Rheumatoid Arthritis: Breedveld FC

Lipsky PE, Abramson SB, Breedveld FC, Brook P, Burmester R, Buttgereit F, Cannon GW, Catella-Lawson F, Crofford LJ, Doherty M, Dougados M, DuBois RN, Froelich J, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gibofsky A, Hernandez-Diaz S, Hochberg MC, Krause A, Liang MH, Machold K, Peloso PM, Raisz LG, Schayes B, Scheiman JM, Simon LS, Smolen J. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10852251 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

van der Kooij SM, Allaart CF, Dijkmans BA, Breedveld FC. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Curr Opin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18388520 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review provides an update on novel treatment strategies striving for remission in patients with recent onset of rheumatoid arthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: As early treatment is crucial to achieve optimal results, identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis early is imperative to achieve clinical remission. Patients with early arthritis who will progress to rheumatoid arthritis can be identified, and treating these patients can postpone the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and retard the progression of structural damage. The best way to achieve remission is by adjusting treatments at regular intervals using predetermined response criteria. Specific treatments to rapidly induce remission include disease modifying antirheumatic drugs combinations, especially combined with glucocorticoids or tumor necrosis factor antagonists. The prediction of joint damage progression, or the response to specific drugs is not yet accurately possible. The early institution of tumor necrosis factor antagonists followed by discontinuation leads to sustained clinical benefit. SUMMARY: Early treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with strategies aiming at remission results in the best outcomes. Until the prediction of a severe disease course and treatment response becomes possible, a promising strategy would be to rapidly induce remission using an effective combination of drugs followed by tapering and discontinuation. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists have proven to be highly effective in this approach.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Sieper J, Emery P, Keystone EC, Schiff MH, Mease P, van Riel PL, Fleischmann R, Weisman MH, Weinblatt ME. · David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA - RM 32-59, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17934088 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

van den Bemt BJ, van den Hoogen FH, Breedveld FC, van der Tempel H, Janknegt R. · Sint Maartenskliniek, Herngstdalseweg 3, 6522JV Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #16925504 No free full text.

Abstract: This article offers an interactive decision matrix technique (InforMatrix), in which a group of experts in rheumatology determine an order of merit within the various biologicals used for rheumatoid arthritis. In this order of merit, six criteria (efficacy, safety, tolerance, ease of use, applicability and costs) are weighed against each other. Data necessary for this weighing process are derived from both literature, as well as clinical practice experience. This article provides an overview of the most relevant clinical trials on the biologicals, as well as a description of the interactive decision matrix technique. Using this interactive matrix technique makes rational consideration of the treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis possible.

van der Helm-van Mil AH, Breedveld FC, Huizinga TW. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #16879719 links to  free full text

Abstract: With regard to rheumatoid arthritis, remission as currently used in the literature can have two meanings: either a state with persistent absence of clinical and radiological signs of disease activity without being treated for a specific time period, or it may point to a disease state with minimal disease activity during antirheumatic treatment. A risk factor for the first is absence of autoantibodies, with the anti-CCP-antibodies as best predictors, whereas risk factors for achieving a drug-induced state of minimal disease activity are not well defined. These definitions of remission refer to different disease states; therefore, we propose that the term remission is reserved for patients that are not treated with antirheumatic drugs.

de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Dijkmans BA, Breedveld FC. · Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Rheum Dis Clin North Am. · Pubmed #16287595 No free full text.

Abstract: Treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is started immediately after diagnosis, resulting in more effective suppression of disease activity and substantial reduction of joint damage. The development of biologic agents has enabled remission as a realistic therapeutic goal in a greater proportion of patients. The tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab, have been studied in numerous randomized clinical trials. These agents can suppress disease activity directly, slow or stop progression of radiologic damage, and prevent further loss of quality of life. Patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors show few adverse events, which together with the high clinical effectiveness is favorable for treatment compliance. The exact role of these agents in the treatment of early-stage RA is unknown.

Breedveld FC. · Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Reumatologie, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #16240851 No free full text.

Abstract: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) a has been identified through basic research as a molecule that has a central role in the regulation of many autoimmune chronic inflammatory diseases. Experimental and clinical research with TNF antagonists has validated this observation. At this time, TNF blockade is indicated for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis. Recent clinical study with this type of molecularly targeted intervention has determined that chronic inflammatory diseases can share some pathophysiological mechanisms, while others are more specific for certain diseases. Therefore, TNF appears to play a central role in multiple forms of inflammation, but the underlying pathogenic mechanism remains intact during TNF blockade. For this reason, there is much interest in studies of combination therapy in which TNF antagonists are added to other treatments, such as methotrexate. Anti-TNF therapy is expensive; therefore, treatment strategies are needed that are affordable and provide optimal care for groups of patients that do not adequately respond to conventional therapy.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Bijlsma JW, Dougados M, Emery P, Keystone EC, Klareskog L, Mease PJ. · 1000 Veteran Avenue Rehabilitation Centre, Room 32-59, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16239380 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Verpoort KN, van Dongen H, Allaart CF, Toes RE, Breedveld FC, Huizinga TW. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15552509 No free full text.

