contrast, at high speed, all of the kinematic modifications observed at natural speed vanished. It seems that pain and its associated sensory signals help to update the motor command and compel patients to adjust the descending command to the altered representation of distal mobility. Finally, the mechanical consequences of these changes are of particular interest since different levels of force exerted at the hip, knee and ankle might result in a supplementary structural alteration of these joints.

Pavy S, Constantin A, Pham T, Gossec L, Maillefert JF, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Tebib J, Wendling D, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie A, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16626993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing recommendations. Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the Cochrane databases, PubMed, and proceedings of meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, European League Against Rheumatism, and American College of Rheumatology. Using this evidence, a group of rheumatologists developed and validated the recommendations. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and the extent of agreement among experts were specified. RESULTS: The recommendations were as follows: 1: The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA should not be less than 10 mg/week and should be determined based on disease severity and patient-related factors; 2: When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response to methotrexate, the dosage should be increased at intervals of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance and patient-related factors; 3: When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with RA, preference should be given to the oral route. A switch to the intramuscular or subcutaneous route should be considered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate effectiveness, or gastrointestinal side effects; 4: At present, there is no evidence indicating that a change in methotrexate dosage is in order when a TNF antagonist is given concomitantly; 5: The investigations that are mandatory before starting methotrexate therapy in a patient with RA consist of a full blood cell count, serum transaminase levels, serum creatinine with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest radiograph. In addition, serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C and a serum albumin assay are recommended. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory symptoms, lung function tests with determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide are recommended; 6: Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring methotrexate therapy in patients with RA consist of full blood cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays. These tests should be obtained at least once a month for the first 3 months then every 4-12 weeks; 7: Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients treated with methotrexate for RA. In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a week, at a distance from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate; 8: In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related to methotrexate toxicity, the drug must be stopped and symptom severity evaluated. Should evidence of serious disease be found, the patient should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonologist should be obtained immediately. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about methotrexate therapy for RA were developed. These recommendations should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Saraux A, Fautrel B, Maillefert JF, Flipo RM, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Gourves K, Guillemin F, Anonymous00195. · Rheumatology Units of the Brest, Dijon, Paris La Pitiè, Lille, and Marseille La Timone Teaching Hospitals, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16583465 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To conduct a practice survey of laboratory and imaging studies used by French rheumatologists to identify the cause of recent-onset arthritis. METHODS: We selected a random sample of 210 rheumatologists, who were asked to recruit all patients with recent-onset arthritis (at least one joint involved, for less than one year) during a 2 week period, and to record laboratory and imaging studies performed. Results were analyzed in the overall group, in diagnostic subgroups, and in clinical presentation subgroups. RESULTS: The 119 rheumatologists who participated recruited 104 patients. Investigations done in 50% to 75% of patients were blood cell counts; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; serum assays of C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factors, antinuclear antibodies; and hand radiographs. Investigations in 50% to 74% of patients were serum ASAT/ALAT, creatinine, and uric acid; and foot radiographs. Finally, 25% to 49% of patients were tested for proteinuria; antikeratin antibodies; hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and Lyme serologies; creatine phosphokinase; blood iron; HLA-B27; and radiographs of chest and pelvis. No differences were found between investigations in patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis and/or undifferentiated arthritis and those in other patients. In contrast, suspected diagnoses and presence of extraarticular manifestations classically associated with specific diseases modified the selection of investigations. CONCLUSION: Although considerable variability occurred, our study suggests that a limited panel of laboratory and imaging studies is performed in at least 25% of patients with recent-onset arthritis, regardless of clues suggesting a specific diagnosis.

Laroche D, Pozzo T, Ornetti P, Tavernier C, Maillefert JF. · UFR STAPS, INSERM/ERM 0207, University of Burgundy, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16249238 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of loss of range of motion (ROM) of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint on the kinematic parameters of walking in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Inclusion of RA patients with inactive disease, no synovitis of the inferior limb and reduced ROM of the MTP joints. Evaluation of the ROM of the MTP dorsal and plantar flexion, and gait analysis using a three-dimensional computerized movement analysis. Calculation of gait parameters and maximal flexion and extension of the hips and knees during walking. Analysis 1 compared the ROM of dorsal and plantar flexion in patients with or without walking pain; 2 compared the gait parameters between patients and controls; 3 investigated a relationship between gait parameters and (i) the ROM of the MTP dorsal and plantar flexion and (ii) the pain at walking; 4 investigated the relationship between the ROM of the MTP dorsal and plantar flexion and maximal flexion and extension of the hip and knee joints during walking. RESULTS: Nine patients and seven controls were included. The MTP ROM was no different in patients presenting with or without pain at walking. The walking velocity was lower and the stride length shorter in patients than in controls. The walking velocity and the stride length were positively related to the MTP dorsal flexion ROM (r(2)=0.75 and 0.67). There was a negative relationship between maximal flexion of the knee and hips during walking and the underlying MTP dorsal flexion ROM (r(2)=0.67 and 0.54). CONCLUSION: In RA patients, reduced MTP dorsal flexion mobility induces changes in the walking parameters, including the kinematics of the overlying lower limb joints. Treatment of an RA-impaired forefoot should focus on MTP mobility as well as on pain.

