Rheumatoid Arthritis: Hamm B

Hermann KG, Backhaus M, Schneider U, Labs K, Loreck D, Zühlsdorf S, Schink T, Fischer T, Hamm B, Bollow M. · Department of Radiology, Charité, Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #14673985 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with conventional radiography in the detection of chronic and acute inflammatory manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the shoulder joint. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients with known RA prospectively underwent clinical examination, radiography, ultrasound, and MRI of the shoulder joints. Each patient was assigned a clinical/laboratory score consisting of 7 parameters, including measurements of shoulder mobility, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level. Conventional radiography was standardized and performed in 2 planes. Ultrasound was performed in 10 predefined planes using a 7.5-MHz linear transducer. MRI at 1.5T comprised transverse and oblique coronal T1- and T2*-weighted fast spin-echo, gradient-echo (GRE), and inversion-recovery sequences with a matrix size of up to 512 pixels. A dynamic T1-weighted GRE sequence was acquired with intravenous administration of contrast medium. Erosions were assessed using all 3 imaging techniques on a 4-point scale. Soft-tissue involvement was evaluated according to the presence of synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bursitis on ultrasound and MRI. The results in the study group were compared with those obtained in a control group of 10 patients with shoulder pain. RESULTS: In the study group, erosions of the humeroscapular joint were detected by conventional radiography in 26 patients, by ultrasound in 30 patients, and by MRI in 39 patients; the differences were statistically significant for the comparisons of conventional radiography with MRI and for ultrasound versus MRI (P < 0.0001). Conventional radiography detected 12 erosions of the scapula and MRI detected 15. Synovitis was demonstrated in 12 patients by ultrasound and in 27 patients by MRI (P = 0.0003). Tenosynovitis was observed in 15 patients by ultrasound and in 28 patients by MRI (P = 0.0064). Bursitis was detected in 13 patients by ultrasound and in 18 patients by MRI. The findings on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlated significantly with the detection of synovitis by ultrasound and erosions by static MRI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound and MRI supplement conventional radiography in assessing the shoulder joint. Although conventional radiography can be used as the sole method of following up known joint destruction in RA, ultrasound and, preferably, MRI are recommended as additional techniques in the initial diagnostic evaluation when radiography yields negative results.

Fischer T, Biedermann T, Hermann KG, Diekmann F, Braun J, Hamm B, Bollow M. · Institut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. · Rofo. · Pubmed #12811695 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The prospective investigation of the therapeutic effect of CT-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection into inflammatory sacroiliac (SI) joints compared to conventional treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in children with juvenile spondyloarthropathy (jSpA) and the determination of the role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in establishing the indication and monitoring the therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprises 89 children with known jSpA who were diagnosed by MRI to have a unilateral or bilateral sacroiliitis. Therapy with NSAIDS was initiated or continued in all 89 patients. Four weeks after the diagnostic MRI, two groups were distinguished according to the clinical response to NSAIDS, with group 1 consisting of 33 responders and group 2 of 56 non-responders. The patients of group 2 were treated with CT-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection (low-dose injection) while the therapy with NSAIDS was continued. A total of 83 SI joints were punctured without complications, 27 bilaterally and 29 unilaterally. The indication for the intervention was based on inflammatory activity as determined by MRI. The therapy was monitored by clinical follow-up every 8 to 12 weeks over a period of 20 months. Follow-up by dynamic MRI was performed in all 56 children of group 2 and in 15 of the 33 children of group 1 within 8 +/- 4 months of the initial examination. RESULTS: A total of 87.5% of the children in group 2 showed a statistically significant decrease in their subjective complaints from 6.9 +/- 3.4 to 1.8 +/- 1.7 (p < 0.05) as measured on a visual analog scale (VAS from 0 to 10). Improvement was seen as early as 1.5 +/- 1.0 weeks after the intervention and lasted for a mean of 12 +/- 6 months. The children in group 1 already showed similar improvement of the VAS from 6.8 +/- 3.2 to 1.5 +/- 1.4 (p < 0.05) during the initial four weeks of NSAIDS therapy, with the improvement lasting for the 20-month observation period. The follow-up dynamic MRI (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) during therapy showed a statistically significant lower contrast-enhancement in both groups (group 1: 117 +/- 43 % versus 38 +/- 24 %, p < 0.05; group 2: 127 +/- 59 % versus 38 +/- 22 %, p < 0.05). One third of the patients of group 2 showed progression of joint destruction despite absence of subjective complaints. CONCLUSION: CT-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection has proven an effective, symptomatic, and uncomplicated therapy of acute sacroiliitis in patients with jSpA. Dynamic MRI has a role in establishing the indication for intervention but its role for any follow-up is restricted to cases with inconclusive clinical response.

