Rheumatoid Arthritis: Le Loët X

Fautrel B, Pham T, Mouterde G, Le Loët X, Goupille P, Guillemin F, Ravaud P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M, Puéchal X, Sibilia J, Soubrier M, Mariette X, Combe B, Anonymous00061, Anonymous00062. · Pierre and Marie Curie University - Paris VI, UFR de Médecine, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18037319 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To update French Society for Rheumatology guidelines regarding the use of TNFalpha antagonists for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Existing guidelines were updated using the AGREE instrument. Items that required updating were selected by a task force, the relevant literature was critically appraised, and new wording was suggested by a limited committee of experts then validated by the task force and subsequently by a panel of external reviewers. The three-topic structure of the recommendations (indication, initiation, and adjustment) and the final algorithm format were maintained. RESULTS: Of the 12 items, five were selected for updating; one pertained to the indication for treatment with TNFalpha antagonists, two to treatment initiation, and two to treatment adjustment. Of the four initially recommended criteria for determining that TNFalpha antagonist therapy is indicated, the first three were left unchanged (confirmed diagnosis of RA; active disease for more than 1month with objective evidence of inflammation or progressive structural damage, or dependency on glucocorticoid therapy, or progressive radiographic damage; and failure to respond adequately to methotrexate - or another agent when methotrexate is contraindicated - in the optimal tolerated dosage). The fourth and last criterion was modified as follows: co-morbidities should be evaluated in order to distinguish absolute contraindications from relative contraindications that require referral to a specialist. Of the four initial recommendations about TNFalpha antagonist initiation, the first and fourth were left unchanged (a workup should be performed prior to treatment initiation, and the patient should receive regular standardized follow-up); the second and third recommendations were modified as follows: there is no evidence that one TNFalpha antagonist is more effective than the others, and concomitant methotrexate therapy is generally advisable, regardless of the TNFalpha antagonist used. Of the four recommendations about treatment adjustment, the first two were modified as follows: the goal of treatment is to achieve the EULAR response criteria or better; and in non-responders, the dosage or dosing interval can be modified when infliximab is used, methotrexate should be added when the TNFalpha antagonist is used alone, and in all other situations the patient should be switched to a different TNFalpha antagonist. The other two recommendations about treatment adjustment were left unchanged (patients who fail to tolerate one TNFalpha antagonist can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist if allowed by the nature of the adverse event; and when a remission is achieved, reduction or discontinuation of symptomatic drugs - most notably glucocorticoids - is appropriate, followed in the event of a prolonged remission by changes in the dosage and/or dosing interval of the TNFalpha antagonist or concomitant disease-modifying drug). CONCLUSION: These recommendations are designed to help practitioners optimize the use of TNFalpha antagonists in patients with RA seen in everyday practice. They do not constitute regulations.

Le Loët X, Lequerré T, Vittecoq O. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16256398 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Vittecoq O, Goeb V, Le Loët X, Tron F. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15996501 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Vittecoq O, Lequerré T, Goëb V, Le Loët X, Abdesselam TA, Klemmer N. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm U905, Rouen, France. · Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19028372 No free full text.

Abstract: Smoking has an impact on the development and outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and lupus. In RA, smoking is associated with the development of the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP2)-positive subset. This risk is increased in heavy smokers carrying at least one copy of the HLA DRB1 shared epitope (SE) alleles. Whereas this interaction between smoking and SE relevant in northern Europe, discrepant results have been observed in other geographic locations, suggesting the involvement of other environmental stimuli and/or gene polymorphisms. There is no interaction between tobacco exposure and PTPN22 1858T for the development of anti-CCP-positive or anti-CCP-negative RA. A strong association exists between smoking and the occurrence of extra-articular manifestations (subcutaneous nodules and cardiovascular events), but smoking has no influence on radiographic outcome. In lupus, tobacco exposure has an impact on the production of anti-double-stranded Desoxyribonuclic (dsDNA) and possibly on the development of the disease, as well as on disease activity/severity. In both diseases, smoking might interfere with drug efficacy.

Le Loët X, Klemmer N. · Service de rhumatologie et Inserm U 519, IFR 23, CHU de Rouen. · Rev Prat. · Pubmed #16544921 No free full text.

