Rheumatoid Arthritis: Goupille P

Pham T, Fautrel B, Gottenberg JE, Goupille P, Hachulla E, Masson C, Morel J, Mouthon L, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Sibilia, Anonymous00011. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18708020 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Fautrel B, Pham T, Mouterde G, Le Loët X, Goupille P, Guillemin F, Ravaud P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M, Puéchal X, Sibilia J, Soubrier M, Mariette X, Combe B, Anonymous00061, Anonymous00062. · Pierre and Marie Curie University - Paris VI, UFR de Médecine, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18037319 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To update French Society for Rheumatology guidelines regarding the use of TNFalpha antagonists for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Existing guidelines were updated using the AGREE instrument. Items that required updating were selected by a task force, the relevant literature was critically appraised, and new wording was suggested by a limited committee of experts then validated by the task force and subsequently by a panel of external reviewers. The three-topic structure of the recommendations (indication, initiation, and adjustment) and the final algorithm format were maintained. RESULTS: Of the 12 items, five were selected for updating; one pertained to the indication for treatment with TNFalpha antagonists, two to treatment initiation, and two to treatment adjustment. Of the four initially recommended criteria for determining that TNFalpha antagonist therapy is indicated, the first three were left unchanged (confirmed diagnosis of RA; active disease for more than 1month with objective evidence of inflammation or progressive structural damage, or dependency on glucocorticoid therapy, or progressive radiographic damage; and failure to respond adequately to methotrexate - or another agent when methotrexate is contraindicated - in the optimal tolerated dosage). The fourth and last criterion was modified as follows: co-morbidities should be evaluated in order to distinguish absolute contraindications from relative contraindications that require referral to a specialist. Of the four initial recommendations about TNFalpha antagonist initiation, the first and fourth were left unchanged (a workup should be performed prior to treatment initiation, and the patient should receive regular standardized follow-up); the second and third recommendations were modified as follows: there is no evidence that one TNFalpha antagonist is more effective than the others, and concomitant methotrexate therapy is generally advisable, regardless of the TNFalpha antagonist used. Of the four recommendations about treatment adjustment, the first two were modified as follows: the goal of treatment is to achieve the EULAR response criteria or better; and in non-responders, the dosage or dosing interval can be modified when infliximab is used, methotrexate should be added when the TNFalpha antagonist is used alone, and in all other situations the patient should be switched to a different TNFalpha antagonist. The other two recommendations about treatment adjustment were left unchanged (patients who fail to tolerate one TNFalpha antagonist can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist if allowed by the nature of the adverse event; and when a remission is achieved, reduction or discontinuation of symptomatic drugs - most notably glucocorticoids - is appropriate, followed in the event of a prolonged remission by changes in the dosage and/or dosing interval of the TNFalpha antagonist or concomitant disease-modifying drug). CONCLUSION: These recommendations are designed to help practitioners optimize the use of TNFalpha antagonists in patients with RA seen in everyday practice. They do not constitute regulations.

Goupille P. · EA 3853 Immuno-Pharmaco-Génétics of Therapeutic Antibodies (IPGA), and Rheumatology Department, Trousseau Teaching Hospital, François Rabelais University, 37044 Tours cedex 9, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16310398 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriatic arthritis exhibits specific characteristics that create challenges for physicians attempting to manage the disease. Active research has produced new knowledge in the fields of epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, evaluation tools, outcome prediction, and treatment. Biotherapies have been introduced for psoriatic arthritis, creating a need for a reappraisal of evaluation tools, outcome prediction, and parameters reflecting treatment effects. TNF-alpha antagonists constitute a breakthrough in the management of psoriatic arthritis. Similar to rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis is entering a new era of evaluation and treatment.

Thomas T, Noël E, Goupille P, Duquesnoy B, Combe B, Anonymous00114. · Rheumatology Department, St-Etienne University Hospital, Boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16213772 No free full text.

Abstract: Shoulder involvement is usually inconspicuous in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the clinical manifestations are nonspecific. Nevertheless, shoulder involvement should be sought routinely and detected early. Range of motion at the shoulder should be evaluated. Although normal radiographic findings do not rule out shoulder involvement, radiographs are crucial for detecting micro- and macro-geodes during follow-up. The development of glenohumeral joint space narrowing is a turning point that indicates a risk of rapid joint destruction. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing the lesions and guiding the treatment strategy. Stepwise use of local interventions as indicated by imaging findings is recommended. Joint replacement should not be left too late, and surgical procedures on the shoulder should be built into the overall treatment plan.