Ornetti P, Solau E, Gaudin P, Sibilia J, Berthelot JM, Puechal X, Tavernier C, Maillefert JF, Anonymous00229. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16100349 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Maillard H, Ornetti P, Grimault L, Ramon JF, Ducamp SM, Saidani T, Tavernier C, Maillefert JF. · Rheumatology Department, Dijon Teaching Hospital, Dijon, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16038846 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of severe pyogenic infections in rheumatology patients taking infliximab in everyday practice. METHODS: Regional prospective cohort study of patients taking infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis with data collection on standardized forms. The medical records of patients with severe pyogenic infections were subjected to a detailed retrospective review. Patients with and without severe pyogenic infections were compared. RESULTS: The cohort included 83 patients (55 women and 28 men). Severe pyogenic infections occurred in five (6%) patients (three women and two men), all of whom had acute or underlying risk factors. Higher values were found in these five patients for mean age (65.8 +/- 12 vs. 53.9 +/- 13 years, P = 0.04) and mean daily glucocorticoid dosage (15.5 +/- 9 vs. 6.9 +/- 7 mg/day prednisone-equivalent, P = 0.036), as compared to the other patients. CONCLUSION: Older age and high-dose glucocorticoid therapy are associated with an increased risk of severe pyogenic infection during infliximab therapy. Caution is in order when starting and monitoring infliximab therapy in patients with risk factors. Our data also emphasize the need for a careful search for risk factors before each infliximab infusion.

Le Loët X, Berthelot JM, Cantagrel A, Combe B, De Bandt M, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Meyer O, Saraux A, Wendling D, Guillemin F. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15994280 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To elaborate a clinical practice decision tree for the choice of the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for untreated rheumatoid arthritis of less than six months' duration. METHODS: Four steps were employed: (1) review of published reports on DMARD efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis; (2) inventory of the information available to guide DMARD choice; (3) selection of the most pertinent information by 12 experts using a Delphi method; and (4) choice of DMARDs in 12 clinical situations defined by items selected in step 3 (28 joint disease activity score (DAS 28): < or =3.2; >3.2 and < or =5.1; >5.1; rheumatoid factor status (positive/negative); structural damage (with/without)-that is, 3 x 2 x 2). Thus, multiplied by all the possible treatment pairs, 180 scenarios were obtained and presented to 36 experts, who ranked treatment choices according to the Thurstone pairwise method. RESULTS: Among the 77 items identified, 41 were selected as pertinent to guide the DMARD choice. They were reorganised into five domains: rheumatoid arthritis activity, factors predictive of structural damage; patient characteristics; DMARD characteristics; physician characteristics. In the majority of situations, the two top ranking DMARD choices were methotrexate and leflunomide. Etanercept was an alternative for these agents when high disease activity was associated with poor structural prognosis and rheumatoid factor positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Starting with simple scenarios and using the pairwise method, a clinical decision tree could be devised for the choice of the first DMARD to treat very early rheumatoid arthritis.

Chevillotte-Maillard H, Ornetti P, Mistrih R, Sidot C, Dupuis J, Dellas JA, Tavernier C, Maillefert JF. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #15705631 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

D'Agostino MA, Maillefert JF, Said-Nahal R, Breban M, Ravaud P, Dougados M. · Service de Rhumatologie B, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15361388 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography allows assessment of soft tissue structures and has become a valued tool for diagnosing synovitis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the learning curve for ultrasonography in evaluating synovitis of the small joints in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Metacarpophalangeal (MCP), metatarsophalangeal (MTP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were evaluated using ultrasonography (Esaote AU 5 Epi, linear probe 10-13 MHz) by four rheumatologists, the first being experienced (senior), the others having no (fellows 1 and 2) or little (fellow 3) experience in ultrasonography. For each fellow, the learning curve was divided into blocks. In each block the fellow examined five consecutive patients with the senior; then, blinded to the senior's results, two further patients alone (seven patients examined per block). For each evaluation, the MCP, PIP, and MTP joints were individually tagged as having synovitis or not. The ultrasonography results were compared between fellow and senior for the two last patients of each block, using proportions of agreement and kappa statistics. RESULTS: 70 patients were evaluated (seven practice patients, followed by nine blocks). For fellows 1 and 2, the proportions of agreement were respectively 42% and 47% (kappa = 0 and 0) at the first evaluation, and rose progressively to 82% and 82% (kappa = 0.63 and 0.62) at the ninth evaluation. For fellow 3, initially good results were followed by decreased accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Detecting synovitis of the MCP, PIP, and MTP joints using ultrasonography can be done accurately by rheumatologists initially not experienced in this technique. At least 70 examinations were necessary to develop competence.

