| 1 |
Review Trace elements in the treatment of rheumatic conditions. 1999
Rosenstein ED, Caldwell JR. · Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Center, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA. · Rheum Dis Clin North Am. · Pubmed #10573767 No free full text.
Abstract: The role of trace metallic elements (copper, selenium, zinc, gold) in chronic inflammatory states is of great interest because many of them are co-factors in metabolic processes involving articular tissues and immune system function. Deficiencies of several of these have been documented in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Other than for the clinically approved gold compounds, there exists only inconsistent evidence for a therapeutic role of trace metallic elements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
|
| 2 |
Review Venoms, copper, and zinc in the treatment of arthritis. 1999
Caldwell JR. · Halifax Clinical Research Institute, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA. · Rheum Dis Clin North Am. · Pubmed #10573766 No free full text.
Abstract: This article discusses the use of venoms, copper, and zinc in the treatment of arthritis. The author examines the history and effectiveness of viper, bee, and ant venoms in order to determine whether these natural ingredients in anti-inflammatory medications help relieve a patient's symptoms. Copper and zinc studies may offer therapeutic benefits, but there is still no solid consensus on the potential role of these elements in treating arthritis.
|
| 3 |
Clinical Conference Concomitant leflunomide therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable doses of methotrexate. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. free! 2002
Kremer JM, Genovese MC, Cannon GW, Caldwell JR, Cush JJ, Furst DE, Luggen ME, Keystone E, Weisman MH, Bensen WM, Kaine JL, Ruderman EM, Coleman P, Curtis DL, Kopp EJ, Kantor SM, Waltuck J, Lindsley HB, Markenson JA, Strand V, Crawford B, Fernando I, Simpson K, Bathon JM. · The Center for Rheumatology, LLP, 1367 Washington Avenue, Suite 101, Albany, NY 12206, USA. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #12416946 links to free full text
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs may confer greater benefits when combined with the antimetabolite methotrexate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus placebo when added to ongoing, stable-dose methotrexate therapy in patients with persistently active rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 20 centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Patients with persistent rheumatoid arthritis, as defined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, despite receiving methotrexate for at least 6 months. INTERVENTION: Leflunomide or matching placebo added to existing methotrexate therapy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy variable was the rate of achievement of 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at the end of the study. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index was assessed at each visit, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form was completed as an end point analysis. RESULTS: In the leflunomide and placebo groups, 46.2% and 19.5% of patients, respectively, met ACR20 criteria at 24 weeks (P < 0.001). Clinical improvement was demonstrated by statistically significant mean changes in individual components of the ACR20 response criteria. Discontinuation rates were similar in both treatment groups (23.1% in the leflunomide group and 24.8% in the placebo group), as were the overall incidences of adverse events (89.2% vs. 89.5%, respectively). Adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with leflunomide and methotrexate provides statistically significant clinical benefit in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are receiving methotrexate therapy. Leflunomide plus methotrexate is generally well tolerated and can be used safely with appropriate liver enzyme and hematologic monitoring.
|
| 4 |
Clinical Conference Phase I/II trial of recombinant methionyl human tumor necrosis factor binding protein PEGylated dimer in patients with active refractory rheumatoid arthritis. 2000
Moreland LW, McCabe DP, Caldwell JR, Sack M, Weisman M, Henry G, Seely JE, Martin SW, Yee CL, Bendele AM, Frazier JL, Kohno T, Cosenza ME, Lyons SA, Dayer JM, Cohen AM, Edwards CK. · Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-7201, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10743796 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of intravenous administration of tumor necrosis factor binding protein (TNFbp) dimer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This phase I/II study was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, ascending dose study evaluating TNFbp dimer administered by i.v. infusion. Thirty-three patients with RA divided into 3 cohorts received TNFbp dimer (30, 100, 300 microg/kg) or placebo during a 5 min infusion at baseline and at 3 and 6 weeks; patients were followed at routine intervals after each infusion through 77 days postinfusion. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using a log-linear regimen and comparisons were made between half-life after first, 2nd, and 3rd doses. Plasma TNFbp dimer concentrations and serum antibody levels were used in the measurement of pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Administration of 30 microg/kg of TNFbp dimer was generally well tolerated; the maximum tolerated dose was 100 microg/kg. No serious adverse events were reported. A significant antibody response affected the half-life and clearance of TNFbp dimer at each dose group. Anti-TNFbp antibodies were noncytotoxic and nonagonistic. Clinical evaluations provided evidence of in vivo activity of TNFbp dimer in these patients. CONCLUSION: TNFbp dimer administered to patients with long standing RA resulted in significant antibody production to the study drug. This effect reduced the half-life and clearance of the TNFbp. This TNFbp will not be a viable option for treating patients with RA secondary to immunogenicity.