Abstract: The diagnosis of early arthritis is often difficult even though it is an important issue. A step-by-step clinical examination is necessary to make the diagnosis of "joint emergency": an infection must be suspected when fever is associated with arthritis. Then, classification of early arthritis will be carried on with a special attention to rheumatoid arthritis when the rheumatism is persistent and erosive. However, arthritis might be undifferentiated for several months to years; such an explanation should be given to the patient. A tight follow-up is necessary.

Fautrel B, Pham T, Gossec L, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15797498 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the information and education of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, using evidence from the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when needed. METHODS: A scientific committee developed eight questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. A task force reviewed the literature for answers to these questions, using the PubMed Medline database (1980-2004) and the 2002-2004 databases of the annual meetings held by the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR), the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR); the indexing terms for the search were rheumatoid, arthritis, patient, education, information, knowledge, general practitioner, family doctor, and continuing medical education. Only articles in French or English were included. A panel of rheumatologists used the evidence thus compiled to develop recommendations for each question; gaps in evidence were filled by calling on the panelists' expert opinion. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and extent of agreement among panelists were specified. RESULTS: There were four general questions about the objectives, supports, and mode of delivery (group or one-on-one) of patient information and education, as well as on evaluating knowledge, and four specific questions on program content. The search identified 1235 articles; 144 were selected on the title and 118 of those on the abstract. Three abstracts presented at meetings were also kept. The evidence from the literature was presented to the panelists during interactive workshops. The panelists then developed eight recommendations, all of which were grade D because no published studies specifically addressed everyday clinical practice. Agreement among panelists ranged across recommendations from 85.7% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about educating and informing patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should increase practice uniformity and ultimately optimize the management of patients with RA.

Lequerré T, Coulouarn C, Derambure C, Lefebvre G, Vittecoq O, Daveau M, Salier JP, Le Loët X. · Rheumatology department, Hôpital de Boisguillaume, CHU de Rouen - Hôpitaux de Rouen, 76031 Rouen cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #12951306 No free full text.

Abstract: Large-scale analysis of gene expression with cDNA arrays is spreading over many biological fields, including rheumatology. In this report, we wish to explain the principle and main advantages of this tool in the context of our discipline. Until 1995, analysis of gene expression was conducted for a few genes at a time but DNA chips now allow one to monitor the expression of thousands of genes in a single experiment and analyze the transcriptome, i.e. the whole of the transcripts in a given cell or tissue. Whatever the platform used (macro- or microarrays, oligo-chips), this technology rests upon the hybridization of i) a set of cDNA clones tethered to a solid support (nylon or glass) as probes, and ii) labelled cDNAs that are reverse-transcribed from bulk mRNAs extracted from a cell or tissue sample as a target. The end result is information on the relative abundance of every mRNA between two or more samples. The transcriptome analysis has two main objectives in rheumatology: i) identifying a gene expression profile that is a hallmark of a pathology and using it for a diagnostic or prognostic purpose, and ii) gathering genes with similar changes of expression, which allows one to specify the identity of novel proteins involved in a well-known intracellular cascade of regulation or even to identify new cascades.

Le Loët X, Pouplin S, Vittecoq O. · Service de rhumatologie Centre hospitalier universitaire, Rouen-Hôpitaux, INSERM U519 et IFR 23, Rouen, Rouen. · Rev Prat. · Pubmed #12001410 No free full text.

Abstract: Synovial diseases of the hip are often overlooked because they are far less frequent that osteoarthritis and because this joint is deep and so difficult to examine. The more important cause is septic arthritis; it requires an hospitalization in emergency. Synovial tissue may also be at the beginning of the spondylarthropathy or, more rarely, of rheumatoid arthritis. In acute forms, diagnosis must be done before any radiological destructive changes. Aspiration of the hip and synovial biopsy are necessary for the diagnosis. In subacute or chronic forms, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging are useful tools to suspect the diagnosis and to guide a biopsy.

Vittecoq O, Jouen-Beades F, Tron F, Le Loët X. · Inserm U-519, IFR 23, Rhumatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Hĵpitaux de Rouen, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #11808982 No free full text.

