Rheumatoid Arthritis: Cohen S

Kavanaugh A, Cohen S, Cush JJ. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15468347 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Bar-Yehuda S, Silverman MH, Kerns WD, Ochaion A, Cohen S, Fishman P. · Can-Fite BioPharma, 10 Bareket Street, PO Box 7537, Petach-Tikva 49170, Israel. · Expert Opin Investig Drugs. · Pubmed #17922624 No free full text.

Abstract: Targeting the A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) to combat inflammation is a new concept based on two findings. First, A(3)AR is highly expressed in inflammatory cells, whereas low expression is found in normal tissues. This receptor was also found to be overexpressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, reflecting receptor status in the remote inflammatory process. Second, A(3)AR activation with a specific agonist induces de-regulation of the NF-kappaB signaling pathway in inflammatory cells, as well as initiation of immunomodulatory effects. The A(3)AR agonist CF-101 (known generically as IB-MECA) induces anti-inflammatory effects in experimental animal models of collagen- and adjuvant-induced arthritis. Combined therapy with CF-101 and methotrexate in adjuvant-induced arthritis rats yielded an additive anti-inflammatory effect. Methotrexate induced upregulation of A(3)AR, rendering the inflammatory cells more susceptible to CF-101. In Phase I and in Phase IIa human studies, CF-101 was safe, well tolerated and showed strong evidence of an anti-inflammatory effect in rheumatoid arthritis patients. In peripheral blood mononuclear cells withdrawn from the patients at base line, a statistically significant correlation between A(3)AR expression level and response to the drug was noted. It is suggested that A(3)AR may serve as a biologic marker to predict patient response to the drug. Taken together, this information suggests that A(3)AR agonists may be a new family of orally bioavailable drugs to be developed as potent inhibitors of autoimmune-inflammatory diseases.

Keystone E, Emery P, Peterfy CG, Tak PP, Cohen S, Genovese MC, Dougados M, Burmester GR, Greenwald M, Kvien TK, Williams S, Hagerty D, Cravets MW, Shaw T. · Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18388156 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine if treatment with a B cell-targeted therapy can inhibit the progression of structural joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), exhibiting an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. METHODS: In this phase III study, patients with an inadequate response to a TNF inhibitor and receiving methotrexate were randomised to rituximab or placebo. Radiographs were obtained at baseline, week 24 and week 56 after randomisation. Patients with an inadequate response to their randomised therapy could receive rescue medication from week 16. From week 24, eligible patients from both treatment arms could receive open-label rituximab. Patients were analysed according to their original treatment group. Radiographs were scored using the Genant-modified Sharp method. The primary radiographic endpoint was change in total Genant-modified Sharp score at week 56. RESULTS: Rituximab treatment caused significant reduction in joint damage progression compared with placebo. The mean change from baseline in the total Genant-modified Sharp score at week 56 was significantly lower for patients treated with rituximab than for patients treated with placebo (1.00 vs 2.31; p = 0.005), and was supported by changes in erosion score (0.59 and 1.32 for rituximab plus methotrexate vs placebo plus methotrexate, respectively; p = 0.011) and joint space narrowing score (0.41 and 0.99, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that a B cell-targeted therapy-rituximab-can significantly inhibit the progression of structural joint damage in patients with RA with long-standing, active and treatment-resistant disease.

