Rheumatoid Arthritis: Krueger K

Emery P, Van Vollenhoven R, Ostergaard M, Choy E, Combe B, Graninger W, Krueger K, Matucci-Cerinic M, Navarro F, van Riel P, Settas L, Steinfeld S. · University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #19286904 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Buttgereit F, Doering G, Schaeffler A, Witte S, Sierakowski S, Gromnica-Ihle E, Jeka S, Krueger K, Szechinski J, Alten R. · Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany. · Lancet. · Pubmed #18207016 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythms are changed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A new modified-release delivery system has been developed which adapts the release of the administered glucocorticoid to the circadian rhythms of endogenous cortisol and disease symptoms to improve the benefit-risk ratio of glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new modified-release prednisone tablet compared with immediate-release prednisone in patients with this disease. METHODS: In a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial, 288 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to either a modified-release prednisone tablet (n=144) or to an immediate-release prednisone tablet (n=144). The modified-release tablet was taken at bedtime and prednisone was released with a delay of 4 h after ingestion. This treatment was compared with morning administration of immediate-release prednisone as an active comparator. The primary outcome measure was duration of morning stiffness of the joints. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00146640. FINDINGS: The mean relative change in duration of morning stiffness of the joints from baseline to end of treatment was significantly higher with modified-release prednisone than with immediate-release prednisone (-22.7%vs -0.4%; difference=22.4% [95% CI 0.49-44.30]; p=0.045). Patients in the prednisone modified-release group achieved a mean reduction of 44.0 (SD 136.6) min compared with baseline. The absolute difference between the treatment groups was 29.2 min (95% CI -2.59 to 61.9) in favour of modified-release prednisone (p=0.072). The safety profile did not differ between treatments. INTERPRETATION: Modified-release prednisone is well tolerated, convenient to administer, and produces a clinically relevant reduction of morning stiffness of the joints in addition to all known therapeutic effects of immediate-release prednisone.

Krueger K, Lino L, Dore R, Radominski S, Zhang Y, Kaur A, Simpson R, Curtis S. · Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, Munchen, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17965424 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A randomised, double-blind study to compare the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, safety and efficacy of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 4086 patients (mean age 60.8 years) diagnosed with RA were enrolled and received etoricoxib 90 mg daily (n = 2032) or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily (n = 2054). Use of gastroprotective agents and low-dose aspirin was allowed. The prespecified primary end point consisted of the cumulative rate of patient discontinuations due to clinical and laboratory GI adverse experiences (AEs). General safety was also assessed, including adjudicated thrombotic cardiovascular event data. Efficacy was evaluated using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGADS; 0-4 point scale). RESULTS: Mean (SD; maximum) duration of treatment was 19.3 (10.3; 32.9) and 19.1 (10.4; 33.1) months in the etoricoxib and diclofenac groups, respectively. The cumulative discontinuation rate due to GI AEs was significantly lower with etoricoxib than diclofenac (5.2 vs 8.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.81; p<or=0.001)). The incidence of discontinuations for hypertension-related and oedema-related AEs were significantly higher with etoricoxib (2.5% and 1.1% respectively) compared with diclofenac (1.5% and 0.4% respectively; p<0.001 for hypertension and p<0.01 for oedema). Etoricoxib and diclofenac treatment resulted in similar efficacy (PGADS mean changes from baseline -0.62 vs -0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Etoricoxib 90 mg demonstrated a significantly lower risk for discontinuing treatment due to GI AEs compared with diclofenac 150 mg. Discontinuations from renovascular AEs, although less common than discontinuations from GI AEs, were significantly higher with etoricoxib.