Rheumatoid Arthritis: Emery P

Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Bombardieri S, Choi H, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Gomez-Reino J, Keystone E, Koch G, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Matucci-Cerinic M, Michaud K, O'Dell J, Paulus H, Pincus T, Richards P, Simon L, Siegel J, Smolen JS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, van der Heijde D, van Riel P, Vlad S, van Vollenhoven R, Ward M, Weinblatt M, Wells G, White B, Wolfe F, Zhang B, Zink A, Felson D, Anonymous00358, Anonymous00359. · Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18821648 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations on how to report disease activity in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) endorsed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). METHODS: The project followed the EULAR standardized operating procedures, which use a three-step approach: 1) expert-based definition of relevant research questions (November 2006); 2) systematic literature search (November 2006 to May 2007); and 3) expert consensus on recommendations based on the literature search results (May 2007). In addition, since this is the first joint EULAR/ACR publication on recommendations, an extra step included a meeting with an ACR panel to approve the recommendations elaborated by the expert group (August 2007). RESULTS: Eleven relevant questions were identified for the literature search. Based on the evidence from the literature, the expert panel recommended that each trial should report the following items: 1) disease activity response and disease activity states; 2) appropriate descriptive statistics of the baseline, the endpoints and change of the single variables included in the core set; 3) baseline disease activity levels (in general); 4) the percentage of patients achieving a low disease activity state and remission; 5) time to onset of the primary outcome; 6) sustainability of the primary outcome; 7) fatigue. CONCLUSION: These recommendations endorsed by EULAR and ACR will help harmonize the presentations of results from clinical trials. Adherence to these recommendations will provide the readership of clinical trials with more details of important outcomes, while the higher level of homogeneity may facilitate the comparison of outcomes across different trials and pooling of trial results, such as in meta-analyses.

Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C, Bolosiu HD, Breedveld F, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Klareskog L, Machold K, Martin-Mola E, Nielsen H, Silman A, Smolen J, Yazici H. · Immuno-Rhumatologie, Lapeyronie Hosp, Montpellier, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16396980 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To formulate EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis. METHODS: In accordance with EULAR's "standardised operating procedures", the task force pursued an evidence based approach and an approach based on expert opinion. A steering group comprised of 14 rheumatologists representing 10 European countries. The group defined the focus of the process, the target population, and formulated an operational definition of "management". Each participant was invited to propose issues of interest regarding the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen issues for further research were selected by use of a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature search was carried out. Evidence was categorised according to usual guidelines. A set of draft recommendations was proposed on the basis of the research questions and the results of the literature search.. The strength of the recommendations was based on the category of evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: 15 research questions, covering the entire spectrum of "management of early arthritis", were formulated for further research; and 284 studies were identified and evaluated. Twelve recommendations for the management of early arthritis were selected and presented with short sentences. The selected statements included recognition of arthritis, referral, diagnosis, prognosis, classification, and treatment of early arthritis (information, education, non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological treatments, and monitoring of the disease process). On the basis of expert opinion, 11 items were identified as being important for future research. CONCLUSIONS: 12 key recommendations for the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis were developed, based on evidence in the literature and expert consensus.

Emery P, Kvien TK. · No affiliation provided · BMJ. · Pubmed #17626917 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Freeston J, Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17383924 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Vital EM, Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Am Fam Physician. · Pubmed #16190499 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Marzo-Ortega H, Emery P, McGonagle D. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12180712 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Emery P, Buch M. · No affiliation provided · BMJ. · Pubmed #11834544 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Emery P, Conaghan P, Quinn M. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11409108 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Smolen JS, Graninger WB, Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10908683 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Bingham S, Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10662866 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Emery P, Panayi G, Sturrock R, Williams B. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10534539 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10325656 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Emery P. · No affiliation provided · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10092158 No free full text.

Abstract: The discovery of the second isoform of cycloxygenase has led to a rapid expansion in basic science, pharmacology and clinical data. With the completion of phase II studies of the new COX-2 specific inhibitors this review examines some of the implications of the new data.

Goëb V, Buch MH, Vital EM, Emery P. · Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK. · Curr Opin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19342956 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the mechanisms of action of abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) and summarize the evidence of its efficacy and safety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy (disease activity, quality of life, prevention of structural damage) of abatacept in patients with RA who have failed to respond to standard disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and antitumour necrosis factor-alpha biologic agents. Selective modulation of T-cell costimulation may also be an alternative therapy for children with JIA who are resitant to conventional DMARDs or biologics. SUMMARY: T-cell activation is critical to the onset and maintenance of RA. Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig), the first selective T-cell costimulation modulator has shown to be effective in RA and JIA. Recent 2-year data from the 'AIM' trial suggests an increased and sustained effect of blocking of T cell signalling on the inhibition of RA structural damage progression over time. Abatacept's safety profile in combination with DMARDs also seems to be favourable but should be avoided in combination with other biologics.