Silverman MH, Strand V, Markovits D, Nahir M, Reitblat T, Molad Y, Rosner I, Rozenbaum M, Mader R, Adawi M, Caspi D, Tishler M, Langevitz P, Rubinow A, Friedman J, Green L, Tanay A, Ochaion A, Cohen S, Kerns WD, Cohn I, Fishman-Furman S, Farbstein M, Yehuda SB, Fishman P. · Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18050382 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Adenosine exerts antiinflammatory effects via activation of the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR), a Gi protein-associated cell-surface receptor, overexpressed in synovial tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CF101 is a highly specific orally bioavailable A3AR agonist. METHODS: This was a multicenter study, blinded to dose, designed to assess the clinical activity and safety of CF101 in active RA. Seventy-four patients were randomized to receive 0.1, 1.0, or 4.0 mg CF101 bid for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. A3AR expression levels were analyzed in PBMC from 18 patients. RESULTS:. Maximal responses were observed with 1.0 mg bid, lower at 0.1 and 4.0 mg bid. At 12 weeks, 55.6%, 33.3%, and 11.5% of the patients receiving 1.0 mg CF101 achieved ACR20%, 50%, and 70% responses, respectively. CF101 was generally well tolerated, with mild headache (4.1%), nausea (2.7%), and rash (2.7%) being the most common treatment-related adverse events. Statistically significant correlations between A3AR overexpression at baseline and ACR50 and ACR70 responses were observed. CONCLUSION: CF101 administered bid for 12 weeks resulted in improvement in signs and symptoms of RA that did not achieve statistical significance, and was safe and well tolerated. The expression level of A3AR was directly correlated with patient responses to CF101, suggesting its utilization as a biomarker for the pharmacodynamic and therapeutic effects of this novel agent. These findings require confirmation in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, currently under way.

Kivitz A, Cohen S, Dowd JE, Edwards W, Thakker S, Wellborne FR, Renz CL, Segurado OG. · Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, USA. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #17157117 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody for SC administration by 2 single-use injection devices providing bioequivalent amounts of adalimumab: a ready-to-use, prefilled syringe and an integrated, disposable delivery system, the autoinjection Pen. Although pens have been shown to be preferred over syringes by patients requiring long-term SC administration of medications, there are no data on preference and pain in the use of biologics in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess injection-site pain, tolerability, and patient preference of 2 delivery systems of adalimumab. METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, sequential trial. Patients self-administered a standard dose of adalimumab 40 mg SC every other week at each of 3 monitored clinical visits: visit 1 (syringe), visits 2 and 3 (Pen). At each visit, patients rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 = none to 10 = pain as bad as it could be) immediately after injection and 15-30 minutes after injection and provided their impressions of and preferences for each delivery system. Safety events were recorded throughout the study and 70 days after final study dose. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the trial and completed all 3 visits (32 women, 20 men; mean [SD] age, 53.8 [12.1] years). Forty (76.9%) patients reported that the Pen was less painful than the syringe, 4 (7.7%) patients found the syringe to be less painful, and 8 (15.4%) patients had no preference. Patients had statistically significant reductions in injection-pain scores from visit 1 to visit 2 and from visit 1 to visit 3. No new safety signals or apparent differences regarding tolerability between the syringe and Pen were observed. In addition, 46 (88.5%) patients preferred the Pen, 3 (5.8%) preferred the syringe, and 3 (5.8%) had no preference. Overall, patients evaluated the Pen as easier to use (94.2%), more convenient (92.3%), requiring less time to inject (82.7%), and safer (88.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experienced less pain self-administering adalimumab via the Pen and preferred it versus the syringe. Further, patients perceived the Pen to be easier to use and more convenient. Both delivery systems were generally well tolerated.

Genovese MC, Cohen S, Moreland L, Lium D, Robbins S, Newmark R, Bekker P, Anonymous00003. · Stanford University, 1000 Welch Road, Suite 203, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15146410 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with the selective anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent etanercept and the anti-interleukin-1 agent anakinra. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four patients in whom rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was active despite methotrexate therapy were treated with subcutaneous etanercept only (25 mg twice weekly), full-dosage etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) plus anakinra (100 mg/day), or half-dosage etanercept (25 mg once weekly) plus anakinra (100 mg/day) for 6 months in a double-blind study at 41 centers in the US. Patients had never previously received anticytokine therapy. Patient response was measured with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set criteria, a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire, and the Disease Activity Score. Safety was assessed by the number of adverse events and clinical laboratory values. Plasma concentrations of both agents and antibody formation against both agents were also assessed. RESULTS: Combination therapy with etanercept plus anakinra provided no treatment benefit over etanercept alone, regardless of the regimen, but was associated with an increased safety risk. Thirty-one percent of the patients treated with full-dosage etanercept plus anakinra achieved an ACR 50% response, compared with 41% of the patients treated with etanercept only. This result was not statistically significant (P = 0.914). The incidence of serious infections (0% for etanercept alone, 3.7-7.4% for combination therapy), injection-site reactions, and neutropenia was increased with combination therapy. Combination therapy had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or immunogenicity of either agent. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra provides no added benefit and an increased risk compared with etanercept alone and is not recommended for the treatment of patients with RA.