Fautrel B, Pham T, Gossec L, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15797498 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the information and education of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, using evidence from the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when needed. METHODS: A scientific committee developed eight questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. A task force reviewed the literature for answers to these questions, using the PubMed Medline database (1980-2004) and the 2002-2004 databases of the annual meetings held by the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR), the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR); the indexing terms for the search were rheumatoid, arthritis, patient, education, information, knowledge, general practitioner, family doctor, and continuing medical education. Only articles in French or English were included. A panel of rheumatologists used the evidence thus compiled to develop recommendations for each question; gaps in evidence were filled by calling on the panelists' expert opinion. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and extent of agreement among panelists were specified. RESULTS: There were four general questions about the objectives, supports, and mode of delivery (group or one-on-one) of patient information and education, as well as on evaluating knowledge, and four specific questions on program content. The search identified 1235 articles; 144 were selected on the title and 118 of those on the abstract. Three abstracts presented at meetings were also kept. The evidence from the literature was presented to the panelists during interactive workshops. The panelists then developed eight recommendations, all of which were grade D because no published studies specifically addressed everyday clinical practice. Agreement among panelists ranged across recommendations from 85.7% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about educating and informing patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should increase practice uniformity and ultimately optimize the management of patients with RA.

Courvoisier N, Dougados M, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Meyer O, Sibilia J, Daures JP, Combe B. · Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, Paris, 75012, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #18771585 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to determine the predictive factors of long-term radiographic outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to describe the relationship between joint damage and disability over the course of the disease. METHODS: A cohort of 191 patients with early RA referred from primary care physicians were prospectively followed for 10 years. To determine the predictive factors of radiographic outcome, univariate analysis of the relationship between baseline values and outcome measures was undertaken using a chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Stepwise multiple logistic regression was also performed to select independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: From data available for 112 patients, univariate analysis revealed a total Sharp score at 10 years that was significantly correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), presence and level of IgA rheumatoid factor, presence of an anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA), serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-3 and radiographic score at baseline. Logistic regression identified the baseline erosion score to be the most important baseline parameter as an independent prognostic factor of total radiographic score at 10 years (odds ratio = 5.64; 95% confidence interval = 1.78 to 17.86). After excluding radiographic scores from the entry parameters, the presence of ACPA and ESR were also predictive of the final total Sharp score. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score was strongly correlated with disease activity parameters, such as disease activity score and pain, at baseline and at three, five and 10 years. No correlation was found between total radiographic Sharp score and HAQ score throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, baseline radiographic score, ESR and ACPA were the best predictive factors of 10-year radiographic outcome in early RA. HAQ disability was associated with disease activity throughout the 10-year follow-up but not with joint damage. This discrepancy with previous reports may be due in part to the early start of therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Vauloup C, Krzysiek R, Greangeot-Keros L, Wendling D, Goupille P, Brault R, Brousse C, Mariette X, Emilie D. · Service de Microbiologie-Immunologie Biologique, hôpital A. Béclère, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. · Eur Cytokine Netw. · Pubmed #17353164 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C infection is frequently associated with a mixed cryoglobulinaemia and circulating auto-antibodies, especially anti-smooth muscle cells (SMA) and anti-liver/kidney/microsome type 1 (LKM-1) anti-tissue antibodies. Treatments with TNF antagonists favour the emergence of auto-antibodies, and particularly anti-dsDNA antibodies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of TNF antagonists on hepatitis C-related immune abnormalities. METHODS: We prospectively monitored for 14 weeks, six patients with actively replicating chronic hepatitis C, initiating an anti-TNF treatment for an associated rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: Anti-nuclear and anti-dsDNA antibodies were induced in two and three patients, respectively. Treatment had no impact on the production of antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens, and it did not induce anti-tissues antibodies in any patient. Cryoglobulinaemia appeared in 2/6 patients, and it persisted in 2 others. No patient developed any news signs of autoimmunity. HCV viraemia remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of auto-antibodies by TNF antagonist treatments does not involve anti-tissues antibodies, even in patients with actively replicating chronic hepatitis C prone to produce anti-SMA and anti-LKM-1 antibodies. In contrast, TNF antagonists may favour emergence of cryoglobulinaemia in such patients.

