Rheumatoid Arthritis: Emilie D

Emilie D. · Service de Médecine Interne et d'Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Béclère, Institut Paris-Sud sur les Cytokines, Clamart. · J Soc Biol. · Pubmed #12134628 No free full text.

Abstract: A number of years ago several groups reported that Interleukin 10 (IL10) was vigorously overproduced in disseminated lupus erythematosus (reviewed in Llorente et al., 2000). This hyperproduction obeys two different patterns. In one pattern, IL10 serum concentrations become elevated during disease and evolve in parallel with them. In the other, the patients' blood mononucleated cells spontaneously release increased IL10 quantities; contrary to serum variations in the first pattern, this increased output is not correlated with disease spurts. Interestingly an increase of this type is frequently found in disease-free parents of these patients (Llorente et al., 1997; Gröndal et al., 1999). Some studies relate this IL10 hyperproduction to a genetic origin (Mehrian et al., 1998; Mok et al., 1998), while others seem to indicate an environmental cause (Gröndal et al., 1999). Together these findings suggest two different possible origins for lupus IL10 overproduction. The first would be due to intrinsic anomalous IL10 production by some immune cells, the second would result from high IL10 output by tissues damaged by the inflammatory process. Considering the properties of IL10, which activates B lymphocytes and inhibits T lymphocytes, overproduction in lupus could explain the immune anomalies of this disease, which is characterized by anti-self antibodies production and by deficient T responses. Interestingly several of these anomalies are found independently from disease outbreaks and, in the case of some, in relatives of patients. The part played by IL10 in lupus has been inferred from the murine NZB-W model, in which an anti-IL10 monoclonal antibody prevents development of the disease (Ishida et al., 1994); this antibody also prevents the appearance of human anti-ADN autoantibodies in immune-deficient mice restored with patients' lymphocytes. A direct demonstration of the role of IL10 in the etiology of lupus symptoms has recently been adduced in a pilot study bearing on six lupus patients, refractory to anti-inflammatory and immuno-suppressive treatments, who were treated for 3 weeks with a murine anti-IL10 monoclonal antibody (Llorente et al., 2000). This treatment brought about a rapid amelioration of the clinical picture, in particular of the cutaneous and articular symptoms, which was maintained for six months after this trial. This symptomatic amelioration was accompanied by a decrease of the biological signs of immune system hyperactivity and a partial amelioration of T lymphocyte function. The better clinical control of the disease allowed a significant decrease of corticotherapy. While this was an open study, without a control group and without randomisation, the rapid and important evolution of clinical and biological parameters towards normal strongly pleads for a favorable effect of the treatment. While confirming previous hypotheses about the rote of IL10 in lupus, this study leaves several points unexplained. First the clinical and biological amelioration in these patients treated with anti-IL10 monoclonal antibody occurred independently of circulating anti-ADN auto-antibodies, indicating that the role of this interleukin in the disease is more complex than could be thought from the initial experiments in mouse. This unexpected result does not exclude that the beneficial effect of the antibody could be mediated by its action on B lymphocytes, since it is well known that these cells play important parts in development auto-immune processes other than only the production of auto-antibodies. It is also possible that the negative effect of IL10 in this disease exerts on other targets than B lymphocytes, in particular on fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Indeed it should be recalled that, while IL10 has often been held as an anti-inflammatory cytokine, its biological properties are more ambiguous, since it can immuno-stimulate some cell types. Among other remaining unknowns, the reason why some IL10 overproducing individuals, belonging to the family of lupus patients, do not develop lupus, is not understood. This fact underlines the multi-factorial origin of this disease, which must stem from associated genetic and environmental causes. IL10 overproduction, while it apparently promotes the symptoms, is certainly not sufficient. The efficiency of anti-IL 10 monoclonal antibodies during lupus, which are well tolerated, points to their usefulness in the therapeutic arsenal, especially in forms that are refractory to conventional anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive treatments. In order to be validated, this hypothesis must be submitted to more in depth, randomized, studies. Moreover humanized antibodies should be developed, which would make it possible to reiterate the treatment during further outbreaks. Once all these conditions are fulfilled, the place of anti-IL10 treatment in lupus and the benefice-risk ratio should be compared to these of therapeutic approaches currently used in refractory forms. If further studies confirm the efficiency of- and tolerance to- IL10 neutralizing antibodies in lupus, it is well possible that these antibodies will eventually equate, for this disease, the recent use of TNF antagonists in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Vauloup C, Krzysiek R, Greangeot-Keros L, Wendling D, Goupille P, Brault R, Brousse C, Mariette X, Emilie D. · Service de Microbiologie-Immunologie Biologique, hôpital A. Béclère, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. · Eur Cytokine Netw. · Pubmed #17353164 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C infection is frequently associated with a mixed cryoglobulinaemia and circulating auto-antibodies, especially anti-smooth muscle cells (SMA) and anti-liver/kidney/microsome type 1 (LKM-1) anti-tissue antibodies. Treatments with TNF antagonists favour the emergence of auto-antibodies, and particularly anti-dsDNA antibodies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of TNF antagonists on hepatitis C-related immune abnormalities. METHODS: We prospectively monitored for 14 weeks, six patients with actively replicating chronic hepatitis C, initiating an anti-TNF treatment for an associated rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: Anti-nuclear and anti-dsDNA antibodies were induced in two and three patients, respectively. Treatment had no impact on the production of antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens, and it did not induce anti-tissues antibodies in any patient. Cryoglobulinaemia appeared in 2/6 patients, and it persisted in 2 others. No patient developed any news signs of autoimmunity. HCV viraemia remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of auto-antibodies by TNF antagonist treatments does not involve anti-tissues antibodies, even in patients with actively replicating chronic hepatitis C prone to produce anti-SMA and anti-LKM-1 antibodies. In contrast, TNF antagonists may favour emergence of cryoglobulinaemia in such patients.

