Rheumatoid Arthritis: Fautrel B

Roux CH, Saraux A, Le Bihan E, Fardellone P, Guggenbuhl P, Fautrel B, Masson C, Chary-Valckenaere I, Cantagrel A, Juvin R, Flipo RM, Euller-Ziegler L, Coste J, Guillemin F. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Nice, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17117490 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine geographical variation in the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthropathies (SpA) in France. METHODS: The survey sample was drawn from 7 areas of France. Households were randomly selected using the national telephone directory, and an individual within each household was randomly chosen by the next-birthday method. All cases of suspected RA and SpA were confirmed by the patient's rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Standardized estimates of prevalence were compared between regions and groups of regions. RESULTS: In total 15,219 anonymous telephone numbers were selected. An average response rate of 64% led to a total of 9395 respondents included in the study. The highest regional rates of RA were observed in the south (range 0.59-0.66%), and the lowest in the north (range 0.14-0.24%), with a national rate of 0.31% (95% CI 0.18-0.48%). Regional heterogeneity was observed for SpA, with the highest rates in Bretagne (0.47%) and the Sud-Est (0.53%) and a national rate of 0.30% (95% CI 0.17-0.46%). CONCLUSION: This study is the largest of its kind conducted in France. It shows inter-regional variations, mainly in RA, with a higher prevalence in the south of the country. The many potential reasons for the heterogeneity observed, including genetic and environmental factors, warrant further research.

Fautrel B, Constantin A, Morel J, Vittecoq O, Cantagrel A, Combe B, Dougados M, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Pham T, Puéchal X, Sibilia J, Soubrier M, Ravaud P, Anonymous00369. · Service de Rhumatologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, UFR de Médecine, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie-Paris-VI, 83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16798046 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for TNFalpha-antagonist therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, under the aegis of the French Society for Rheumatology. METHOD: We used the methods recommended by the French Agency for Healthcare Accreditation and Evaluation, the AGREE collaboration, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR). The recommendations focus on patient selection, monitoring, and treatment adjustments. RESULTS: Criteria for selecting patients eligible for TNFalpha-antagonist treatment of RA include: 1) a definitive diagnosis of RA; 2) disease activity for longer than 1 month, including presence of objective signs of inflammation; or radiographic progression; 3) previous failure of methotrexate in the highest tolerated dosage or of another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with contraindications to methotrexate; 4) absence of contraindications to TNFalpha-antagonist therapy. When starting TNFalpha-antagonist therapy 1) a thorough baseline evaluation should be conducted; 2) any of the three available agents can be used, as no differences in efficacy have been identified in patient populations; 3) concomitant methotrexate therapy is recommended regardless of the TNFalpha antagonist used; and 4) patients should receive standardized follow-up at regular intervals. Treatment adjustments should be based on the following: 1) the treatment objective is achievement of a EULAR response; 2) when such a response is not achieved, the dosage or dosing interval can be changed, or the patient can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist; 3) in patients who experience intolerance to a TNFalpha antagonist, another TNFalpha antagonist may be tried, depending on the nature of the adverse event; 4) occurrence of a remission should lead to a reduction in symptomatic medications, most notably glucocorticoids where used; in the event of a prolonged remission, either the TNFalpha antagonist or the concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drug may be reduced. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are intended to help physicians use TNFalpha antagonists in their everyday practice with RA patients. They do not constitute regulations.