Maillefert JF, Combe B, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, and INSERM/ERIT-M 0207, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12860733 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early combined therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) during the first year in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induces long term beneficial effects, compared with monotherapy, when the further treatment strategy is a free choice. METHODS: Study design: five year multicentre prospective longitudinal trial. Participants: 146/205 patients with RA previously included in a one year prospective randomised trial comparing the effects of treatment with MTX, SSZ, or a combination of both. Criteria for inclusion: patients with early RA (< or =1 year duration). Follow up: between the end of years 1 and 5, patients were followed up and treated by their own rheumatologist, who was allowed to indicate any treatment. Outcome measures: disease activity score (DAS), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and Sharp/van der Heijde radiological score at baseline and after five years of follow up. Analysis: comparison of the five year follow up DAS, HAQ, and radiological scores in patients given combined and single treatment during the first year. RESULTS: At the end of the five years of follow up, the patients primarily receiving single or combined treatment had similar mean DAS, HAQ, and radiographic scores. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with early RA using combined therapy with MTX and SSZ during the first year did not influence the long term inflammatory status, or disability, or structural changes, compared with single disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment.

Dougados M, Combe B, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Olive P, Schattenkirchner M, Meusser S, Paimela L, Rau R, Zeidler H, Leirisalo-Repo M, Peldan K. · Institut de Rhumatologie, Hardy B, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #10364900 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a combination therapy. METHODS: 205 patients fulfilling the ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not treated with disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs previously, with an early (< or = 1 year duration), active (Disease Activity Score (DAS) > 3.0), rheumatoid factor and/or HLA DR 1/4 positive disease were randomised between sulphasalazine (SASP) 2000 (maximum 3000) mg daily (n = 68), or methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 (maximum 15) mg weekly (n = 69) or the combination (SASP + MTX) of both (n = 68). RESULTS: The mean changes in the DAS during the one year follow up of the study was -1.15, -0.87, -1.26 in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively (p = 0.019). However, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of either EULAR good responders 34%, 38%, 38% or ACR criteria responders 59%, 59%, 65% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively. Radiological progression evaluated by the modified Sharp score was very modest in the three groups: mean changes in erosion score: +2.4, +2.4, +1.9, in narrowing score: +2.3, +2.1, +1.6 and in total damage score: +4.6, +4.5, +3.5, in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SASP + MTX group 91% versus 75% in the SASP and MTX group (p = 0.025). Nausea was the most frequent side effect: 32%, 23%, 49% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that an early initiation therapy of disease modifying drug seems to be of benefit. However, this study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant superiority of the combination therapy although several outcomes were in favour of this observation. The tolerability of the three treatment modalities seems acceptable.

Tubach F, Salmon D, Ravaud P, Allanore Y, Goupille P, Bréban M, Pallot-Prades B, Pouplin S, Sacchi A, Chichemanian RM, Bretagne S, Emilie D, Lemann M, Lorthololary O, Mariette X, Anonymous00120. · Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot; INSERM U738; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Paris, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19565495 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy, but whether this association is drug-specific remains a concern. Our objective was to describe cases of TB associated with anti-TNF mAb therapy, identify risk factors, and estimate the incidence. METHODS: We conducted an incidence study and a case-control analysis to investigate the risk of newly diagnosed TB associated with the use of anti-TNF agents. As part of the French Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies (RATIO) registry, for 3 years we collected cases of TB among French patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy for any indication; for each case, 2 patients treated with anti-TNF agents served as control subjects. RESULTS: We collected 69 cases of TB in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 40), spondylarthritides (n = 18), inflammatory colitis (n = 9), psoriasis (n = 1) and Behçet's disease (n = 1) with infliximab (n = 36), adalimumab (n = 28), and etanercept (n = 5). None of the patients had received correct chemoprophylactic treatment. The sex- and age-adjusted incidence rate of TB was 116.7 per 100,000 patient-years. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 12.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 9.7-15.5) and was higher for therapy with infliximab and adalimumab than for therapy with etanercept (SIR 18.6 [95% CI 13.4-25.8] and SIR 29.3 [95% CI 20.3-42.4] versus SIR 1.8 [95% CI 0.7-4.3], respectively). In the case-control analysis, exposure to infliximab or adalimumab versus etanercept was an independent risk factor for TB (odds ratio [OR] 13.3 [95% CI 2.6-69.0] and OR 17.1 [95% CI 3.6-80.6], respectively). Other risk factors were age, the first year of anti-TNF mAb treatment, and being born in an endemic area. CONCLUSION: The risk of TB is higher for patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy than for those receiving soluble TNF receptor therapy. The increased risk with early anti-TNF treatment and the absence of correct chemoprophylactic treatment favor the reactivation of latent TB.

