Rheumatoid Arthritis: Helliwell P

Sokoll KB, Helliwell P. · Department of Rheumatology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, St Luke's Hospital, Little Horton Lane, Bradford, BD5 0NA, UK. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #16370920 No free full text.

Abstract: Synovitis is a painful and, occasionally, disabling disease. Patients with synovitis, especially new onset synovitis, should be referred to a rheumatologist urgently so that they can be assed and treated as quickly as possible. Clinical assessment and investigations are required to help differentiate between transient (< 3 months) and persistent (> 3 months) synovitis. This differentiation is important, as persistent synovitis can lead to joint damage and disability. Septic arthritis is a rheumatological emergency requiring immediate assessment and specific treatment. The earlier synovitis is treated, the more effective treatment is likely to be. If treated very early, there is potential to prevent the move from transient to persistent synovitis. Transient synovitis can be treated with painkillers, NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids, depending on severity. Persistent synovitis may also require disease-modifying drugs. Clinical indicators of persistence include symptom duration at first visit, early morning stiffness for > 1 h, arthritis in more than three joints, bilateral compression pain in metatarsophalangeal joints, rheumatoid factor positivity, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, erosions on hand or feet X-rays and a family history of rheumatoid arthritis. Disease-modifying drugs need to be considered early to achieve clinical remission before damage and disability occur. Despite emerging new treatments for synovitis, especially persistent synovitis, full clinical remission is still not achieved in most patients, and more research into disease processes and targeted therapies is required.

Proudman SM, Conaghan PG, Richardson C, Griffiths B, Green MJ, McGonagle D, Wakefield RJ, Reece RJ, Miles S, Adebajo A, Gough A, Helliwell P, Martin M, Huston G, Pease C, Veale DJ, Isaacs J, van der Heijde DM, Emery P. · University of Leeds, UK. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10943871 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a regimen of methotrexate, cyclosporin A, and corticosteroids introduced at onset in poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can produce a significant improvement in outcome compared with standard monotherapy with sulfasalazine (SSZ). METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients presenting with new, untreated RA of less than 12 months' duration who fulfilled criteria for poor long-term outcome were randomized to receive either combination therapy (n = 40) or SSZ alone (n = 42). The primary outcome measures were remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20% improvement at 48 weeks. RESULTS: After 48 weeks, the numbers of patients who met the ACR criteria for 20% improvement were not significantly different between the two groups (combination 58% versus SSZ 45%), and similar numbers of patients had persisting clinical remission (approximately 10% both groups). During the first 3 months, there were significantly greater reductions in parameters of disease activity in the combination group. By 24 weeks, the swollen and tender joint counts, C-reactive protein levels, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates had fallen significantly in both groups, with a greater improvement in the swollen and tender joint count in the combination group. At 48 weeks, the radiographic damage score had increased by a median of 1 (range 0-42.5) in the combination group and 1.25 (range 0-72.5) in the SSZ group (P = 0.28; although there were significant differences in the scores for the right hand). There were significantly fewer withdrawals due to lack of efficacy in the combination group than in the SSZ group (1 of 40 versus 10 of 42; P = 0.007). In the combination group, dose reduction was needed in 22.5% because of hypertension and in 22.5% because of elevated creatinine levels. Over 48 weeks, serum creatinine increased in both groups, but particularly in the combination arm. CONCLUSION: In poor-prognosis RA patients, "aggressive" combination therapy led to more rapid disease suppression but did not result in significantly better ACR response or remission rates. This suggests that in poor-prognosis disease, an approach based on identifying patients with poor treatment responses before extra therapy is added ("step-up" approach) may be more appropriate than the use of combination therapy in all patients from the outset.

