Rheumatoid Arthritis: Di Poi E

Di Poi E, Perin A, Morassi MP, Del Frate M, Ferraccioli GF, De Vita S. · Division of Rheumatology, DPMSC,School of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17417995 No free full text.

Abstract: TNF-alpha is thought to play a pivotal role in the initiation and perpetuation of the chronic inflammatory process in rheumatoid arthritis. TNF-alpha blockers such as infliximab and etanercept are currently used in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when traditional DMARDs have failed and are effective in a significant proportion of patients. However, about one third are non-responders to anti-TNF-alpha.The aim of this study was to verify whether rheumatoid patients, after failing infliximab, can benefit from etanercept.We analysed 18 patients with active RA with no response to at least 3 DMARDs and where infliximab therapy had failed. The patients had received infliximab associated with methotrexate: eleven of them did not show any significant response, while seven patients, after a good response, relapsed. Etanercept was then started. EULAR criteria of response were used with calculation of activity index DAS28 at baseline, after 2 weeks, 3 months and every third month until last follow-up. A moderate or good response was achieved with etanercept in 13 out of 18 patients. From our experience, etanercept can be considered as a good alternative choice when infliximab has failed.

Ferraccioli GF, Assaloni R, Di Poi E, Gremese E, De Marchi G, Fabris M. · Division of Rheumatology, Dipartimento Patologia Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, School of Medicine, University of Udine, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #12364628 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible clinical and biological rescue of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 16 patients who were still active despite intensive combination therapy after receiving infliximab following the Anti-Tumour necrosis factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy (ATTRACT) schedule. METHODS: Sixteen patients who were still active despite combination therapy with optimal doses of methotrexate (MTX 15-17.5 mg/week) and cyclosporin A (CsA 2.5-3.5 mg/day) received infliximab. Ten received their combination plus infliximab (Combi), and six received infliximab plus MTX alone (Mono). The follow-up was carried out for 30 weeks in all patients and for 46 weeks in eight. Efficacy and safety were examined. RESULTS: At entry, the mean disease activity score (DAS) was 5.6 (all patients had a DAS >3.7). After therapy, eight of 10 patients in Combi and four out of six in Mono showed an improvement of >50% in the initial swollen joint count, yet only one patient reached 50% improvement in the initial DAS after 30 weeks, and one patient had a DAS <2.4 (low disease activity). Of the eight patients who reached 46 weeks of follow-up, three showed an improvement in DAS of 50% and two had a DAS <2.4. When considering the change over time, the difference between DAS at entry and at week 30 was statistically significant only in patients receiving MTX plus CsA, while it was not significant in those receiving MTX only. Two patients developed recurrent febrile upper respiratory infections in the Combi therapy group, while two had a single febrile infection in the MTX alone group. Two patients became strongly anti-cardiolipin positive (IgM >40 MPL) and one developed a coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: Infliximab can be added incrementally to MTX plus CsA, with favourable results in terms of efficacy and safety over time in severe rapidly aggressive and progressive RA. Finally, minor evidence emerged for a stronger efficacy of the Combi treatment compared with Mono.

Ferraccioli GF, Gremese E, Tomietto P, Favret G, Damato R, Di Poi E. · Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, DPMSC, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #12154206 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two monotherapies followed by step-up combination therapy with two or three complementary drugs in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with sulphasalazine (SSZ) alone. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients with early active RA were enrolled in this open controlled clinical trial. The primary end-point was 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria (ACR50) at 6, 12 or 18 months. The secondary end-points were a full response (Magnusson criteria) and/or remission (ACR criteria) at 3 yr. Methotrexate (MTX) (group 1), cyclosporin A (CsA) (group 2) or SSZ (group 3) was used first. After 6 months, a combination of two drugs (CsA and MTX) was employed in groups 1 and 2. SSZ was added after 12 months if improvement was less than ACR50 with the combination. Group 3 continued with SSZ alone. RESULTS: After 6 months, 57% of patients in group 1, 31% of group 2 (MTX vs CsA, P=0.002) and 33% of group 3 (MTX vs SSZ, P=0.01) had reached ACR50 improvement according to intention-to-treat analysis. At month 12 after starting a drug combination, 67% of group 1 and 76% of group 2 had reached ACR50 compared with 24% of group 3. At the 18-month follow-up, 90% of group 1 and 88% of group 2 but only 24% of group 3 had reached ACR50. After 18 months, 62% of group 1, 60% of group 2 and 48% of group 3 showed side-effects and three, five and eight patients in the three groups respectively had dropped out of the study. At the 3-yr follow-up, 9% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 and 7% of group 3 were in remission according to the ACR criteria; according to the Magnusson criteria, 40% showed a full response in groups 1 and 2 but only 21% did so in group 3. CONCLUSION: MTX appears to be the fastest-acting agent. A step-up approach with MTX plus CsA plus SSZ led to a 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria in most patients. After 3 yr, 40% of patients receiving combination therapy and 21% of patients receiving monotherapy showed a full response, while 9 and 7% respectively attained remission.