Pham T, Claudepierre P, Constantin A, Fautrel B, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Goupille P, Hachulla E, Masson C, Morel J, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Sibilia J. · Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Conception, Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19560051 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To elaborate a how-to-use abatacept material intended to help physicians in the management of patients with inflammatory diseases treated with this drug in routine practice. METHODS: 1) Selection of the relevant domains by a rheumatologists' panel; 2) Search for published evidence in each domain; 3) Elaboration of the clinical tool guide with a 3-level gradation of evidence (evidence-based medicine EBM, official recommendations and expert's opinion). The experts were 11 academic rheumatologists with a large experience in prescribing abatacept and in managing rheumatoid arthritis. They were all members of the CRI (Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation), a section of the French Rheumatology Society dedicated to the inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Each fact sheet was reviewed by two other experts; 4) Regular updating based on medical literature and postmarketing surveillance data. RESULTS: Four domains were considered relevant: abatacept contraindications, management of side effects or associated diseases appearing during abatacept treatment, management of "practical situations" such as surgery or pregnancy, physician and patient information. After the literature analysis and discussion during an experts' meeting, a consensus was reached on: a pre-treatment checklist aimed at searching abatacept contraindications; a what-to-do document when facing side effects or associated diseases (autoimmune pathology, bacterial or viral infections, cardiovascular diseases, intolerance to abatacept, solid or haematological malignancy) or "practical situations" (surgery, pregnancy, vaccination, travel, drug-drug interactions); an example of standard information letter to be addressed to the attending physician (rheumatologist and general practitioner); an example of standard information letter to be addressed to the patient. CONCLUSION: Based on both an EBM approach and an expert's opinion approach, this abatacept clinical tool guide should provide assistance to all physicians attending patients treated with abatacept. For a better implementation in clinical practice, this tool guide will be available online at www.cri-net.com and regularly updated.

Berthelot JM, De Bandt M, Goupille P, Solau-Gervais E, Lioté F, Goeb V, Azaïs I, Martin A, Pallot-Prades B, Maugars Y, Mariette X, Anonymous00064. · Service de Rhumatologie, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU Nantes, 44093, Nantes Cedex 01, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #19059799 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report on the outcome of 15 cases of pregnancies in women treated with anti-TNF drugs during conception or pregnancy METHODS: French rheumatologists connecting to the web-site of CRI site: http://www.cri-net.com were asked to fill in a structured questionnaire reporting the outcome of pregnancy in women still treated by a TNF blocker at the time of conception. RESULTS: Spondylarthropathies (n=8), rheumatoid arthritis (n=4), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n=2), and psoriatic arthritis (n=1) were treated by infliximab (n=3), adalimumab (n=2), or etanercept (n=10). Miscarriages occurred twice, and elective termination was preferred once. Anti-TNF had been administered during the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy in 12, three and two cases. The 12 babies were in good condition, without apparent malformation or symptoms of neonatal illnesses. CONCLUSION: The number of reported cases exceeds 300, but only 29 women were treated during their whole pregnancy. The rate of congenital malformations observed so far might appear reassuring compared to the general population for women exposed only during conception. Conversely, there are too few reports of exposure during pregnancy to allow any conclusion about the safety of TNF blockers, and additional long term follow-up of children would be welcome in order to rule out minor forms of VACTERL association that might have been overlooked at birth.

Goupille P. · Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU de Tours, Hôpital Trousseau, 37044 Tours, France. · Ann Dermatol Venereol. · Pubmed #18721667 No free full text.

Abstract: With more than 10 years of experience in rheumatology and thousands of patients treated, the infectious and oncological risks of TNF-alpha blocking agents are well known. The efficacy of biotherapies in rheumatismal diseases has been largely demonstrated. The recent review of publications and communications shows that biotherapies benefit the comorbidities associated with inflammatory rheumatisms (uveitis, Crohn disease, hemorrhagic rectocolitis, stroke, myocardial infarction). They can even reduce the excess mortality of chronic rheumatoid inflammatory diseases.