Strand V, Cohen S, Crawford B, Smolen JS, Scott DL, Anonymous00392. · Division of Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #15039493 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have used patient- and physician-reported outcomes, ESR and/or CRP as components of ACR response criteria to assess efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Mean changes from baseline in patient- and physician-reported outcome measures, ESR and CRP were compared in two RCTs in patients with active RA. Comparisons between active and placebo treatment used mean percentage improvements and standard effect sizes (SESs). RESULTS: In both protocols, patient-reported assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function reflected little or no improvement with placebo, best discriminating between active and placebo therapy, as did ESR and CRP. CONCLUSION: Improvements in signs and symptoms of active RA in placebo RCTs appear to be best reflected by patient-reported measures of physical function, as long as reported changes in global assessments of disease activity and/or pain reflect similar benefit. Patient-reported outcome measures should be considered objective; treatment-associated changes are congruent with measures of inflammation, and appear less susceptible to the placebo response.

Pincus T, Strand V, Koch G, Amara I, Crawford B, Wolfe F, Cohen S, Felson D. · Division of Rheumatology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12632413 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capacity of a pooled index of only the 3 patient self-report questionnaire measures among the 7 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core data set (Core Data Set) measures to distinguish efficacy of active treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with leflunomide or methotrexate versus placebo in a randomized, controlled clinical trial, and to compare the results with those obtained using the ACR 20% response criteria (ACR20), Disease Activity Score (DAS), and other pooled indices. METHODS: The 7 ACR Core Data Set measures of 1) joint swelling, 2) joint tenderness, 3) physician global assessment, 4) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 5) functional disability, 6) pain, and 7) patient global assessment were combined into the following 5 pooled indices: "All Core Data Set" (all 7 measures), "Assessor Only" (measures 1-3), "Assessor + ESR" (measures 1-4), "Patient Only" (measures 5-7), and "Patient + ESR" (measures 4-7). The capacity of each of these 5 indices to detect differences between active treatment and placebo treatment was compared with that of the ACR20 and the DAS using 4 different analytic methods, each of which presented advantages and limitations. Agreement of the indices with one another and with the ACR20 and the DAS was analyzed according to pairwise kappa statistics and Z scores in multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Each of the 5 indices, including "Patient Only," had a similar capacity to detect greater efficacy of leflunomide and methotrexate versus placebo in this clinical trial, according to each of 4 methods, at similar levels of statistical and clinical significance. CONCLUSION: A pooled index of patient self-report questionnaire Core Data Set measures appears to be as informative as ACR20 responses, DAS scores, and pooled indices of all and assessor-derived Core Data Set measures for distinguishing between active treatment and placebo treatment in this RA clinical trial.

