Rheumatoid Arthritis: Maier AL

Husni ME, Maier AL, Mease PJ, Overman SS, Fraser P, Gravallese EM, Weinblatt ME. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12115220 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of adult patients with Still's disease. METHODS: Twelve adult patients who met criteria for Still's disease and had active arthritis were enrolled in a 6-month open-label trial of etanercept given in biweekly doses of 25 mg. The mean disease duration at study entry was 10.7 years. All patients had been treated unsuccessfully with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Efficacy was evaluated according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Ten patients successfully completed the study; 2 withdrew due to disease flare. In 4 patients, the dosage of etanercept was increased from 25 mg biweekly to 25 mg 3 times per week. Seven patients met ACR 20% response criteria. Of these 7 responders, 4 met ACR 50% response criteria and 2 met ACR 70% response criteria. Among the 3 patients with systemic features of Still's disease (fever and rash), improvement in these features was seen in 1; the arthritis did not improve in any of these 3 patients. Except in the 2 patients who withdrew due to disease flare (rash, fever, and arthritis), no other significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In this initial study of etanercept therapy for Still's disease in the adult, this treatment resulted in improvement in the arthritis and was well tolerated. Additional trials should be performed to elucidate the effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Still's disease.

Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Coblyn JS, Maier AL, Helfgott SM, Morrell M, Byrne VM, Kaymakcian MV, Strand V. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10403258 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and pharmacokinetics of and clinical response to leflunomide, a de novo pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, when administered to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have been receiving long-term methotrexate therapy. METHODS: This was an open-label, 52-week study in which 30 patients with RA that remained active despite therapy with methotrexate at 17+/-4 mg/week (mean +/- SD) for > or =6 months were given leflunomide, 10-20 mg/day. Patients were assessed for adverse effects, pharmacokinetic measurements of leflunomide and methotrexate, and clinical response by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed 1 year of treatment. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions between leflunomide and methotrexate were noted. This combination therapy was generally well tolerated clinically, with the exception of elevations of liver enzyme levels. Seven patients withdrew from the treatment regimen: 2 withdrawals were voluntary, 3 were due to persistent elevation of plasma transaminase levels, and 2 were due to lack of efficacy. Of the patients, 16 (53%) met ACR 20% response criteria. Two met ACR criteria for remission after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The combination of methotrexate and leflunomide has therapeutic potential in RA.

Johnsen AK, Schiff MH, Mease PJ, Moreland LW, Maier AL, Coblyn JS, Helfgott SM, Leff JA, Weinblatt ME. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16482646 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of etanercept 50 mg administered twice weekly versus 25 mg administered twice weekly as monotherapy in patients with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) blocker-naäve active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with RA were randomized in an unequal allocation (2:1) in a blinded fashion to receive either 50 mg (51 patients) or 25 mg (26 patients) of etanercept twice a week for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The primary outcome measure, the ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks, showed no difference between the 2 dose groups. In addition, there was no difference in ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses or in EULAR response criteria by Week 24. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients with any non-infectious adverse event. The proportion of patients with upper respiratory tract infections was significantly higher in patients receiving 50 mg etanercept compared with those receiving 25 mg (26% vs 4%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Etanercept as a monotherapy at 50 mg twice weekly does not provide increased efficacy when compared to the standard dose of 25 mg twice weekly in TNF-alpha blocker-naäve patients.

Agarwal SK, Maier AL, Chibnik LB, Coblyn JS, Fossel A, Lee R, Fanikos J, Fiumara K, Lowry C, Weinblatt ME. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16342095 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of use of infliximab with an emphasis on treatment escalation and the durability of infliximab use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an academic setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pharmacy and medical records of 183 patients with RA who received at least 1 infliximab infusion at the infusion centers of the Brigham and Women's Hospital. Treatment escalation was defined as an increase in the dosage of infliximab to >3 mg/kg and/or a decrease in the dosing interval to <7 weeks between infusions. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with RA received infliximab infusions for a mean +/- SD duration of 58.2 +/- 56.6 weeks. Infliximab was discontinued in 48% of the patients during the first year of therapy and in 67% of the patients overall. A total of 126 patients had a treatment escalation, including 25 patients with a dose increase, 35 patients with a decrease in the interval, and 66 patients with both. Infliximab treatment was associated with a decrease in corticosteroid and methotrexate doses. Patients who had a treatment escalation were more likely to continue infliximab infusions compared with patients without a treatment escalation (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.1). CONCLUSION: The use of infliximab may be an effective treatment for RA; however, a substantial number of patients will discontinue its use. Treatment escalation is commonly used in the management of RA with infliximab and is associated with longer duration of infliximab use.