Combe B, Benessiano J, Berenbaum F, Cantagrel A, Daurès JP, Dougados M, Fardellone P, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Guillemin F, Le Loet X, Logeart I, Mariette X, Meyer O, Ravaud P, Rincheval N, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J. · University Hospital, Montpellier, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17905631 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The French Society of Rheumatology initiated a large national multicenter, longitudinal and prospective cohort, the so-called "ESPOIR cohort study" in order to set up databases to allow various investigations on diagnosis, prognostic markers, epidemiology, pathogenesis and medico-economic factors in the field of early arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Patients were recruited if they had undifferentiated arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, of less than 6 months disease duration and if they were DMARD and steroids naïve. Patients have then to be followed every 6 months during the first 2 years then every year during at least 10 years. Clinical, biological, radiographic and medico-economic databases have been constituted to fit in the different objectives of the project and more than 20 scientific studies have already been accepted by the scientific committee. RESULTS: 813 patients were included (76.75% were female). The mean age was 48.07+/-12.55 years. The mean delay from the onset of symptoms to referral to the rheumatologist was 74.8+/-76.6 days. Baseline swollen and tender joint counts were 7.19+/-5.37 and 8.43+/-7.01; DAS28 score was 5.11+/-1.31. CRP was abnormal in 38.9% of the patients; 44.2%, 45.8% and 38.8% had respectively IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgA RF and anti-CCP antibodies. HLA DRB1*01 or 04 genes were found in 56.7% of them. Finally, 22% of these patients had erosions on hand or feet at baseline.

Cohen G, Gossec L, Dougados M, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Daures JP, Rincheval N, Combe B. · Immuno-Rhumatologie, Montpellier I University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16935911 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the radiological damage progression in patients with recent rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission. METHODS: A cohort of 191 patients with active early (<1 year) rheumatoid arthritis was prospectively assessed at baseline, 3 and 5 years by the Disease Activity Score (DAS) and the Sharp-van der Heijde Score (SHS) for radiographic damage. Patients in remission (DAS<1.6) at the 3-year and 5-year time points were compared with patients with a persistently active rheumatoid arthritis by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: 57 patients died, were lost to follow-up or had incomplete data; 30 (15.7% of those who completed) patients were in remission at 3 and 5 years. The SHS in these two groups was not significantly different at baseline (p = 0.15), but was lower in the remission group at 5 years (p = 0.0047). The median (IQR) radiographic score increased from 0.5 (0-7) at baseline to 2.5 (0-14) after 5 years for the remission group (p = 0.18) and from 2 (0-7) to 13 (3-29) in the group with active rheumatoid arthritis (p<0.001). 5 (16.7%) patients in remission had relevant progression of radiographic damage (ie, progression >4.1 points) and 6 (20%) presented new erosions in a previously unaffected joint between the third and the fifth years. CONCLUSION: Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission did not present statistically significant radiographic degradation at the group level; nevertheless, 16.7% of these patients did present degradation. Absence of progression should be part of the remission definition in rheumatoid arthritis.

Cohen JD, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Meyer O, Sibilia J, Daurès JP, Combe B. · Department of Immuno-Rhumatologie, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier I University and INSERM U454, Montpellier, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16924692 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and determine prognostic factors of 5-year quality of life in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of 191 patients with RA and disease duration < 1 year was prospectively followed over 5 years. The outcome measure was quality of life as assessed by the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2). Univariate analysis, then stepwise multiple logistic regression, was used to find independent baseline prognostic variables. RESULTS: After accounting for death, loss of followup, and missing data, 158 patients (82.72%) were included in the analysis. The mean AIMS2 physical, symptom, psychological, social interaction, and work scores after 5 years were 1.6 (range 0-6.88), 4.0 (0-10), 3.48 (0-9.22), 4.06 (0-8.69), and 1.87 (0-8.13), respectively. The AIMS2 physical component was significantly correlated with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score at 5 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the baseline values able to predict the 5-year physical, psychological, symptom, social interaction, and work status were, respectively: HAQ score and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), body mass index (BMI), HAQ; erosion score and sex, HAQ; ESR and anti-perinuclear antibody; matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3) level, joint space narrowing, and tender joint scores; HAQ score and age. CONCLUSION: The multidimensional structure of the AIMS2 allowed us to assess the 5-year health-related quality of life in early RA. Using this instrument as an outcome variable, prognostic factors were selected and varied widely depending on the evaluated domain. The baseline HAQ score was the best predictive factor of 4 of the 5 domains of the AIMS2.

