Rheumatoid Arthritis: Kavanaugh AF

Kavanaugh AF. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16331750 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Kavanaugh AF. · Center for Innovative Therapy, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California 92093-0943, USA. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #16652441 No free full text.

Abstract: Reported data from recent clinical trials have contributed substantially to our growing understanding of the potential effectiveness and safety of B cell targeted therapy in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Trials with rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that depletes mature B cells, have amassed the most data of any B cell targeted therapy to date. A number of other B cell directed therapies are under investigation. Interestingly, although they may share a common target, the different agents have quite distinct mechanisms of action, and therefore their efficacy and safety profiles may differ. A common concern with all B cell directed therapies is the potential effect these agents may have on humoral immunity. The safety profile of rituximab in the oncology setting is well known, based on a database of well over 370,000 patients. Phase II trials of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have begun to examine safety issues specifically in the RA population, including issues surrounding longterm and repeated treatment safety profiles. Questions about the longterm safety of B cell therapy remain to be clarified: What will be the safety profile for repeated treatment courses? What will be the safety profile when B cell targeted therapies are used in sequence or in conjunction with other agents? Answers to these important questions are likely to come from careful observations by treating clinicians, data from registries, and longterm followup of patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Strand V, Kavanaugh AF. · Division of Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #15150427 links to  free full text

Abstract: Bone loss in RA includes juxta-articular osteopenia, erosions and systemic osteoporosis. In each case, synthesis of new bone matrix is unable to balance osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, resulting in net bone loss. IL-1, TNF and other proinflammatory cytokines stimulate osteoclast differentiation and activation, resulting in bone loss. In addition, these proinflammatory cytokines stimulate synovial fibroblasts and chondrocytes to produce proteinases that degrade cartilage. In animal arthritis models, blocking IL-1 significantly reduces bone erosions and cartilage degradation, whereas blocking TNF decreases synovitis. In patients with active RA, treatment with the TNF blockers etanercept and infliximab, as well as with anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, significantly reduced erosions and joint space narrowing. It remains to be determined, however, whether slowing radiographic progression with these biological therapies will significantly improve long-term outcomes in RA.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Emery P, Gibofsky A, Kavanaugh AF, Keystone EC, Klareskog L, Russell AS, van de Putte LB, Weisman MH, Kavenaugh AF. · University of California, UCLA, Rheumatology, Division Los Angeles, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #14532138 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Crofford JJ, Emery P, Feldmann M, Kalden JR, Kavanaugh AF, Keystone EC, Klareskog LG, Lipsky PE, Maini RN, Russell AS, Scott DL, Smolen JS, Van de Putte LB, Visher TL, Weisman MH. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11053077 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Breedveld FC, Han C, Bala M, van der Heijde D, Baker D, Kavanaugh AF, Maini RN, Lipsky PE. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15286005 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with poor physical function in rheumatoid arthritis and to assess whether baseline joint damage has an impact on improvement in physical function during infliximab treatment. METHODS: 428 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment received methotrexate alone or with infliximab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every four or eight weeks) for 54 weeks (the ATTRACT trial). Data on clinical outcomes and physical function (assessed by the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ)) were collected. Structural damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp score. Odds ratios (OR) for factors associated with severe functional disability (HAQ > or =2.0) at baseline were estimated using multiple logistic regression analyses, and baseline factors related to the change in physical function after treatment at week 54 were determined. RESULTS: Baseline radiographic scores were correlated with baseline HAQ scores. After adjustment for demographic characteristics in the logistic regression model, baseline disease activity scores, radiological joint damage, fatigue, and morning stiffness were found to be associated with severe functional disability (HAQ >2.0), with OR values of 2.00 (1.53 to 2.63), 1.82 (1.15 to 2.87), 1.19 (1.05 to 1.34), and 1.07 (1.01 to 1.13), respectively. In multiple linear regression analysis, physical disability, joint damage, and fatigue at baseline were correlated with less improvement in physical function after treatment. Infliximab treatment was associated with greater improvement in physical function. CONCLUSIONS: Greater joint damage at baseline was associated with poorer physical function at baseline and less improvement in physical function after treatment, underlining the importance of early intervention to slow the progression of joint destruction.

