| 1 |
Clinical Conference A 26 week randomised, double blind, placebo controlled exploratory study of sulfasalazine in juvenile onset spondyloarthropathies. free! 2002
Burgos-Vargas R, Vázquez-Mellado J, Pacheco-Tena C, Hernández-Garduño A, Goycochea-Robles MV. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12228171 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Article [Social costs of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Mexico from the patient's perspective] 2008
Mould-Quevedo J, Peláez-Ballestas I, Vázquez-Mellado J, Terán-Estrada L, Esquivel-Valerio J, Ventura-Ríos L, Aceves-Avila FJ, Bernard-Medina AG, Goycochea-Robles MV, Hernández-Garduño A, Burgos-Vargas R, Shumski C, Garza-Elizondo M, Ramos-Remus C, Espinoza-Villalpando J, Alvarez-Hernández E, Flores-Alvarado D, Rodríguez-Amado J, Casasola-Vargas J, Skinner-Taylor C, Anonymous00077. · Unidad de Investigación en Economía de la Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México D.F., México. · Gac Med Mex. · Pubmed #18714591 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the social costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and gout from the patient's perspective. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of the cost and resource utilization of 690 RA, AS, and gout patients from 10 medical centers and private facilities in five cities of Mexico. The information was obtained from the baseline of a dynamic cohort. We estimated out-of-pocket expenses, institutional direct costs, and direct medical costs. RESULTS: The mean (SD) annual out-of-pocket expense (USD) was $610.0 ($302.2) for RA, $578.6 ($220.5) for AS, and $245.3 ($124.0) for gout. Figures correspond to 15%, 9.6%, and 2.5% of the family income. They also represented 26.1%, 25.3%, and 24.4% of the total annual cost per RA, AS, and gout patients, respectively. The expected direct institutional patient/year costs were 1,724.2 for RA, $1,710.8 for AS, and $760.7 for gout. The total patient annual costs were $2,334.3 for RA, $2,289.4 for AS, and $1,006.1 for gout. Most out-of-pocket expenses were used to purchase drugs, pay for laboratory tests, imaging studies, and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, the cost of RA, AS, and gout represents 25% of direct medical costs. The cost of RA is higher than that for AS and gout.
|
| 3 |
Article Prescription rheumatology practices among Mexican specialists. 2007
Goycochea-Robles MV, Arce-Salinas CA, Guzmán-Vázquez S, Cardiel-Ríos MH. · Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital General Regional No. 1 Gabriel Mancera, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, D. F., and Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, México. · Arch Med Res. · Pubmed #17350489 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: We undertook this study to describe prescription practices and the degree of disease control in a large sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated by rheumatologists in Mexico. METHODS: Board-certified Mexican rheumatologists across the country were asked to assess consecutive RA and AS patients; 1208 patients completed a self-administered questionnaire with information on demographics, disease duration, co-morbidity, treatment, pain, disability and a validated Spanish version of instruments to measure physical function and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1096 RA patients, 88.1% were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 1020 (93.3%) with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 365 (33.4%) with steroids, and 70 (6.4%) with biological agents. Their mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-Di) score was 1.21+/-0.80, Disease Activity Index, 28 joint count (DAS 28) 3.9+/-1.29, and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI), 3.94+/-2.01. Regarding the 112 AS patients, 110 (98.2%) received NSAIDs, 90 (80.4%) were on DMARDs, 11 (9.8%) took steroids, and 11 (9.8%) received biological agents, their functional status shown as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score of 4.4+/-2.5. Among the 1110 DMARD users, only 64 received one drug, and a great proportion used two or more DMARDs; 81 subjects (16.2%) were on biological agents, in any combination. RA patients more commonly used methotrexate, 791 (72%) cases, and hydroxychloroquine. Taking into account their diagnosis, the combination most prescribed was NSAIDs plus DMARDs in 660 subjects (54.7%). CONCLUSIONS: DMARDs in combination with other drug are the most frequently prescribed therapeutic scheme for RA and AS patients. These schemes used for both conditions by Mexican rheumatologists are in line with current international recommendations.
|
|
|