Rheumatoid Arthritis: Goldstein JL

Goldstein JL. · Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #11032099 No free full text.

Abstract: Despite their substantial clinical benefits in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, pain, and other musculoskeletal complaints, conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) are associated with significant toxicities that can frequently limit their use. The most common and noteworthy adverse effects of NSAID are gastrointestinal (GI), and range from dyspeptic symptoms to ulcers and serious ulcer complications. The upper GI toxicities associated with the use of conventional NSAID led to the search for medications that were as clinically effective as these agents, but with a significantly improved GI safety profile. It is now known that the constitutively expressed isoenzyme cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 catalyzes the synthesis of prostanoids that help to regulate normal physiologic processes, including GI mucosa protection, whereas the inducible isoenzyme COX-2 leads to the generation of prostaglandins that mediate inflammation, pain, and fever. This knowledge has led to the development of new compounds that, at therapeutic concentrations, inhibit COX-2 without affecting COX-1. The first COX-2 targeted agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was celecoxib. This article reviews the risks of GI complications associated with conventional NSAID use and compares these risks with that of the new COX-2 specific inhibitor celecoxib.

Rabeneck L, Goldstein JL, Vu A, Mayne TJ, Rublee DA. · Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15842577 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia and related gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are commonly reported by patients taking nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and significantly impact treatment effectiveness, cost, and quality of life. This study sought to evaluate dyspepsia-related health in osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking valdecoxib compared with patients taking nonspecific NSAIDs. METHODS: Analysis of two separate, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: one in RA patients randomized to placebo, valdecoxib (10 and 20 mg once daily [o.d.]) and naproxen (500 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]); one in OA patients randomized to placebo, valdecoxib (10 and 20 mg o.d.), diclofenac (75 mg b.i.d.), or ibuprofen (800 mg three times daily [t.i.d.]). Study population comprised patients with RA in flare or clinically documented OA who required chronic symptomatic treatment with NSAIDs/analgesics. Dyspepsia-related health was evaluated at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 12 (or early termination) using the validated Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) questionnaire. This patient self-report tool consists of scales for evaluating dyspepsia pain intensity, nonpain symptoms, and satisfaction. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population with the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: Valdecoxib was significantly better at endpoint than standard doses of naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen for pain intensity scores (p < 0.05), and provided significantly improved nonpain symptom and satisfaction scores compared with naproxen for patients with RA (p < 0.05). For RA patients, the difference between valdecoxib and naproxen pain intensity scores were clinically meaningful; at all the time points, significantly fewer patients receiving valdecoxib reported severe dyspepsia pain intensity increases (>/=10 points) than those receiving naproxen. At 12 wk, fewer patients receiving valdecoxib reported severe dyspepsia pain intensity increases versus those receiving ibuprofen and diclofenac. CONCLUSIONS: The GI tolerability of valdecoxib is superior to that of nonspecific NSAIDs, and therefore can potentially have a favorable impact on patient quality of life.

Goldstein JL, Kivitz AJ, Verburg KM, Recker DP, Palmer RC, Kent JD. · University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #12848634 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In long-term outcomes studies, cyclooxygenase COX-2 specific inhibitors spare COX-1 at supratherapeutic doses and therefore demonstrate improved gastrointestinal safety over nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, in clinical practice, anti-inflammatory drugs are often used for short-term treatment of pain. AIM: To compare the short-term upper gastrointestinal mucosal effects of naproxen with the new COX-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, or placebo, in elderly subjects. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, study, elderly subjects (65-76 years old), with a normal baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), received oral valdecoxib (a supratherapeutic 40 mg b.d. dosage, n = 62), naproxen (500 mg b.d., n = 62), or placebo (n = 62) for 6.5 days. Upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury was evaluated post-treatment by EGD (day 7). RESULTS: Subjects receiving naproxen (11/60, 18%) had significantly more gastroduodenal ulcers post-treatment than those receiving placebo (2/61, 3%; P < 0.01) or valdecoxib (0/60, 0%; P < 0.001). A similar significant finding was observed for gastric ulcer rates. All treatments had similar adverse event rates and clinical laboratory findings. CONCLUSIONS: Valdecoxib, even at supratherapeutic doses, was associated with an ulcer rate significantly lower than naproxen but similar to placebo in healthy elderly subjects, despite the short duration of therapy (6.5 days). Naproxen and valdecoxib were as well tolerated as placebo.

Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Burke TA, Peña BM, Lefkowith J, Geis GS. · Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive and Liver Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #11929402 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIM: To compare celecoxib (800 mg/day, n=1997) with diclofenac (150 mg/day, n=1996) on dyspepsia-related tolerability. METHODS: In one of the two protocols comprising the Celecoxib Long-Term Arthritis Safety Study, a randomized double-blind trial, patients completed the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment Questionnaire at baseline and at weeks 4, 13, 26 and 52 for the following three scales: Pain Intensity, Non-Pain Symptoms and Satisfaction with Dyspepsia-Related Health. RESULTS: For the Pain Intensity scale, patients given diclofenac had significantly higher (worsening dyspepsia) mean changes, defined as follow-up minus baseline, than patients given celecoxib (P < 0.001, at all assessments). The mean changes in the Pain Intensity scale (scale, 2-47; higher score is higher pain intensity) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 1.48) for celecoxib and 2.76 (95% CI: 2.28, 3.25) for diclofenac at 4 weeks. Satisfaction was superior with celecoxib at all assessments (P < 0.001). At 4 weeks, the mean changes in the Satisfaction scale (scale, 7-35; higher score is higher satisfaction) were 0.02 (95% CI: - 0.26, 0.29) for celecoxib and - 0.72 (95% CI: - 1.00, - 0.45) for diclofenac. Diclofenac patients had significantly higher Non-Pain Symptoms at 4 weeks (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib, at two to four times the recommended dose, demonstrated a superior dyspepsia-related tolerability and satisfaction compared with standard dosages of diclofenac.

Rabeneck L, Wristers K, Goldstein JL, Eisen G, Dedhiya SD, Burke TA. · Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11808967 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) scales as measures of change in dyspepsia-related health in a blinded, randomized, controlled trial in arthritis patients treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: Three thousand nine hundred seven arthritis patients completed SODA at baseline and weeks 4, 13, 26, and 52 and/or at early termination. Using baseline and 4-wk data, reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's a and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Dyspepsia adverse events were defined based on a combined set of World Health Organization Adverse Reaction Terminology terms. The ability of SODA to measure change in dyspepsia-related health was evaluated by comparing SODA change scores by dyspepsia adverse event severity level and withdrawal status. Responsiveness was further evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves using withdrawal due to dyspepsia as the criterion. RESULTS: The SODA scales--Pain Intensity (alpha = 0.93), Non Pain Symptoms (alpha = 0.82), and Satisfaction (alpha = 0.89)--demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability using baseline data. Reproducibility was fair to good: Pain Intensity ICC = 0.49, Non Pain Symptoms ICC = 0.61, and Satisfaction ICC = 0.45. SODA change scores (4-wk score - baseline score) increased, or worsened, with increasing dyspepsia severity and differentiated between adjacent levels of dyspepsia severity for eight of nine adjacent comparisons (p < 0.05). SODA change scores also differentiated between those who did and did not withdraw (p < 0.001). Responsiveness was highest with the Pain Intensity scale (AUC = 0.78), followed by the Non Pain Symptoms (AUC = 0.74) and Satisfaction (AUC = 0.75) scales. CONCLUSIONS: SODA is a reliable, valid instrument for use as a measure of dyspepsia tolerability in future clinical trials involving cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific and/or traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Goldstein JL, Correa P, Zhao WW, Burr AM, Hubbard RC, Verburg KM, Geis GS. · Section of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612-7323, USA. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11316141 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) block prostaglandin production by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX); they are believed to cause gastroduodenal damage by inhibiting the COX-1 isoform and to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the COX-2 isoform. As compared to conventional NSAIDs, celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, has been shown in previous single posttreatment endoscopy studies to be associated with lower gastroduodenal ulcer rates. In response to concerns that such studies may under-represent ulceration rates, the present serial endoscopy study was designed to compare cumulative gastroduodenal ulcer rates associated with the use of celecoxib to those of naproxen, a conventional NSAID. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, 537 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were randomized to treatment with celecoxib 200 mg b.i.d. (n = 270) or naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. (n = 267) for 12 wk. Gastroduodenal damage was determined from esophagogastroduodenoscopy after 4, 8, and 12 wk of therapy. Arthritis efficacy was evaluated with Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments. RESULTS: Gastroduodenal ulcer rates after celecoxib and naproxen treatment were 4% versus 19% in the 0-4 wk interval (p < 0.001), 2% versus 14% in the 4-8 wk interval (p < 0.001), and 2% versus 10% in the 8-12 wk interval (p < 0.001), respectively. After 12 wk of treatment, the cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers was 9% with celecoxib and 41% with naproxen. In the celecoxib group, gastroduodenal ulcers were significantly associated with Helicobacter pylori status (p < 0.05), concurrent aspirin usage (p = 0.001), and a history of ulcer (p = 0.010), but not with disease type (OA/RA), age, gender, other relevant medical histories, or concurrent corticosteroid or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs usage (p > 0.05). Celecoxib produced a significantly lower incidence rate of both gastric (p < 0.001) and duodenal (p < 0.030) ulcers. The two agents produced similar improvements in Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of arthritis efficacy. The incidence of adverse events and withdrawal rates did not differ significantly between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to naproxen (500 mg b.i.d.), use of celecoxib (200 mg b.i.d.), a COX-2 specific agent, at the recommended RA dose and twice the most frequently prescribed OA dose, was associated with lower rates of gastric, duodenal, and gastroduodenal ulcers but had comparable efficacy, in patients with OA and RA.

Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, Makuch R, Eisen G, Agrawal NM, Stenson WF, Burr AM, Zhao WW, Kent JD, Lefkowith JB, Verburg KM, Geis GS. · Pharmacia Clinical Research and Development, 4901 Searle Pkwy, Bldg A3E, Skokie, IL 60077, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #10979111 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with a spectrum of toxic effects, notably gastrointestinal (GI) effects, because of inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1. Whether COX-2-specific inhibitors are associated with fewer clinical GI toxic effects is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether celecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is associated with a lower incidence of significant upper GI toxic effects and other adverse effects compared with conventional NSAIDs. DESIGN: The Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from September 1998 to March 2000. SETTING: Three hundred eighty-six clinical sites in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8059 patients (>/=18 years old) with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in the study, and 7968 received at least 1 dose of study drug. A total of 4573 patients (57%) received treatment for 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, 400 mg twice per day (2 and 4 times the maximum RA and OA dosages, respectively; n = 3987); ibuprofen, 800 mg 3 times per day (n = 1985); or diclofenac, 75 mg twice per day (n = 1996). Aspirin use for cardiovascular prophylaxis (</=325 mg/d) was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of prospectively defined symptomatic upper GI ulcers and ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation, and obstruction) and other adverse effects during the 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: For all patients, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 0.76% vs 1.45% (P =.09) and 2. 08% vs 3.54% (P =.02), respectively. For patients not taking aspirin, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 0.44% vs 1.27% (P =.04) and 1.40% vs 2.91% (P =.02). For patients taking aspirin, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 2.01% vs 2.12% (P =.92) and 4.70% vs 6.00% (P =.49). Fewer celecoxib-treated patients than NSAID-treated patients experienced chronic GI blood loss, GI intolerance, hepatotoxicity, or renal toxicity. No difference was noted in the incidence of cardiovascular events between celecoxib and NSAIDs, irrespective of aspirin use. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, celecoxib, at dosages greater than those indicated clinically, was associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic ulcers and ulcer complications combined, as well as other clinically important toxic effects, compared with NSAIDs at standard dosages. The decrease in upper GI toxicity was strongest among patients not taking aspirin concomitantly. JAMA. 2000;284:1247-1255

Eisen GM, Goldstein JL, Hanna DB, Rublee DA. · Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #15740543 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIM: To compare the incidence of abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea associated with valdecoxib, nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. METHODS: Data from five randomized, double-blind 12-week trials were pooled. Independent risk factors for abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea were also determined. RESULTS: The final analysis consisted of 4394 patients. Nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users (n = 1185) received naproxen 1000 mg/day (n = 766), ibuprofen 2400 mg/day (n = 207) or diclofenac sodium 150 mg/day (n = 212). Valdecoxib users received 10 mg/day (n = 955), 20 mg/day (n = 851) or 40 mg/day (n = 430). A total of 973 patients received placebo. The nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug group was most likely to report abdominal pain or dyspepsia, while the placebo group reported the highest incidence of nausea. The most important risk factors for abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea were nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, gastrointestinal history of nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related intolerance or gastroduodenal ulcers, osteoarthritis diagnosis, female gender and age <65 years. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrates a clear decrease in dyspepsia and an improvement in upper gastrointestinal tolerability for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis taking valdecoxib, even at supratherapeutic doses, compared with those taking nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over 12 weeks.

Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Agrawal N, Stenson WF, Kent JD, Verburg KM. · University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #15339324 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIM: In a predefined analysis, data were pooled from eight blinded, randomized, controlled trials, and separately from three long-term, open-label trials to determine the rate of upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications with the cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor, valdecoxib, vs. non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: In randomized, controlled trials, 7434 osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients received placebo (n = 973), valdecoxib 5-80 mg daily (n = 4362), or a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (naproxen, ibuprofen or diclofenac; n = 2099) for 12-26 weeks. In long-term, open-label trials, 2871 patients received valdecoxib 10-80 mg daily for up to 1 year. All potential events were reviewed by a blinded, independent review committee based on a priori definitions of ulcer complications (perforations, obstructions, bleeds). RESULTS: In randomized, controlled trials, 19 of 955 potential events were adjudicated to be ulcer complications. Valdecoxib was associated with a significantly lower ulcer complication rate than non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.68% vs. 1.96%, all patients; 0.29% vs. 2.08%, non-aspirin users; P < 0.05). In long-term, open-label trials, seven of 310 potential events were adjudicated to be ulcer complications; the annualized incidence for valdecoxib was 0.39% (seven of 1791 patient-years) for all patients and 0.2% (three of 1472 patient-years) for non-aspirin users. CONCLUSIONS: Valdecoxib, including above recommended doses, is associated with a significantly lower rate of upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications than therapeutic doses of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Goldstein JL. · Section of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612-7323, USA. · Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #10929893 No free full text.

