Rheumatoid Arthritis: Juvin R

Gaudin P, Leguen-Guegan S, Allenet B, Baillet A, Grange L, Juvin R. · Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Sud, Teaching Hospital, BP 338, 38434 Echirolles cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17913551 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Dynamic exercise therapy as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine for healthy individuals is of unclear relevance to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). No recommendations on this issue are available. Few studies have evaluated the optimal program, frequency, or target population; furthermore, there is no consensus about the best assessment tools for monitoring clinical, functional, and structural parameters during dynamic exercise therapy in patients with RA. METHODS: We conducted an extensive review of the literature published between 1964 and 2005. We identified nine randomized controlled studies that provided a high level of proof regarding the effects of dynamic exercise therapy in RA patients older than 18 years of age. RESULTS: Dynamic exercise programs improve aerobic capacity and muscle strength in patients with RA. Their effects on functional capacity are unclear, and many sources of bias influenced the study results. The clinical and laboratory safety profiles were good. The structural impact of dynamic exercise remains to be determined.

Baillet A, Payraud E, Niderprim VA, Nissen MJ, Allenet B, François P, Grange L, Casez P, Juvin R, Gaudin P. · 1Clinic of Rheumatology, Hôpital Sud, Echirolles, Hôpital A Michallon, Grenoble, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19211654 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional, clinical, radiological and quality of life outcomes of a 4-week dynamic exercise programme (DEP) in RA. METHODS: Patients matched on the principal medico-social parameters were randomly assigned to either the DEP or the conventional joint rehabilitation group. Primary end point for judging effectiveness was functional status assessed by HAQ. Secondary outcomes included Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form (AIMS2-SF) and radiological worsening measured by Simple Narrowing Erosion Score (SENS). Clinical evaluation consisted of disease activity score (DAS 28), cycling aerobic fitness and dexterity. Dexterity was measured using Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA) and Duruoz Hand Index (DHI). Data were collected at baseline 1, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled. HAQ improved throughout the length of the trial in the DEP group. This improvement was greater in DEP than in the standard joint rehabilitation group at 1 month (-0.2 vs no variation from baseline, P = 0.04), but not at 6 months (-0.2 vs -0.1 in control group, P = 0.25) or 12 months (-0.1 vs no variation in control group, P = 0.51). DEP improved NHP (-23 vs + 7% in control group, P = 0.01) and aerobic fitness (+0.3 vs + 0.1 km per 5 min in control group, P = 0.02) at 1 month but the progress was not statistically significant thereafter. DEP also improved DHI, SODA, DAS 28 and AIMS2-SF, although not significantly. CONCLUSION: DEP was effective on functional status assessed by HAQ, quality of life and aerobic fitness at 1 month.

Trocmé C, Marotte H, Baillet A, Pallot-Prades B, Garin J, Grange L, Miossec P, Tebib J, Berger F, Nissen MJ, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. · GREPI CNRS UMR 5525, INSERM IFR 130, Université J Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18664547 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The use of biologicals such as infliximab has dramatically improved the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors predictive of therapeutic response need to be identified. A proteomic study was performed prior to infliximab therapy to identify a panel of candidate protein biomarkers of RA predictive of treatment response. METHODS: Plasma profiles of 60 patients with RA (28 non-responders (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)) negative and 32 responders (ACR70 positive) to infliximab) were studied by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) technology on two types of arrays, an anion exchange array (SAX2) and a nickel affinity array (IMAC3-Ni). Biomarker characterisation was carried out using classical biochemical methods (purification by ammonium sulfate precipitation or metal affinity chromatography) and identification by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis. RESULTS: Two distinct protein profiles were observed on both arrays and several proteins were differentially expressed in both patient populations. Five proteins at 3.86, 7.77, 7.97, 8.14 and 74.07 kDa were overexpressed in the non-responder group, whereas one at 28 kDa was increased in the responder population (sensitivity>56%, specificity>77.5%). Moreover, combination of several biomarkers improved the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of patient response to over 97%. The 28 kDa protein was characterised as apolipoprotein A-I and the 7.77 kDa biomarker was identified as platelet factor 4. CONCLUSIONS: Six plasma biomarkers are characterised, enabling the detection of patient response to infliximab with high sensitivity and specificity. Apolipoprotein A-1 was predictive of a good response to infliximab, whereas platelet factor 4 was associated with non-responders.

Roux CH, Saraux A, Le Bihan E, Fardellone P, Guggenbuhl P, Fautrel B, Masson C, Chary-Valckenaere I, Cantagrel A, Juvin R, Flipo RM, Euller-Ziegler L, Coste J, Guillemin F. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Nice, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17117490 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine geographical variation in the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthropathies (SpA) in France. METHODS: The survey sample was drawn from 7 areas of France. Households were randomly selected using the national telephone directory, and an individual within each household was randomly chosen by the next-birthday method. All cases of suspected RA and SpA were confirmed by the patient's rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Standardized estimates of prevalence were compared between regions and groups of regions. RESULTS: In total 15,219 anonymous telephone numbers were selected. An average response rate of 64% led to a total of 9395 respondents included in the study. The highest regional rates of RA were observed in the south (range 0.59-0.66%), and the lowest in the north (range 0.14-0.24%), with a national rate of 0.31% (95% CI 0.18-0.48%). Regional heterogeneity was observed for SpA, with the highest rates in Bretagne (0.47%) and the Sud-Est (0.53%) and a national rate of 0.30% (95% CI 0.17-0.46%). CONCLUSION: This study is the largest of its kind conducted in France. It shows inter-regional variations, mainly in RA, with a higher prevalence in the south of the country. The many potential reasons for the heterogeneity observed, including genetic and environmental factors, warrant further research.

