Rheumatoid Arthritis: Colin D

Devauchelle-Pensec V, Saraux A, Alapetite S, Colin D, Le Goff P. · Rheumatology Department (DC), Hĵpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHU Brest, BP 814, F 29609 Brest Cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #12477226 No free full text.

Abstract: The extent to which radiographs of the hands and feet can contribute to the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has received little research attention. Yet, the workup for recent-onset inflammatory joint disease usually includes radiographs of the hands and feet. We reviewed the literature for data on the value of these radiographs for diagnosing early RA. We sought to determine whether radiographic changes in the hands and feet constitute a valid diagnostic criterion, i.e., show good discrimination, good reproducibility, and an ability to detect early disease. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of these changes could be calculated from published data. Few cohort studies of early inflammatory joint disease have been published, and the data come mainly from studies in early RA. Among radiographic alterations described to date, erosions seem associated with the best reliability and discriminating power. Radiographic alterations are of limited sensitivity for early rheumatoid arthritis because they occur only after some time. Radiographs of the hands and feet are far easier to obtain than magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography, which seem promising but are still undergoing validation.

Devauchelle-Pensec V, Berthelot JM, Jousse S, Samjee I, Josseaume T, Colin D, Chalés G, Thorel JB, Hoang S, Martin A, Youinou P, Le Goff P, Saraux A. · Unit of Rheumatology, Cavale Blanche Hospital, CHU Brest, Brest, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16783864 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of baseline hand radiographs to predict the diagnosis 2 years later in a cohort of patients with early arthritis. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with arthritis onset within the previous year were evaluated. At baseline, all patients underwent a standardized evaluation including laboratory tests and radiographs. Hand radiographs were read by a blinded observer who used a standardized procedure for detecting features of crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After 30 +/- 11.3 months, the final diagnosis was established by a panel of rheumatologists. All radiographs were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between radiographic features and a clinical diagnosis of RA, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) arthritis, and hydroxyapatite arthritis. No radiographic abnormalities suggesting psoriatic arthritis or gout were seen. The sensitivities of hand radiographs for diagnosing CPPD or hydroxyapatite arthritis ranged from 80% to 100%. Baseline hand radiographs suggested the final diagnosis in 31/258 patients, including 21 (22.5%) of the 93 patients with RA, 10 of the 11 (91%) patients with CPPD or hydroxyapatite deposition disease, and none of the patients with other disorders. Sensitivity was 29%, specificity 86.5%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 63%. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with recent arthritis, the overall performance of hand radiographs in predicting a diagnosis 2 years later was modest. However, they had an excellent diagnostic value for calcium deposition diseases.