Rheumatoid Arthritis: Jouen F

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 6 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Arthritis, Rheumatoid," originating from Planet Earth —» Jouen F.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Article Diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of antibodies to citrullinated peptides. 2009

Goëb V, Jouen F, Gilbert D, Le Loët X, Tron F, Vittecoq O. · Service de Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19524474 No free full text.

Abstract: The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) must be made early, because prompt initiation of treatments tailored to disease activity is crucial to improve structural and functional outcomes. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs) are well-established diagnostic markers for RA and should be included in the classification criteria. Here, we describe the main tests for detecting ACPAs and we underline the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of ACPAs in patients with RA. The presence of ACPAs predicts poorer functional and structural outcomes, and ACPA titers respond to some of the medications used in RA. Therefore, ACPA titers should be determined at regular intervals throughout follow-up.

2 Article Impact of three anti-TNFalpha biologics on existing and emergent autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthropathy patients. 2008

Bacquet-Deschryver H, Jouen F, Quillard M, Ménard JF, Goëb V, Lequerré T, Mejjad O, Daragon A, Tron F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm U905 (IFRMP 23), Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. · J Clin Immunol. · Pubmed #18587633 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of 3 anti-TNFalpha agents on markers of autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathy (SPA) patients. METHODS: First-time anti-TNFalpha biologics (infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab) were prescribed to 156 RA and 95 SPA (58 ankylosing spondylarthritides, 37 psoriatic arthritides). During 1-2 years of follow-up, clinical, biological [antinuclear (ANA) and anti-double-stranded (dsDNA) antibodies, rheumatoid factors (RF), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) for RA], and therapeutic data were collected biannually. RESULTS: ANA appeared or ANA and anti-dsDNA titers increased significantly (P < 0.001) more under infliximab than etanercept in both rheumatisms and than adalimumab in RA patients. During the 2-year follow-up, ANA appeared more in RA patients taking adalimumab than etanercept (P = 0.003), but independently of the anti-TNFalpha used; anti-dsDNA titers rarely became positive. Under etanercept or infliximab, ANA and anti-dsDNA were not influenced by the underlying pathology nor were they affected by infliximab intensification over 18 months. Only one case of cutaneous lupus was observed in a patient having IgG anti-dsDNA. The therapeutic responses were independent of ANA and anti-dsDNA titers for all rheumatisms and biologics. In RA patients, RF titers, but not anti-CCP levels, declined with the therapeutic response for all biologics. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that has evaluated the impact of three TNFalpha blockers on ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies in RA and SPA patients. Autoimmunity was more induced with infliximab than etanercept and to a lesser degree to adalimumab but, more importantly, this emergent autoimmunity was exceptionally associated to clinical manifestations of lupus.

3 Article Contribution of PTPN22 1858T, TNFRII 196R and HLA-shared epitope alleles with rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies to very early rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis. 2008

Goëb V, Dieudé P, Daveau R, Thomas-L'otellier M, Jouen F, Hau F, Boumier P, Tron F, Gilbert D, Fardellone P, Cornélis F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18535030 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of TNFRII 196R, PTPN22 1858T and HLA-shared epitope (SE) alleles, RFs and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) for RA diagnosis in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis. METHODS: We followed up 284 patients who had swelling of at least two joints that had persisted for longer than 4 weeks but had been evolving for <6 months. At 2 yrs, patients were classified as having RA or non-RA rheumatic diseases according to the ACR criteria. Patients were genotyped with respect to TNFRII 196M/R and PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphisms and HLA-SE. The presence of IgA, IgG and IgM RF isotypes and ACPA was sought in sera collected at disease onset. RESULTS: HLA-SE alleles alone, concomitant presence of TNFRII 196R and PTPN22 1858T alleles, IgA, IgG and IgM RF alone and ACPA were found to be significantly associated with RA diagnosis. Using logistic regression analysis, the concomitant presence of RF and ACPA at disease onset was the best association to predict RA diagnosis. In patients (n = 34) who did not fulfil the ACR criteria for RA at inclusion but who progressed to ACR positivity, the study of the genetic risk markers did not contribute to predict RA diagnosis at 2 yrs. CONCLUSIONS: PTPN22 1858T, TNFRII 196R and HLA-SE alleles do not improve the predictive value of RF and ACPA for RA diagnosis in our cohort, and do not contribute to an earlier diagnosis in undifferentiated patients initially negative for RF and ACPA.