Abstract: The vascular endothelium is a common target of inflammatory joint disease. Autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Sjögren's syndrome can be responsible for a spectrum of vascular disorders that encompasses vasculitis, thrombosis and/or atheroma associated with the antiphospholipid syndrome, and vascular damage caused by cryoglobulin deposition. These mechanisms can coexist, particularly in lupus patients. Joint disease is sometimes the presenting manifestation in primary vasculitis. Autoantibodies are detectable in most patients with vascular involvement and inflammatory joint disease. They are not merely markers for vascular involvement: in vitro and in vivo data suggest that some autoantibodies may contribute to the genesis of endothelial lesions, together with other factors. For instance, evidence of pathogenic effects has been found for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), most notably with antimyeloperoxidase or antiproteinase-3 specificity, in small-vessel vasculitides (Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, and microscopic polyangiitis); for immune complexes, particularly those containing cryoglobulins, in vasculitides secondary to CTDs; and for circulating anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, above all anti-beta2-glycoprotein I, in antiphospholipid syndrome. Antibodies to annexin V, modified lipoproteins, and endothelial cells may be of interest; their clinical relevance is unclear, however, and no standardized assays are available, so thatthese antibodies are not looked for in everyday practice. When deciding which antibody tests should be performed in a given patient, the circumstances surrounding the onset of the vasculopathy should be borne in mind. In patients with previous CTD, the tests are selected based on the diagnosis. In contrast, in a patient with no previous diagnosis, a vasculopathy can be either primary or secondary to undiagnosed CTD or to antiphospholipid syndrome: consequently, a broader array of tests is needed in this situation.

Le Loët X, Nordström D, Rodriguez M, Rubbert A, Sarzi-Puttini P, Wouters JM, Woolley JM, Wright N, Lawrence C, Appleton B. · Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18634163 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra in addition to a disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). METHODS: In this large, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, adult patients with RA receiving methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or hydroxychloroquine for > or = 3 months were given anakinra 100 mg once daily for up to 36 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate changes from baseline to week 36 in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index and subscales. Changes in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), proportion of patients meeting European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the safety of each combination regimen were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1207 patients were enrolled, received > or = 1 dose of anakinra, and were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. A statistically significant change in the HAQ disability index was observed (p = 0.0001); no significant differences were seen among the 3 DMARD groups. A clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (> 0.22) was observed in 51% of patients. Mean improvement in DAS28 was 1.5 (p < 0.0001), and 64% of patients achieved a good or moderate EULAR response score. Injection site reaction was the most frequently (62%) reported adverse event. The incidence of infections (24%), most commonly respiratory infection, was similar across treatment groups. No notable changes were observed in laboratory findings and vital signs. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that anakinra 100 mg/day in combination with DMARD therapy safely improved functional status in patients with active RA.

Lequerré T, Quartier P, Rosellini D, Alaoui F, De Bandt M, Mejjad O, Kone-Paut I, Michel M, Dernis E, Khellaf M, Limal N, Job-Deslandre C, Fautrel B, Le Loët X, Sibilia J, Anonymous00361, Anonymous00362. · Rheumatology Department, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm 905, 76031 Rouen, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17947302 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anakinra treatment has been reported to be effective in some patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA) or adult-onset Still disease (AoSD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and the safety of anakinra treatment in SoJIA and AoSD. METHODS: SoJIA and AoSD patients were treated with anakinra (1-2 mg/kg/day in children, 100 mg/day in adults); we analysed its effect on fever, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, numbers of swollen and tender joints, the assessment of disease activity (by physician and parent/patient) and pain (by parent/patient), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric core set criteria for JIA activity. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, 20 with SoJIA and 15 with AoSD. Their mean age (range) at the onset of treatment was 12.4 (3-23) and 38.1 (22-62) years, respectively; disease duration was 7.0 (1-16) and 7.8 (2-27) years, respectively. Active arthritis was present in all cases but one. Of the 20 SoJIA patients, 5 achieved ACR 50% improvement in symptoms (ACR50) response criteria at 6 months. Steroid dose had been decreased by 15% to 78% in 10 cases. A total of 11 of the 15 AoSD patients achieved at least a 50% improvement for all disease markers (mean follow-up: 17.5 (11-27) months). Steroids had been stopped in two cases and the dose was decreased by 45% to 95% in 12 patients. Two patients stopped anakinra due to severe skin reaction, and two patients due to infection: one visceral leishmaniasis and one varicella. CONCLUSION: Anakinra was effective in most AoSD patients, but less than half SoJIA patients achieved a marked and sustained improvement.