Fautrel B, Saraux A, Maillefert JF, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Flipo RM, Penrod JR, Guillemin F, Anonymous00187. · Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris and School of Public Health, Nancy, France. bruno.fautrel.psl.ap-hop-paris.fr · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15334420 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs of workups to diagnose early arthritis. METHODS: In 2000, the French Society for Rheumatology conducted a survey of a representative sample of French and Belgian rheumatologists (n = 239). The respondents were asked to consider 2 hypothetical scenarios, 1 describing undifferentiated arthritis and the other more suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis. They were then asked what diagnostic workup they would order. Costs for each study were determined in 2001 euros, according to the French public health system fee schedules. RESULTS: In total, 151 rheumatologists participated in the study (63%). The mean +/- SD diagnostic costs were 406.5 +/- 194.3 euro for the case with no diagnostic clues, and 280.7 +/- 154.3 euro for the case suggestive of early RA. Responses were very heterogeneous. The 2 main sources of expenditure were immunology tests and imaging. Hospital staff physicians tended to order more expensive workups, and costs tended to vary inversely with physician experience. The most important predictor of cost was diagnostic doubt, as estimated by the number of diagnoses proposed by respondents in each case; each additional diagnosis cost an additional 19.1-26.1 euro. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic workups after a first medical visit for early polyarthritis result in substantial direct costs. This observation and the great variability observed in physicians' practices point out the need for consensus on the appropriate workups for these patients.

Maillefert JF, Combe B, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Dijon, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #14623945 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive validity of radiological change on 5-yr disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study was designed to be multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, with a 5-yr follow-up. Participants were RA patients (ACR criteria), with a disease duration of <1 yr at entry. Radiographs of the hands and feet in posteroanterior view at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up (van der Heijde's modification of Sharp method) were used for structural evaluation. Disability was evaluated with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at yr 5. Analyses consisted of (i) correlation existing between the changes in the radiological scores during the first year and the HAQ value at yr 5 and (ii) determination of the optimal cut-off in the changes in the radiological scoring system, by ROC curve analysis, in which variable to be explained was disability status at yr 5, defined by HAQ value of at least 1. RESULTS: Due to missing data and/or lost to follow-up, 135 patients (out of the 191 recruited patients) were included in the analyses (mean change in the radiological score = 4.9 +/- 8.7 points, mean HAQ at yr 5 = 0.62 +/- 0.68). There was a statistically significant correlation between the HAQ-disability status at yr 5 and the changes observed in the radiological total damage and narrowing scores during the first year (r = 0.18, P = 0.046 and r = 0.25, P = 0.006, respectively). Conversely, the short-term changes in the erosion score were not correlated with subsequent HAQ-disability (r = 0.084, P = 0.36). A change of at least 2 points in the total X-ray score was considered as optimal (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 66.7, 53.9, 32.8 and 82.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This work shows that early changes in joint damage in patients with recent-onset RA are related to subsequent HAQ-disability. This relationship is due to changes in narrowing, rather than in erosion score, suggesting that the joint narrowing score might be of great importance in the follow-up of RA patients and in the reports of scientific results. The weak performance of the thresholds established using predictive validity for subsequent HAQ-disability compromise their use at the individual level.