Kavanaugh A, Genovese M, Baughman J, Kivitz A, Bulpitt K, Olsen N, Weisman M, Matteson E, Furst D, van Vollenhoven R, Anderson J, Cohen S, Wei N, Meijerink J, Jacobs C, Mocci S. · Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92037-0943, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12610799 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Human cartilage glycoprotein 39 (HC gp-39) appears to be a relevant autoantigen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Administration of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II complexed antigens without requisite costimulatory signals can induce immunologic tolerance. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of AG4263 in patients with RA. AG4263 is a soluble complex of native HLA-DR4 (beta*0401) complexed to Org 36601, a 13-mer peptide derived from HC gp-39 (also referred to as CDP263). METHODS: Thirty-one HLA-DRB1*0401 positive patients with persistent RA disease activity despite concurrent methotrexate were randomized to 7 infusions of AG4263 (n = 24) or placebo (n = 7) over 6 weeks. The initial dose of 0.5 micro g/kg was escalated in subsequent cohorts to a maximum of 150 micro g/kg. Safety analyses included recording of adverse events and measurement of CD4/CD8 counts, reactivity to recall antigens, and development of antibodies to HLA-DR4. Efficacy was assessed using the Paulus 20 criteria. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated, with injection site reaction the most common adverse event. There was no loss of reactivity to recall antigens, change in cell counts, or antibodies to HLA-DR. The mean half-life of AG4263 was 12.5 h. Some evidence of clinical response was seen; responses were more common among patients receiving the highest doses of AG4263 and among those with baseline T cell reactivity to CDP263. CONCLUSION: AG4263 was safe, well tolerated, and without evidence of generalized immune suppression. Along with the observed trend toward clinical efficacy, the results suggest that this therapeutic approach warrants further investigation in patients with RA.

Moreland LW, Alten R, Van den Bosch F, Appelboom T, Leon M, Emery P, Cohen S, Luggen M, Shergy W, Nuamah I, Becker JC. · Spain Rehabilitation Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1717 6th Avenue South, Room 068, Birmingham, AL 35294-7201, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12115176 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: T cells are involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In animal models of autoimmune diseases, blockade of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing or treating this disease by preventing T cell activation. To date, the effect of costimulatory blockade in patients with RA is unknown. The goal of this multicenter, multinational study was to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of costimulatory blockade using CTLA-4Ig and LEA29Y in RA patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with at least 1 disease-modifying agent. METHODS: CTLA-4Ig, LEA29Y (0.5, 2, or 10 mg/kg), or placebo was administered intravenously to 214 patients with RA. Patients received 4 infusions of study medication, on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and were evaluated on day 85. The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20). All patients were monitored for treatment safety and tolerability. RESULTS: CTLA-4Ig and LEA29Y infusions were well tolerated at all dose levels. Peri-infusional adverse events were carefully monitored, and showed similar incidence across all dose groups with the exception of headaches, which were slightly more frequent in the 2 treatment groups. The incidence of discontinuations due to worsening of RA was 19%, 12%, and 9% at 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg, respectively, in the CTLA-4Ig-treated patients and 3%, 3%, and 6% at 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg, respectively, in the LEA29Y-treated patients (versus 31% in the placebo group). ACR20 responses on day 85 had increased in a dose-dependent manner (23%, 44%, and 53% of CTLA-4Ig-treated patients and 34%, 45%, and 61% of LEA29Y-treated patients at 0.5, 2.0, and 10 mg/kg, respectively, versus 31% of placebo-treated patients). CONCLUSION: Both of the costimulatory blocking molecules studied were generally safe and well tolerated. As compared with placebo, both CTLA-4Ig and LEA29Y demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of RA.

Petrone D, Condemi JJ, Fife R, Gluck O, Cohen S, Dalgin P. · Baylor University Medical Center and Arthritis Centers of Texas, Dallas 75246, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11920411 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 dosages of cevimeline for the treatment of xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. METHODS: A 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo, 15 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily, or 30 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline and throughout the study for their global assessment of dryness (mouth, eyes, overall) as well as their subjective assessment of the specific symptoms of dry mouth and dry eyes. Total saliva and tear flow also were measured. RESULTS: Patients taking 30 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily had statistically significant improvements in their subjective global assessment of dry eyes (P = 0.0453), dry mouth (P = 0.0004), and increased salivary flow (P = 0.007). Patients receiving the 30-mg dosage also showed greater objective improvement (increased salivary and lacrimal flow rates, as measured by Schirmer's test) than did patients receiving placebo. Frequently reported adverse events included headache, increased sweating, abdominal pain, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Treatment with cevimeline at a dosage of 30 mg 3 times daily resulted in substantive improvement by increasing the rate of saliva and tear flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, as well as improving subjective symptoms of dry mouth, dry eyes, and overall dryness. The 15-mg dosage relieved some symptoms, and both dosages were well tolerated.

