Rheumatoid Arthritis: Logeart I

Lukas C, Guillemin F, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Logeart I, Fautrel B, Daures JP, Combe B, Anonymous00090. · Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19327234 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To describe the rate and timing of DMARD start in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in France, and to determine the factors leading to this treatment start. METHODS: The ESPOIR cohort study collects data on patients presenting with early arthritis. Baseline characteristics were assessed, and Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the likelihood of starting DMARD treatment over time, adjusting for patient-, disease- and physician characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 775 analysed patients, 598 (77.2%) received at least 1 DMARD during the follow-up period, after a median time of 4.0 months. In general, a higher tender joint count, involvement of the hands, involvement of more than 3 joint groups, presence of abnormal CRP-levels or CCP-antibodies significantly increased the likelihood of being treated (p<0.01 for all determinants), as well as a positive result on the bilateral foot-squeeze test (p<0.04). In addition, a significant hetero-geneity in therapeutic strategy across the 14 tested French regions was found: adjusted hazard ratios for DMARD start ranged from 1 to 2.15 (p<0.01), depending on the region where a patient was followed. For anti-CCP test and swollen joint count we demonstrated a statistically significant interaction with geographic region, implying that these tests are interpreted differently across regions. The same factors that increased the likelihood to start a DMARD were related to an earlier start. CONCLUSION: Rate and timing of treatment start with DMARDs in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in France is determined by well known clinical and biochemical variables. Apart from these variables, however, unknown and intangible factors that seem to cluster geographically are responsible for important variations in practice performance.

Combe B, Benessiano J, Berenbaum F, Cantagrel A, Daurès JP, Dougados M, Fardellone P, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Guillemin F, Le Loet X, Logeart I, Mariette X, Meyer O, Ravaud P, Rincheval N, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J. · University Hospital, Montpellier, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17905631 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The French Society of Rheumatology initiated a large national multicenter, longitudinal and prospective cohort, the so-called "ESPOIR cohort study" in order to set up databases to allow various investigations on diagnosis, prognostic markers, epidemiology, pathogenesis and medico-economic factors in the field of early arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Patients were recruited if they had undifferentiated arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, of less than 6 months disease duration and if they were DMARD and steroids naïve. Patients have then to be followed every 6 months during the first 2 years then every year during at least 10 years. Clinical, biological, radiographic and medico-economic databases have been constituted to fit in the different objectives of the project and more than 20 scientific studies have already been accepted by the scientific committee. RESULTS: 813 patients were included (76.75% were female). The mean age was 48.07+/-12.55 years. The mean delay from the onset of symptoms to referral to the rheumatologist was 74.8+/-76.6 days. Baseline swollen and tender joint counts were 7.19+/-5.37 and 8.43+/-7.01; DAS28 score was 5.11+/-1.31. CRP was abnormal in 38.9% of the patients; 44.2%, 45.8% and 38.8% had respectively IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgA RF and anti-CCP antibodies. HLA DRB1*01 or 04 genes were found in 56.7% of them. Finally, 22% of these patients had erosions on hand or feet at baseline.

Bannwarth B, Logeart I, Vergult G. · Service de rhumatologie, groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, France. · Rev Med Interne. · Pubmed #15471596 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess the prescribing patterns of rofecoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor or coxib relative to those of conventional non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the primary care setting in France. METHODS: A representative sample of 1010 French general practitioners participated in the study. They recorded the demographic, medical and pharmaceutical characteristics of all patients for whom they prescribed an NSAID between July 1, 2001 and June 30, 2002. RESULTS: The prescribing patterns of rofecoxib were similar for both available dosages (12.5 and 25 mg). The proportion of patients aged 65 years and older was significantly higher among those receiving rofecoxib (48%) than among those receiving a traditional NSAID (37.3%). A history of peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent in the former (4.8%) than in the latter (2.1%). Low dose aspirin and antihypertensive agents were being taken in 6.1% and 34.8%, respectively, of the patients in the rofecoxib group versus 2.3% and 15.6%, respectively, in the conventional NSAID group. Concurrent use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was marginally less frequent in the rofecoxib group (16.9%) than in the conventional NSAID group (18.6%). However, a significantly higher proportion of patients were given a PPI prior to rofecoxib therapy (10.4%) than prior to conventional NSAID therapy (3.7%). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that French general practitioners are more likely to prescribe rofecoxib for patients who have risk factors of NSAID gastropathy.