Maillefert JF, Dardel P, Cherasse A, Mistrih R, Krause D, Tavernier C. · Department of Rheumatology, Dijon University Hospital, INSERM/ERITm, University of Burgondy, 3 rue du Fb Raines, 21000 Dijon, France. · Eur J Radiol. · Pubmed #12810213 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To describe the localisation of synovitis and tenosynovitis of the hindfoot observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with chronic polyarthritis, and to correlate the findings of physical examination and MRI. METHODS: Patients with chronic polyarthritis, and one or two painful hindfoot were included. On physical examination and on MRI, the tibio-talar, talo-calcaneal, and talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboidal joints were adjudged to have or not synovitis, and the tibialis anterior and posterior, the peroneus longus and brevis, the flector digitorum and hallucis longus tendons to have or not tenosynovitis. Criteria for synovitis and tenosynovitis were a high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, a low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and enhancement after Gd-DTPA injection, in the joint area, and around the tendon, respectively. The correlation between the findings of physical examination and those of MRI were evaluated using the Kappa statistics. RESULTS: 12 patients (three men, nine women, mean age of 55.5 years+/-11.4 S.D.) with chronic polyarthritis (rheumatoid arthritis (RA): nine, ankylosing spondylitis: one; psoriatic arthritis: one, unclassified: one) were included. All presented with one (7 patients) or two (5 patients) painful hindfeet (and swelling for 16 out of 17 hindfeet). On physical examination, 25 joints and eight tendons were adjudged to have synovitis and tenosynovitis. MRI showed synovitis in 12 out of 25 of these joints (48%), and tenosynovotis in three out of eight of these tendons (37.5%). Moreover, MRI showed ten and seven clinically unsuspected synovitis and tenosynovitis, respectively. The proportion of agreements between physical examination and MRI were 54.9% (kappa=0.1) and 88.2% (kappa=0.27) for synovitis and tenosynovitis, respectively. CONCLUSION: A weak correlation was observed between the findings of physical examination and MRI in patients with chronic polyarthritis and a painful hindfoot. MRI might be used to localise synovitis in the area before performing some intra-articular injections. However, other studies are needed to address this question.

Maillefert JF, Muller G, Falgarone G, Bour JB, Ratovohery D, Dougados M, Tavernier C, Breban M. · Department of Rheumatology, René Descartes University, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12079907 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Various viruses have been implicated in the cause and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which has been recognised as a cause of some autoimmune diseases, and which has been described as sometimes presenting with rheumatic manifestations indistinguishable from RA, might be a candidate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of HCV infection in patients with RA. METHODS: Consecutive patients with RA admitted to hospital in two departments of rheumatology were prospectively studied. Patients' serum samples were screened for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies. Patients with positive serology were further evaluated for the presence of HCV ribonucleic acid by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: 309 patients (232 women, 77 men, mean age (SD) 54.1 (14.8) years) were studied. Their mean (SD) disease duration was 74.1 (91) months. Tests for rheumatoid factors and antinuclear antibodies were positive in 213 (69%) and 114 (37%) of the patients respectively. Systemic vasculitis was found in 12 (4%) of the patients. Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 36.4 (SD 30.5) mm at the first hour (normal <10 mm) and C reactive protein was 36.8 (SD 45.8) mg/l (normal range <5 mg/l), respectively, with 181(58.6%) of patients considered as having active disease. Aspartate transaminases were increased in 14 (4%) patients, and alkaline phosphatase in 14 (4%). A positive anti-HCV serology was found in two (0.65%) patients, including one with a previously diagnosed HCV infection. HCV RNA was positive by RT-PCR in one of those two patients. CONCLUSION: A 0.65% prevalence of past or active HCV infection was found in patients with RA, which did not differ from the prevalence of HCV in the general French population. This result does not support the participation of HCV infection in the pathogenesis of RA.

Saraux A, Maillefert JF, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Guillemin F, Botton E. · Rheumatology Unit, Brest Teaching Hospital, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12079905 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The cause of recent onset polyarthritis can be difficult to identify. OBJECTIVE: To determine which laboratory and imaging studies French rheumatologists recommend, not taking cost into account, for the diagnosis of recent onset polyarthritis without extra-articular manifestations. METHODS: From the list of the French Society for Rheumatology, a random sample of 210 rheumatologists was selected, who were asked to complete a questionnaire on the laboratory and imaging studies they would recommend in two fictional cases of recent onset polyarthritis (possible rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-case 1 and probable RA-case 2). RESULTS: In case 1, the following were recommended by over 75% of respondents: hand radiographs, rheumatoid factors (RFs), and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (92%, 98%, and 98%, respectively). 50-74% of respondents recommended radiographs of the feet, knees, and chest (50%, 57%, and 66%, respectively); blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum assays of C reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (65%, 74%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). 25-49% recommended determination of creatinine and proteinuria, HLA-B27, antikeratin antibody, radiographs of the pelvis, and synovial fluid analysis. Several investigations were recommended less often in case 2 than in case 1. Nevertheless, some laboratory and imaging studies (radiographs of hand, feet, knees, chest x rays, blood cell counts, ANA, RF, antikeratin antibody, CRP, ESR, creatinine, AST and ALT, proteinuria, and joint aspiration) were recommended by more than 25% of respondents in both cases. CONCLUSION: Wide variations were found among rheumatologists, indicating a need for standardisation. Some laboratory and imaging studies are recommended by at least 25% of respondents in recent onset polyarthritis with or without clues suggesting RA. In contrast, many tests were considered useful by fewer than 25% of the respondents in both cases.