Rheumatoid Arthritis: Landewé R

Schett G, Landewé R, van der Heijde D. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17513569 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Boonen A, Landewé R. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15647423 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Landewé R. · Department of Internal Medicine/Division of Rheumatology and Caphri Research Institute, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #17985418 No free full text.

Abstract: The emphasis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management today is on early diagnosis and intervention, but the choice of intervention has become increasingly complex. The number of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs available for treatment of RA has increased significantly. The efficacy, toxicity, and cost of those agents vary widely. And the progression of joint damage in RA is highly unpredictable and variable, ranging from self-limited disease to rapid progressive destruction. Prognostic markers that could identify patients with aggressive, rapidly progressing disease and predict the response to therapy would provide a rational basis for early, aggressive treatment. They would also protect patients with less aggressive disease from possible overtreatment and toxicities, and could have a significant influence on allocation of healthcare resources. The search for predictive markers of arthritis outcome has been and undoubtedly will continue to be the subject of many studies. This article will review both established and emerging predictive markers in RA.

Landewé R, van der Heijde D. · University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, PO Box 5800, 6202AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16239387 links to  free full text

Abstract: Despite the advent of sophisticated imaging systems, plain radiography continues to be a valuable outcome variable in clinical trials of inflammatory disorders for a number of reasons. This paper discusses the pros and cons of the different ways in which radiographic data in trials is presented; the minimum time needed to demonstrate radiographic progression in the context of a clinical trial; and the best ways to statistically analyse radiographic data.

Garnero P, Geusens P, Landewé R. · University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #14969051 No free full text.

Abstract: The progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease characterized by synovitis, cartilage degradation and bone erosion, is highly variable from patient to patient. New specific biological markers reflecting quantitative and dynamic changes in joint tissue turnover have been recently developed and include assays for type II collagen synthesis and degradation and synovitis. Increasing evidence from prospective studies in early RA indicate that some of these markers may be useful to predict the progression and identify patients at risk for rapid joint damage, before any damage is detected by radiography. Although studies on their value in assessing the efficacy of treatments are still limited, preliminary data in early RA suggest that biological markers will play an important role in the development and the early monitoring of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs with respect to future radiographic progression.

Landewé R, van de Heijde D. · Department Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University Hospital, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #14969048 No free full text.

Abstract: Radiographic progression is one of the most important outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials, because it reflects historic disease activity, is associated with loss of function over time, and can be reliably assessed. Trials involving patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) will differ from those focusing on RA patients in many respects. They include a heterogeneous spectrum of patients, and some of them will have self-limiting arthritis, or arthritis with a low likelihood of ever becoming erosive. Furthermore, because of the early presentation a high proportion of patients with a high likelihood of erosions will still be non-erosive at presentation; and since EIA trials will aim at permanent clinical remission induced by therapy, the signs of progression will be very subtle. Current radiographic scoring methods may not be sensitive to the small changes that are expected to occur in EIA trials. This makes radiographic progression a rather unlikely single primary outcome in such trials. However, "permanent clinical remission" (with or without therapy) appears to be a most realistic outcome in such trials, and radiographic stability (the demonstration of "no progression") may serve as a key criterion in establishing whether the endpoint of permanent clinical remission is actually met. The moment at which the first erosion develops is also important in making the correct diagnosis and has implications for the prognosis. We propose here a number of recommendations for the use of radiographic progression as one of the obligatory outcome measures in clinical trials with EIA.

van der Heijde D, Landewé R. · University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, University Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #14532139 links to  free full text

Abstract: It was shown previously that reparative changes in erosions can be seen in individual joints and individual patients. Whether repair may occur at a group level, and can be induced by treatment, is not known. This manuscript describes a means of visualising data obtained in a clinical trial by the use of probability plots to better understand the results. These probability plots give a good insight into the coherence of the data. They can also be used to make the interpretation of repair at a group level easier. Probability plots also explain the hazard of using binomial cut off points to compare treatment effects. The interference of true repair with measurement error is demonstrated. Repair at a group level is suggested if the mean progression score is statistically significantly different from zero, which can be visualised by a 95% confidence interval of this mean change score below zero. Application of this technique may give us better information on the effects of new drugs on the induction of repair.