Buch MH, Vital EM, Emery P. · Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19007425 links to  free full text

Abstract: T-cell biology has regained importance in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Despite the significant improvements associated with the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade, reasonable proportions of failures and suboptimal responses have been reported, necessitating a search for alternative targeted therapies. This has included drug therapy designed to interrupt T-cell activation via the co-stimulation pathway. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein that blocks the co-stimulatory signal mediated by the CD28-CD80/86 pathway, which is required for T-cell activation. Several clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of this drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This review summarizes the clinical data supporting this line of treatment and considers the safety and efficacy data from phase II and III trials.

Villeneuve E, Emery P. · Unit of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. · Skeletal Radiol. · Pubmed #18773202 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Vital EM, Emery P. · Academic Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. · J Autoimmun. · Pubmed #18501558 No free full text.

Abstract: The therapy of rheumatoid arthritis has been revolutionised by advances in the understanding of disease at a cellular and molecular level accompanied by the technology to target specific mediators of disease. Proposed therapeutic targets from in vitro and animal models however have frequently resulted in unexpected outcomes in clinical trials. These have included have included cytokines, chemokines, the T cell receptor trimolecular complex, T cells and B cells. The most successful strategies have resulted from a close dialogue between clinical and laboratory work. The key stages in the development of these agents and remaining unanswered questions are reviewed.

Emery P, McInnes IB, van Vollenhoven R, Kraan MC. · Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds University, Leeds LS7 4S, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18094000 No free full text.

Abstract: Inflammation is the major factor driving the progression of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, it is critical to achieve rapid suppression of inflammation to maximize disease control. The severity of inflammation and progression of joint damage varies from patient to patient. Some patients have the propensity to change slowly over time and then progress in a more rapid and dynamic fashion. In those where inflammation is more severe, extensive damage can occur within only a few years of disease onset. The progress of joint destruction, as assessed radiographically, results in a decline in functional capacity and quality of life. Consequently, the challenge for clinicians is to identify and treat those patients who develop rapid, progressive disease. Several biological markers and clinical indicators have been identified to help predict or establish which of the patients have rapidly progressing disease or who are at most risk for rapid progression. Early diagnosis of patients with rapidly progressing RA enables immediate and intensive intervention (e.g. with biologic therapy) and a greater opportunity to change the course of disease.

Michaud K, Bombardier C, Emery P. · Section of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6270, USA. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17977487 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive, autoimmune disease that, in addition to causing joint damage, is associated with pain, fatigue, disability and functional loss, which can substantially decrease a patient's quality of life (QoL). Along with improvements in signs and symptoms, QoL benefits have become increasingly important in optimizing treatment outcomes in RA. Measurements of QoL have previously been under-used in all areas of medicine and only recently have clinical trials included them as a measure of treatment effectiveness. The existence of a positive relationship between improvements in signs and symptoms and concomitant improvements in QoL provides additional evidence that QoL measures are useful benchmarks for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for RA. Furthermore, since these outcome measures evaluate the real-life, patient-centered benefits of RA therapies, they are likely to become increasingly central to the assessment of disease impact in clinical trials and practice, and to both drug approval and reimbursement decisions.This article reviews the impact of abatacept, a selective co-stimulation modulator, on the QoL of patients with active RA across a number of pivotal clinical trials. Firstly, an overview of the key QoL measurements used in abatacept clinical trials is provided, including those such as the Short Form-36, Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale for pain, sleep and fatigue. We then present QoL data obtained in a wide range of patients with RA, including those with an inadequate response to either methotrexate or anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, who have been treated with abatacept. Analysis of these data demonstrates that abatacept therapy has the potential to improve QoL across a range of patients with RA.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Sieper J, Emery P, Keystone EC, Schiff MH, Mease P, van Riel PL, Fleischmann R, Weisman MH, Weinblatt ME. · David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA - RM 32-59, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17934088 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Koeller M, Weisman MH, Emery P. · Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Lancet. · Pubmed #17570481 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis is characterised by pain, swelling, and destruction of joints, with resultant disability. Only disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs can interfere with the disease process. In the past few years, biological agents, especially inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor, have allowed for hitherto unseen therapeutic benefit, although even with these drugs the frequency and degree of responses are restricted. Therefore, new agents are needed, and three novel biological compounds for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis have already been used in practice or are on the horizon: rituximab (anti-CD20), abatacept (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin), and tocilizumab (anti-interleukin 6 receptor). We discuss the targets of these drugs, the roles of these targets in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, and the efficacy and adverse effects of these agents from clinical trial data. Novel therapeutic strategies in conjunction with optimised disease assessment for better treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and an outlook into potential future targets are also presented.