Eshed I, Feist E, Althoff CE, Hamm B, Konen E, Burmester GR, Backhaus M, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19474128 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of MRI of finger and wrist joints for diagnosing early RA. MRI was evaluated as a stand-alone tool and in combination with ACR criteria and serum markers such as RF. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (31 men, 68 women; median age 46 years) with unspecified arthritis or suspected RA and negative X-ray findings were included. MR images of the hand and wrist of these patients were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of synovitis, erosions and tenosynovitis. The clinical diagnosis (early RA or non-RA) was made by a rheumatologist after clinical follow-up for 6-41 months. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had a clinical diagnosis of RA and 41 were diagnosed as non-RA. Step-wise logistic regression of all MR parameters evaluated identified tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons to be the most powerful predictor of early RA (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 73%). Including ACR criteria in the analysis, positive serum RF and tenosynovitis were the strongest predictors of early RA (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 63%). When serum anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP), ANA and CRP were included as additional parameters, anti-CCP and flexor tenosynovitis were the strongest predictors of early RA (sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Flexor tenosynovitis diagnosed by MRI of the hand is a strong predictor of early RA. Combining flexor tenosynovitis on MRI with positive serum anti-CCP or positive RF is an even stronger predictor of early RA.

Schirmer C, Scheel AK, Althoff CE, Schink T, Eshed I, Lembcke A, Burmester GR, Backhaus M, Hamm B, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Charité Medical School, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17068069 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare dedicated low-field MRI (lfMRI) with conventional MRI (cMRI) in the detection and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The wrist and finger joints of 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (median (range) disease duration 8 years (7-12); Disease Activity Score 3.3 (2.6-4.5)) were examined by 0.2 T lfMRI and 1.5 TcMRI. The protocols comprised coronal spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences before and after contrast medium administration. Synovitis of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints 2-5 and the wrist joints was scored according to Outcome Measures in Rheumatology recommendations. Tenosynovitis and erosions were scored using 4-point and 6-point scales, respectively. The results were analysed by calculating kappa values and performing McNemar's test intra-individually on a joint-by-joint basis. RESULTS: Agreement between the two MRI techniques was good to excellent for synovitis and erosions, and moderate for tenosynovitis. Of the 306 joints evaluated, 245 and 200 joints showed synovitis in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. Scoring of synovitis of the finger joints yielded kappa values from 0.69 to 0.94. Of the 68 flexor tendons evaluated, tenosynovitis was diagnosed by lfMRI in 24 and by cMRI in 33 instances. Of the 391 bones evaluated, 154 and 139 showed erosions in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. kappa values for erosion scores were between 0.65 and 1. CONCLUSION: Dedicated, lfMRI shows high agreement with cMRI in diagnosing and scoring synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis when using standardised scoring systems.