Cohen S, Hurd E, Cush J, Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Moreland LW, Kremer J, Bear MB, Rich WJ, McCabe D. · Department of Rheumatology, St. Paul Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11920396 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe active RA who were receiving MTX for 6 consecutive months, with stable doses for > or = 3 months (those with disease duration of >6 months but <12 years) were randomized into 6 groups: placebo or 0.04, 0.1, 0.4, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg of anakinra administered in a single, daily, subcutaneous injection. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (attained an ACR20 response) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were randomized in the study. Patient demographics and disease status were similar in the 6 treatment groups. The ACR20 responses at week 12 in the 5 active treatment plus MTX groups demonstrated a statistically significant (P = 0.001) dose-response relationship compared with the ACR20 response in the placebo plus MTX group. The ACR20 response rate in the anakinra 1.0-mg/kg (46%; P = 0.001) and 2.0-mg/kg (38%; P = 0.007) dose groups was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (19%). The ACR20 responses at 24 weeks were consistent with those at 12 weeks. Similar improvements in anakinra-treated subjects were noted in individual ACR components, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, onset of ACR20 response, sustainability of ACR20 response, and magnitude of ACR response. Anakinra was safe and well tolerated. Injection site reaction was the most frequently noted adverse event, and this led to premature study withdrawal in 7% (1.0-mg/kg group) to 10% (2.0-mg/kg group) of patients receiving higher doses. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistently active RA, the combination of anakinra and MTX was safe and well tolerated and provided significantly greater clinical benefit than MTX alone.

Cohen S, Cannon GW, Schiff M, Weaver A, Fox R, Olsen N, Furst D, Sharp J, Moreland L, Caldwell J, Kaine J, Strand V. · St Paul Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11592358 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Three 6-12-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials have shown leflunomide (LEF; 20 mg/day, loading dose 100 mg x 3 days) to be effective and safe for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This analysis of the North American trial assessed whether the clinical benefit evident at month 12 was sustained over 24 months of treatment with LEF as compared with the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX), an equivalent disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, at 24 months. METHODS: The year-2 cohort, comprising patients continuing into the second year of treatment with > or = 1 dose of study medication and > or = 1 followup visit after week 52, consisted of 235 patients (LEF n = 98; placebo n = 36; MTX n = 101). The mean (+/- SD) maintenance dose of LEF was 19.6 +/- 1.99 mg/day in year 2 and that of MTX was 12.6 +/- 4.69 mg/week. Statistical analyses used an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. Statistical comparisons of the active treatments only were prospectively defined in the protocol. RESULTS: In total, 85% and 79% of LEF and MTX patients, respectively, who entered year 2 completed 24 months of treatment. From month 12 to month 24, the American College of Rheumatology improvement response rates of > or = 20% (LEF 79% versus MTX 67%; P = 0.049), > or = 50% (LEF 56% versus MTX 43%; P = 0.053), and > or = 70% (LEF 26% versus MTX 20%; P = 0.361) were sustained in both of the active treatment groups. The mean change in total Sharp radiologic damage scores at year 2 compared with year 1 and baseline (LEF 1.6 versus MTX 1.2) showed statistically equivalent sustained retardation of radiographic progression in the active treatment groups. Maximal improvements evident at 6 months in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (HAQ DI) and the physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form were sustained over 12 months and 24 months; improvement in the HAQ DI with LEF4(-0.60) was statistically significantly superior to that with MTX (-0.37) at 24 months (P = 0.005). Over 24 months in the ITT cohort, serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 1.6% of the LEF-treated patients and 3.7% of the MTX-treated patients. Frequently reported adverse events included upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, rash, reversible alopecia, and transient liver enzyme elevations. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of LEF and MTX were maintained over the second year of this 2-year trial. Both active treatments retarded radiographic progression over 24 months. LEF was statistically significantly superior to MTX in improving physical function as measured by the HAQ DI over 24 months of treatment. Results indicate that LEF is a safe and effective initial treatment for active RA, with clinical benefit sustained over 2 years of treatment without evidence of new or increased toxicity.

