| 1 |
Editorial Updating the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in adult rheumatoid arthritis (again). free! 2006
Deighton CM, George E, Kiely PD, Ledingham J, Luqmani RA, Scott DG. · No affiliation provided · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16527881 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Review Rheumatoid cachexia: a clinical perspective. 2008
Summers GD, Deighton CM, Rennie MJ, Booth AH. · Department of Rheumatology, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, London Road, Derby DE1 2QY, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18448480 No free full text.
Abstract: Rheumatoid cachexia is under-recognized in clinical practice. The loss of lean body tissue, which characterizes cachexia, is often compensated for by gain in body fat-so called 'cachectic obesity'-so that 85% or more RA patients have a normal BMI. Severe cachexia with loss of weight leads to increased morbidity and premature mortality but loss of muscle bulk with a normal BMI also associates with poor clinical outcomes. Increasing BMI, even into the obese range, is associated with less joint damage and reduced mortality. Measurement of body composition using DXA and other techniques is feasible but the results must be interpreted with care. Newer techniques such as whole-body MRI will help define with more confidence the mass and distribution of fat and muscle and help elucidate the relationships between body composition and outcomes. Cachexia shows little response to diet alone but progressive resistance training and anti-TNF therapies show promise in tackling this potentially disabling extra-articular feature of RA.
|
| 3 |
Article Undergraduate musculoskeletal examination teaching by trained patient educators--a comparison with doctor-led teaching. free! 2006
Raj N, Badcock LJ, Brown GA, Deighton CM, O'Reilly SC. · Rheumatology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, East Midlands, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16613915 links to free full text
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To compare the core hand and knee examination skills gained by undergraduates taught either by trained patient educators (PEs) or by doctors. METHODS: A total of 50 final year medical students were randomized to receive training from PEs or doctors. Group A were taught hand examination by a PE with rheumatoid arthritis, and knee examination by a PE with osteoarthritis. Group B was taught hand and knee examination by a consultant rheumatologist plus an untrained patient with appropriate signs. All students were taught an established core skills set in small group workshops. Students then undertook two validated objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) stations with two blinded assessors. Pre- and post-teaching questionnaires established the students' self-reported levels of skills (SRS) and a student evaluation of teaching (SET). The study was analysed as an equivalence trial. A mean difference in OSCE scores of 10% was assumed to be of educational significance. RESULTS: Although the SET scores of both groups were high, the doctor-led group received higher scores. Aside from this, the two student groups did not differ significantly. There were no significant differences in mean hand OSCE (mean difference = 0.88, P = 0.28, 95% CI = -0.73 to 2.49) or knee OSCE (mean difference = 0.28, P = 0.7, 95% CI = -1.19 to 1.75) scores. Both the upper and lower confidence intervals for each mean difference fell within the 10% range (-2.8 to 2.8 for the hand, and -2.5 to 2.5 for the knee) and equivalence was assumed. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately trained PEs can deliver clearly structured undergraduate skills, teaching with equivalent learning outcomes to those of rheumatology consultants. PEs are a valuable development to augment musculoskeletal education in the face of expanding student numbers.
|
|
|