Pham T, Gossec L, Constantin A, Pavy S, Bruckert E, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Tebib J, Wendling D, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie, CHU de la Conception, Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16690341 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: Recommendations were developed using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing the recommendations; Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the literature; Based on this evidence, recommendations were developed by a panel of experts. RESULTS: The recommendations were as follows: 1) In patients with RA, attention should be given to the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is responsible for an excess burden of morbidity and mortality; 2) It must be recognized that RA may be an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Persistent inflammation is an additional risk factor; 3) The cardiovascular risk should be evaluated, and modifiable risk factors should be corrected; 4) In patients with RA requiring glucocorticoid therapy, the need for cardiovascular risk minimization is among the reasons that mandate the use of the minimal effective dose; 5) It should be recognized that methotrexate may protect against cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA; 6) It should be recognized that TNFalpha antagonists remain contraindicated in patients with RA and severe heart failure. TNFalpha antagonists do not seem to worsen moderate heart failure and may protect against cardiovascular mortality; 7) AFSSAPS recommendations about LDL-cholesterol objectives should be followed, with active RA being counted as a cardiovascular risk factor; 8) In patients with RA, statin therapy should be considered only when cholesterol levels are elevated despite appropriate dietary treatment; 9) RA per se does not indicate aspirin for primary prevention. When aspirin is used for secondary prevention, it should be recognized that concomitant treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the antiplatelet effects and increase the gastrointestinal side effects of aspirin therapy.

Gossec L, Pavy S, Pham T, Constantin A, Poiraudeau S, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Tebib J, Cantagrel A, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie B, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16626995 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of nonpharmacological treatments in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: A scientific committee used a Delphi prioritization procedure to select five questions. Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the literature and presented to a panel of rheumatologists. The panel developed five detailed recommendations, filling gaps in evidence with their expert opinion. The strength of each recommendation was determined. RESULTS: Of the 565 publications retrieved by the literature review, 198 were included in the analysis. The five recommendations on nonpharmacological treatments for early RA were validated by a final vote among all participants. The recommendations are as follows: (1) physicians may decide to provide joint protection education to patients with potentially severe early RA, with the knowledge that structured joint protection programs have not been found effective; (2) physical exercise and sports can be recommended to patients with early RA; muscle strength exercises are advisable; (3) in patients with early RA, metatarsal pain and/or foot alignment abnormalities should be looked for regularly, and appropriate insoles should be prescribed if needed; (4) dietary measures and nutritional supplements are not indicated as part of the treatment of early RA; (5) elimination diets, particularly those with low intakes of dairy products, should be discouraged in patients with early RA. CONCLUSION: These recommendations should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Pavy S, Constantin A, Pham T, Gossec L, Maillefert JF, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Tebib J, Wendling D, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie A, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16626993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing recommendations. Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the Cochrane databases, PubMed, and proceedings of meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, European League Against Rheumatism, and American College of Rheumatology. Using this evidence, a group of rheumatologists developed and validated the recommendations. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and the extent of agreement among experts were specified. RESULTS: The recommendations were as follows: 1: The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA should not be less than 10 mg/week and should be determined based on disease severity and patient-related factors; 2: When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response to methotrexate, the dosage should be increased at intervals of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance and patient-related factors; 3: When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with RA, preference should be given to the oral route. A switch to the intramuscular or subcutaneous route should be considered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate effectiveness, or gastrointestinal side effects; 4: At present, there is no evidence indicating that a change in methotrexate dosage is in order when a TNF antagonist is given concomitantly; 5: The investigations that are mandatory before starting methotrexate therapy in a patient with RA consist of a full blood cell count, serum transaminase levels, serum creatinine with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest radiograph. In addition, serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C and a serum albumin assay are recommended. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory symptoms, lung function tests with determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide are recommended; 6: Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring methotrexate therapy in patients with RA consist of full blood cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays. These tests should be obtained at least once a month for the first 3 months then every 4-12 weeks; 7: Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients treated with methotrexate for RA. In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a week, at a distance from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate; 8: In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related to methotrexate toxicity, the drug must be stopped and symptom severity evaluated. Should evidence of serious disease be found, the patient should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonologist should be obtained immediately. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about methotrexate therapy for RA were developed. These recommendations should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Meyer O, Nicaise-Roland P, Santos MD, Labarre C, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Sibilia J, Combe B. · Rheumatology Unit, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat University Hospital, 75018 Paris, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #16469118 links to  free full text