Strand V, Cohen S, Schiff M, Weaver A, Fleischmann R, Cannon G, Fox R, Moreland L, Olsen N, Furst D, Caldwell J, Kaine J, Sharp J, Hurley F, Loew-Friedrich I. · Stanford University, Calif, USA. · Arch Intern Med. · Pubmed #10573044 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Leflunomide is a reversible inhibitor of de novo pyrimidine synthesis shown to be effective in a phase 2 trial in 402 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide treatment with placebo and methotrexate treatment in patients with active RA. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo, and active-controlled 12-month study. SETTING: Forty-seven university and private rheumatology practices in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Diagnosis of RA by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for duration of 6 months or longer and no previous methotrexate treatment. INTERVENTION: Leflunomide treatment (20 mg/d), placebo, or methotrexate treatment (7.5-15 mg/wk). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: American College of Rheumatology success rate (completed 52 weeks of treatment and met the ACR > or = 20% response criteria), disease progression as assessed by x-ray films, and improvement in function and health-related quality of life using the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: The 482 patients studied were predominantly women (mean age, 54 years; mean disease duration, 6.7 years) for whom a mean of 0.8 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs had failed. The ACR response and success rates for patients receiving leflunomide treatment (52% and 41%, respectively) and methotrexate treatment (46% and 35%, respectively) were significantly higher than those for patients receiving placebo (26% and 19%, respectively) (P<.001), and they were statistically equivalent, with mean time to initial response at 8.4 weeks for patients receiving leflunomide vs 9.5 weeks for patients receiving methotrexate therapy. X-ray analyses demonstrated less disease progression with leflunomide (P=.001) and methotrexate (P = .02) therapy than with placebo. Leflunomide and methotrexate treatment improved measures of physical function and health-related quality of life significantly more than placebo (P<.001 and P<.05, respectively). Common adverse events for patients receiving leflunomide treatment included gastrointestinal complaints, skin rash, and reversible alopecia. Asymptomatic transaminase elevations resulted in treatment discontinuations for 7.1% of patients receiving leflunomide therapy, 1.7% of patients receiving placebo, and 3.3% of patients receiving methotrexate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical responses following administration of leflunomide, a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of RA, were statistically superior to those with placebo and equivalent to those with methotrexate treatment. Both active treatments improved signs and symptoms of active RA, delayed disease progression as demonstrated by x-ray films, and improved function and health-related quality of life.

Ochaion A, Bar-Yehuda S, Cohen S, Barer F, Patoka R, Amital H, Reitblat T, Reitblat A, Ophir J, Konfino I, Chowers Y, Ben-Horin S, Fishman P. · Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd., Kiryat-Matalon, Petah-Tikva, Israel. · Cell Immunol. · Pubmed #19426966 No free full text.

Abstract: The Gi protein associated A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) was recently defined as a novel anti-inflammatory target. The aim of this study was to look at A(3)AR expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases and to explore transcription factors involved receptor expression. Over-expression of A(3)AR was found in PBMCs derived from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis and Crohn's disease compared with PBMCs from healthy subjects. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrated the presence of DNA binding sites for nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) in the A(3)AR gene promoter. Up-regulation of NF-kappaB and CREB was found in the PBMCs from patients with RA, psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The PI3K-PKB/Akt signaling pathway, known to regulate both the NF-kappaB and CREB, was also up-regulated in the patients' PBMCs. Taken together, NF-kappaB and CREB are involved with the over-expression of A(3)AR in patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases. The receptor may be considered as a specific target to combat inflammation.