4 Article Clinical significance of autoantibodies recognizing Sjögren's syndrome A (SSA), SSB, calpastatin and alpha-fodrin in primary Sjögren's syndrome. free! 2007

Goëb V, Salle V, Duhaut P, Jouen F, Smail A, Ducroix JP, Tron F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm U519 (IFRMP23), Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, Rouen, France. · Clin Exp Immunol. · Pubmed #17286756 links to  free full text

Abstract: The aim of our study was (i) to compare the clinical and biological characteristics of 148 (137 women, 11 men) primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) patients at diagnosis as a function of their sex and (ii) to assess the prognostic value of anti-calpastatin and anti-alpha-fodrin autoantibodies. In addition, the presence of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-52- and 60-kDa Sjögren's syndrome A (SSA), anti-Sjögren's syndrome B (SSB), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies and rheumatoid factors (RF) of IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes was sought in sera collected at pSS onset. Raynaud's syndrome, significantly more frequent in women, was the only systemic manifestation of pSS whose frequency differed significantly as a function of the patient's sex (P = 0.02). ANA (P = 0.001) and anti-60-kDa SSA autoantibodies (P = 0.03) were significantly more common in women, while men never synthesized detectable levels of anti-SSB, anti-calpastatin or IgG anti-alpha-fodrin autoantibodies. In addition, anti-CCP autoantibodies were found in low percentages of pSS patients (4% F/18% M). The absence of autoantibodies does not exclude the diagnosis of pSS in men that will be based mainly on the anatomopathological findings of a minor salivary gland biopsy. Positivity of anti-60-kDa SSA, anti-SSB, anti-calpastatin, IgA and IgG anti-alpha-fodrin antibodies is not associated with pSS clinical and biological severity.

5 Article Autoantibodies, metalloproteinases and bone markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients are unable to predict their responses to infliximab. free! 2007

Lequerré T, Jouen F, Brazier M, Clayssens S, Klemmer N, Ménard JF, Mejjad O, Daragon A, Tron F, Le Loët X, Vittecoq O. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16899502 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To identify biochemical, immunological and bone markers as predictors of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' responses to infliximab. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with active RA (American College of Rheumatology criteria), refractory to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, received infliximab (3 mg/kg) infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 8 weeks in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide. At week 14, infliximab efficacy was evaluated using disease activity score (DAS)28. A serum sample, collected just before starting infliximab, was tested by ELISA (unless stated otherwise) for the following immunological markers: rheumatoid factor by agglutination and ELISA (IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes); anti-cyclic citrullinated protein; autoantibodies recognizing calpastatin domain I and its 27 C-terminal fragment, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, alpha-enolase; anti-keratin and anti-perinuclear factor antibodies (immunofluorescence); biochemical markers: C-reactive protein (nephelometry), metalloproteinase-1 and -3, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases-1 and -2, antioxidants (vitamins A and E; selenium); bone resorption markers: pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, osteoprotegerin, soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Each parameter's predictive value of the response to infliximab was analysed using Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Hierarchical clustering was performed with The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) multiple experiment viewer software. RESULTS: Good, moderate and non-responder rates were 6.5, 61.8 and 31.5%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between responders and non-responders, regardless of the serum parameters considered. Analysis of dichotomous or continuous variables failed to identify markers predictive of a good or poor response to infliximab. CONCLUSION: The search for soluble markers in RA patients' sera likely to predict response to infliximab because of their involvement in RA pathogenesis seems disappointing. However, because of the limited power to detect smaller differences in biomarkers, the present study is a preliminary exploratory analysis.

6 Article Diagnostic and prognostic values of anti glucose-6-phosphate isomerase antibodies in community-recruited patients with very early arthritis. free! 2004

Jouen F, Vittecoq O, Leguillou F, Tabti-Titon I, Menard JF, Mejjad O, Pouplin S, Boumier P, Fardellone P, Gayet A, Gilbert D, Tron F, Le Loët X. · INSERM 519, Institut Fédératif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides (IFR MP 23), Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Rouen, France. · Clin Exp Immunol. · Pubmed #15320914 links to  free full text

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic values of antiglucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) antibodies in patients with very early arthritis. Anti-GPI antibodies were measured by ELISA using purified GPI from rabbit muscle in: (i) 383 sera from healthy blood donors (n = 120), well-established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 99) and non-RA differentiated arthritis (NRADA) (n = 164) patients; (ii) 195 sera obtained from community-recruited patients with very early inflammatory arthritis (VErA cohort) that were studied for 1 year and classified as having RA (n = 116), NRADA (n = 41), and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (n = 38) after the follow-up period. The criterion for severity was the progression of radiographic damage. Prevalence of anti-GPI antibodies was significantly higher in well-established RA patients (45.4%) compared to healthy subjects (2.5%). Anti-GPI antibodies were also present in sera from NRADA: systemic lupus erythematosus 53%, polymyositis 45.4%, adult-onset Still's disease 44%, systemic sclerosis 42.8%, spondylarthropathies 25% and primary Sjögren's syndrome 5.8%. No significant association was found between the presence of anti-GPI antibodies and the 3 diagnostic groups from the VErA cohort. No correlation was observed between anti-GPI and autoantibodies usually associated with RA. Anti-GPI antibodies were not predictive of radiological progression in patients with very early arthritis. Thus, anti-GPI antibodies are not useful for discriminating RA from non-RA rheumatic diseases and do not constitute a predictive factor of structural damage.