Rheumatoid Arthritis: Homik J

Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Shea B, Homik J, Wells G, Tugwell P. · Health Services Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mailbox Station 152, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77024, USA. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #11034691 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess the short-term efficacy and toxicity of antimalarials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase up to and including August 2000. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing antimalarials against placebo in patients with RA DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data abstraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. The same two reviewers using a validated checklist (Jadad 1996) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the 6-month endpoint. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences for joint counts, pain and global assessments. Weighted mean differences were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout. MAIN RESULTS: We found four trials, with 300 patients randomized to hydrochloroquine and 292 to placebo. Only trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine could be pooled in the analysis. A statistically significant benefit was observed when hydroxychloroquine was compared to placebo. The standardized mean differences for the various outcome measures ranged from -0.33 to -0.52, and were statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were also observed for ESR. Overall withdrawals and withdrawals due to lack of efficacy were significantly more frequent in the placebo group. No differences were observed in withdrawals due to toxicity. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxychloroquine appears to be efficacious for the treatment of RA. Its overall effect appears to be moderate, but its low toxicity profile should be considered when treating patients with RA.

Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Shea B, Homik J, Wells G, Tugwell P. · Health Services Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mailbox Station 152, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77024 USA. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #10796401 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To estimate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of antimalarials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase up to and including July 1997. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing antimalarials against placebo in patients with RA DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data abstraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. The same two reviewers using Jadad's scale (Jadad 1995) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the 6-month endpoint. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences for joint counts, pain and global assessments. Weighted mean differences were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout. MAIN RESULTS: We found four trials, with 300 patients randomized to hydrochloroquine and 292 to placebo. Only trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine could be pooled in the analysis. A statistically significant benefit was observed when hydroxychloroquine was compared to placebo. The standardized mean differences for the various outcome measures ranged from -0.33 to -0. 52, and were statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were also observed for ESR. Overall withdrawals and withdrawals due to lack of efficacy were significantly more frequent in the placebo group. No differences were observed in withdrawals due to toxicity. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxychloroquine appears to be efficacious for the treatment of RA. Its overall effect appears to be moderate, but its low toxicity profile should be considered when treating patients with RA.

Ramos-Remus C, Sierra-Jimenez G, Skeith K, Aceves-Avila FJ, Russell AS, Offer R, Olguin-Redes JE, Homik J, Sanchez L, Sanchez-Ortiz A, Navarro-Cano G. · Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Mexico. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17646901 No free full text.

Abstract: The mean age of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset is around 50 years as reported in several clinical trials involving Caucasian patients. However, clinical observations suggest that Mexican RA patients' disease is initiated at a younger age. The objective of the study was to assess whether the age of onset of RA is different in Mexican and in Canadian RA patients. Certified rheumatologists from Canada and Mexico directly interviewed consecutive RA patients attending their clinics regarding the date patients first noticed a swollen joint. None of the participant rheumatologists were aware of the primary aim of this exploratory study at the time of the interviews. Data was gathered from 161 Mexican (91% women) and 130 Canadian (77% women) RA patients collected by three rheumatologists in each country. Duration since disease onset was not different within countries (mean 95% confidence interval [CI] for differences -10 to 16 years, p = 0.12 for Canadians, and -6 to 10 years, p = 0.26, for Mexicans). However, there was a significant difference between the two countries. Mexicans patients on average developed RA almost 12 years younger than Canadians (95% CI for difference 9 to 15 years, p < 0.001). Frequency distribution showed that 35.5% of Canadians but only 4% of Mexicans had the onset of the disease after the age of 55 (all p < 0.001). It appears that RA begins at a much younger age in Mexican than Canadian patients. If this were confirmed after controlling for different confounders and biases, it would have important societal, economic, and therapeutic implications.

Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C. · Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. · Control Clin Trials. · Pubmed #11018564 No free full text.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the performance of MEDLINE and EMBASE for the identification of articles regarding controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in English and related to selected topics: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoporosis (OP), and low back pain (LBP). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for literature published in 1988 and 1994. The initial selection of papers was then reviewed to confirm that the articles were about CCTs and to assess the quality of the studies. Selected journals were also hand searched to identify CCTs not retrieved by either database. Overall, 4111 different references were retrieved (2253 for RA, 978 for OP, and 880 for LBP); 3418 (83%) of the papers were in English. EMBASE retrieved 78% more references than MEDLINE (2895 versus 1625). Overall, 1217 (30%) of the papers were retrieved by both databases. Two hundred forty-three papers were about CCTs. Two-thirds of these were retrieved by both databases, and one-third by only one. An additional 16 CCTs not retrieved by either database were identified through hand searching. Taking these into account, EMBASE retrieved 16% more CCTs than MEDLINE (220 versus 188); the EMBASE search identified 85% of the CCTs compared to 73% by MEDLINE. No significant differences were observed in the mean quality scores and sample size of the CCTs missed by MEDLINE compared to those missed by EMBASE. Our findings suggest that the use of MEDLINE alone to identify CCTs is inadequate. The use of two or more databases and hand searching of selected journals are needed to perform a comprehensive search.