Gilworth G, Emery P, Barkham N, Smyth MG, Helliwell P, Tennant A. · Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. · BMC Musculoskelet Disord. · Pubmed #19531252 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS) is established and is used by physicians to identify patients at risk of job loss for rapid intervention. The study objective was to explore the concept of Work Instability (a mismatch between an individual's abilities and job demands) in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and develop a Work Instability Scale specific to this population. METHODS: New items generated from qualitative interviews were combined with items from the RA-WIS to form a draft AS-WIS. Rasch analysis was used to examine the scaling properties of the AS-WIS using data generated through a postal survey. The scale was validated against a gold standard of expert assessment, a test-retest survey examined reliability. RESULTS: Fifty-seven participants who were in work returned the postal survey. Of the original 55 items 38 were shown to fit the Rasch model (chi(2) 37.5; df 38; p 0.494) and free of bias for gender and disease duration. Following analysis for discrimination against the gold standard assessments 20 items remained with good fit to the model (chi(2) 24.8; df 20; p 0.21). Test-retest reliability was 0.94. CONCLUSION: The AS-WIS is a self-administered scale which meets the stringent requirements of modern measurement. Used as a screening tool it can identify those experiencing a mismatch at work who are at risk of job retention problems and work disability. Work instability is emerging as an important indication for the use of biologics, thus the AS-WIS has the potential to become an important outcome measure.

Firth J, Helliwell P, Hale C, Hill J, Nelson EA. · School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18543055 No free full text.

Abstract: We explored the predictors of foot ulceration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The cases were 15 patients with RA reporting foot ulceration in response to a postal survey of patients sampled from a diagnostic register in secondary care (n = 1,130). The controls were 66 patients with RA randomly sampled from the survey respondents (n = 883) after matching for age, sex and disease duration. Patients with co-existent diabetes were excluded. Clinical examination included the assessment of known risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes including: neuropathy (insensitivity to 10 g monofilament), peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial pressure index [ABPI]), foot deformity (Platto indices) and raised plantar pressure (PressureStat readings). A 44 swollen-joint count, the presence of pre-ulcerative lesions and current steroid therapy were identified through univariate analysis as additional potential predictors in patients with RA. Forward step-wise logistic regression analysis showed that the following variables were significant predictors of ulceration: steroid therapy (OR = 9.70, 95%CI = 2.09-45.11, p = 0.004), abnormal ABPI (OR = 13.45, 95%CI = 1.19-151.43, p = 0.035), the presence of pre-ulcerative lesions (OR = 7.40, 95%CI = 1.51-36.30, p = 0.014) and swollen-joint count (OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 1.02-1.53, p = 0.034). Abnormal sensation, foot deformity and raised plantar pressures were not significant predictors of ulceration. The wide confidence intervals for ABPI were due to sparse data with very few abnormal values, and the results of exact logistic regression (more accurate where data is sparse and case matching employed) found that ABPI was no longer a significant predictor (p = 0.054). The significance of the other predictors did not differ substantially. In this preliminary study, abnormal sensation, foot deformity and raised plantar pressures were not significantly associated with foot ulceration but active disease and current steroid therapy were. The contribution of peripheral vascular disease to risk is unclear and further investigation is needed in a larger cohort.

Firth J, Hale C, Helliwell P, Hill J, Nelson EA. · Postgraduate Suite, School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18240257 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of foot ulceration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in secondary care. METHODS: A postal survey of all patients with RA (n = 1,130) under the care of rheumatologists in Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK was performed. The prevalence data were validated through clinical examination, case-note review, and contact with health professionals. The false-negative rate was investigated in a subsample of patients (n = 70) who denied any history of ulceration. RESULTS: The postal survey achieved a 78% response rate. Following validation, the point prevalence of foot ulceration was 3.39% and the overall prevalence was 9.73%. The false-positive rate was initially high at 21.21%, but use of diagrammatic questionnaire data to exclude leg ulceration reduced the rate to 10.76%. The false-negative rate was 11.76%. The most common sites for ulceration were the dorsal aspect of hammer toes, the metatarsal heads, and the metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with hallux abducto valgus, with 33% of patients reporting multiple sites of ulceration. Patients with open-foot and healed-foot ulceration had significantly longer RA disease duration, reported significantly greater use of special footwear, and had a higher prevalence of foot surgery than ulcer-free patients. CONCLUSION: Foot ulceration affects a significant proportion of patients with RA. Further work is needed to establish risk factors for foot ulceration in RA and to target foot health provision more effectively.

