Rheumatoid Arthritis: Duquesnoy B

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 3 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Arthritis, Rheumatoid," originating from Planet Earth —» Duquesnoy B.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Review The rheumatoid shoulder: current consensus on diagnosis and treatment. 2006

Thomas T, Noël E, Goupille P, Duquesnoy B, Combe B, Anonymous00114. · Rheumatology Department, St-Etienne University Hospital, Boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16213772 No free full text.

Abstract: Shoulder involvement is usually inconspicuous in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the clinical manifestations are nonspecific. Nevertheless, shoulder involvement should be sought routinely and detected early. Range of motion at the shoulder should be evaluated. Although normal radiographic findings do not rule out shoulder involvement, radiographs are crucial for detecting micro- and macro-geodes during follow-up. The development of glenohumeral joint space narrowing is a turning point that indicates a risk of rapid joint destruction. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing the lesions and guiding the treatment strategy. Stepwise use of local interventions as indicated by imaging findings is recommended. Joint replacement should not be left too late, and surgical procedures on the shoulder should be built into the overall treatment plan.

2 Clinical Conference Magnetic resonance imaging of the hand for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in the absence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies: a prospective study. 2006

Solau-Gervais E, Legrand JL, Cortet B, Duquesnoy B, Flipo RM. · Department of Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16832852 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the practical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in establishing a positive diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a cohort of patients with early inflammatory polyarthralgia, in the absence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies. METHODS: We prospectively followed 30 outpatients with inflammatory polyarthralgia and/or synovitis of at least one joint. Patients were disease modifying antirheumatic drug-naive and received no corticosteroids. At the initial visit a clinical examination, radiographs of hands, wrists and feet, and MRI of hands were performed. Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies were assessed. The MRI procedure was T1 fat saturation with gadolinium injection [scores were established on the basis of the axial view of the carpal and metacarpal joints, using the RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) defined in the OMERACT study]. In all patients, radiographs at baseline were normal and anti-CCP antibodies were negative. RESULTS: At one-year followup, the final diagnosis was: 16 RA; the non-RA group was composed of 4 cases of spondyloarthropathy, 2 cases of fibromyalgia, 4 cases of undifferentiated arthritis (3 of which were self-limiting), 1 sicca syndrome, 1 hemochromatosis, 1 polymyositis, and 1 paraneoplastic syndrome. No statistical difference was found between patients with and without RA for carpal erosion, synovitis, and tenosynovitis. However, a statistical difference was observed between the RA and non-RA group where metacarpophalangeal (MCP) erosion scores were concerned (p = 0.024). This difference persisted when we compared erosions of the second and third MCP in the 2 groups (p = 0.044). ROC curve analysis revealed a positive MCP score at 15, with a specificity of 70% and a sensitivity of 64%. CONCLUSION: In our population of 30 anti-CPP negative patients with normal radiographs, MRI of hands, showing MCP erosions, can be helpful for the diagnosis of RA.

3 Article Lack of efficacy of a third tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist after failure of a soluble receptor and a monoclonal antibody. free! 2006

Solau-Gervais E, Laxenaire N, Cortet B, Dubucquoi S, Duquesnoy B, Flipo RM. · Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, 59037 Lille cedex, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16510526 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Some studies have highlighted the potential benefits of switching from infliximab to etanercept, or after failure of one or the other treatment. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the potential benefits of using the three anti-TNF-alpha agents that are currently available. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the response to treatment in RA patients who had received the three anti-TNF-alpha agents, namely infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. METHODS: Among a cohort of 364 patients undergoing biological treatments since the year 2000, 284 had been treated with only one anti-TNF-alpha agent. Our assessment focused on the records of 70 patients who had received at least two anti-TNF-alpha agents. Twenty of the 70 patients had received all three anti-TNF-alpha agents (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab). Effectiveness was assessed using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), and adverse events were reported for each anti-TNF-alpha treatment. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients who had received two anti-TNF-alpha agents, 32 had switched from an antibody to a soluble receptor; 45% of them had a good clinical response to the soluble receptor. Thirty patients had switched from a soluble receptor to an antibody; 45% of them had a good clinical response to the antibody. Only eight patients had switched from an antibody to another antibody with an efficiency score of 33%. Of the 20 patients who had received three anti-TNF-alpha agents, seven had stopped receiving the third anti-TNF-alpha agent due to lack of effectiveness. In this group of non-responders to the third anti-TNF-alpha treatment, all patients except one had stopped receiving the two previous anti-TNF-alpha agents, without adverse events, for lack of effectiveness. These patients were deemed resistant to anti-TNF-alpha therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to anti-TNF-alpha agents is rare. The lack of effectiveness of a soluble receptor and of one of the anti-TNF-alpha antibodies predicts the lack of effectiveness of the third anti-TNF-alpha treatment.