Le Loët X, Pavelka K, Richarz U. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Hôpitaux Rouen, Rouen, France. · BMC Musculoskelet Disord. · Pubmed #15958159 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the utility of transdermal fentanyl (TDF, Durogesic) for the treatment of pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip, which was not adequately controlled by non-opioid analgesics or weak opioids. The second part of the trial, investigating TDF in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is reported separately. METHODS: Current analgesia was optimised during a 1-week run-in. Patients then received 28 days treatment with TDF starting at 25 microg/hr, with the option to increase the dose until adequate pain control was achieved. Metoclopramide was taken during the first week and then as needed. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients recruited, 75 with OA knee and 44 with OA hip completed the treatment phase, 30 knee and 18 hip patients entered the one-week taper-off phase. The most frequently used maximum dose of TDF was 25 microg/hr. The number of patients with adequate pain control increased during the run-in period from 4% to 27%, and further increased during TDF treatment to 88% on day 28. From baseline to endpoint, there were significant reductions in pain (p < 0.001) and improvements in functioning (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p < 0.05) health. Scores for 'pain right now' decreased significantly within 24 hours of starting TDF treatment. TDF was assessed favourably and 84% of patients would recommend it for OA-related pain. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events (reported by 32% and 26% of patients respectively), despite prophylaxis with metoclopramide, which showed limited efficacy in this setting. CONCLUSION: TDF significantly increased pain control, and improved functioning and quality of life. Metoclopramide appeared to be of limited value in preventing nausea and vomiting; more effective anti-emetic treatment may enable more people to benefit from strong opioids such as TDF. This study suggests that four weeks is a reasonable period to test the benefit of adding TDF to improve pain control in OA patients and that discontinuing therapy in cases of limited benefit creates no major obstacles.

Mejjad O, Vittecoq O, Pouplin S, Grassin-Delyle L, Weber J, Le Loët X, Anonymous00062. · Department of Rheumatology, CHU de Rouen, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 76031 Rouen, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15589436 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Prescribing foot orthotics in rheumatoid arthritis patients with symptomatic forefoot involvement is a standard practice. However, limited research has been reported regarding gait and pain improvement with the use of foot orthotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (13 F, 3 M; mean age: 52 +/- 12 years) with metatarsalgia due to rheumatoid arthritis were included in this prospective, randomized with crossover study, and received foot orthotics. At 1 month follow-up, space and time gait variables with and without foot orthotics were assessed by Bessou's locometer; pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Pain levels significantly decreased (P = 0.008) by wearing foot orthotics. Despite a significant step length increase (P = 0.05) with orthotics, there was no significant improvement of stride length, cadence, or walking speed which was the main assessment criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing foot orthotics improves pain, but not sufficiently to improve gait in rheumatoid arthritis patients with metatarsalgia. Foot orthotics improved comfort levels because of a decrease in pain, but was not sufficient to correct gait.

Vittecoq O, Jouen-Beades F, Krzanowska K, Bichon-Tauvel I, Ménard JF, Daragon A, Tron F, Le Loët X. · Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Rouen, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #11324930 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measurements of different autoantibodies (Ab) and cytokines are useful to distinguish very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from other inflammatory rheumatisms. METHODS: From a population-based recruitment, 32 patients with very early polyarthritis (median duration: 4 months) were studied. Evaluations at entry (M0), and at 6 (M6) and 12 months (M12). Ab tested: rheumatoid factors (RF) by agglutination methods and ELISA, antiperinuclear factor (APF), antikeratin Ab (AKA), anti-Sa and antinuclear Ab. Cytokine production (TNFalpha, IL2, IFNgamma, IL1beta, IL10) in whole blood cell culture (WBCC) was determined at M0. At M12, patients were classified as having RA (N = 15) or other rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: At M0, AKA/APF and anti-Sa Ab frequencies were low, 13% and 7%, respectively. While most Ab detected at M0 persisted, others appeared during follow-up, particularly APF, which rose from 13 to 40% at M12. At M6, IgM-RF was detected in two RA patients exclusively by ELISA. AKA/APF were found to be highly specific markers for RA (100% specificity). At some time during follow-up, two RF-negative RA patients were AKA-positive. In two patients, AKA and APF were present at M0 before they satisfied ACR criteria. IL2 and IFNgamma production was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for RA patients. CONCLUSION: AKA/APF and anti-Sa Ab were detected in community cases of very early RA. AKA/APF and RF detected by ELISA might contribute to an earlier diagnosis of RA. Low production of IFNgamma and IL2 in WBCC constituted a distinct immunopathological feature in very early RA patients.