Eshed I, Althoff CE, Schink T, Scheel AK, Schirmer C, Backhaus M, Lembcke A, Bollow M, Hamm B, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Charité Medical School, Campus Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20-21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16882591 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of a double dose compared to a single dose of contrast material in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on semi-quantitative scoring of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This prospective study included 38 RA patients (23 women and 15 men, mean age 51 years). All patients underwent low-field MRI of the hand before administration of contrast medium, after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA), and after another dose of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA. Two readers (A and B) blinded to dosage independently scored the single dose and double dose image sets for synovitis according to outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT) recommendations. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were also calculated for each set. RESULTS: 149 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were evaluated. There was good inter-reader agreement for each of the two sets (intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.75 for the single dose set and 0.83 for the double dose). Median CNR and SNR values were 5.4 and 15.9, respectively, for the single dose set and 8.5 and 16.6, respectively, for the double dose set (p<0.0001). Single dose set mean synovitis scores were 1.7 and 1.6 for readers A and B, respectively. Double dose set scores were 1.9 and 2.0, respectively. Thus, higher synovitis scores were recorded for the double dose sets than the single dose sets (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: In low-field MRI, when evaluating RA, the dose of the contrast material influences synovitis scoring. Therefore, dosage of contrast material should be taken into consideration when using extremity dedicated low-field MRI.

Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, Werner C, Schirmer C, Detert J, Bollow M, Hamm B, Müller GA, Burmester GR, Backhaus M. · Department of Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16192290 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective long term follow up study comparing conventional radiography (CR), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone erosions and synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) finger joints. METHODS: The metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints II-V (128 joints) of the clinically dominant hand of 16 patients with RA were included. Follow up joint by joint comparisons for erosions and synovitis were made. RESULTS: At baseline, CR detected erosions in 5/128 (4%) of all joints, US in 12/128 (9%), and MRI in 34/128 (27%). Seven years later, an increase of joints with erosions was found with CR (26%), US (49%) (p<0.001 each), and MRI (32%, NS). In contrast, joint swelling and tenderness assessed by clinical examination were decreased at follow up (p = 0.2, p<0.001). A significant reduction in synovitis with US and MRI (p<0.001 each) was seen. In CR, 12 patients did not have any erosions at baseline, while in 10/12 patients erosions were detected in 25/96 (26%) joints after 7 years. US initially detected erosions in 9 joints, of which two of these joints with erosions were seen by CR at follow up. MRI initially found 34 erosions, of which 14 (41%) were then detected by CR. CONCLUSION: After 7 years, an increase of bone erosions was detected by all imaging modalities. In contrast, clinical improvement and regression of synovitis were seen only with US and MRI. More than one third of erosions previously detected by MRI were seen by CR 7 years later.

Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Kahler E, Pasewaldt D, Fritz J, Hamm B, Brunner E, Müller GA, Burmester GR, Backhaus M. · Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany. <> · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15751062 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop an ultrasonographic (US) synovitis scoring system suitable for evaluation of finger joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare semiquantitative US scoring with quantitative US measurements. METHODS: US was performed at the palmar and dorsal sides of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 10 healthy subjects and in the clinically more affected hand in 46 RA patients. Ten patients additionally underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Synovitis was measured, standardized, and scored according to a semiquantitative method. The 2 methods (semiquantitative US scoring, quantitative US) were compared and statistical cutoffs were identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. MRI results were compared with semiquantitative US scoring and quantitative US results. The optimal US scoring method from 6 joint combinations was identified (ROC curve analysis). RESULTS: Synovitis was most frequently detected in the palmar proximal area (86% of affected joints). We found no significant differences between individual PIP joints or between individual MCP joints, indicating that all fingers within each of these joint groups should be treated equally for statistical calculations, although each joint group as a whole should be treated separately. The optimal cutoff point to distinguish between "health" and "pathology" was 0.6 mm both for MCP joints (sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%) and for PIP joints (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%). There was no significant difference between semiquantitative US scores and quantitative US measurements. The best results for joint combinations were achieved using the "sum of 4 fingers" (second through fifth MCP and PIP joints) and "sum of 3 fingers" (second through fourth MCP and PIP joints) methods. Comparison of MRI results with semiquantitative US scores revealed high concordance. CONCLUSION: US evaluation of finger joint synovitis can be considerably simplified by focusing on the palmar side and by applying semiquantitative grading instead of quantitative measurements. For evaluation of treatment efficacy based on synovitis in RA patients, we recommend using the "sum of 3 fingers" method in longitudinal trials.

Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Hess D, Scholz A, Blind S, Hamm B, Bollow M. · Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12228160 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To carry out a prospective two year follow up study comparing conventional radiography, three-phase bone scintigraphy, ultrasonography (US), and three dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with precontrast and dynamic postcontrast examination in detecting early arthritis. The aim of the follow up study was to monitor the course of erosions during treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs by different modalities and to determine whether the radiographically occult changes like erosive bone lesions of the finger joints detected by MRI and US in the initial study would show up on conventional radiographs two years later. Additionally, to study the course of soft tissue lesions depicted in the initial study in comparison with the clinical findings. METHODS: The metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints (14 joints) of the clinically more severely affected hand (soft tissue swelling and joint tenderness) as determined in the initial study of 49 patients with various forms of arthritis were examined twice. The patients had initially been divided into two groups. The follow up group I included 28 subjects (392 joints) without radiographic signs of destructive arthritis (Larsen grades 0-1) of the investigated hand and wrist, and group II (control group) included 21 patients (294 joints) with radiographs showing erosions (Larsen grade 2) of the investigated hand or wrist, or both, at the initial examination. RESULTS: (1) Radiography at the two year follow up detected only two erosions (two patients) in group I and 10 (nine patients) additional erosions in group II. Initial MRI had already detected both erosions in group I and seven (seven patients) of the 10 erosions in group II. Initial US had depicted one erosion in group I and four of the 10 erosions in group II. (2) In contrast with conventional radiography, 3D MRI and US demonstrated an increase in erosions in comparison with the initial investigation. (3) The abnormal findings detected by scintigraphy were decreased at the two year follow up. (4) Both groups showed a marked clinical improvement of synovitis and tenosynovitis, as also shown by MRI and US. (5) There was a striking discrepancy between the decrease in the soft tissue lesions as demonstrated by clinical findings, MRI, and US, and the significant increase in erosive bone lesions, which were primarily evident at MRI and US. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical improvement and a regression of inflammatory soft tissue lesions, erosive bone lesions were increased at the two year follow up, which were more pronounced with 3D MRI and less pronounced with US. The results of our study suggest that owing to the inadequate depiction of erosions and soft tissue lesions, conventional radiography alone has limitations in the intermediate term follow up of treatment. US has a high sensitivity for depicting inflammatory soft tissue lesions, but dynamic 3D MRI is more sensitive in differentiating minute erosions.

Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ, Raber H, Hamm B, Burmester GR, Bollow M. · Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10366117 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was performed comparing conventional radiography, 3-phase bone scintigraphy, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with precontrast and dynamic postcontrast examinations in 60 patients with various forms of arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyl-arthropathy, and arthritis associated with connective tissue disease. METHODS: A total of 840 finger joints were examined clinically and by all 4 imaging methods. Experienced investigators blinded to the clinical findings and diagnoses analyzed all methods independently of each other. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 32 patients (448 finger joints) without radiologic signs of destructive arthritis (Larsen grades 0-1) of the evaluated hand and wrist and group 2 included 28 patients (392 finger joints) with radiographs revealing erosions (Larsen grade 2) of the evaluated hand and/or wrist. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation, scintigraphy, MRI, and ultrasound were each more sensitive than conventional radiography in detecting inflammatory soft tissue lesions as well as destructive joint processes in arthritis patients in group 1. All differences were statistically significant. We found ultrasound to be even more sensitive than MRI in the detection of synovitis. MRI detected erosions in 92 finger joints (20%; 26 patients) in group 1 that had not been detected by conventional radiography. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that MRI and ultrasound are valuable diagnostic methods in patients with arthritis who have normal findings on radiologic evaluation.