Saraux A, Fautrel B, Maillefert JF, Flipo RM, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Gourves K, Guillemin F, Anonymous00195. · Rheumatology Units of the Brest, Dijon, Paris La Pitiè, Lille, and Marseille La Timone Teaching Hospitals, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16583465 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To conduct a practice survey of laboratory and imaging studies used by French rheumatologists to identify the cause of recent-onset arthritis. METHODS: We selected a random sample of 210 rheumatologists, who were asked to recruit all patients with recent-onset arthritis (at least one joint involved, for less than one year) during a 2 week period, and to record laboratory and imaging studies performed. Results were analyzed in the overall group, in diagnostic subgroups, and in clinical presentation subgroups. RESULTS: The 119 rheumatologists who participated recruited 104 patients. Investigations done in 50% to 75% of patients were blood cell counts; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; serum assays of C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factors, antinuclear antibodies; and hand radiographs. Investigations in 50% to 74% of patients were serum ASAT/ALAT, creatinine, and uric acid; and foot radiographs. Finally, 25% to 49% of patients were tested for proteinuria; antikeratin antibodies; hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and Lyme serologies; creatine phosphokinase; blood iron; HLA-B27; and radiographs of chest and pelvis. No differences were found between investigations in patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis and/or undifferentiated arthritis and those in other patients. In contrast, suspected diagnoses and presence of extraarticular manifestations classically associated with specific diseases modified the selection of investigations. CONCLUSION: Although considerable variability occurred, our study suggests that a limited panel of laboratory and imaging studies is performed in at least 25% of patients with recent-onset arthritis, regardless of clues suggesting a specific diagnosis.

Fautrel B, Woronoff-Lemsi MC, Ethgen M, Fein E, Monnet P, Sibilia J, Wendling D. · Department of Rheumatology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15996504 No free full text.

Abstract: When the anti-TNFalpha drugs first came onto the market, their high price was the subject of much debate. Moreover, we must add the costs associated with their administration to the purchase price. Variations in medical practices may be the source of substantial variations in these costs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs involved with the use of infliximab and etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to study the impact of variations in medical practices on them. METHODS: A pragmatic cost minimization analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective to compare the costs of administration, that is, the direct medical costs, of the first two available anti-TNFalpha agents: infliximab and etanercept. Records of 60 patients from three university hospital rheumatology departments were reviewed retrospectively for a 52-week period. This analysis considered the following costs: purchase costs for the drugs and for any co-prescribed disease-modifying drugs, inpatient or outpatient administration, medical follow-up and the transportation costs associated with treatment that were reimbursed by the French health insurance system. Costs that did not differ between the two products were excluded (work-up for inclusion, etc.). RESULTS: Data were collected for 58 patients, 30 treated with infliximab and 28 with etanercept. Patients' mean age was 52 years; 81% were women. RA had first developed on average 15 years earlier; the disease was positive for rheumatoid factors in 68% of cases and erosive in 93%. The total average annual cost of administration did not differ for infliximab and etanercept: 19,469 and 19,619 , respectively (P=0.56). The mean costs of administration nonetheless varied considerably between the three hospital centers: from 16,566 to 24,313 for infliximab (P<0.0001) and from 16,069 to 24,383 for etanercept (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The financial burden of biological treatments for RA is strongly influenced by the substantial heterogeneity in medical practices.

Le Loët X, Berthelot JM, Cantagrel A, Combe B, De Bandt M, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Lioté F, Maillefert JF, Meyer O, Saraux A, Wendling D, Guillemin F. · Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15994280 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To elaborate a clinical practice decision tree for the choice of the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for untreated rheumatoid arthritis of less than six months' duration. METHODS: Four steps were employed: (1) review of published reports on DMARD efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis; (2) inventory of the information available to guide DMARD choice; (3) selection of the most pertinent information by 12 experts using a Delphi method; and (4) choice of DMARDs in 12 clinical situations defined by items selected in step 3 (28 joint disease activity score (DAS 28): < or =3.2; >3.2 and < or =5.1; >5.1; rheumatoid factor status (positive/negative); structural damage (with/without)-that is, 3 x 2 x 2). Thus, multiplied by all the possible treatment pairs, 180 scenarios were obtained and presented to 36 experts, who ranked treatment choices according to the Thurstone pairwise method. RESULTS: Among the 77 items identified, 41 were selected as pertinent to guide the DMARD choice. They were reorganised into five domains: rheumatoid arthritis activity, factors predictive of structural damage; patient characteristics; DMARD characteristics; physician characteristics. In the majority of situations, the two top ranking DMARD choices were methotrexate and leflunomide. Etanercept was an alternative for these agents when high disease activity was associated with poor structural prognosis and rheumatoid factor positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Starting with simple scenarios and using the pairwise method, a clinical decision tree could be devised for the choice of the first DMARD to treat very early rheumatoid arthritis.