Tubach F, Salmon D, Ravaud P, Allanore Y, Goupille P, Bréban M, Pallot-Prades B, Pouplin S, Sacchi A, Chichemanian RM, Bretagne S, Emilie D, Lemann M, Lorthololary O, Mariette X, Anonymous00120. · Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot; INSERM U738; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Paris, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19565495 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy, but whether this association is drug-specific remains a concern. Our objective was to describe cases of TB associated with anti-TNF mAb therapy, identify risk factors, and estimate the incidence. METHODS: We conducted an incidence study and a case-control analysis to investigate the risk of newly diagnosed TB associated with the use of anti-TNF agents. As part of the French Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies (RATIO) registry, for 3 years we collected cases of TB among French patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy for any indication; for each case, 2 patients treated with anti-TNF agents served as control subjects. RESULTS: We collected 69 cases of TB in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 40), spondylarthritides (n = 18), inflammatory colitis (n = 9), psoriasis (n = 1) and Behçet's disease (n = 1) with infliximab (n = 36), adalimumab (n = 28), and etanercept (n = 5). None of the patients had received correct chemoprophylactic treatment. The sex- and age-adjusted incidence rate of TB was 116.7 per 100,000 patient-years. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 12.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 9.7-15.5) and was higher for therapy with infliximab and adalimumab than for therapy with etanercept (SIR 18.6 [95% CI 13.4-25.8] and SIR 29.3 [95% CI 20.3-42.4] versus SIR 1.8 [95% CI 0.7-4.3], respectively). In the case-control analysis, exposure to infliximab or adalimumab versus etanercept was an independent risk factor for TB (odds ratio [OR] 13.3 [95% CI 2.6-69.0] and OR 17.1 [95% CI 3.6-80.6], respectively). Other risk factors were age, the first year of anti-TNF mAb treatment, and being born in an endemic area. CONCLUSION: The risk of TB is higher for patients receiving anti-TNF mAb therapy than for those receiving soluble TNF receptor therapy. The increased risk with early anti-TNF treatment and the absence of correct chemoprophylactic treatment favor the reactivation of latent TB.

Hamdi H, Mariette X, Godot V, Weldingh K, Hamid AM, Prejean MV, Baron G, Lemann M, Puechal X, Breban M, Berenbaum F, Delchier JC, Flipo RM, Dautzenberg B, Salmon D, Humbert M, Emilie D, Anonymous00131. · INSERM UMR-S764, Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Paris-Sud sur les Cytokines, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM U764, 32 rue des Carnets, 92140, Clamart, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #16859506 links to  free full text

Abstract: Reactivation of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection is a major complication of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha treatment, but its mechanism is not fully understood. We evaluated the effect of the TNF antagonists infliximab (Ifx), adalimumab (Ada) and etanercept (Eta) on anti-mycobacterial immune responses in two conditions: with ex vivo studies from patients treated with TNF antagonists and with the in vitro addition of TNF antagonists to cells stimulated with mycobacterial antigens. In both cases, we analysed the response of CD4+ T lymphocytes to purified protein derivative (PPD) and to culture filtrate protein (CFP)-10, an antigen restricted to Mtb. The tests performed were lymphoproliferation and immediate production of interferon (IFN)-gamma. In the 68 patients with inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthropathy or Crohn's disease), including 31 patients with a previous or latent tuberculosis (TB), 14 weeks of anti-TNF-alpha treatment had no effect on the proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes. In contrast, the number of IFN-gamma-releasing CD4+ T lymphocytes decreased for PPD (p < 0.005) and CFP-10 (p < 0.01) in patients with previous TB and for PPD (p < 0.05) in other patients (all vaccinated with Bacille Calmette-Guérin). Treatments with Ifx and with Eta affected IFN-gamma release to a similar extent. In vitro addition of TNF antagonists to CD4+ T lymphocytes stimulated with mycobacterial antigens inhibited their proliferation and their expression of membrane-bound TNF (mTNF). These effects occurred late in cultures, suggesting a direct effect of TNF antagonists on activated mTNF+ CD4+ T lymphocytes, and Ifx and Ada were more efficient than Eta. Therefore, TNF antagonists have a dual action on anti-mycobacterial CD4+ T lymphocytes. Administered in vivo, they decrease the frequency of the subpopulation of memory CD4+ T lymphocytes rapidly releasing IFN-gamma upon challenge with mycobacterial antigens. Added in vitro, they inhibit the activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes by mycobacterial antigens. Such a dual effect may explain the increased incidence of TB in patients treated with TNF antagonists as well as possible differences between TNF antagonists for the incidence and the clinical presentation of TB reactivation.

Emilie D. · Inserm U131 et service de microbiologie-immunologie biologique, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, institut Paris-Sud-Cytokines, Clamart, France. · Rev Med Interne. · Pubmed #16475264 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.