Saraux A, Guillemin F, Guggenbuhl P, Roux CH, Fardellone P, Le Bihan E, Cantagrel A, Chary-Valckenaere I, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Juvin R, Behier JM, Fautrel B, Masson C, Coste J. · Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital, Brest-Cedex, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15817661 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) in France in a multiregional representative sample in the year 2001. METHODS: A two stage random sample was constituted in seven areas from the national telephone directory and the next birthday method in each household. Interviewers were patient-members of self help groups trained to administer telephone surveys using a validated questionnaire for detecting inflammatory joint disease. Quality of data collection was controlled periodically. SpA was confirmed by the patient's rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Prevalence estimates after probability sampling correction were standardised for age and sex (1999 national census). RESULTS: Among the 15 219 anonymous telephone numbers selected, 3.6% were places of work or secondary residences and were excluded. The phone interview participation rate ranged across regions from 55.1 to 69.9%. 3554 men and 5841 women were included in the study. Twenty nine cases of SpA were confirmed. All but one fulfilled ESSG criteria. Mean age was 47 years (range 21-78). The overall prevalence standardised for age and sex was 0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.46). Prevalence was similar in women (0.29% (95% CI 0.14 to 0.49)) and men (0.31 % (95% CI 0.12 to 0.60)). Geographical analysis by department clustering found no significant differences. The prevalence of SpA was as high as that of rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of SpA in France was 0.30% in 2001, with no difference between women and men. Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis were the most common SpA subsets.

Guillemin F, Saraux A, Guggenbuhl P, Roux CH, Fardellone P, Le Bihan E, Cantagrel A, Chary-Valckenaere I, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Juvin R, Behier JM, Fautrel B, Masson C, Coste J. · EA 3444 School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nancy, Nancy, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15800010 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vary across Europe. Recent estimates in southern European countries showed a lower prevalence than in northern countries. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of RA in France in a multiregional representative sample in the year 2001. METHODS: A two stage random sample was constituted in seven areas (20 counties) from the national telephone directory of households and by the next birthday method in each household. Patient-interviewers, member of self help groups, were trained to administer telephone surveys using a validated questionnaire for case detection of inflammatory rheumatism, and conducted the survey under quality control. All suspected cases of RA were confirmed by their rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Prevalence estimates after probability sampling correction were standardised for age and sex (national census 1999). RESULTS: An average response rate of 64.7% (two stages combined) led to a total of 9395 respondents. Standardised prevalence was 0.31% (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.48) for RA, 0.51% in women and 0.09% in men, with a higher age-specific prevalence in the 65-74 year age band. A geographical analysis of county clustering showed significant variation across the country. CONCLUSION: This national multiregional cooperative study demonstrates the usefulness of working in association with patients of self help groups. It showed a similar prevalence of RA to that of the spondyloarthropathies estimated concomitantly during the survey. It provides a reliable basis for definition of population targets for healthcare delivery and drug treatments.

Saraux A, Guillemin F, Fardellone P, Guggenbuhl P, Behier JM, Cantagrel A, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Juvin R, Le Loet X, Masson C, Sany J, Schaeverbeke T, Coste J, Anonymous00053. · Rheumatology Department, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHU Brest, 29609 Brest cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #14769520 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate agreement between a rheumatologist visit and a telephone interview by a patient organization member, regarding the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthropathy (SpA) and the classification criteria for these two conditions. METHOD: Patients underwent a standardized interview and physical examination by hospital-based rheumatologists, who diagnosed RA in 230 cases, SpA in 175, and other conditions (controls) in 195. Members of patient organizations then used a standardized questionnaire to interview the patients by telephone about their diagnosis and about 1987 ACR classification criteria for RA and the ESSG criteria for SpA. RESULTS: Agreement between the two sources of data was poor for the classification criteria but satisfactory for the diagnosis (kappa, 0.84 (0.81-0.87) for RA and 0.78 (0.75-0.81) for SpA). CONCLUSION: Standardized telephone interviews conducted by patient organization members accurately identify the diagnosis made by rheumatologists based on a physical examination and medical record review, whereas agreement is poor regarding classification criteria for RA and SpA.

Maillefert JF, Sibilia J, Toussirot E, Vignon E, Eschard JP, Lorcerie B, Juvin R, Parchin-Geneste N, Piroth C, Wendling D, Kuntz JL, Tavernier C, Gaudin P. · Department of Rheumatology, Dijon University Hospital, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10534549 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To obtain an overview of rheumatic disorders occurring after hepatitis B vaccination. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to rheumatology departments in nine French hospitals. Criteria for entry were rheumatic complaints of 1 week's duration or more, occurrence during the 2 months following hepatitis B vaccination, no previously diagnosed rheumatic disease and no other explanation for the complaints. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included. The observed disorders were as follows: rheumatoid arthritis for six patients; exacerbation of a previously non-diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus for two; post-vaccinal arthritis for five; polyarthralgia-myalgia for four; suspected or biopsy-proved vasculitis for three; miscellaneous for two. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis B vaccine might be followed by various rheumatic conditions and might trigger the onset of underlying inflammatory or autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However, a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccination and the observed rheumatic manifestations cannot be easily established. Further epidemiological studies are needed to establish whether hepatitis B vaccination is associated or not with an incidence of rheumatic disorders higher than normal.