De Bandt M, Sibilia J, Le Loët X, Prouzeau S, Fautrel B, Marcelli C, Boucquillard E, Siame JL, Mariette X, Anonymous00326. · Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Robert Ballanger, Aulnay sous Bois, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #15899041 links to  free full text

Abstract: The development of drug-induced lupus remains a matter of concern in patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha. The incidence of such adverse effects is unknown. We undertook a retrospective national study to analyse such patients.Between June and October 2003, 866 rheumatology and internal medicine practitioners from all French hospital centres prescribing anti-TNF in rheumatic diseases registered on the website of the 'Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation' were contacted by email to obtain the files of patients with TNF-induced systemic lupus erythematosus. Twenty-two cases were collected, revealing two aspects of these manifestations. Ten patients (six patients receiving infliximab, four patients receiving etanercept) only had anti-DNA antibodies and skin manifestations one could classify as 'limited skin lupus' or 'toxidermia' in a context of autoimmunity, whereas 12 patients (nine patients receiving infliximab, three patients receiving etanercept) had more complete drug-induced lupus with systemic manifestations and at least four American Congress of Rheumatology criteria. One patient had central nervous system manifestations. No patients had lupus nephritis. The signs of lupus occurred within a mean of 9 months (range 3-16 months) in patients treated with infliximab and within a mean of 4 months (range 2-5 months) in patients treated with etanercept. In all cases after diagnosis was determined, anti-TNF was stopped and specific treatment introduced in eight patients: two patients received intravenous methylprednisolone, four patients received oral steroids (15-35 mg/day), and two patients received topical steroids. Lupus manifestations abated within a few weeks (median 8 weeks, standard deviation 3-16) in all patients except one with longer-lasting evolution (6 months). At that time, cautious estimations (unpublished data from Schering Plough Inc. and Wyeth Inc.) indicated that about 7700 patients had been exposed to infliximab and 3000 to etanercept for inflammatory arthritides in France. It thus appears that no drug was more implicated than the other in lupus syndromes, whose incidence was 15/7700 = 0.19% with infliximab and 7/3800 = 0.18% with etanercept.Clinicians should be aware that lupus syndromes with systemic manifestations may occur in patients under anti-TNF alpha treatment.

Gossec L, Fautrel B, Pham T, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loet X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Rheumatology Department, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Paris, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15850994 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop French evidence-based recommendations for the structural evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in everyday practice. METHODS: A scientific committee selected 10 questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. Evidence-based responses to each question were sought by searching the PubMed and Ovid databases and the abstract databases for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, the EULAR, and the American College of Rheumatology. The following indexing terms were used: rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, patient, diagnostic imaging, radiography, joint, erosion, and joint space width. All articles published in French or English prior to May 2004 were identified. The evidence from these articles was reported to a panel of 77 rheumatologists working in hospital or office practice. The panel developed detailed recommendations, filling gaps in evidence with their expert opinion. The strength of each recommendation was determined. RESULTS: The 10 questions probed the structural evaluation of RA by plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography, both for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. The literature search retrieved 673 publications, of which 166 were selected and reviewed. The panel developed 10 recommendations, one for each question, which were accepted by consensus. CONCLUSION: Recommendations relative to the diagnosis or monitoring of structural involvement in patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Pham T, Gossec L, Fautrel B, Combe B, Flipo RM, Goupille P, Le Loët X, Mariette X, Puéchal X, Wendling D, Schaeverbeke T, Sibilia J, Sany J, Dougados M. · Service de rhumatologie, CHU de la Conception, Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #15850993 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, using evidence from the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when needed. METHODS: A scientific committee selected 7-10 questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. Evidence-based responses to each question were sought in the literature and were then used by a panel to develop recommendations. To fill in gaps in knowledge from the literature, the panelists relied on their personal opinion. RESULTS: The seven questions dealt with the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of RA and the factors predicting disease severity. The literature review identified 799 articles whose title and abstract suggested relevance to the study. Elimination of articles that provided no data on the study topic left 128 original articles. The panel developed seven recommendations, one for each question, which were accepted by consensus. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about the physical and laboratory-test follow-up of patients with RA seen in everyday practice were developed. Because they constitute an objective foundation built by consensus among experts, should improve the uniformity and quality of care provided to RA patients in everyday practice.

