Rheumatoid Arthritis: Dernis E

Lequerré T, Quartier P, Rosellini D, Alaoui F, De Bandt M, Mejjad O, Kone-Paut I, Michel M, Dernis E, Khellaf M, Limal N, Job-Deslandre C, Fautrel B, Le Loët X, Sibilia J, Anonymous00361, Anonymous00362. · Rheumatology Department, Rouen University Hospital & Inserm 905, 76031 Rouen, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17947302 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anakinra treatment has been reported to be effective in some patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA) or adult-onset Still disease (AoSD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and the safety of anakinra treatment in SoJIA and AoSD. METHODS: SoJIA and AoSD patients were treated with anakinra (1-2 mg/kg/day in children, 100 mg/day in adults); we analysed its effect on fever, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, numbers of swollen and tender joints, the assessment of disease activity (by physician and parent/patient) and pain (by parent/patient), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric core set criteria for JIA activity. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, 20 with SoJIA and 15 with AoSD. Their mean age (range) at the onset of treatment was 12.4 (3-23) and 38.1 (22-62) years, respectively; disease duration was 7.0 (1-16) and 7.8 (2-27) years, respectively. Active arthritis was present in all cases but one. Of the 20 SoJIA patients, 5 achieved ACR 50% improvement in symptoms (ACR50) response criteria at 6 months. Steroid dose had been decreased by 15% to 78% in 10 cases. A total of 11 of the 15 AoSD patients achieved at least a 50% improvement for all disease markers (mean follow-up: 17.5 (11-27) months). Steroids had been stopped in two cases and the dose was decreased by 45% to 95% in 12 patients. Two patients stopped anakinra due to severe skin reaction, and two patients due to infection: one visceral leishmaniasis and one varicella. CONCLUSION: Anakinra was effective in most AoSD patients, but less than half SoJIA patients achieved a marked and sustained improvement.

Mayoux-Benhamou A, Giraudet-Le Quintrec JS, Ravaud P, Champion K, Dernis E, Zerkak D, Roy C, Kahan A, Revel M, Dougados M. · Department of Rehabilitation, Cochin Hospital, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75679 Paris Cedex 14, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18085742 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of education on the exercise habits of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after 6 and 12 months. METHODS: We studied 208 outpatients recruited between June 2001 and December 2002. This was a prospective controlled randomized trial. The active group received a multidisciplinary education program, including training in home-based exercises and guidelines for leisure physical activity (PA). The control group received a booklet added to usual medical care. Compliance with home-based exercises was defined as a practice rate >or= 30% of the prescribed training. Compliance with leisure PA was defined as >or= 20% increase in Baecke questionnaire score. Additional assessments involved possible predictors of compliance and changes with regard to the compliance. RESULTS: At 6-month followup, home-based exercise and leisure PA compliance were significantly higher [13.5% vs 1%, respectively (p = 0.001); and 28.2% vs 13.8% (p = 0.02)], but were not at 12 months. Predictors of leisure PA compliance at 6 months included participating in the active group (odds ratio 2.74, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.38) and previous low leisure PA (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.47 to 14.61), with decreased fatigue (FACIT-F mean -2.94 +/- 8.04 vs -0.1 +/- 7.25 for noncompliant subjects; p = 0.04) and improved psychological status (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale mean -1.25 +/- 3.12 vs 0.11 +/- 3.39; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Education of patients with RA may increase compliance especially with leisure PA, particularly when it is poor at baseline, but these effects are limited and short-term.

Giraudet-Le Quintrec JS, Mayoux-Benhamou A, Ravaud P, Champion K, Dernis E, Zerkak D, Ouslimani A, Courpied JP, Revel M, Kahan A, Dougados M. · AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Université René-Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17610321 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on health and functional status of an 8-week group-education program for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in addition to usual medical care. METHODS: All consecutive inpatients and outpatients with RA (ACR criteria) were asked to participate in this randomized, prospective, controlled trial. The educational intervention consisted of 8 weekly ambulatory sessions, each lasting 6 hours. Followup was undertaken after 1 year. The primary criterion for judging effectiveness was the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score; secondary criteria consisted of coping, medical knowledge, patient global satisfaction, and quality of life scores before the intervention and after 1 year. RESULTS: We asked 1242 inpatients and outpatients to participate in the study: 208 (16.75%) agreed (104 in each group). At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. After 1 year, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in change in HAQ score: -0.04 +/- 0.46 (education group) vs -0.06 +/- 0.47 (control group) (p = 0.79). Statistically significant differences were found in 3 domains: patient coping (-1.22 +/- 5.55 vs -0.22 +/- 3.81; p = 0.03), knowledge (3.42 +/- 4.73 vs 0.73 +/- 3.78; p < 0.0001), and satisfaction (10.07 +/- 11.70 vs 5.72 +/- 13.77; p = 0.02), all of which were better for the group attending the education sessions. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in patient coping, knowledge, and satisfaction, the education program was not found to be effective at 1 year. There may have been methodological problems relating to the sensitivity of questionnaires and patient selection, and tailored educational interventions should be considered.