Fabris M, Tolusso B, Di Poi E, Tomietto P, Sacco S, Gremese E, Ferraccioli G. · Department of Rheumatology, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore School of Medicine, Rome, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15940758 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To analyze tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) synthesis by mononuclear cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: TNF-alpha molecular expression and extracellular release were assessed in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 27 RA patients and 16 healthy blood donor controls during 8 hours of LPS stimulation. We also analyzed the mRNA expression of tristetraprolin (TTP), the major TNF-alpha mRNA destabilizing factor. TNF receptor p75 (TNFR 2) plasma concentrations were also tested in all patients. RESULTS: Controls and patients demonstrated a comparable wide range of TNF-alpha release capability, but patients achieved the peak value of protein release more quickly. Defining the median TNF-alpha release in controls as the cutoff value to distinguish high and low LPS-induced TNF-alpha-releasing phenotypes, patients with early RA (disease duration < 1 yr) belonged mainly to the low TNF-alpha producer subgroup, whereas patients with long-standing RA (> 1 yr) were prevalently high TNF-alpha producers. TTP molecular expression was higher in patients with shorter, than in patients with longer, disease duration. The profile of TNF-alpha release in patients with early RA changed significantly when retested after 6 months of therapy, while patients with long-standing disease maintained the same behavior as at baseline. Finally, a baseline low TNF-alpha-producer phenotype predisposed to a better responsiveness to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. CONCLUSION: The LPS-induced TNF-alpha-releasing phenotype differs between cells obtained from RA patients with different disease durations and seems to influence the therapeutic outcome.

Fabris M, Tolusso B, Di Poi E, Assaloni R, Sinigaglia L, Ferraccioli G. · Division of Rheumatology, DPMSC School of Medicine. University of Udine, Italy. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12233877 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To define the frequency of the exon 6 tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) receptor II (TNFRII) gene polymorphism in severe and mild-moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its possible influence on anti-TNF-alpha treatment responsiveness. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with RA, the first (n = 97) defined as methotrexate responders (MTX-R) with mild-moderate synovitis, and the second (n = 78) defined as nonresponders to combination therapy and receiving anti-TNF-alpha treatment because of their severe and aggressive disease (TNF-T), were studied retrospectively and compared to age, sex, and ethnically matched controls (n = 84). In the prospective study, 66 patients with severe RA were followed over the first 6 months of anti-TNF-alpha therapy and their response was examined according to genotype. RESULTS: We observed a trend towards an increased frequency of the GG genotype in patients with severe RA (6.4%) in comparison with patients with mild-moderate disease (3.1%) and controls (1.2%). When looking at the response to anti-TNF-alpha therapy, we observed that after 12 weeks of treatment, 37.8% of the TT versus 10.7% of the TG/GG patients passed from high to medium-low disease activity (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In our cohorts of patients selected by response to the conventional therapy and by disease severity, our preliminary study results showed a trend towards a higher prevalence of the GG genotype for the exon 6 TNFRII polymorphism in the less responsive patients with more aggressive disease. We also found a lower degree of response to anti-TNF-alpha treatments in patients carrying the G allele.

Fabris M, Di Poi E, Sacco S, Damante G, Sinigaglia L, Ferraccioli G. · Divisione di Reumatologia, DPMSC, Università degli Studi di Udine, Italia. · Reumatismo. · Pubmed #12089610 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To study -238 and +489 TNF-alpha polymorphisms in severe-unresponsive (more than 6 swollen joints and still active disease despite at least 6 months of DMARDs combination therapy) and mild-responsive (less than 3 swollen joints and good response to MTX or other conventional DMARDs) rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We investigated 100 RA patients (56 with severe and 44 with mild disease activity) and 45 healthy blood donors (HBDs). Genotyping was performed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism procedure. Several clinical and serological parameters were also examined. RESULTS: Severe RA patients disclosed the -238 GG genotype in 100% of the cases versus 95.5% in the mild-responsive patients and 91.2% in the HBDs. The +489 GG genotype disclosed only a trend towards a prevalence in severe RA patients. However the +489 A allele seems to associates with early onset, longer disease duration and longer responsiveness to conventional therapy. CONCLUSION: The -238 AG genotype is absent in severe-unresponsive RA, but present in mild-responsive RA subjects. Thus -238 GG homozygosity associates with severity and unresponsiveness. In contrast the +489 polymorphism does not segregate differently between responsive and unresponsive RA patients.

Ferraccioli G, Mecchia F, Di Poi E, Fabris M. · Chair and Division of Rheumatology, DPMSC, Udine University Medical Centre, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11874843 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) (as well as of anti-DNA antibodies) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept or combination therapy. METHODS: Eight patients treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly were studied for a period of 85 weeks. A control group of 39 patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing combination treatment (methotrexate (MTX) + cyclosporin A or MTX + chloroquine) were studied for the same period of time. The occurrence of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA-IgG) and anti-DNA was examined, together with the possible occurrence of infections due to bacteria capable of inducing B cell activation. RESULTS: In 5/8 patients receiving etanercept an increase of ACA-IgG was seen, while anti-DNA became positive in 3/8 patients. A nasal or bronchial infection due to Staphylococcus aureus (Staph aureus) or a urinary tract infection due to E coli, occurred in all five cases. Antibiotic treatment produced a return to normal of ACA-IgG, and also of anti-DNA, in all cases except one. The infectious agent was eradicated in all subjects but one. In the control group Staph aureus was found in the nasal swab in 10/39 subjects; ACA-IgM (followed by ACA-IgG) appeared at the same time as infection occurred in 6/10, while no infection related to the increased ACA-IgM was recorded in the other four. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial DNA, especially that enriched in CpG motifs, is a powerful immunostimulant that may, in some cases, lead to ACA or anti-DNA positivity, once tumour necrosis factor alpha is blocked. Eradication of the infections leads to a rapid decrease of ACA-IgG and of anti-DNA levels.

Tolusso B, Fabris M, Di Poi E, Assaloni R, Tomietto P, Ferraccioli GF. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12594130 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Di Poi E, Ferraccioli GF. · No affiliation provided · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10464570 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Ferraccioli GF, Di Poi E. · No affiliation provided · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #10383275 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.