Keystone E, Heijde D, Mason D, Landewé R, Vollenhoven RV, Combe B, Emery P, Strand V, Mease P, Desai C, Pavelka K. · University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18975346 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosage regimens of lyophilized certolizumab pegol (a novel PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor agent) as adjunctive therapy to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to MTX therapy alone. METHODS: In this 52-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 982 patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive treatment with subcutaneous certolizumab pegol at an initial dosage of 400 mg given at weeks 0, 2, and 4, with a subsequent dosage of 200 mg or 400 mg given every 2 weeks, plus MTX, or placebo plus MTX. Co-primary end points were the response rate at week 24 according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20) and the mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score at week 52. RESULTS: At week 24, ACR20 response rates using nonresponder imputation for the certolizumab pegol 200-mg and 400-mg groups were 58.8% and 60.8%, respectively, as compared with 13.6% for the placebo group. Differences in ACR20 response rates versus placebo were significant at week 1 and were sustained to week 52 (P < 0.001). At week 52, mean radiographic progression from baseline was reduced in patients treated with certolizumab pegol 200 mg (0.4 Sharp units) or 400 mg (0.2 Sharp units) as compared with that in placebo-treated patients (2.8 Sharp units) (P < 0.001 by rank analysis). Improvements in all ACR core set of disease activity measures, including physical function, were observed by week 1 with both certolizumab pegol dosage regimens. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: Treatment with certolizumab pegol 200 or 400 mg plus MTX resulted in a rapid and sustained reduction in RA signs and symptoms, inhibited the progression of structural joint damage, and improved physical function as compared with placebo plus MTX treatment in RA patients with an incomplete response to MTX.

van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Klareskog L, Rodríguez-Valverde V, Settas L, Pedersen R, Fatenejad S. · Rheumatology Department, University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15641062 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different methods of presentation and analysis of radiographic data in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial including 682 patients with active RA who were treated with methotrexate, etanercept, or a combination of the 2 drugs was used for this study. Probability plots of the change from baseline to year 1 were produced to visualize progression, and were compared with usual descriptive statistics. The primary analysis of the trial (based on annualized actual mean change from baseline in total Sharp score at 1 year, using linear imputation) was challenged using various ways of handling missing information with alternative imputation methods, and by various statistical analyses including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and mixed model analysis on both raw and log-transformed data. RESULTS: Probability plots provided detailed insight into the differentiated treatment effects between the 3 arms of this study. As adjuncts to formal hypothesis testing, these plots were more useful for presenting data than were summary descriptive statistics or use of preset cutoff points to define lack of progression. Additional analyses presented here support the results obtained with the per-protocol analysis that showed an advantage of the combination treatment compared with the monotherapy arms and for etanercept versus methotrexate alone. Various ways of handling missing information confirmed the robustness of the results. In addition, both ANCOVA and mixed model analyses on raw and on log-transformed data produced similar results. CONCLUSION: We suggest a panel of alternative analysis methods and alternative ways of handling missing information to verify that the radiographic results reported in an randomized controlled trial are not influenced by technical factors, such as interpolation, handling of missing data, and choice of statistical tests.