Firth J, Turner D, Smith W, Woodburn J, Helliwell P. · School of Healthcare, Postgraduate Suite, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. · Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). · Pubmed #17374423 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Plantar pressure measurements are a useful screening tool to assess foot function and identify patients at risk of developing ulceration. The validity and reliability of PressureStat for measuring plantar pressures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has not been addressed. METHODS: Bench testing placed the PressureStat under loads throughout the range reported for PressureStat (0-15.0 kg/cm(2)). The outputs were digitised to measure pixel density in comparison with the PressureStat calibration card. In clinical testing, simultaneous barefoot plantar pressure measurements were recorded from 10 rheumatoid arthritis patients using the PressureStat and EMED-ST systems. Reliability was examined by four independent examiners using kappa statistics. The absolute peak pressure values in each mask region were determined from the EMED-ST platform by masking in the same manner using a real size plantar pressure printout. FINDINGS: In all test conditions, the pixel density recorded from the PressureStat outputs exceeded the range recorded on the calibration card, with the largest difference in the lower ranges. In clinical testing, correcting the PressureStat scores for 'background noise' (not suggested by manufacturer) inverted and improved these comparisons. Inter-observer kappa values between the first and second readings ranged from 0.26 to 0.59, with some evidence of a learning effect. Intra-observer kappa values were 0.57, 0.51, 0.33 and 0.43 for observers 1-4 respectively. INTERPRETATION: Pressure data obtained with the PressureStat system in bench testing and patients with RA is inaccurate, particularly in the lower ranges. The grading of PressureStat readings taken from rheumatoid arthritis patients found fair to moderate intra and inter-observer agreement suggesting that interpretation is also imprecise.

Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H, Anonymous00006. · University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16871531 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of existing classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to construct new criteria from observed data. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from consecutive clinic attendees with PsA and other inflammatory arthropathies. Subjects were classified by each of 7 criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Latent class analysis was used to calculate criteria accuracy in order to confirm the validity of clinical diagnosis as the gold standard definition of "case"-ness. Classification and Regression Trees methodology and logistic regression were used to identify items for new criteria, which were then constructed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Data were collected on 588 cases and 536 controls with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 384), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 72), undifferentiated arthritis (n = 38), connective tissue disorders (n = 14), and other diseases (n = 28). The specificity of each set of criteria was high. The sensitivity of the Vasey and Espinoza method (0.97) was similar to that of the method of McGonagle et al (0.98) and greater than that of the methods of Bennett (0.44), Moll and Wright (0.91), the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (0.74), and Gladman et al (0.91). The CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis) criteria consisted of established inflammatory articular disease with at least 3 points from the following features: current psoriasis (assigned a score of 2; all other features were assigned a score of 1), a history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present), a family history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present or there was a history of psoriasis), dactylitis, juxtaarticular new bone formation, rheumatoid factor negativity, and nail dystrophy. These criteria were more specific (0.987 versus 0.960) but less sensitive (0.914 versus 0.972) than those of Vasey and Espinoza. CONCLUSION: The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.

Helliwell P, Reay N, Gilworth G, Redmond A, Slade A, Tennant A, Woodburn J. · Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15934122 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a new foot impact scale to assess foot status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using established qualitative methodology and the latest item response techniques (Rasch analysis). METHODS: Foot problems in RA were explored by conducting qualitative interviews that were then used to generate items for a new foot impact scale. Further validation was undertaken following postal surveys and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of the first postal survey (n = 192 responses) produced a 63-item binary response, 4-subscale instrument. The 4 subscales covered the domains impairment, activities, participation, and footwear. Following test-retest postal surveys and additional analysis, the instrument was reduced to a 2 subscale, 51-item questionnaire covering the domains of impairments/shoes and activities/participation. Initial results of these subscales indicate good psychometric properties, external validity, and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: A foot impact scale to assess the impact of RA and to measure the effect of interventions has been developed. The 2 scales comprising the instrument demonstrate good psychometric properties.