Rheumatoid Arthritis: Maddison P

Maddison P, Kiely P, Kirkham B, Lawson T, Moots R, Proudfoot D, Reece R, Scott D, Sword R, Taggart A, Thwaites C, Williams E. · Department of Rheumatology, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2PW, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #15657072 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine, by consensus, the optimal use of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using a multidisciplinary panel of experts and performing meta-analyses of available data. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of experts in RA was convened. Important questions, pertinent to the use of leflunomide in the treatment of RA, were defined by consensus at an initial meeting. Each question was allocated to subgroups of two or three members, who worked separately to prepare a balanced opinion, based on published literature, data from individual patients taking part in phase II and phase III clinical trials provided by Aventis, and data from a USA-based medical claims database (AETNA). The full group then reconvened to agree on an overall consensus statement. Recommendations concerning efficacy and tolerability versus comparator drugs and placebo were derived from two new meta-analyses. RESULTS: Leflunomide was at least as effective as sulphasalazine and methotrexate, and equally well tolerated on meta-analysis of trial data. Overall withdrawal rates for all adverse events were similar for all three drugs. Avoidance of the loading dose reduces 'nuisance' side-effects (e.g. nausea), but probably delays the onset of action. Adverse events could usually be managed by dose reduction and/or symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of efficacy, safety and cost, leflunomide should be considered in patients with RA who have failed first-line DMARD drug therapy. In refractory cases, leflunomide may be used in combination with, for example, methotrexate before biological agents. Therapy should be initiated by a specialist, but repeat prescribing in general practice on a shared care basis is acceptable using agreed protocols. Clear mechanisms are required to monitor toxicity, with good communication between the patient and rheumatologist to manage nuisance side-effects and avoid unnecessary discontinuation of leflunomide.

Marcora S, Lemmey A, Maddison P. · School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales-Bangor, George Building, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PX, UK. · Clin Nutr. · Pubmed #15896432 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is complicated by cytokine-driven alterations in protein and energy metabolism and consequent muscle wasting (cachexia). The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of a mixture of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, glutamine and arginine (HMB/GLN/ARG) as nutritional treatment for rheumatoid cachexia. METHODS: Forty RA patients supplemented their diet with either HMB/GLN/ARG or a nitrogen (7.19 g/day) and calorie (180 kcal/day) balanced mixture of alanine, glutamic acid, glycine, and serine (placebo) for 12 weeks. Body composition and other outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up, and analysed by mixed ANOVA. RESULTS: Dietary supplementation with HMB/GLN/ARG was not superior to placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid cachexia (groupxtime interactions P>0.05 for all outcomes). Both amino acid mixtures significantly increased (main effect of time) fat-free mass (727+/-1186 g, P<0.01), total body protein (719+/-1703 g, P=0.02), arms (112+/-183 g, P<0.01) and legs (283+/-534 g, P<0.01) lean mass, and some measures of physical function. No significant adverse event occurred during the study, but patients in the HMB/GLN/ARG group reported fewer gastrointestinal complaints compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary supplementation with HMB/GLN/ARG is better tolerated but not more effective in reversing cachexia in RA patients compared to the mixture of other non-essential amino acids used as placebo. Further controlled studies are necessary to confirm the beneficial anabolic and functional effects of increased nitrogen intake in this population.

Lemmey A, Maddison P, Breslin A, Cassar P, Hasso N, McCann R, Whellams E, Holly J. · School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11196538 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine if the altered insulin-like growth factor (IGF) status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is due to inflammation, altered body composition, or lack of exercise. METHODS: Subjects included 73 patients with RA, 54 patients with other rheumatic diseases, both inflammatory and noninflammatory, and 28 healthy, physically active controls. Serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured by radioimmunoassay. Body composition was estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and habitual exercise level approximated by questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed by 2 and 3 way ANOVA and moderated hierarchical regression. RESULTS: Serum IGF-I (p < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (p < 0.001), and the BP-3:total IGF molar ratio (p < 0.001) were depressed in both patient groups relative to controls. In contrast, IGF-II levels were depressed only in patients with RA (p < 0.01). Differences in the IGF proteins between patients and controls could not be attributed to inflammation. Habitual exercise level, but not body composition, was shown to be a significant predictor for IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and BP-3:total IGF molar ratio (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the reduction in circulating IGF proteins observed in our patients is more related to their sedentary lifestyle than to the inflammatory process. This conclusion is in agreement with reports that show that highly active individuals typically exhibit higher levels of systemic IGF proteins than age matched sedentary controls.

Sote Y, Green S, Maddison P. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18156151 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Marcora S, Lemmey A, Maddison P. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12429552 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.