Landewé R, Geusens P, Boers M, van der Heijde D, Lems W, te Koppele J, van der Linden S, Garnero P. · Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15146408 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a randomized clinical trial setting with an aggressive combination-therapy arm and a mild-monotherapy arm, whether therapy-induced changes in urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and type II collagen (CTX-II) predict 5-year radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients had participated in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) trial comparing aggressive step-down combination therapy (the COBRA regimen, including temporary high-dose prednisolone, temporary low-dose methotrexate, and sulfasalazine [SSZ]) and mild monotherapy (SSZ). Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. Radiographs were scored according to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method (mean of 2 independent readers who were aware of the sequence). Individual long-term radiographic progression was estimated, using baseline radiographs and all radiographs obtained during the followup period, by simple linear regression analysis (curve fitting). RESULTS: Both COBRA therapy and SSZ monotherapy produced a significant decrease in urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels at 3 months, and this decrease was amplified at 6 months. COBRA therapy suppressed CTX-II (change from baseline levels -36% and -43% at 3 and 6 months, respectively), but not CTX-I, significantly better than did SSZ (-17% and -21% at 3 and 6 months, respectively) at 3 and 6 months. The magnitude of the decrease in urinary CTX-II levels at 3 months significantly predicted long-term (5-year) radiographic progression (beta = 0.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.13, 0.83]). This effect was independent of the change in disease activity and inflammation indices at 3 months. Patients whose CTX-II levels were normalized (<150 ng/mmoles of urinary creatinine) at 3 months had a significantly higher chance of radiographic stability (no progression over 5 years) than did patients whose CTX-II levels were increased both at baseline and at 3 months (odds ratio 4.5 [95% CI 1.5, 13]). CONCLUSION: The individual CTX-II response measured after 3 months of therapy in patients with active RA who had increased CTX-II levels at baseline independently predicts long-term radiographic progression. Urinary CTX-II levels may be used as early markers of treatment efficacy in patients with RA.

Garnero P, Landewé R, Boers M, Verhoeven A, Van Der Linden S, Christgau S, Van Der Heijde D, Boonen A, Geusens P. · INSERM Research Unit 403, and Synarc, Lyon, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12428224 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The known risk factors for radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not optimally discriminative in patients with early disease who do not have evidence of radiologic damage. We sought to determine whether urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II) collagen (markers of bone and cartilage destruction, respectively) are associated with long-term radiologic progression in patients with early RA. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 110 patients with early RA who were participating in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) clinical trial and followup study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral pulse prednisolone, methotrexate, plus sulfasalazine with sulfasalazine alone. We investigated the relationship between baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II and the mean annual progression of joint destruction over a median of 4 years, as measured by changes in the modified Sharp score (average of 2 independent readers). RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels in the highest tertile were the strongest predictors of radiologic progression (Sharp score increase >2 units/year; odds ratio 7.9 and 11.2, respectively), independently of treatment group, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, rheumatoid factor (RF), and baseline joint damage (Sharp score). The likelihood ratios for a positive test were 3.8 and 8.0 for CTX-I and CTX-II, respectively, which compared favorably with the likelihood ratios for the ESR (3.0), baseline joint damage (1.6), and RF (1.8). When patients were grouped according to the presence (Sharp score >/=4, n = 49) and absence (Sharp score <4, n = 61) of joint damage at baseline, CTX-I and CTX-II levels were predictive only in those without baseline joint damage (odds ratio 14.9 and 25.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: High baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II independently predict an increased risk of radiologic progression over 4 years in patients with early RA, especially those without radiologic joint damage. Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II may be useful for identifying individual RA patients at high risk of progression very early in the disease, before erosions can be detected radiographically. Such patients may be in special need of treatments that inhibit bone and cartilage degradation.

Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewé R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, Gaylis N, Murphy FT, Neal JS, Zhou Y, Visvanathan S, Hsia EC, Rahman MU, Anonymous00042. · Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Vienna, Austria. · Lancet. · Pubmed #19560810 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors are frequently used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, but whether use of a different TNFalpha inhibitor can improve patient response is unknown. We assess the efficacy and safety of the TNFalpha inhibitor golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received one or more TNFalpha inhibitors. METHODS: 461 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis from 82 sites in 10 countries were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system, stratified by study site and methotrexate use, to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n=155), 50 mg golimumab (n=153), or 100 mg golimumab (n=153) every 4 weeks between Feb 21, 2006, and Sept 26, 2007. Allocation was double-blind. Eligible patients had been treated with at least one dose of a TNFalpha inhibitor previously. Patients continued stable doses of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, oral corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The primary endpoint was achievement at week 14 of 20% or higher improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20). At week 16, patients who had less than 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts were given rescue therapy and changed treatment from placebo to 50 mg golimumab, or from 50 mg to 100 mg golimumab. Drug efficacy was assessed by intention to treat and safety was assessed according to the study drug given. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00299546. FINDINGS: Patients had discontinued previous TNFalpha inhibitors because of lack of effectiveness (269 [58%] patients) or reasons unrelated to effectiveness (246 [53%] patients), such as intolerance and accessibility issues. Patients had active disease, which was indicated by a median of 14.0 (IQR 9.0-22.0) swollen and 26.0 (16.0-41.0) tender joints for the whole group. 28 (18%) patients on placebo, 54 (35%) patients on 50 mg golimumab (odds ratio 2.5 [95% CI 1.5-4.2], p=0.0006), and 58 (38%) patients on 100 mg golimumab (2.8 [1.6-4.7], p=0.0001) achieved ACR20 at week 14. Two patients were never treated, and 57 patients did not complete the study because of adverse events, unsatisfactory treatment effect, loss to follow-up, death, or other reasons. 155 patients on placebo, 153 on 50 mg golimumab, and 153 on 100 mg golimumab were assessed for drug efficacy. For weeks 1-16, serious adverse events were recorded in 11 (7%) patients on placebo, 8 (5%) on 50 mg golimumab, and 4 (3%) on 100 mg golimumab. For weeks 1-24, after some patients were given rescue therapy, serious adverse events were recorded in 15 (10%) patients on placebo, 14 (5%) on 50 mg golimumab, and 8 (4%) on 100 mg golimumab. INTERPRETATION: Golimumab reduced the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with active disease who had previously received one or more TNFalpha inhibitors. FUNDING: Centocor Research and Development and Schering-Plough Research Institute.

Lukas C, Guillemin F, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Logeart I, Fautrel B, Daures JP, Combe B, Anonymous00090. · Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19327234 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To describe the rate and timing of DMARD start in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in France, and to determine the factors leading to this treatment start. METHODS: The ESPOIR cohort study collects data on patients presenting with early arthritis. Baseline characteristics were assessed, and Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the likelihood of starting DMARD treatment over time, adjusting for patient-, disease- and physician characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 775 analysed patients, 598 (77.2%) received at least 1 DMARD during the follow-up period, after a median time of 4.0 months. In general, a higher tender joint count, involvement of the hands, involvement of more than 3 joint groups, presence of abnormal CRP-levels or CCP-antibodies significantly increased the likelihood of being treated (p<0.01 for all determinants), as well as a positive result on the bilateral foot-squeeze test (p<0.04). In addition, a significant hetero-geneity in therapeutic strategy across the 14 tested French regions was found: adjusted hazard ratios for DMARD start ranged from 1 to 2.15 (p<0.01), depending on the region where a patient was followed. For anti-CCP test and swollen joint count we demonstrated a statistically significant interaction with geographic region, implying that these tests are interpreted differently across regions. The same factors that increased the likelihood to start a DMARD were related to an earlier start. CONCLUSION: Rate and timing of treatment start with DMARDs in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in France is determined by well known clinical and biochemical variables. Apart from these variables, however, unknown and intangible factors that seem to cluster geographically are responsible for important variations in practice performance.

Syversen SW, Goll GL, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Gaarder PI, Odegård S, Haavardsholm EA, Kvien TK. · Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23, Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19132792 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: As current predictors of joint destruction have low specificity, serological biomarkers reflecting bone and cartilage destruction have been proposed as tools in assessing prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether serum concentrations of a panel of biomarkers could predict radiographic progression in patients with RA. METHODS: A cohort of 238 patients with RA was followed longitudinally for 10 years with collection of clinical data and serum samples. These analyses focus on the 136 patients with radiographs of the hands available at baseline and at 5 and/or 10 years. Radiographs were scored according to the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (SHS). Baseline sera were analyzed for receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), human cartilage glycoprotein-39 (YKL-40), C2C, collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX-I), and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of radiographic progression. RESULTS: Baseline CTX-I levels were higher in progressors [0.41 ng/ml (interquartile range 0.31-0.75)] than in nonprogressors [0.32 ng/ml (IQR 0.21-0.49)], and were independently associated with 10-year change in radiographic damage score [ss = 16.4 (IQR 5.7-27.1)]. We found no association between radiographic progression and baseline serum levels of RANKL, OPG, C2C, YKL-40, or COMP. CONCLUSION: This longterm followup study of patients with RA indicates a relationship between elevated CTX-I levels in serum and subsequent joint destruction. This association was, however, weak, and our study does not support that serum CTX-I or any of the other tested biomarkers will serve as more useful prognostic markers than current predictors such as anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, radiographic damage early in the disease course, and signs of inflammation.

Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D, Anonymous00034. · University Hospital and CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18625618 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop a new index for disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (ASDAS) that is truthful, discriminative and feasible, and includes domains/items that are considered relevant by patients and doctors. METHODS: Eleven candidate variables covering six domains of disease activity, selected by ASAS experts in a Delphi exercise, were tested in a three-step approach, similar to the methodology used for the disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis. Data on 708 patients included in ISSAS (International Study on Starting tumour necrosis factor blocking agents in Ankylosing Spondylitis) were used. Cross validation was carried out in the OASIS cohort (Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study). RESULTS: Principal component analysis disclosed three factors with eigenvalues >0.75: patient assessments, peripheral joint assessments and acute phase reactants. Discriminant function analysis resulted in a correct classification in approximately 72% of the cases (prior probability approximately 50%). Regression analysis resulted in an index with five variables (total back pain, patient global assessment, duration of morning stiffness, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)). Three additional candidate indices were designed using similar methodology while omitting either ESR or CRP or patient global assessment. All four scores correlated with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; r = 0.67-0.80), patient (0.58-0.75) and physician's global assessment (0.41-0.48) of disease activity. All four candidate ASDAS indices performed better than BASDAI or single-item variables in discriminating between high and low disease activity state, according to doctors as well as patients in the OASIS cohort. CONCLUSION: The first steps in the development of a new assessment tool of disease activity in AS derived four candidate indices with good face and construct validity, and high discriminant capacity.

Lukas C, Sharp JT, Angwin J, Boers M, Duryea J, Hall JR, Kauffman JA, Landewé R, Langs G, Bernelot Moens HJ, Peloschek P, van der Heijde D. · University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18597408 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Comparison of performances of 5 (semi)automated methods in measuring joint space width (JSW) in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Change in JSW was determined by 5 measurement methods on 4 radiographs per patient from 107 patients included in the COBRA trial (comparing sulfasalazine alone or in combination with methotrexate and corticosteroids). For each method the number of patients with sufficient available results was assessed (efficiency). An independent repeated measurement was carried out on a random sample of 30 patients' baseline and 1-year radiographs, to evaluate within-method reliability of change scores. Discriminatory ability (DA) of the measurement methods (between the 2 treatment arms) was compared with the DA of the Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS) and its 2 components (erosion and JSW scores). RESULTS: The overall success rate varied widely between methods. Applying the chosen threshold of a minimum of 50% available joints with a change score per patient resulted in a success rate > 92% in 4/5 methods. Repeatability of measurements was good for most methods (intraclass correlation coefficient > or = 0.80 in 4/5 methods). Almost all measurement methods in 3 followup periods (12/14) showed a lower mean loss of JSW in patients from the intensive treatment group, although this was rarely statistically significant, confirming the known difference in structural damage. JSW as measured by the (semi)automated systems often showed higher DA than the JSW score of the SHS, but was lower than the total SHS and erosion scores. CONCLUSION: Although efficiency of the methods should be improved further, results already show good reliability and encouraging DA of most methods. Optimal information may be obtained with a combination of scoring of erosions and (semi)automated measurement of JSW.

van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Einstein S, Ory P, Vosse D, Ni L, Lin SL, Tsuji W, Davis JC. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18438853 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of etanercept therapy on radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Patients with AS who had previously participated in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept therapy were enrolled in a 72-week open-label extension. Radiographs of the cervical and lumbar spine from patients who received etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) for up to 96 weeks were compared with radiographs from patients in a large prevalence cohort (Outcome Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study [OASIS]) who had not been treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) agents. Radiographs obtained at 2 time points up to 96 weeks apart from patients in both study populations were digitized and read by 2 independent readers who were blinded with regard to patient group and sequence. The primary end point was the 96-week change in the modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS). RESULTS: A total of 257 patients treated with etanercept were compared with 175 unselected patients from the OASIS study. There was no significant difference in the change in the mSASSS from baseline among patients who received etanercept (mean +/- SD 0.91 +/- 2.45) versus those from the OASIS group (0.95 +/- 3.18). CONCLUSION: Unlike other inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, structural progression in AS seems to be independent of TNF, despite the fact that TNF is responsible for the signs and symptoms due to inflammation in this disease.

