Rheumatoid Arthritis: Ishimori ML

Cepeda EJ, Williams FM, Ishimori ML, Weisman MH, Reveille JD. · The University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, MSB 5.270, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18079191 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab) in HIV-positive patients with rheumatic diseases refractory to standard therapy. METHODS: Patients were treated with anti-TNF blocker with rheumatic diseases refractory to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs who had a CD4 count of >200 mm3 and an HIV viral load of <60 000 copies/mm3 and no active concurrent infections. Changes in CD4 counts, HIV viral loads, or other adverse effects while on anti-TNF agents and clinical response were monitored for 28.1 (SD 20.9) months (range 2.5-55). RESULTS: Eight HIV-positive patients were treated with anti-TNF blockers (two patients with rheumatoid arthritis, three with psoriatic arthritis, one with undifferentiated spondyloarthritis, one with reactive arthritis and one with ankylosing spondylitis). No significant clinical adverse effect was attributed to this treatment in any patient. CD4 counts and HIV viral load levels remained stable in all patients. Three patients on etanercept therapy and two patients on infliximab had sustained clinical improvement in their rheumatic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective series of eight patients suggests that treatment with anti-TNF-alpha therapy is a viable alternative in HIV patients without advanced disease with associated rheumatic diseases refractory to standard therapy.

Moder KG, Wener MH, Weisman MH, Ishimori ML, Wallace DJ, Buckeridge DL, Homburger HA. · Department of Rheumatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17407218 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective, multicenter evaluation of autoantibody testing by multiplex immunoassay in patients with known or suspected connective tissue diseases (CTD). We evaluated agreement between multiplex immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and assessed the diagnostic utility of autoantibody profiles. METHODS: Samples from 908 patients with suspected CTD seen in rheumatology clinics were collected prospectively at 3 tertiary care centers. Diagnoses were established according to recognized classification criteria. Tests for autoantibodies were obtained by multiplex immunoassay and by EIA. The results of the multiplex immunoassay were analyzed using a previously validated interpretative algorithm, MDSS (Medical Decision Support Software), that suggests possible disease associations based on the pattern of results for the autoantibodies. RESULTS: The median patient age was 49.7 years; 83% were female. The most common diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis in 352 patients and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 332 patients. Agreement between multiplex and EIA testing ranged from a high of 99% (95% CI 98% to 100%) for Jo-1 to a low of 79% (95% CI 76% to 82%) for antinuclear antibodies. The MDSS algorithm suggested an appropriate disease association in 75% to 100% of patients with SLE. The results varied depending on the disease and the autoantibodies present. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patterns of autoantibodies detected by multiplex immunoassay testing, when analyzed by an interpretative algorithm, are useful in the evaluation of patients with CTD in situations of high disease prevalence. Further testing is necessary to determine its utility in settings of low disease prevalence.