| 2 |
Article Hepatotoxicity associated with sulfasalazine in inflammatory arthritis: A case series from a local surveillance of serious adverse events. free! 2008
Jobanputra P, Amarasena R, Maggs F, Homer D, Bowman S, Rankin E, Filer A, Raza K, Jubb R. · Department of Rheumatology, Selly Oak Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Raddlebarn Road, Birmingham, B29 6JD, UK. · BMC Musculoskelet Disord. · Pubmed #18405372 links to free full text
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are handicapped by under-reporting and limited detail on individual cases. We report an investigation from a local surveillance for serious adverse drug reactions associated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs that was triggered by the occurrence of liver failure in two of our patients. METHODS: Serious ADR reports have been solicited from local clinicians by regular postcards over the past seven years. Patients', who had hepatotoxicity on sulfasalazine and met a definition of a serious ADR, were identified. Two clinicians reviewed structured case reports and assessed causality by consensus and by using a causality assessment instrument. The likely frequency of hepatotoxicity with sulfasalazine was estimated by making a series of conservative assumptions. RESULTS: Ten cases were identified: eight occurred during surveillance. Eight patients were hospitalised, two in hepatic failure - one died after a liver transplant. All but one event occurred within 6 weeks of treatment. Seven patients had a skin rash, three eosinophilia and one interstitial nephritis. Five patients were of Black British of African or Caribbean descent. Liver enzymes showed a hepatocellular pattern in four cases and a mixed pattern in six. Drug-related hepatotoxicity was judged probable or highly probable in 8 patients. The likely frequency of serious hepatotoxicity with sulfasalazine was estimated at 0.4% of treated patients. CONCLUSION: Serious hepatotoxicity associated with sulfasalazine appears to be under-appreciated and intensive monitoring and vigilance in the first 6 weeks of treatment is especially important.
|
| 3 |
Article The outcome of knee synovitis in early arthritis provides guidelines for management. 2000
Devlin J, Gough A, Huissoon A, Perkins P, Jubb R, Emery P. · Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, Leeds, UK. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10791615 No free full text.
Abstract: The aim of the study was to examine the clinical outcome of patients presenting to an early arthritis clinic with synovitis of the knee. The patients were assessed at presentation for evidence and pattern of joint inflammation. These patients were then reassessed at 3, 6 and 12 months and thereafter annually to determine clinical outcome. One thousand six hundred and thirty-three consecutive referrals were examined, 903 of whom had early synovitis. One hundred and thirty had knee synovitis at presentation, of whom 73 fulfilled ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the study. All 73 presented with a symmetrical polyarthritis that included the small joints and had persistent disease at 1 year. Of the remaining 57 patients, 61% of those presenting with an oligoarthritis and 33% with a polyarthritis (including knee synovitis) were in remission at 1 year. None of those presenting as a monoarthritis of the knee had inflammation at 1 year or fulfilled ACR criteria for RA at any time. It was concluded that patients presenting with knee synovitis in the absence of a small joint polyarthritis usually have a benign course following standard therapy. No patient who presented with monoarthritis developed RA. Knee synovitis as part of a polyarthritis (even when not fulfilling ACR criteria) probably justifies disease-modifying antirheumatic drug at presentation.
|