Rheumatoid Arthritis: Guyot MH

Ducoulombier V, Solau E, Coquerelle P, Houvenagel E, Siame JL, Desprez X, Fauquert P, Guyot MH, Delcambre B, Flipo RM. · Rheumatology Department, Roger Salengro Teaching Hospital, Lille University Hospitals, 59037 Lille Cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17182267 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Infliximab is effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Add-on infliximab therapy in patients on methotrexate results in a rapid gain in effectiveness, which lasts at least 1 year. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and continuation rate of infliximab in patients with RA after the first year of treatment. METHODS: The first 50 patients with RA who were given infliximab in the North-Pas-de-Calais region of France were included in a multicenter open-label study. The patients had severe RA or failed to respond to conventional medications. Infliximab was given in a dosage of 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks in combination with methotrexate. Effectiveness was evaluated using the DAS28-3 score and EULAR response criteria. The dates and reasons of infliximab discontinuations were recorded. RESULTS: The 2-year infliximab continuation rate was 70%. Serious adverse events requiring infliximab discontinuation occurred in 7 patients. Mean DAS28-3 scores in the 35 patients who took infliximab for at least 2 years were 6.42 at baseline, 4.33 after 30 weeks, 4.31 after 54 weeks, and 3.86 after 102 weeks. According to EULAR criteria after 102 weeks, there were 12 good responders, 18 moderate responders, and 5 nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Experience acquired in the North-Pas-de-Calais district of France suggests that infliximab is continued for more than 2 years in more than two-thirds of patients and remains effective over this period.

Pouchot J, Larbre JP, Lemelle I, Sommelet D, Grouteau E, David L, Duquesne A, Deslandre CJ, Koné Paut I, Pillet P, Goumy L, Barbier C, Guyot MH, Mazingue F, Laloum SG, Fischbac M, Quartier P, Guyot C, Jean S, Legall E, Plouvier E, Bost M, de Lumley L, Brégeon C, Guillemin F, Coste J, Prieur AM, Anonymous00241. · Internal Medicine Department, Médecine Interne, Hĵpital Louis Mourier, 178, rue des Renoullers, Colombes, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #12477231 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the functional disability tool Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), a variant of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). CHILDREN AND METHODS: The disability index is the mean of the scores on the eight domains of the CHAQ and can range from 0 (no disability) to 3 (maximum disability). The CHAQ was first translated into French and adapted, then validated in a multicenter cross-sectional study in 306 children with JIA (systemic onset, 23%; polyarticular onset, 22%; extended oligoarticular subtype, 25%; and persistent oligoarticular subtype, 30%). RESULTS: Overall CHAQ scores discriminated between the four JIA subtypes (systemic: 1.1 +/- 0.9; polyarticular: 0.8 +/- 0.7, extended oligoarticular 0.8 +/- 0.7, and persistent oligoarticular: 0.4 +/- 0.5 [P < 0.0001]). Reproducibility evaluated by test-retest at a 7-day interval was excellent (intraclass coefficient, 0.91), as was agreement between the Parent's and Children's versions of the questionnaire (intraclass coefficient, 0.89). Significant correlations were found between the overall CHAO score and variables reflecting disease severity (joint counts, physician's and parent's global assessments, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), indicating excellent convergent validity of the tool. CONCLUSION: The French version of the CHAQ displays good psychometric characteristics, although its sensitivity to change remains to be established. The French version of the CHAO should prove useful in international studies and can be expected to be helpful for monitoring individual patients with JIA.

Pouchot J, Ruperto N, Lemelle I, Sommelet D, Grouteau E, David L, Duquesne A, Job Deslandre C, Kone Paut I, Pillet P, Goumy L, Barbier C, Guyot MH, Mazingue F, Gandon Laloum S, Fischbach M, Quartier P, Guyot C, Jean S, Le Gall E, Plouvier E, Bost M, de Lumley L, LePlège A, Larbre JP, Guillemin F, Coste J, Landgraf JM, Prieur AM, Anonymous00066. · Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11510333 No free full text.

Abstract: We report the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation into the French language of two health status instruments. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is a disease specific instrument that measures functional ability in daily living activities in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) is a generic health related quality of life instrument designed to capture the physical and psychosocial well-being of children independently from the underlying disease. Five hundred children were enrolled including 306 patients with JIA classified into systemic (23%), polyarticular (22%), extended oligoarticular (25%), and persistent oligoarticular (30%) subtypes, and 194 healthy children. Both instruments were reliable with intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients for the test-retest procedure of 0.91 for the CHAQ, and 0.87 and 0.89 for the physical and psychosocial summary scores of CHQ, respectively. Agreement between parents and children evaluated for the CHAQ was high with an ICC of 0.89 for the disability index; weighted kappa coefficients for the 8 domains ranged from 0.61 to 0.72. Convergent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations with the JIA core set of variables (physician and parent global assessment, scores for active joints and joints with limited range of motion, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for both instruments. Both CHAQ and CHQ discriminated between healthy and JIA children, but only the disease specific CHAQ questionnaire discriminated clearly between the 4 JIA subtypes. In conclusion, the French versions of the CHAQ and the CHQ are reliable, and valid health assessment questionnaires to be used in children suffering from JIA.

Cortet B, Guyot MH, Solau E, Pigny P, Dumoulin F, Flipo RM, Marchandise X, Delcambre B. · Department of Rheumatology, CHRU Lille, Hôpital R. Salengro, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11138329 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess the occurrence of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine the factors influencing bone loss (particularly the usefulness of bone turnover markers) over an 18-month period. METHODS: A total of 51 patients were studied, 6 men and 45 females (of whom 35 were menopausal). Their mean age was 56 +/- 10 years and the mean RA duration was 12 +/- 10 years. Twenty-eight (55%) were receiving corticosteroids (10 mg/day for a mean duration of 6 +/- 5 years). Several clinical and biological parameters reflecting disease activity or severity were recorded both at the 0 and 18-month investigations. Bone turnover was assessed at baseline by measuring the serum levels of 4 biological markers. Three of them reflected bone formation, i.e., procollagen type I C-terminal propepeptide (PICP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC). The fourth, procollagen type I-C terminal telopeptide (ICTP), reflected bone resorption. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry both at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) at baseline and 18 months later. RESULTS: Bone loss occurred both at the LS: 2.1%, [95% CI: 0.8%-3.4%, P < 0.005] and femoral neck: 3.1%, [95% CI: 1.1%-5.1%, P < 0.005]. Bone loss was markedly increased for postmenopausal women at the FN: 5.3% [95% CI: 2.9%-7.6%, P < 0.005]. Bone loss was not statistically significantly different between users and non-users of steroids. Bone loss at the LS was significantly correlated with both osteocalcin (r = 0.51, P < 0.01) and ICTP levels (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). FN bone loss was correlated with the osteocalcin level only (r = 0.34, P < 0.05). Fast losers (bone loss at the LS above the median) had higher OC (P < 0.01) and ESR (P < 0.05) levels at baseline as compared with slow losers (bone loss at the LS below the median). CONCLUSION: Bone loss occurs in RA particularly at the FN and seems to be influenced by increased bone turnover and high levels of inflammation.