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of serially determined anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies for predicting structural joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared to a single baseline determination. Ninety-nine RA patients with disease durations of less than one year and no history of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were followed prospectively for at least five years. Anti-CCP2 concentrations were measured using a second-generation ELISA. Sharp scores as modified by van der Heijde were determined on hand and foot radiographs. Anti-CCP2 antibodies were detected in 55.5% of patients at baseline and 63.6% at any time during the first three years. Presence of anti-CCP2 at any time during the first three years was associated with radiographic damage at baseline (odds ratio (OR), 3.66; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.99-13.54) and with five year progression of the total Sharp score (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.3-7.7), erosion score (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.4-19.2) and joint space narrowing score (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.15-6.8). The presence of anti-CCP2 or IgM RF at baseline did not predict these outcomes. Patients with negative anti-CCP2 tests throughout follow-up had less radiographic progression than patients with increasing anti-CCP2 concentrations; they did not differ from patients with decreasing anti-CCP2 antibody levels. HLADRB1* typing showed that progression of the mean modified Sharp score was not correlated with the presence of the shared epitope alleles. In conclusion, serially determined anti-CCP2 antibodies during the first three years of follow-up performs better than baseline determination for predicting radiographic progression in patients with early RA.

Gossec L, Fautrel B, Pham T, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loet X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Rheumatology Department, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15850994 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop French evidence-based recommendations for the structural evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in everyday practice. METHODS: A scientific committee selected 10 questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. Evidence-based responses to each question were sought by searching the PubMed and Ovid databases and the abstract databases for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, the EULAR, and the American College of Rheumatology. The following indexing terms were used: rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, patient, diagnostic imaging, radiography, joint, erosion, and joint space width. All articles published in French or English prior to May 2004 were identified. The evidence from these articles was reported to a panel of 77 rheumatologists working in hospital or office practice. The panel developed detailed recommendations, filling gaps in evidence with their expert opinion. The strength of each recommendation was determined. RESULTS: The 10 questions probed the structural evaluation of RA by plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography, both for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. The literature search retrieved 673 publications, of which 166 were selected and reviewed. The panel developed 10 recommendations, one for each question, which were accepted by consensus. CONCLUSION: Recommendations relative to the diagnosis or monitoring of structural involvement in patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Pham T, Gossec L, Fautrel B, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie, CHU de la Conception, Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15850993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, using evidence from the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when needed. METHODS: A scientific committee selected 7-10 questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. Evidence-based responses to each question were sought in the literature and were then used by a panel to develop recommendations. To fill in gaps in knowledge from the literature, the panelists relied on their personal opinion. RESULTS: The seven questions dealt with the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of RA and the factors predicting disease severity. The literature review identified 799 articles whose title and abstract suggested relevance to the study. Elimination of articles that provided no data on the study topic left 128 original articles. The panel developed seven recommendations, one for each question, which were accepted by consensus. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of patients with RA seen in everyday practice were developed. Because they constitute an objective foundation built by consensus among experts, should improve the uniformity and quality of care provided to RA patients in everyday practice.

Gossec L, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Sibilia J, Meyer O, Sany J, Daurès JP, Combe B. · René Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Department of Rheumatology B, Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15140774 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 191 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose disease duration was less than one year were followed up prospectively for five years. Remission, defined by a disease activity score (DAS) of <1.6, was used as the outcome measure. Baseline clinical, laboratory, genetic, and radiographic data (with radiographic scores determined by Sharp's method, modified by van der Heijde) were obtained. RESULTS: 48 patients (25.1%) fulfilled the remission criteria at the three year follow up visit, and 30 (15.7%) at three and five years. On univariate analysis by Fisher's exact test, remission at three years and persistent remission at five years were closely correlated with baseline DAS values, C reactive protein level, Ritchie score, health assessment questionnaire score, duration of morning stiffness, and to a lesser extent baseline total radiological scores and rheumatoid factor negativity. No significant correlation was found with sex, age, extra-articular manifestations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies, anti-keratin antibodies, anti-HSP 90, anticalpastatin antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, or HLA-DRB1* genotypes. Logistic regression analysis showed that the baseline independent variables predictive of remission were low DAS, Ritchie score, morning stiffness duration, and total radiographic score. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis were mainly clinical markers of disease activity and radiological scores.