Fautrel B, Borget C, Rozenberg S, Meyer O, Le Loët X, Masson C, Koeger AC, Kahn MF, Bourgeois P. · Department of Rheumatology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #9972972 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Adult Still's disease (ASD) is a rare chronic polyarthritis, usually treated with corticosteroid therapy. Because some patients become dependent on high dose prednisone or are refractory to that treatment, and because adverse events are frequent with corticosteroid, we evaluated the efficacy of low dose methotrexate (MTX) as a second-line drug. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 26 patients with ASD treated with low dose MTX because their disease was either resistant to or dependent on corticosteroids. RESULTS: The group included 13 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 32.6 years at onset of ASD. Mean disease duration at the beginning of MTX treatment was 59.9 mo (range 7 to 444). Evaluation took place at the maximum followup, which averaged 48.9 mo (range 8 to 136). The mean dose of MTX was 11.5+/-3.6 mg/week (range 7.5 to 17.5). Twenty-three patients responded to MTX; 18 had complete remission. No difference was seen between patients with or without extraarticular manifestations. Leukocyte and neutrophil counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significantly reduced (p = 0.0001). Daily prednisone intake decreased by 69% (21.5 mg) (p = 0.0001). Eleven patients were able to stop taking corticosteroids. One patient with AA amyloidosis renal failure died of neutropenia: this was the only serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: MTX is an effective second-line treatment of ASD that does not respond to prednisone. It allows significant reduction of corticosteroid doses, which is beneficial to these patients, who have frequent and numerous corticosteroid related adverse events.

Lequerré T, Bansard C, Vittecoq O, Derambure C, Hiron M, Daveau M, Tron F, Ayral X, Biga N, Auquit-Auckbur I, Chiocchia G, Le Loët X, Salier JP. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital and Inserm 905 & Institut Fédératif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides 23, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19563633 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease and its underlying molecular mechanisms are still poorly understood. Because previous microarray studies have only focused on long-standing (LS) RA compared to osteoarthritis, we aimed to compare the molecular profiles of early and LS RA versus control synovia. METHODS: Synovial biopsies were obtained by arthroscopy from 15 patients (4 early untreated RA, 4 treated LS RA and 7 controls, who had traumatic or mechanical lesions). Extracted mRNAs were used for large-scale gene-expression profiling. The different gene-expression combinations identified by comparison of profiles of early, LS RA and healthy synovia were linked to the biological processes involved in each situation. RESULTS: Three combinations of 719, 116 and 52 transcripts discriminated, respectively, early from LS RA, and early or LS RA from healthy synovia. We identified several gene clusters and distinct molecular signatures specifically expressed during early or LS RA, thereby suggesting the involvement of different pathophysiological mechanisms during the course of RA. CONCLUSIONS: Early and LS RA have distinct molecular signatures with different biological processes participating at different times during the course of the disease. These results suggest that better knowledge of the main biological processes involved at a given RA stage might help to choose the most appropriate treatment.

Tebib J, Mariette X, Bourgeois P, Flipo RM, Gaudin P, Le Loët X, Gineste P, Guy L, Mansfield CD, Moussy A, Dubreuil P, Hermine O, Sibilia J. · Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 765 chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19549290 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Since current treatment options for patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain inadequate, especially for those unresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), new and improved medication is needed. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of masitinib (AB1010), a potent and selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c-KIT, in the monotherapy treatment of DMARD-refractory RA. METHODS: This was a multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label, randomised, dose-ranging, phase 2a trial. Masitinib was administered orally to 43 patients who had inadequate response to DMARDs, at initial randomised dosing levels of 3 and 6 mg/kg per day over a 12-week period. Dose adjustment was permitted based upon tolerability and response criteria. Efficacy was assessed via American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score using 28 joint counts (DAS28), index of improvement in RA (ACRn) and C-reactive protein (CRP) improvement, relative to baseline at week 12. RESULTS: Improvement was observed in all efficacy endpoints, including ACR20/50/70 scores of 54%, 26% and 8%, respectively, and a reduction in CRP level by greater than 50% for approximately half the population. This improvement was sustainable throughout an extension phase (> 84 weeks) and was also independent of initial DMARD resistance (anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha and/or methotrexate). A relatively high patient withdrawal rate (37%) required the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) data imputation. Incidence of adverse events was high (95%), although the majority were of mild or moderate severity with a considerable decline in frequency observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Two nonfatal serious adverse events were reported. Dose-response analyses tentatively indicate that an initial dosing level of 6.0 mg/kg per day administered orally in two daily intakes is the most appropriate, based upon potency and tolerability trends. CONCLUSIONS : Treatment with masitinib improved DMARD-refractory active RA. Following an initial high incidence of mostly mild to moderate side effects during the first 12 weeks of treatment, masitinib appears to be generally well tolerated. This, together with evidence of a sustainable efficacy response, suggests that masitinib is suitable for long-term treatment regimens. Since this was the first study of masitinib in a nononcologic pathology, the relatively high patient withdrawal rate observed can be partly attributed to a highly cautious response to adverse events. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant further placebo-controlled investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00831922.