Ochaion A, Bar-Yehuda S, Cohen S, Amital H, Jacobson KA, Joshi BV, Gao ZG, Barer F, Patoka R, Del Valle L, Perez-Liz G, Fishman P. · Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd., Kiryat-Matalon, Petah-Tikva 49170, Israel. · Biochem Pharmacol. · Pubmed #18602896 No free full text.

Abstract: The A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) is over-expressed in inflammatory cells and was defined as a target to combat inflammation. Synthetic agonists to this receptor, such as IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA, exert an anti-inflammatory effect in experimental animal models of adjuvant- and collagen-induced arthritis. In this study we present a novel A(3)AR agonist, CF502, with high affinity and selectivity at the human A(3)AR. CF502 induced a dose dependent inhibitory effect on the proliferation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) via de-regulation of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) signaling pathway. Furthermore, CF502 markedly suppressed the clinical and pathological manifestations of adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) in a rat experimental model when given orally at a low dose (100 microg/kg). As is typical of other G-protein coupled receptors, the A(3)AR expression level was down-regulated shortly after treatment with agonist CF502 in paw and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from treated AIA animals. Subsequently, a decrease in the expression levels of protein kinase B/Akt (PKB/Akt), IkappaB kinase (IKK), I kappa B (IkappaB), NF-kappaB and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) took place. In addition, the expression levels of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3beta), beta-catenin, and poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP), known to control the level and activity of NF-kappaB, were down-regulated upon treatment with CF502. Taken together, CF502 inhibits FLS growth and the inflammatory manifestations of arthritis, supporting the development of A(3)AR agonists for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Lavi G, Voronov E, Dinarello CA, Apte RN, Cohen S. · Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Bldg. 39, Room 222, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, 84105 Israel. · J Control Release. · Pubmed #17900737 No free full text.

Abstract: The interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis and has the potential to treat metastatic cancers involving excess amounts of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1). To maintain sustained delivery and improve its therapeutic efficacy, IL-1Ra was encapsulated with stabilizers in biodegradable poly-(lactic/glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres. In vitro cytokine release and bioactivity studies in cultured melanoma B16 cells revealed the microspheres to be capable of sustained IL-1Ra release on a daily level that could inhibit cell proliferation for at least 7 days. The level of IL-1Ra released from the microspheres was revealed in rat serum. Significant amounts of IL-1Ra were released over the course of 2 weeks, at levels sufficient for the inhibition of exogenously-administered IL-1 beta. In mice injected with B16 melanoma cells, the sustained IL-1Ra delivery from biodegradable microspheres inhibited tumor growth and significantly prolonged mice survival. Furthermore, the tumors were less vascularized and after amputation of the primary tumor, the number of lung metastases was reduced by 70%, as compared to the control groups. Thus, we show that biodegradable microspheres represent an efficient system for sustaining IL-1Ra delivery and improving its therapeutic efficacy. As such, the system can be integrated into therapeutic protocols for treating metastatic cancers.

Prescott K, Costner M, Cohen S, Kazi S. · Internal Medicine Department, Rheumatic Diseases Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. · Am J Med Sci. · Pubmed #17496730 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Flares or onset of inflammatory bowel disease in association with immunosuppression has been reported in the literature. METHODS: We studied 4 cases of patients with rheumatic disease who developed or had a flare of ulcerative colitis either after initiation of or while taking a tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor. RESULTS: We identified 4 patients, three male and one female. Two of the male patients had a seronegative spondyloarthropathy and one had rheumatoid arthritis. The female patient had amyopathic dermatomyositis. Two of the 4 patients had ulcerative colitis prior to tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment. Both of these patients had quiescent ulcerative colitis that flared after they began taking etanercept. Two patients developed de novo ulcerative colitis while taking a tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in these 4 cases supports a temporal relationship between initiating a tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor and onset or flare of ulcerative colitis. These observations raise the possibility that tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy, which has been used as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease, may rarely be a factor in the development of disease.