Abstract: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used successfully by many patients for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of arthritis, and other painful and inflammatory disorders. However, traditional nonselective NSAIDs that inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 lead to a state of propensity for gastric and duodenal ulcer disease and ulcer complications. The point prevalence of endoscopic ulcers ranges from 14 to 44% of patients using NSAIDs. Moreover, it is estimated that 1.46-1.90% of chronic NSAID users develop serious upper gastrointestinal (UGI) toxicity annually, most notably UGI bleeding, gastric/duodenal obstruction or ulcer perforation. In the USA, it has been estimated that 107,000 hospitalisations and 16,500 deaths occur annually related to the use of nonselective NSAIDs. Because these ulcer complications are often not heralded by chronic symptoms of dyspepsia, symptoms alone are not sufficient to guide long-term management of NSAID-related toxicity. Instead, prophylactic and preventive therapies are recommended in patients at above-average and high risk. Epidemiological data have identified that patients with a past history of ulcer disease, past history of UGI bleeding, greater age, concomitant corticosteroid use, and those who use higher doses and multiple NSAIDs fall into this category. Other risk factors of lesser importance have also been identified. A controversial issue remains regarding the possible increased risk of NSAID-associated ulcers and ulcer complications in patients who are infected with Helicobacter pylori. Prophylactic therapies have been evaluated primarily in randomised clinical trials, with the rate of endoscopic ulcers as the primary endpoint. It is assumed, but not proven, that these endoscopic ulcer rates are surrogate markers for gastrointestinal toxicity and are predictive of the rate of significant UGI adverse events. In the only outcomes trial to date, it was reported that misoprostol (200 microg 4 times daily) caused an approximately 50% reduction in serious UGI adverse events in a large 6-month trial involving rheumatoid arthritis patients. In parallel, this approximates the 50% reduction of endoscopic ulcers seen in randomised controlled trials using misoprostol. While H2 receptor antagonists are ineffective agents at traditional doses, proton pump inhibitors have been clearly shown to reduce the rate of endoscopic ulcers in several trials. In fact, the efficacy approximates to the efficacy seen with misoprostol. Beyond efficacy and in practical terms, the choice of optimal prophylaxis should take into consideration patient compliance, patient satisfaction, side-effects and cost.

Goldstein JL, Silverstein FE, Agrawal NM, Hubbard RC, Kaiser J, Maurath CJ, Verburg KM, Geis GS. · Section of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, 60612, USA. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #10925968 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation, or gastric outlet obstruction) associated with celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, compared with the rate associated with nonspecific, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: A pooled analysis was conducted of 14 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and a separate analysis of one long-term open label trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for symptomatic treatment of arthritis. The RCTs enrolled 11,008 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis treated for 2-24 wk; the long-term open label trial enrolled 5,155 patients receiving celecoxib for a maximum of 2 yr. In the RCTs, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 1,864; 208 patient-years), celecoxib 25-400 mg b.i.d. (n = 6,376; 1,020 patient-years), or a comparator NSAID (n = 2,768; 535 patient-years); NSAIDs were naproxen 500 mg b.i.d., diclofenac 50 or 75 mg b.i.d., or ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d.). In the long-term, open-label trial, patients received celecoxib 100-400 mg b.i.d. for up to 2 yr (n = 5,155; 5,002 patient-years). The principal outcome measure of this analysis was development of a UGI ulcer complication, which was prospectively defined as bleeding, perforation, or gastric outlet obstruction. Ulcer complications were assessed and adjudicated by persons blinded to the patient's treatment assignment or the study in which the patient participated. RESULTS: In the RCTs, UGI ulcer complications occurred in no placebo patients (0 of 1,864 patients), in 2 of 6,376 celecoxib patients (0.03%), and in 9 of 2,768 patients receiving an NSAID (0.33%), corresponding to annual incidences of 0.20% for celecoxib (p > 0.05 vs placebo) and 1.68% for NSAIDs (p = 0.002 vs celecoxib and placebo). In the long-term open-label trial, nine UGI ulcer complications occurred, for an incidence of 0.17% and an annualized incidence of 0.18%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of UGI ulcer complications associated with celecoxib was 8-fold lower than with nonspecific NSAIDs. The incidence of ulcer complications observed in celecoxib-treated patients was similar to that in patients receiving placebo in the RCTs, and to that in non-NSAID users reported in the literature.