Goëb V, Jouen F, Gilbert D, Le Loët X, Tron F, Vittecoq O. · Service de Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19524474 No free full text.

Abstract: The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) must be made early, because prompt initiation of treatments tailored to disease activity is crucial to improve structural and functional outcomes. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs) are well-established diagnostic markers for RA and should be included in the classification criteria. Here, we describe the main tests for detecting ACPAs and we underline the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of ACPAs in patients with RA. The presence of ACPAs predicts poorer functional and structural outcomes, and ACPA titers respond to some of the medications used in RA. Therefore, ACPA titers should be determined at regular intervals throughout follow-up.

Fautrel B, Guillemin F, Meyer O, de Bandt M, Berthelot JM, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Wendling D, Saraux A, Combe B, Le Loët X, Anonymous00044, Anonymous00045, Anonymous00046. · Department of Rheumatology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19333993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To survey rheumatologists' preferences for the choice of a second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) after inadequate response with methotrexate (MTX) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Thirty-six rheumatologists stated their preferences for RA treatment after inadequate response with MTX therapy (optimal dose at least 6 months). From the initial scenario, we derived 54 vignettes varying by rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody presence, swollen joint count, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and structural damage. Respondents stated their preference among 5 therapeutic options: MTX continuation, switch to another conventional DMARD, addition of another conventional DMARD, addition of anakinra, or addition of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker. Presentation by pairs yielded 10 combinations of strategies for each variant, totaling 540 vignettes; participants evaluated a random sample of 180 vignettes. Determinants of each top-ranked option were analyzed by logistic regression. The compilation of these data served to define a therapeutic algorithm. RESULTS: The responses of 33 rheumatologists were analyzable. Therapeutic preferences corresponded to the top-ranked options. For patients with mild or moderately active RA, either a switch or step-up strategy to another conventional DMARD was top ranked. TNF blockers were preferred for RA patients with high disease activity or progressive structural damage. On the basis of these preferences, we developed a simple decision tree for use in daily clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our simple, easy-to-use decision tree developed from rheumatologists' preferences for therapy after failure of MTX therapy in RA treatment may guide rheumatologists in daily practice to choose a second-line DMARD.

Goëb V, Thomas-L'Otellier M, Daveau R, Charlionet R, Fardellone P, Le Loët X, Tron F, Gilbert D, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology and Inserm Unit 905, IFRMP 23, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen 76031 cedex, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19284558 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to identify new early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) autoantibodies. METHODS: Sera obtained from 110 early untreated RA patients (<6 months) were analyzed by western blot using HL-60 cell extract, separated on one-dimensional and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (1-DE, 2-DE). Sera from 50 healthy blood donors and 20 patients with non-RA rheumatisms were used as controls for 1-DE and 2-DE, respectively. The immunoreactive proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis and the presence of potential sites of citrullination in each of these proteins was evaluated. FT-ICR mass spectrometry was used to verify experimentally the effect of citrullination upon the mass profile observed by MALDI-TOF analysis. RESULTS: The 110 1-DE patterns allowed detection of 10 recurrent immunoreactive bands of 33, 39, 43, 46, 51, 54, 58, 62, 67 and 70 kDa, which were further characterized by 2-DE and proteomic analysis. Six proteins were already described RA antigens: heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1, aldolase, alpha-enolase, calreticulin, 60 kDa heat shock protein (HSP60) and BiP. Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 and the far upstream element-binding proteins (FUSE-BP) 1 and 2 were identified as new antigens. Post-translational protein modifications were analyzed and potentially deiminated peptides were found on aldolase, alpha-enolase, PGK1, calreticulin, HSP60 and the FUSE-BPs. We compared the reactivity of RA sera with citrullinated and noncitrullinated alpha-enolase and FUSE-BP linear peptides, and showed that antigenicity of the FUSE-BP peptide was highly dependent on citrullination. Interestingly, the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP2) status in RA serum at inclusion was not correlated to the reactivity directed against FUSE-BP citrullinated peptide. CONCLUSIONS: Two categories of antigens, enzymes of the glycolytic family and molecular chaperones are also targeted by the early untreated RA autoantibody response. For some of them, and notably the FUSE-BPs, citrullination is involved in the immunological tolerance breakdown observed earlier in RA patients. Autoantibodies recognizing a citrullinated peptide from FUSE-BP may enhance the sensibility for RA of the currently available anti-CCP2 test.