Hafström I, Albertsson K, Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Svensson B, Anonymous00040. · The Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18420939 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if remission induced by low-dose prednisolone during the first 2 years of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the BARFOT glucocorticoid (GC) study had a sustained effect on radiological damage for a total of 4 years. METHODS: A total of 150 of 211 eligible patients with RA who had been randomised to the 7.5 mg prednisolone group (P) or no prednisolone group (NoP) in addition to the initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were included. Radiographs of hands and feet were scored using the Sharp-van der Heijde scoring method. A patient was considered to be in remission if the 28-joint count disease activity score was <2.6. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 53 (14) and 57 (12) years for the patients in the P and NoP groups, respectively. 64% were female, 64% rheumatoid factor positive, and disease duration at baseline was 6 months. At 2 years the proportion of patients in remission in the P and NoP groups was 55 vs 30%, p = 0.003. Longitudinal analysis showed that over the entire course of the disease, patients on prednisolone had a higher probability of being in remission. Patients in remission at 2 years, compared with those not in remission, had significantly lower total Sharp score, erosion score and joint space narrowing score at 2 and 4 years. The changes in bone mineral density during the 4 years did not differ between those in remission and those with active disease, and were similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone 7.5 mg daily in addition to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs increases the rate of remission in patients with early RA, which has a beneficial and sustained effect on radiological damage.

Hoff M, Haugeberg G, Odegård S, Syversen S, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK. · Department of Rheumatology, St. Olav's Hospital, University Hospital in Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18339664 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine 1-year hand bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a predictor of radiographic damage at 5-year and 10-year follow-up METHODS: A total of 136 patients with RA (disease duration 0-4 years) were followed for 10 years with clinical data and hand radiographs. Joint damage was scored according to the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method (vdH Sharp score) and hand bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by digital x ray radiogrammetry (DXR). Group comparisons, correlation analyses and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between hand bone loss and radiographic joint damage. RESULTS: Patients with hand BMD loss at 1 year had a higher median increase in vdH Sharp score compared to patients without loss at 5 years (12 vs 2, p = 0.001) and 10 years (22 vs 4, p = 0.002). In a linear regression model adjusting for age, gender, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) and radiographic damage, absolute hand DXR-BMD loss at 1 year was an independent predictor of radiographic outcome at 5 years (p<0.01) and 10 years (p = 0.02). In a logistic regression model the odds ratio (95% CI) for radiographic progression among patients with hand BMD loss was 3.5 (1.4 to 8.8) and 3.5 (1.4 to 8.4) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early hand bone loss measured by DXR-BMD is an independent predictor of subsequent radiographic damage. Our findings support that quantitative hand bone loss in RA precedes radiographic joint damage and may be used as a tool for assessment of bone involvement in RA.

van der Heijde D, Landewé R, van Vollenhoven R, Fatenejad S, Klareskog L. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18203764 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the relationship between long-term radiographic damage and physical function. However, it is not known if short-term radiographic progression is also associated with physical function. Aim: To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical function and both the level of radiographic damage and the radiographic progression rate in patients with early or advanced active rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The database for the 2-year Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) was used for this study. Physical function was measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score at baseline, 6 months and 1 and 2 years. Radiographs of the hands and feet, taken at the same time points, were scored by the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (TSS). The HAQ score was modelled using generalised mixed linear modelling by TSS or progression in TSS (interval 0-1 year and 1-2 years) adjusted for age, sex, treatment and disease activity. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex and disease activity, both TSS and the change in TSS (progression rate) were significant determinants of the HAQ score. When radiographic progression was divided into four categories (negative, zero, minor and greater progression), results showed that HAQ scores tended to be higher with a higher rate of progression. Patients with negative progression scores had lower HAQ scores than patients with positive progression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater radiographic damage, and those with recent radiographic progression, have a higher degree of disability.

