| 1 |
Article Tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons of the hand detected by MRI: an early indicator of rheumatoid arthritis. 2009
Eshed I, Feist E, Althoff CE, Hamm B, Konen E, Burmester GR, Backhaus M, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19474128 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of MRI of finger and wrist joints for diagnosing early RA. MRI was evaluated as a stand-alone tool and in combination with ACR criteria and serum markers such as RF. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (31 men, 68 women; median age 46 years) with unspecified arthritis or suspected RA and negative X-ray findings were included. MR images of the hand and wrist of these patients were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of synovitis, erosions and tenosynovitis. The clinical diagnosis (early RA or non-RA) was made by a rheumatologist after clinical follow-up for 6-41 months. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had a clinical diagnosis of RA and 41 were diagnosed as non-RA. Step-wise logistic regression of all MR parameters evaluated identified tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons to be the most powerful predictor of early RA (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 73%). Including ACR criteria in the analysis, positive serum RF and tenosynovitis were the strongest predictors of early RA (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 63%). When serum anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP), ANA and CRP were included as additional parameters, anti-CCP and flexor tenosynovitis were the strongest predictors of early RA (sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Flexor tenosynovitis diagnosed by MRI of the hand is a strong predictor of early RA. Combining flexor tenosynovitis on MRI with positive serum anti-CCP or positive RF is an even stronger predictor of early RA.
|
| 2 |
Article Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI. 2007
Schirmer C, Scheel AK, Althoff CE, Schink T, Eshed I, Lembcke A, Burmester GR, Backhaus M, Hamm B, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Charité Medical School, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17068069 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare dedicated low-field MRI (lfMRI) with conventional MRI (cMRI) in the detection and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The wrist and finger joints of 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (median (range) disease duration 8 years (7-12); Disease Activity Score 3.3 (2.6-4.5)) were examined by 0.2 T lfMRI and 1.5 TcMRI. The protocols comprised coronal spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences before and after contrast medium administration. Synovitis of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints 2-5 and the wrist joints was scored according to Outcome Measures in Rheumatology recommendations. Tenosynovitis and erosions were scored using 4-point and 6-point scales, respectively. The results were analysed by calculating kappa values and performing McNemar's test intra-individually on a joint-by-joint basis. RESULTS: Agreement between the two MRI techniques was good to excellent for synovitis and erosions, and moderate for tenosynovitis. Of the 306 joints evaluated, 245 and 200 joints showed synovitis in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. Scoring of synovitis of the finger joints yielded kappa values from 0.69 to 0.94. Of the 68 flexor tendons evaluated, tenosynovitis was diagnosed by lfMRI in 24 and by cMRI in 33 instances. Of the 391 bones evaluated, 154 and 139 showed erosions in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. kappa values for erosion scores were between 0.65 and 1. CONCLUSION: Dedicated, lfMRI shows high agreement with cMRI in diagnosing and scoring synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis when using standardised scoring systems.
|
| 3 |
Article Low-field MRI for assessing synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Impact of Gd-DTPA dose on synovitis scoring. 2006
Eshed I, Althoff CE, Schink T, Scheel AK, Schirmer C, Backhaus M, Lembcke A, Bollow M, Hamm B, Hermann KG. · Department of Radiology, Charité Medical School, Campus Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20-21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16882591 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of a double dose compared to a single dose of contrast material in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on semi-quantitative scoring of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This prospective study included 38 RA patients (23 women and 15 men, mean age 51 years). All patients underwent low-field MRI of the hand before administration of contrast medium, after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA), and after another dose of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA. Two readers (A and B) blinded to dosage independently scored the single dose and double dose image sets for synovitis according to outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT) recommendations. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were also calculated for each set. RESULTS: 149 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were evaluated. There was good inter-reader agreement for each of the two sets (intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.75 for the single dose set and 0.83 for the double dose). Median CNR and SNR values were 5.4 and 15.9, respectively, for the single dose set and 8.5 and 16.6, respectively, for the double dose set (p<0.0001). Single dose set mean synovitis scores were 1.7 and 1.6 for readers A and B, respectively. Double dose set scores were 1.9 and 2.0, respectively. Thus, higher synovitis scores were recorded for the double dose sets than the single dose sets (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: In low-field MRI, when evaluating RA, the dose of the contrast material influences synovitis scoring. Therefore, dosage of contrast material should be taken into consideration when using extremity dedicated low-field MRI.
|
|
|