Flipon E, Brazier M, Clavel G, Boumier P, Gayet A, Le Loët X, Fardellone P, Anonymous00059. · Departments of Rheumatology and Biochemistry, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France. · Fundam Clin Pharmacol. · Pubmed #19267774 No free full text.

Abstract: This study was conducted to identify early predictors of the total cost of inflammatory arthritis (IA). One hundred and eighty patients affected by undifferentiated arthritis (UA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included in the French Very Early rheumatoid Arthritis (VErA) cohort between 1998 and 2001. Health economic data for 2003 were collected using a patient self-questionnaire. Results were analysed in terms of direct, indirect and total costs in 2003 euros (2003euro) for the population as a whole and in diagnostic subgroups. A payor perspective (the French National Health Insurance, in this case) was adopted. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify predictors of total cost from among the criteria assessed on recruitment. Results of the study showed that for the study population as a whole, the mean total cost was euro4700 per patient. The costs attributable to the RA and UA sub-groups were euro5928 and euro2424 per patient, respectively. In a univariate analysis, certain parameters were significantly correlated with a higher cost of illness. In the multivariate analysis, some of these parameters were further identified as being predictive of higher cost. Two strong significant, early predictors of total cost were identified: higher pain (P = 0.002) and the presence of rheumatoid factor (P = 0.004). In the RA sub-group, lower grip strength of the dominant hand (P = 0.039) was another predictor of the illness's subsequent economic impact. In conclusion, our data show that simple clinical and laboratory parameters can be used early in the course of IA to predict the condition's impact on healthcare budgets.

Bacquet-Deschryver H, Jouen F, Quillard M, Ménard JF, Goëb V, Lequerré T, Mejjad O, Daragon A, Tron F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm U905 (IFRMP 23), Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. · J Clin Immunol. · Pubmed #18587633 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of 3 anti-TNFalpha agents on markers of autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathy (SPA) patients. METHODS: First-time anti-TNFalpha biologics (infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab) were prescribed to 156 RA and 95 SPA (58 ankylosing spondylarthritides, 37 psoriatic arthritides). During 1-2 years of follow-up, clinical, biological [antinuclear (ANA) and anti-double-stranded (dsDNA) antibodies, rheumatoid factors (RF), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) for RA], and therapeutic data were collected biannually. RESULTS: ANA appeared or ANA and anti-dsDNA titers increased significantly (P < 0.001) more under infliximab than etanercept in both rheumatisms and than adalimumab in RA patients. During the 2-year follow-up, ANA appeared more in RA patients taking adalimumab than etanercept (P = 0.003), but independently of the anti-TNFalpha used; anti-dsDNA titers rarely became positive. Under etanercept or infliximab, ANA and anti-dsDNA were not influenced by the underlying pathology nor were they affected by infliximab intensification over 18 months. Only one case of cutaneous lupus was observed in a patient having IgG anti-dsDNA. The therapeutic responses were independent of ANA and anti-dsDNA titers for all rheumatisms and biologics. In RA patients, RF titers, but not anti-CCP levels, declined with the therapeutic response for all biologics. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that has evaluated the impact of three TNFalpha blockers on ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies in RA and SPA patients. Autoimmunity was more induced with infliximab than etanercept and to a lesser degree to adalimumab but, more importantly, this emergent autoimmunity was exceptionally associated to clinical manifestations of lupus.