Madi L, Cohen S, Ochayin A, Bar-Yehuda S, Barer F, Fishman P. · Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd., Kiryat-Matalon, Petah-Tikva, Israel. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17216675 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) upregulation has been found in cells of synovial tissue and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. We investigated A3AR levels in PBMC of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in mitogen-activated PBMC from healthy subjects. We examined the role of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB), a transcription factor present in the A3AR promoter, in mediating receptor upregulation. METHODS: A3AR and NF-kappaB protein levels were evaluated in PBMC of RA patients (n = 23) and healthy subjects by Western blot. A3AR and NF-kappaB levels were also analyzed in phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated PBMC in the presence and absence of antibodies against interleukin 2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was performed in PHA-stimulated PBMC of healthy subjects to determine A3AR expression. RESULTS: A3AR was overexpressed in PBMC of RA patients compared to healthy subjects and was directly correlated to an increase in NF-kappaB. Similar findings were observed in PHA and LPS-stimulated PBMC from healthy subjects. Antibodies against IL-2 or TNF-alpha prevented the increase in A3AR and NF-kappaB expression. CONCLUSION: Overexpression of A3AR was found in PBMC of RA patients. Receptor upregulation was induced by inflammatory cytokines controlling the expression of the A3AR transcription factor NF-kappaB.

Hansen KE, Cush J, Singhal A, Cooley DA, Cohen S, Patel SR, Genovese M, Sundaramurthy S, Schiff M. · University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15077264 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report the safety and efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) in combination with infliximab (INF) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In an open, multicenter, retrospective study, data were collected on the safety and efficacy of LEF and INF. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients received the combination of LEF and INF for an average of 6.6 months and a total exposure of 581 patient-months. The mean duration of LEF was 17 +/- 9 months (range 3-32 months; median 18.5 months) with an average of 4.8 INF infusions per patient. In all but 3 subjects, LEF was used initially and INF was added later. Infusion reactions occurred in 3 patients (0.7% of all infusions). A total of 34% of subjects experienced adverse events and in 6 (6.8% of the group) these were deemed serious. Ten infections occurred when patients were taking the combination; 9 patients recovered fully and 1 died of bacterial pneumonia. A lifetime smoker developed lung cancer and another patient was found to have colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse events noted within the combination therapy group were in keeping with the known risks of each drug when used individually. Limited data were available on efficacy, but a general improvement in disease control was noted with the combination of drugs, which for most patients involved the addition of INF to previous use of LEF.

McMinn JR, Cohen S, Moore J, Lilly S, Parkhurst J, Tarantino MD, Terrell DR, George JN. · Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190, USA. · Am J Hematol. · Pubmed #12749017 No free full text.

Abstract: Management of patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have persistent, severe, and symptomatic thrombocytopenia following splenectomy is difficult and empirical. No single agent or regimen provides long-term success for most patients, and for most treatments it is difficult to assess whether benefits outweigh risks. We report three consecutive patients with critical chronic refractory ITP, who responded promptly and completely following treatment with etanercept, an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. These patients had failed 6-11 previous treatments. In the first patient, etanercept was given for its approved indication: a flare of co-existing rheumatoid arthritis. The next two patients were treated with etanercept because of successful outcomes in the previous patients. Although etanercept appeared to be effective treatment for ITP in these 3 patients, the experimental nature of this treatment and the potential risks must be emphasized. On the basis of these case reports, a clinical trial has been initiated to systematically evaluate the efficacy and risks of etanercept in the management of children and adults with chronic ITP.