Ikeda K, Cox S, Emery P. · Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds University, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #17540047 links to  free full text

Abstract: The availability of newer, and more expensive, therapies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis has changed treatment beyond recognition. Disease remission is the goal for all new patients. Studies have shown that a combination of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking drugs and methotrexate produces superior outcomes over monotherapy alone; however, use is limited by cost and potential side-effects. Currently, anti-TNF therapy is normally reserved for patients who have failed traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The question that remains is whether TNF-blocking drugs are better used if given early; the high direct costs are countered by both direct and indirect savings in healthcare costs from optimal control of disease, and the benefits of early control outweigh the increased risk of infection and malignancy.

Emery P, Gabay C, Kraan M, Gomez-Reino J. · Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds University, Chapel Town Road, Leeds, LS7 4S, UK. · Rheumatol Int. · Pubmed #17505829 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterised by inflammation resulting in structural joint damage and functional disability. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is a pivotal mediator and driver of inflammation in RA. Inflammation is closely related to the production of C-reactive protein (CRP), and a close correlation exists between serum CRP and TNFalpha levels. CRP levels are therefore a convenient, objective biomarker of disease activity. CRP correlates closely with changes in inflammation/disease activity, radiological damage and progression and functional disability. Identification of TNFalpha as a driver of RA progression has led to the introduction of TNFalpha-blocking agents and, subsequently, improvement of disease management. TNFalpha-blocking agents provide rapid, profound and sustained suppression of disease activity in correspondence with a marked reduction in CRP levels. A reduction in CRP level correlates closely with the positive clinical response to TNFalpha-blocking therapy. Thus, CRP levels can be used to predict, assess and monitor response to treatment with TNFalpha-blocking agents, and may be helpful in determining the optimal TNFalpha-blocker dosage. Given the close correlation between inflammation and disease progression and the relation between inflammation and CRP, the latter, if used effectively in clinical practice, may be means to identify patients likely to progress rapidly and who require intensive anti-TNFalpha therapy. The purpose of this review is to identify how CRP levels may be useful for monitoring the effect of therapy on halting disease progression and why monitoring CRP levels at baseline and after treatment should become a routine part of clinical practice.

Dass S, Vital EM, Emery P. · Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #17150009 No free full text.

Abstract: Significant numbers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suffer from disease that is refractory to both conventional therapy and newer biological agents such as TNF-alpha inhibitors. These patients may respond insufficiently, lose an effective response, develop toxicity or carry contraindications to such agents. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 that effectively depletes B cells in peripheral blood, has been licensed for the treatment of certain haematological malignancies for almost 10 years. B cells are now known to have multiple key roles in the pathogenesis of RA. Data is now available that indicates efficacy and safety of B-cell depletion with rituximab in the treatment of RA in a variety of patient groups. The clinical outcomes from these studies, together with its safety profile, have led to rituximab being licensed for the treatment of patients with RA who have failed to obtain benefit from anti-TNF-alpha agents.

Saleem B, Nizam S, Emery P. · Academic Unit Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17083760 No free full text.

Abstract: Remission is now the accepted goal of management in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This article highlights the controversies surrounding the definition of remission and reviews the potential of current treatment options to achieve remission. Defining "true" remission can be difficult based on current criteria, which do not consider structural and physical function. Nonetheless, considerable advances in recent years have made the concept of remission a realistic goal.In early RA, substantial and largely irreversible radiographic damage is seen in 60% of patients within the first 2 years of diagnosis. Early therapeutic intervention would ideally lead to reduction in long-term disability in RA and likelihood of inducing and maintaining remission.Long-term maintenance therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to be effective in preventing flares of disease. Stopping therapy for short periods does not necessarily lead to flares, but the effect on long-term radiographic damage and potential to achieve similar levels of disease control following reinstatement of therapy is not established.Early use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist therapy (e.g. infliximab) has been shown to lead to significant improvement in disease activity measures (clinical and radiologic outcomes) when compared to monotherapy or combination DMARD and corticosteroid therapies. Response was shown to be sustained in 70% of patients receiving TNF-blocking therapy 1 year after stopping treatment. This suggests the significant role of TNF-blocking therapy in enabling sustainable remission without need for long-term administrations, which has important implications for favourable health economics. At present, little published evidence exists on the effects of withdrawal of TNF-blocking therapy in patients with established RA in remission. In conclusion, evidence indicates that remission is a realistic goal, but more evidence is required to establish optimal treatment strategies and define criteria for remission that include imaging and immunological as well as clinical assessment of the disease state.