Goëb V, Dieudé P, Daveau R, Thomas-L'otellier M, Jouen F, Hau F, Boumier P, Tron F, Gilbert D, Fardellone P, Cornélis F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18535030 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of TNFRII 196R, PTPN22 1858T and HLA-shared epitope (SE) alleles, RFs and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) for RA diagnosis in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis. METHODS: We followed up 284 patients who had swelling of at least two joints that had persisted for longer than 4 weeks but had been evolving for <6 months. At 2 yrs, patients were classified as having RA or non-RA rheumatic diseases according to the ACR criteria. Patients were genotyped with respect to TNFRII 196M/R and PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphisms and HLA-SE. The presence of IgA, IgG and IgM RF isotypes and ACPA was sought in sera collected at disease onset. RESULTS: HLA-SE alleles alone, concomitant presence of TNFRII 196R and PTPN22 1858T alleles, IgA, IgG and IgM RF alone and ACPA were found to be significantly associated with RA diagnosis. Using logistic regression analysis, the concomitant presence of RF and ACPA at disease onset was the best association to predict RA diagnosis. In patients (n = 34) who did not fulfil the ACR criteria for RA at inclusion but who progressed to ACR positivity, the study of the genetic risk markers did not contribute to predict RA diagnosis at 2 yrs. CONCLUSIONS: PTPN22 1858T, TNFRII 196R and HLA-SE alleles do not improve the predictive value of RF and ACPA for RA diagnosis in our cohort, and do not contribute to an earlier diagnosis in undifferentiated patients initially negative for RF and ACPA.

Goëb V, Salle V, Duhaut P, Jouen F, Smail A, Ducroix JP, Tron F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm U519 (IFRMP23), Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, Rouen, France. · Clin Exp Immunol. · Pubmed #17286756 links to  free full text

Abstract: The aim of our study was (i) to compare the clinical and biological characteristics of 148 (137 women, 11 men) primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) patients at diagnosis as a function of their sex and (ii) to assess the prognostic value of anti-calpastatin and anti-alpha-fodrin autoantibodies. In addition, the presence of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-52- and 60-kDa Sjögren's syndrome A (SSA), anti-Sjögren's syndrome B (SSB), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies and rheumatoid factors (RF) of IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes was sought in sera collected at pSS onset. Raynaud's syndrome, significantly more frequent in women, was the only systemic manifestation of pSS whose frequency differed significantly as a function of the patient's sex (P = 0.02). ANA (P = 0.001) and anti-60-kDa SSA autoantibodies (P = 0.03) were significantly more common in women, while men never synthesized detectable levels of anti-SSB, anti-calpastatin or IgG anti-alpha-fodrin autoantibodies. In addition, anti-CCP autoantibodies were found in low percentages of pSS patients (4% F/18% M). The absence of autoantibodies does not exclude the diagnosis of pSS in men that will be based mainly on the anatomopathological findings of a minor salivary gland biopsy. Positivity of anti-60-kDa SSA, anti-SSB, anti-calpastatin, IgA and IgG anti-alpha-fodrin antibodies is not associated with pSS clinical and biological severity.

Meyer O, de Bandt M, Berthelot JM, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Saraux A, Wendling D, Guillemin F, Le Loët X, Anonymous00174. · Department of Rheumatology, AP-HP, Bichat Paris 7 University Hospital, CHU Bichat, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17194614 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The objective was to develop a clinical practice format for choosing a second-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) after a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD in patients with early RA. METHODS: A panel of 34 experts selected treatment option from various scenarios using the Thurstone pairwise method. The experts had to choose between two proposed DMARDs without proposing other options. The scenarios were obtained using the three items: DAS28, rheumatoid factor status and radiographic structural damage. A sample of 240 among 480 scenarios for each expert was taken at random. Responses given by at least 20% of the experts were considered pertinent. RESULTS: Recommendations for choosing a second DMARD for early RA after failure of a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD were established according to 4 parameters: type of first-line DMARD, activity, RF status and radiographic joint damage. The results of this study suggest that in patients with early RA who fail a 6-month course of first-line DMARD therapy, the best options may be addition of corticosteroid when disease activity is moderate to high and switching to a biologic agent when further radiographic joint damage occurs, particularly in patients with positive tests for RF. CONCLUSION: Although our scenarios did not include step-up (add instead of substitute) strategies, except for corticosteroids, we feel that the format presented here can optimise the management of patients with early RA seen in clinical practice.