Keystone EC, Kavanaugh AF, Sharp JT, Tannenbaum H, Hua Y, Teoh LS, Fischkoff SA, Chartash EK. · University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15146409 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is an important proinflammatory cytokine that mediates inflammatory synovitis and articular matrix degradation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the ability of adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, to inhibit the progression of structural joint damage, reduce the signs and symptoms, and improve physical function in patients with active RA receiving concomitant treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In this multicenter, 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 619 patients with active RA who had an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week (n = 207), adalimumab 20 mg subcutaneously every week (n = 212), or placebo (n = 200) plus concomitant MTX. The primary efficacy end points were radiographic progression at week 52 (total Sharp score by a modified method [TSS]), clinical response at week 24 (improvements of at least 20% in the American College of Rheumatology core criteria [ACR20]), and physical function at week 52 (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]). RESULTS: At week 52, there was statistically significantly less radiographic progression, as measured by the change in TSS, in the patients receiving adalimumab either 40 mg every other week (mean +/- SD change 0.1 +/- 4.8) or 20 mg weekly (0.8 +/- 4.9) as compared with that in the placebo group (2.7 +/- 6.8) (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). In addition, there were statistically significant changes in the components of the TSS. At week 24, ACR20 responses were achieved by 63% and 61% of patients in the adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly groups, respectively, versus 30% of patients in the placebo group (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, ACR20 responses were achieved by 59% and 55% of patients taking adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly, respectively, versus 24% of patients taking placebo (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, physical function as measured by the HAQ demonstrated statistically significant improvement with adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly compared with placebo (mean change in HAQ score -0.59 and -0.61, respectively, versus -0.25; P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). A total of 467 patients (75.4%) completed 52 weeks of treatment. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated. Discontinuations occurred in 22.0% of adalimumab-treated patients and in 30.0% of placebo-treated patients. The rate of adverse events (both serious and nonserious) was comparable in the adalimumab and placebo groups, although the proportion of patients reporting serious infections was higher in patients receiving adalimumab (3.8%) than in those receiving placebo (0.5%) (P < or = 0.02), and was highest in the patients receiving 40 mg every other week. CONCLUSION: In this 52-week trial, adalimumab was more effective than placebo at inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage, reducing the signs and symptoms, and improving physical function in patients with active RA who had demonstrated an incomplete response to MTX.

Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, van Vollenhoven R, Sharp J, Perez JL, Spencer-Green GT. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, C4-R Postbox 9600, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16385520 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score. RESULTS: Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission.

Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Kavanaugh AF, Chartash EK, Segurado OG. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16308341 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) given for up to 4 years in patients with active, longstanding rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Patients responding inadequately to MTX were entered into a 24 week, controlled study (ARMADA) with adalimumab plus MTX or placebo plus MTX, and some were enrolled in a subsequent open label extension. The efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated. Additional analyses were made for those patients whose corticosteroid and/or MTX dosages were adjusted during the extension. RESULTS: Of 271 patients in the original ARMADA trial, 262 received at least one dose of adalimumab and were evaluated. At the time of analysis, 162/262 (62%) patients had remained in the study and received treatment for a mean of 3.4 years. Withdrawals were for lack of efficacy (8%), adverse events (12%), and other reasons (18%). In 147 patients who completed 4 years' treatment, efficacy achieved at 6 months was maintained. At 4 years, 78%, 57%, and 31% had achieved ACR20/50/70; 43% achieved clinical remission (DAS28 <2.6); and 22% had no physical function abnormalities (HAQ = 0). Results were similar for 196 patients who received treatment for 2-4 years. Efficacy was maintained in many patients when dosages were decreased (corticosteroids (51/81 (63%) patients), MTX (92/217 (42%)), or both (25/217 (12%))). Serious adverse events were comparable during open label treatment and the controlled phase. Serious infections occurring during open label treatment and the blinded period were similar (2.03 v 2.30 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab plus MTX sustained clinical response and remission in patients with RA during 4 years. The safety profile during the first 6 months was similar to that after 4 years' follow up. Reduction of corticosteroid and/or MTX dosages did not adversely affect long term efficacy.

Pincus T, Yazici Y, Yazici H, Kavanaugh AF, Kremer JM, Wolfe F. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16320353 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.