van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Landewé R, Bruyn GA, Cantagrel A, Durez P, Herrero-Beaumont G, Molad Y, Codreanu C, Valentini G, Zahora R, Pedersen R, MacPeek D, Wajdula J, Fatenejad S. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18050208 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) is a 3-year, double-blind, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of etanercept, methotrexate, and the combination of etanercept plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The results after 1 and 2 years of the study have been previously reported. Here we provide the 3-year clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety of etanercept, methotrexate, and the combination in patients with RA. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter TEMPO study, 682 patients received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, methotrexate < or =20 mg weekly, or the combination. Key efficacy assessments included the Disease Activity Score (DAS) and the DAS in 28 joints. RESULTS: Combination therapy resulted in significantly greater improvement in the DAS and in more patients with disease in remission than either monotherapy. This finding was confirmed by longitudinal analysis; patients receiving combination therapy were more than twice as likely to have disease in remission than those receiving either monotherapy. Independent predictors of remission included male sex, lower disease activity, lower level of joint destruction, and/or better physical function. Combination and etanercept therapy both resulted in significantly less radiographic progression than did methotrexate (P < 0.05). Etanercept and combination treatment were well tolerated, with no new safety findings. CONCLUSION: Etanercept plus methotrexate showed sustained efficacy through 3 years and remained more effective than either monotherapy, even after adjustment for patient withdrawal. Combination therapy for 3 years led to disease remission and inhibition of radiographic progression, 2 key goals for treatment of patients with RA.

Halvorsen EH, Pollmann S, Gilboe IM, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Ødegård S, Kvien TK, Molberg Ø. · Institute of Immunology, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, 0027 Oslo, Norway. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18006540 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Antibodies targeting citrullinated antigens are specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Citrullination is catalysed by the peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) enzyme family. Critical enzymes are often targeted by disease-specific antibodies in complex immune-mediated diseases. Here, we have tested for autoantibodies against human recombinant PAD4 (hPAD4) in Caucasian RA patients. METHODS: A time-resolved fluorometric immunoassay based on hPAD4 was developed to analyse sera from two RA cohorts (n = 237 and n = 177), one systemic lupus erythaematosus (SLE) cohort (n = 84) and 148 healthy controls. Simple and multiple analyses were performed to examine possible associations between anti-hPAD4 and disease variables. RESULTS: Raised levels of anti-hPAD4 IgG were found in both RA cohorts compared to the controls, and 23% of the RA patients were anti-hPAD4 IgG positive. Anti-hPAD4 was associated with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF), as well as increased physical disability. Anti-hPAD4 was also associated with higher longitudinal radiographic damage scores and increased clinical joint pathology, but weaker than anti-CCP. No associations were found between anti-hPAD4 and selected Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1 variants. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 23% of Caucasian RA patients have serum IgG antibodies against hPAD4.The presence of serum anti-hPAD4 IgG was in simple analyses associated with a more severe disease phenotype, and the association with physical disability was maintained in multiple analyses.

Dias EM, Lukas C, Landewé R, Fatenejad S, van der Heijde D. · Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17644537 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of a simplified scoring method for structural damage on radiographs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score or SENS) with the Sharp-van der Heijde Score (SHS) as reference. METHOD: We used the radiographic data from the Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO trial). The SENS was derived from the crude SHS data. Inter-observer reliability for status scores and change scores was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients and by the Smallest Detectable Change method. The ability to discriminate between treatment groups was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Stratifying the sensitivity to change and discriminative ability for different levels of disease severity assessed a potential ceiling effect. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was similar for both methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients were higher for status scores than for change scores. The Smallest Detectable Change was 4.98 (1.1% of possible maximum score) for SHS and 2.28 (3.5%) for SENS. Sensitivity of SENS to detect progression above the Smallest Detectable Change, with reference SHS, ranged from 45.0 to 88.7%. Specificity ranged from 81.5 to 97.3%, and the kappa coefficient (between-method agreement) ranged from 0.58 to 0.66. Discriminative ability between treatment groups was good and similar for both methods. A ceiling effect could not be detected. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to most of the tested properties, the performance of SENS is as good as that of SHS. This confirms that SENS is a valuable method, which may be feasible in clinical practice.