Combe B, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Bozonnat MC, Sibilia J, Eliaou JF, Meyer O, Sany J, Dubois A, Daurès JP, Dougados M. · Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, CHU Montpellier, INSERM U454, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #14677175 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors of disability in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the radiological and functional course of the disease. METHODS: A total of 191 patients with early RA (diagnosed for less than one year) according to American College of Rheumatology criteria were followed prospectively for 5 years. At baseline and at endpoint, Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores and radiological scores (Sharp's score modified by van der Heijde) were performed. Correlations between numerous baseline data and HAQ score at endpoint were analyzed, using nonparametric tests. A multilinear regression model was performed to select independent prognostic factors of HAQ disability. RESULTS: During the 5-year followup, mean HAQ decreased from 1.3 (+/- 0.7) to 0.6 (+/- 0.6). There were 98 (65.3%) patients with a score > 1 point at baseline, but only 46 (27.4%) after 3 years and 34 (21.8%) after 5 years. Moreover, 90% of the patients had an improvement of the disability score. Final HAQ disability was associated with baseline values of HAQ score, Pain, Ritchie index, tender joint count, Disease Activity Score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erosion. Multivariate analysis selected baseline HAQ score, Ritchie index, ESR, CRP, and presence of erosion as independent prognostic factors of HAQ disability. The probability cutoff in the logistic model was selected to minimize the sum of false positive and false negative values: negative predictive value = 92.71%, positive predictive value = 46.15%, p = 0.408. Sex, age, IgM and IgA rheumatoid factors, other tested autoantibodies, and HLA class II genes did not contribute significantly to prediction of the disability after 5 years. At baseline, mean scores were 3.6 units (+/- 7.7) for total radiological score, 1.7 (+/- 4.5) for erosion score, and 1.9 (+/- 3.7) for joint space narrowing score. After 5 years, they were 17.9 +/- 22.3, 6.9 +/- 9.5, and 11.0 +/- 15.4, respectively. No erosion was present at the start in 58.0% of patients, compared to 24.2% and 22.4% at 3 and 5 years. Global radiographic progression concerned 87 patients (55.8%) during the 5 years. CONCLUSION: During the first 5 years of RA, radiological damage increased progressively in half of the patients, whereas HAQ disability improved in most of them during the same period of time and could be predicted by baseline values of HAQ score, Ritchie index, ESR, CRP, and presence (or absence) of erosion.

Maillefert JF, Combe B, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dougados M. · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Dijon, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #14623945 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive validity of radiological change on 5-yr disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study was designed to be multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, with a 5-yr follow-up. Participants were RA patients (ACR criteria), with a disease duration of <1 yr at entry. Radiographs of the hands and feet in posteroanterior view at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up (van der Heijde's modification of Sharp method) were used for structural evaluation. Disability was evaluated with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at yr 5. Analyses consisted of (i) correlation existing between the changes in the radiological scores during the first year and the HAQ value at yr 5 and (ii) determination of the optimal cut-off in the changes in the radiological scoring system, by ROC curve analysis, in which variable to be explained was disability status at yr 5, defined by HAQ value of at least 1. RESULTS: Due to missing data and/or lost to follow-up, 135 patients (out of the 191 recruited patients) were included in the analyses (mean change in the radiological score = 4.9 +/- 8.7 points, mean HAQ at yr 5 = 0.62 +/- 0.68). There was a statistically significant correlation between the HAQ-disability status at yr 5 and the changes observed in the radiological total damage and narrowing scores during the first year (r = 0.18, P = 0.046 and r = 0.25, P = 0.006, respectively). Conversely, the short-term changes in the erosion score were not correlated with subsequent HAQ-disability (r = 0.084, P = 0.36). A change of at least 2 points in the total X-ray score was considered as optimal (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 66.7, 53.9, 32.8 and 82.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This work shows that early changes in joint damage in patients with recent-onset RA are related to subsequent HAQ-disability. This relationship is due to changes in narrowing, rather than in erosion score, suggesting that the joint narrowing score might be of great importance in the follow-up of RA patients and in the reports of scientific results. The weak performance of the thresholds established using predictive validity for subsequent HAQ-disability compromise their use at the individual level.