Saraux A, Guillemin F, Guggenbuhl P, Roux CH, Fardellone P, Le Bihan E, Cantagrel A, Chary-Valckenaere I, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Juvin R, Behier JM, Fautrel B, Masson C, Coste J. · Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital, Brest-Cedex, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15817661 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) in France in a multiregional representative sample in the year 2001. METHODS: A two stage random sample was constituted in seven areas from the national telephone directory and the next birthday method in each household. Interviewers were patient-members of self help groups trained to administer telephone surveys using a validated questionnaire for detecting inflammatory joint disease. Quality of data collection was controlled periodically. SpA was confirmed by the patient's rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Prevalence estimates after probability sampling correction were standardised for age and sex (1999 national census). RESULTS: Among the 15 219 anonymous telephone numbers selected, 3.6% were places of work or secondary residences and were excluded. The phone interview participation rate ranged across regions from 55.1 to 69.9%. 3554 men and 5841 women were included in the study. Twenty nine cases of SpA were confirmed. All but one fulfilled ESSG criteria. Mean age was 47 years (range 21-78). The overall prevalence standardised for age and sex was 0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.46). Prevalence was similar in women (0.29% (95% CI 0.14 to 0.49)) and men (0.31 % (95% CI 0.12 to 0.60)). Geographical analysis by department clustering found no significant differences. The prevalence of SpA was as high as that of rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of SpA in France was 0.30% in 2001, with no difference between women and men. Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis were the most common SpA subsets.

Guillemin F, Saraux A, Guggenbuhl P, Roux CH, Fardellone P, Le Bihan E, Cantagrel A, Chary-Valckenaere I, Euller-Ziegler L, Flipo RM, Juvin R, Behier JM, Fautrel B, Masson C, Coste J. · EA 3444 School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nancy, Nancy, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15800010 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vary across Europe. Recent estimates in southern European countries showed a lower prevalence than in northern countries. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of RA in France in a multiregional representative sample in the year 2001. METHODS: A two stage random sample was constituted in seven areas (20 counties) from the national telephone directory of households and by the next birthday method in each household. Patient-interviewers, member of self help groups, were trained to administer telephone surveys using a validated questionnaire for case detection of inflammatory rheumatism, and conducted the survey under quality control. All suspected cases of RA were confirmed by their rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Prevalence estimates after probability sampling correction were standardised for age and sex (national census 1999). RESULTS: An average response rate of 64.7% (two stages combined) led to a total of 9395 respondents. Standardised prevalence was 0.31% (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.48) for RA, 0.51% in women and 0.09% in men, with a higher age-specific prevalence in the 65-74 year age band. A geographical analysis of county clustering showed significant variation across the country. CONCLUSION: This national multiregional cooperative study demonstrates the usefulness of working in association with patients of self help groups. It showed a similar prevalence of RA to that of the spondyloarthropathies estimated concomitantly during the survey. It provides a reliable basis for definition of population targets for healthcare delivery and drug treatments.

Fautrel B, Clarke AE, Guillemin F, Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Panaritis T, Fortin PR, Menard HA, Donaldson C, Penrod JR. · Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15742435 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A willingness-to-pay (WTP) survey measures the value of a given intervention in money terms. We examined the WTP of Canadian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for a hypothetical cure for RA under private and public scenarios. The validity of the survey was explored by studying the association between WTP and variables thought to be associated with WTP and randomly-varied variables of the survey materials. METHODS: A telephone survey was carried out in a sample of 121 patients with RA from 5 rheumatologists affiliated with the McGill University Health Centre. In advance, patients had been sent a 4-page brochure providing a comprehensive description of the disease (including photos or no photos). The hypothetical cure for RA was presented through 2 scenarios: a private insurance implying an annual premium and a public coverage requiring additional income taxes. The survey included questions related to their WTP, socioeconomic status (ability to pay), general health, opinion about the performance of the healthcare system, and their opinion about the difficulty of the survey. For elicitation of WTP, patients were randomized to one of 3 payment cards. Mailed questionnaires concerning RA health status were also completed. A series of univariate comparisons and multivariate ordered logit regressions were carried out to examine the association of WTP and patient and study variables. RESULTS: Patients were willing to pay annually significantly more for the private program (mean 1190 Canadian dollars) than for the public program (mean 502 Canadian dollars). Annual WTP was associated with age, household income, site of care (private program), private health insurance, opinion about the performance of the public healthcare system (public program), and presence of brochure photos. The payment card did not affect WTP for either program. CONCLUSION: The WTP survey was well understood and accepted by the patients with RA. Although measures of RA-specific health status (e.g., Health Assessment Questionnaire) were not found to be associated with WTP, many variables thought to be associated with WTP were found to be related in the expected directions. Since WTP for the private program was higher than that for the public program, our study design did not fully capture altruistic valuations of RA patients. Thus, our estimates represent a lower bound on patients' WTP for an RA cure.

Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Fautrel B, Clarke AE, Duffy CM, Penrod JR. · Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, The Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15693099 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Adolescent arthritis or rheumatism (AAR) has been shown to influence the activities, mental health, and healthcare utilization of affected individuals. However, these effects have never been estimated in a population-based sample. We examined the association of AAR with health status, health services use, health behaviors, and activity limitations. We also investigated the effect of socioeconomic status and family background on respondents with AAR. METHODS: The 1996 National Population Health Survey is a nationally representative survey exploring the health status and behaviors of Canadians. Among the 26,012 individuals aged 12 to 19 with complete responses on the presence of chronic illnesses, the 213 self-reporting arthritis or rheumatism (AAR) were compared to: (1) all other adolescents as a single group; or (2) the group of 9161 adolescents reporting other chronic diseases (OCD) but not AAR, and the group of 16,638 adolescents without chronic disease (WCD). Between-group differences were examined for the following variables: health status; use of health services; presence of activity limitations in school, work, or at home; and school enrollment and work status. RESULTS: Compared to those without, respondents with AAR reported more diagnoses of non-AAR chronic illnesses. Depression among AAR individuals was more prevalent than among non-AAR individuals, as was suffering from moderate or severe pain. Those with AAR were more likely than WCD individuals to use physician services, hospital services, and pain relief medications. AAR patients were more likely to be limited in their activities, and less likely to be enrolled in school than OCD or WCD individuals. CONCLUSION: This study indicates a broad range of effects of AAR in a nationally representative sample. Arthritis or rheumatism affected measures of mental health, health service use, and the school, work, and home activities of affected individuals, compared to individuals without chronic disease or with other chronic disease.

Fautrel B, Saraux A, Maillefert JF, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Flipo RM, Penrod JR, Guillemin F, Anonymous00187. · Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris and School of Public Health, Nancy, France. bruno.fautrel.psl.ap-hop-paris.fr · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15334420 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs of workups to diagnose early arthritis. METHODS: In 2000, the French Society for Rheumatology conducted a survey of a representative sample of French and Belgian rheumatologists (n = 239). The respondents were asked to consider 2 hypothetical scenarios, 1 describing undifferentiated arthritis and the other more suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis. They were then asked what diagnostic workup they would order. Costs for each study were determined in 2001 euros, according to the French public health system fee schedules. RESULTS: In total, 151 rheumatologists participated in the study (63%). The mean +/- SD diagnostic costs were 406.5 +/- 194.3 euro for the case with no diagnostic clues, and 280.7 +/- 154.3 euro for the case suggestive of early RA. Responses were very heterogeneous. The 2 main sources of expenditure were immunology tests and imaging. Hospital staff physicians tended to order more expensive workups, and costs tended to vary inversely with physician experience. The most important predictor of cost was diagnostic doubt, as estimated by the number of diagnoses proposed by respondents in each case; each additional diagnosis cost an additional 19.1-26.1 euro. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic workups after a first medical visit for early polyarthritis result in substantial direct costs. This observation and the great variability observed in physicians' practices point out the need for consensus on the appropriate workups for these patients.

