Rheumatoid Arthritis: Chalés G

Binard A, Alassane S, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Berthelot JM, Jousse-Joulin S, Chalés G, Le Henaff C, Thorel JB, Hoang S, Youinou P, Saraux A. · Unit of Rheumatology and the Laboratory of Immunology, la Cavale Blanche Hospital, Brest Teaching Hospitals, Brest, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17985408 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical, laboratory, and radiological features and outcomes in patients with monoarthritis (MA), identified in a cohort of patients with early arthritis. METHODS: A cohort of 270 patients with undiagnosed arthritis of less than 1 year's duration was divided into 3 groups: single episode of MA (MA, n = 27), MA with a history of patient-reported arthritis (MA + past, n = 23), and oligo- or polyarthritis (OA/PA, n = 220). At 6-month intervals, all patients underwent a standardized examination, radiographs, and standard laboratory tests including rheumatoid factors (RF), antiperinuclear factor (APF), antikeratin antibody (AKA), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP), antinuclear antibodies, and HLA-AB-DR typing. After a median followup of 30 months, the diagnosis was evaluated by a hospital-based rheumatologist. RESULTS: Age and sex did not differ across the 3 groups. Knee involvement was more common in the MA group than in the MA + past group (p < 0.03), whereas hand and metatarsophalangeal involvement was less common (p < 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively). RF and anti-CCP were less often positive in the MA group than in the MA + past group (p < 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively) and the OA/PA group (p < 0.02 and p < 0.03). No patient in the MA group received a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA was less common and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were prescribed less often in the MA group than in the other 2 groups (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: The MA group was clearly different from the other groups, with a favorable outcome and no risk of progression to RA.

Devauchelle-Pensec V, Berthelot JM, Jousse S, Samjee I, Josseaume T, Colin D, Chalés G, Thorel JB, Hoang S, Martin A, Youinou P, Le Goff P, Saraux A. · Unit of Rheumatology, Cavale Blanche Hospital, CHU Brest, Brest, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16783864 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of baseline hand radiographs to predict the diagnosis 2 years later in a cohort of patients with early arthritis. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with arthritis onset within the previous year were evaluated. At baseline, all patients underwent a standardized evaluation including laboratory tests and radiographs. Hand radiographs were read by a blinded observer who used a standardized procedure for detecting features of crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After 30 +/- 11.3 months, the final diagnosis was established by a panel of rheumatologists. All radiographs were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between radiographic features and a clinical diagnosis of RA, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) arthritis, and hydroxyapatite arthritis. No radiographic abnormalities suggesting psoriatic arthritis or gout were seen. The sensitivities of hand radiographs for diagnosing CPPD or hydroxyapatite arthritis ranged from 80% to 100%. Baseline hand radiographs suggested the final diagnosis in 31/258 patients, including 21 (22.5%) of the 93 patients with RA, 10 of the 11 (91%) patients with CPPD or hydroxyapatite deposition disease, and none of the patients with other disorders. Sensitivity was 29%, specificity 86.5%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 63%. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with recent arthritis, the overall performance of hand radiographs in predicting a diagnosis 2 years later was modest. However, they had an excellent diagnostic value for calcium deposition diseases.