van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Boonen A, Einstein S, Herborn G, Rau R, Wassenberg S, Weissman BN, Winalski CS, Sharp JT. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #17605816 links to  free full text

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that experts recognize repair of erosions and, if so, to determine which, if any, morphologic features permitted them to recognize the repair. We also tested whether scoring by a standard method detected repair. Seven experienced readers of radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis were presented with 64 sets of single joints-of-interest at two time points, randomized and blinded for the correct sequence. The readers assessed which joint was better, and recorded whether any of six specific features were seen. Two independent readers, experienced in scoring by the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method who were not on the expert panel, then scored the complete films that included the joint-of-interest. The panel agreed very well on which of two joints was better, and, even though they did not know the true sequence, the panel accurately assigned a sequence slightly better than chance alone (58%) but worse than their agreement on which image was 'better or worse' (78%). The readers therefore indirectly assigned repair by choosing the second film as the best. Putative repair features were seen in cases of both repair and progression, and were not discriminatory. Similar results were obtained when the experts were presented with the entire hand or foot containing the joint-of-interest. In the third repair exercise, two independent readers who scored whole hands and feet using a standard method found a mean negative score in 22/60 joints-of-interest. All 22 joints were also scored as repair by the panel. Repair was detected reliably by a majority of the panel on viewing paired images based on a better/worse decision and assigning sequence in a set of images that were blinded for sequence by an independent project manager. In this test set of images, repair was manifested by a reduction in the size of erosion in many cases. Size was one feature that aided the experts to detect repair but cannot be the only one; the experts had to find other features to determine whether a smaller erosion was the first in a sequence of radiographs in a patient with progressive damage or was the second film in a patient exhibiting repair. The change in size of erosion was also picked up by independent readers applying the van der Heijde-modified Sharp scoring method and was reflected in their scores.

Maksymowych WP, Landewé R, Conner-Spady B, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Tempel H, Poole AR, Wang N, van der Heijde D. · University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17530713 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: In prospective studies, only baseline radiographic damage has been identified as an independent predictor of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Several biomarkers have been identified as independent predictors of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis, however, and these may be of use in AS. This study was undertaken to analyze serologic biomarkers as predictors of radiographic progression in AS. METHODS: We measured a panel of biomarkers reflecting cartilage turnover and osteoclasis. These biomarkers were cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, human cartilage gp-39 (YKL-40), type II collagen epitopes detected by the C2C and C1,2C degradation assays and the CPII synthesis assay, aggrecan 846 epitope, osteoprotegerin, and matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3). The analysis was performed in a cohort of AS patients from the Netherlands, Belgium, and France enrolled in a longitudinal study, the Outcome Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study. We examined 2-year radiographic progression data scored using the modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS). RESULTS: Complete data were available on 97 patients. Only the biomarkers YKL-40 and MMP-3 showed weak to moderate univariate correlation with 2-year progression. After adjustment for sex, age, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, and baseline mSASSS, only MMP-3 was significantly associated with 2-year progression (beta = 0.29, P = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis revealed MMP-3 (cutoff 68 ng/ml; odds ratio 9.4 [95% confidence interval 1.6-56]) and baseline mSASSS (cutoff 10 mSASSS units; odds ratio 18.6 [95% confidence interval 2.5-138]) as the only independent predictors of 2-year progression (cutoff 3 mSASSS units; model R(2) = 50%). MMP-3 was primarily contributory in patients who already had substantial baseline damage (>10 mSASSS units). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that MMP-3 is a significant independent predictor of radiographic progression in patients with AS, particularly in those with preexisting radiographic damage.