Fautrel B, Sibilia J, Mariette X, Combe B, Anonymous00144. · Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15184196 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Consensus is lacking on treatment for corticosteroid resistant adult onset Still's disease (ASD). OBJECTIVE: To assess anti-TNFalpha efficacy and tolerance in refractory ASD. METHODS: All departments of rheumatology and internal medicine in France were contacted by mail to identify cases of refractory ASD for which anti-TNFalpha had been used. Medical information was collected using a standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 20 patients with mean age 40.7 years (range 18-74) at treatment start and mean disease duration 8.5 years (range 2-21), the clinical expression of ASD was predominantly systemic in five patients and polyarticular in 15. Response to corticosteroids and methotrexate had been considered inadequate in all patients. Infliximab was used to treat 15 patients, and etanercept used for 10; five had received both drugs consecutively. Steroids were concurrently used in 18 patients and an immunosuppressant in 17. At a mean (SD) follow up of 13 (14) months, complete remission had occurred in five cases (of 25 treatment sequences): one receiving etanercept and four infliximab. Partial response was observed in 16 cases (seven etanercept and nine infliximab). Treatment failed in four cases (two with each anti-TNFalpha). At the last visit, anti-TNFalpha therapy was discontinued in 17 cases, 11 times because of lack (or loss) of efficacy, four times because of a side effect, and twice for other reasons. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNFalpha therapy may be helpful for some patients with refractory ASD. However, most patients achieve only partial remission. Additional information is thus needed to evaluate more precisely the risk-benefit ratio of this treatment.

Fautrel B, Fermand JP, Sibilia J, Nochy D, Rousselin B, Ravaud P. · Rheumatology Institute, Hĵpital Cochin, Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12136908 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Primary amyloidosis is classical in the course of multiple myeloma (MM), but peripheral amyloid arthropathy is unusual. We evaluated the frequency and effect of amyloid arthropathy in a single center series of patients with MM. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of cases of peripheral joint amyloidosis in a cohort of patients with MM. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 1996, 11 patients (6 women, 5 men, mean age 59 yrs) were diagnosed with biopsy proven amyloid arthropathy in a cohort of 311 patients with MM. Arthritis was the first symptom of amyloidosis in all patients and occurred within the 6 months after MM diagnosis in most patients (7/11). Nine patients had light chain MM and X light chain was more common than kappa (6 vs 5). Shoulder hypertrophic arthropathy and rheumatoid arthritis-like polyarthritis were the 2 most common involved sites. In most cases, joint involvement was responsible for major limitations in activities of daily living. Amyloid deposits were clearly visible on magnetic resonance images (MRI), which also showed inflammatory synovitis in some cases. Control of MM was often associated with improvement of amyloid arthropathy, but additional rheumatological treatment--oral low dose prednisone or joint steroid injection--was often needed to achieve more complete relief. Amyloid arthropathy was not associated with decreased survival, except for patients with concomitant cardiac involvement. CONCLUSION: This series provides reliable information on amyloid arthropathy, especially regarding functional effects, anatomical lesions on MRI, and therapeutic options.

Saraux A, Maillefert JF, Fautrel B, Flipo RM, Kaye O, Lafforgue P, Guillemin F, Botton E. · Rheumatology Unit, Brest Teaching Hospital, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12079905 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The cause of recent onset polyarthritis can be difficult to identify. OBJECTIVE: To determine which laboratory and imaging studies French rheumatologists recommend, not taking cost into account, for the diagnosis of recent onset polyarthritis without extra-articular manifestations. METHODS: From the list of the French Society for Rheumatology, a random sample of 210 rheumatologists was selected, who were asked to complete a questionnaire on the laboratory and imaging studies they would recommend in two fictional cases of recent onset polyarthritis (possible rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-case 1 and probable RA-case 2). RESULTS: In case 1, the following were recommended by over 75% of respondents: hand radiographs, rheumatoid factors (RFs), and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (92%, 98%, and 98%, respectively). 50-74% of respondents recommended radiographs of the feet, knees, and chest (50%, 57%, and 66%, respectively); blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum assays of C reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (65%, 74%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). 25-49% recommended determination of creatinine and proteinuria, HLA-B27, antikeratin antibody, radiographs of the pelvis, and synovial fluid analysis. Several investigations were recommended less often in case 2 than in case 1. Nevertheless, some laboratory and imaging studies (radiographs of hand, feet, knees, chest x rays, blood cell counts, ANA, RF, antikeratin antibody, CRP, ESR, creatinine, AST and ALT, proteinuria, and joint aspiration) were recommended by more than 25% of respondents in both cases. CONCLUSION: Wide variations were found among rheumatologists, indicating a need for standardisation. Some laboratory and imaging studies are recommended by at least 25% of respondents in recent onset polyarthritis with or without clues suggesting RA. In contrast, many tests were considered useful by fewer than 25% of the respondents in both cases.