|
| 5 |
Clinical Conference The Prosorba column for treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. free! 1999
Felson DT, LaValley MP, Baldassare AR, Block JA, Caldwell JR, Cannon GW, Deal C, Evans S, Fleischmann R, Gendreau RM, Harris ER, Matteson EL, Roth SH, Schumacher HR, Weisman MH, Furst DE. · Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10524687 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Prosorba column as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with active and treatment-resistant (refractory) disease. METHODS: A sham-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of Prosorba versus sham apheresis was performed in patients with RA who had failed to respond to treatment with methotrexate or at least 2 other second-line drugs. Patients received 12 weekly treatments with Prosorba or sham apheresis, with efficacy evaluated 7-8 weeks after treatment ended. Patients were characterized as responders if they experienced improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria at the efficacy time point. A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) evaluated interim analyses for the possibility of early completion of the trial. RESULTS: Patients in the trial had RA for an average of 15.5 years (range 1.7-50.6) and had failed an average of 4.2 second-line drug treatments prior to entry. After the completion of treatment of 91 randomized patients, the DSMB stopped the trial early due to successful outcomes. Of the 47 patients in the Prosorba arm, 31.9% experienced ACR-defined improvement versus 11.4% of the 44 patients in the sham-treated arm (P = 0.019 after adjustment for interim analysis). When results from 8 additional patients, who had completed blinded treatments at the time of DSMB action, were added to the analysis (n = 99), results were unchanged. The most common adverse events were a short-term flare in joint pain and swelling following treatment, a side effect that occurred in most subjects at least once in both treatment arms. Other side effects, although common, occurred equally as frequently in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Apheresis with the Prosorba column is an efficacious treatment for RA in patients with active disease who have failed other treatments.
|
| 6 |
Article Risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes and their association with methotrexate-related side effects in rheumatoid arthritis. free! 2006
Weisman MH, Furst DE, Park GS, Kremer JM, Smith KM, Wallace DJ, Caldwell JR, Dervieux T. · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16447238 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate agent that is often associated with toxicity. This study investigated whether risk genotypes for folate-dependent enzymes are associated with the toxicity of MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Blood was collected for analysis in a muticenter, cross-sectional study of RA patients who had been receiving MTX for at least 1 month prior to enrollment, and side effects occurring at the time of a single study visit were recorded. Low-penetrance risk genotypes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677TT, thymidylate synthase (TSER) *2/*2 (variable number of tandem repeats), amino imidazole ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) 347GG, and serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) 1420CC were measured and summed to constitute the toxicogenetic index specific to each patient. Statistical analyses consisted of logistic regression models with clustered-center effects, and associations with risk genotypes were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Among 214 patients enrolled at 4 study sites, a total of 67 patients (31%) presented with a side effect (gastrointestinal event, headache, lethargy, alopecia, cough, or dyspnea). Risk genotypes associated with side effects in the central nervous system were MTHFR 677TT (OR 3.3, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 2.4, P < 0.05). ATIC 347GG was associated with gastrointestinal side effects (OR 3.0, P < 0.01), while TSER*2/*2 (OR 5.4, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 3.2, P < 0.01) were associated with alopecia. The toxicogenetic index ranged from 0 to 3 (median 1). An index of 3 was associated with an approximately 7-fold higher likelihood of having a side effect compared with an index of 0 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a composite index of the cumulative risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes may be an effective means of profiling RA patients who develop side effects to MTX.
|
|
|