Fautrel B, Zing E, Golmard JL, Le Moel G, Bissery A, Rioux C, Rozenberg S, Piette JC, Bourgeois P. · Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. · Medicine (Baltimore). · Pubmed #11997716 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Fautrel B, Le Moël G, Saint-Marcoux B, Taupin P, Vignes S, Rozenberg S, Koeger AC, Meyer O, Guillevin L, Piette JC, Bourgeois P. · Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11246670 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of serum ferritin and glycosylated ferritin (GF) levels in diagnosing adult onset Still's disease (AOSD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of 205 patients who had ferritin and GF assays in one hospital laboratory. Records of all patients were reviewed, and a standardized questionnaire used to extract all data available at the time of the assay. The clinicians' final diagnosis was also recorded. Patients were classified as having "certain AOSD" (based on Yamaguchi's criteria) or a control disease. The concordance of ferritin and GF levels with final diagnosis was evaluated. RESULTS: In total 49 AOSD and 120 control patients were eligible. The mean ferritin value was significantly higher in the AOSD group (4,752 +/- 9,599 microg/l) than in the control group (1,571 +/- 3,807 microg/l), p = 0.029. GF was significantly lower in AOSD patients (15.9 +/- 11.9%) than in the control group (31.5 +/- 18.7%), p < 0.001. The combination of a GF level of < or = 20% with ferritin above the upper limit of normal yielded a sensitivity of 70.5% and specificity of 83.2%. The combination of a GF level < or = 20% with ferritin 5 times normal produced a sensitivity of 43.2% and specificity of 92.9%. This latter combination allowed an AOSD diagnosis to be ruled out for 6 of the 8 control patients who met Yamaguchi's positive criteria. CONCLUSION: Ferritin and GF levels are powerful diagnostic markers of AOSD. They may be helpful in clinical practice for excluding differential diagnoses.

Vignes S, Le Moël G, Fautrel B, Wechsler B, Godeau P, Piette JC. · Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #10784516 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the evolution of levels of total serum ferritin and percentage of the glycosylated form in patients with adult onset Still's disease (AOSD) at the time of diagnosis and during follow up. METHODS: All patients with AOSD were tested at the time of diagnosis and during follow up. Total serum ferritin levels were analysed by immunoassay, and the percentage of glycosylated ferritin was determined by methods using Sepharose-Con A. RESULTS: 14 patients (eight women, six men) with AOSD were enrolled. At the time of diagnosis, mean (SD) age was 36 (16) years. Mean initial total serum ferritin was 6350 (1300) microg/l (normal <250 microg/l). The mean initial percentage of glycosylated ferritin was 14.7 (13)% (normal >50%). Mean follow up time was 37 (35) months. At the time of the last examination all patients were in remission except one, who presented a chronic articular form. Total serum ferritin remained high in this single patient and was normal in the 13 others, with a mean of 98 (73) microg/l. In all patients the percentage of glycosylated ferritin remained low, with a mean of 16 (16)%. CONCLUSION: Total serum ferritin is a marker of the active phase of AOSD. The percentage of glycosylated ferritin is low both in the active phase and in remission. Further studies are needed to confirm these data and to determine their specificity for AOSD before considering any possible use of a low percentage of glycosylated ferritin as a diagnostic tool in suspected AOSD, especially when atypical or previously treated.

Foltz V, Loeuille D, Etchepare F, Chary-Valckenaere I, Rosenberg C, Tanguy ML, Fautrel B, Bourgeois P. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18945634 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Banal F, Etchepare F, Rouhier B, Rosenberg C, Foltz V, Rozenberg S, Koeger AC, Fautrel B, Bourgeois P. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16769791 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Fautrel B, Foltz V, Frances C, Bourgeois P, Rozenberg S. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12115253 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.