Abstract: The prognosis of patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) may vary from self-limited to severe destructive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because early aggressive treatment might offer an effective means to slow disease progression in RA, it is important to identify UA patients who will develop RA and treat them as early as possible. At the same time, inappropriate treatment of patients with a more benign disease course should be avoided. Here, an overview is given of the characteristics and numbers of patients with UA who evolve into RA. UA is defined as any arthritis that has the potential for a persistent course, without fulfilling the classification criteria for specific rheumatic disorders. To compare endpoints in the different databases, the 1987 ACR criteria for RA were used. In the nine databases employing a similar definition for undifferentiated arthritis, the proportion of patients with UA that evolved into RA within 1 year varied from 6% to 55%. These differences arise in large part from differences in the inclusion criteria and in the definitions used for UA and RA. The data from the various cohorts support a hypothesis that a considerable proportion of UA patients are actually patients with RA in a very early stage. Controlled intervention studies with early antirheumatic treatment in these patients are mandatory in order to provide further insight into the natural course of UA and to define a treatment strategy that will successfully slow or prevent disease progression.

Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Emery P, van Riel PL, Dougados M, Strand CV, Breedveld FC. · Department of Internal Medicine III, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #15170905 No free full text.

Abstract: In most studies of disease modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, in combination with either leflunomide or biological agents, patients are given an additional agent after they have failed treatment with methotrexate (MTX). This review of clinical studies shows that leflunomide is clinically efficacious and well tolerated when added to either sulfasalazine or MTX, as both an initial and ongoing treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Experience in combining leflunomide with biological agents is limited to a small number of open-label studies with infliximab. According to the opinion obtained at an International Expert Panel Meeting held in Paris in May 2003, leflunomide can be used in combination therapy: 61% of the Expert Panel would use leflunomide with MTX, 71% with sulfasalazine, 43% with infliximab, 33% with adalimumab, 19% with etanercept, and 38% with anakinra. The Expert Panel stated that the combination of leflunomide and infliximab warrants a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with incomplete clinical responses to leflunomide monotherapy, provided leflunomide is started first, without a loading dose, and infliximab is added after good tolerability to leflunomide has been established. The Expert Panel concluded that combination therapy with leflunomide has a place in the treatment of RA. Caution is advised, however, when using combination treatments and, therefore, the patient's safety should be carefully monitored.

van Riel PL, Smolen JS, Emery P, Kalden JR, Dougados M, Strand CV, Breedveld FC. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #15170904 No free full text.

Abstract: The safety profile of leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has been well documented in clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance, and epidemiological studies. Both postmarketing surveillance and epidemiological study results are consistent with the safety profile of leflunomide reported in clinical trials, and no increased risk was observed with leflunomide, compared with other disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; these studies have allowed a more precise representation of the incidence of adverse events occurring with leflunomide under normal conditions of care. The most common leflunomide-associated adverse events include diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, alopecia, and rash. Ninety-five percent of the Expert Panel considered the adverse events associated with leflunomide to be manageable. If an adverse event required treatment to be stopped, many of the experts would consider subsequently restarting leflunomide. For minor adverse events, it was suggested that the physician might also consider using cholestyramine or charcoal to determine if the side effect is dose-related and, if it was, reduce the leflunomide dose accordingly. In addition to informing patients about the likelihood of side effects, it is important to emphasize that their incidence appears to diminish with continued treatment. It is also important to adequately support patients who are experiencing side effects and involve them in their disease management, for example, by offering the choice of reducing the leflunomide dose and/or having symptomatic treatment. Other patient management recommendations in this review reflect the views of the majority of participants as expressed in the meeting.

Smolen JS, Emery P, Kalden JR, Van Riel PL, Dougados M, Strand CV, Breedveld FC. · Division of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · J Rheumatol Suppl. · Pubmed #15170903 No free full text.

Abstract: This expert review of results from the leflunomide phase II and III clinical trials database demonstrates that leflunomide meets all 3 goals desired of disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy: reducing the signs and symptoms of the disease; inhibiting structural damage; and improving physical function. Further, leflunomide has a rapid onset of action, sustained efficacy, and is effective in early and late disease, regardless of whether patients have received other DMARD previously. The consistent efficacy of leflunomide across phase III clinical trials is confirmed by the findings from clinical practice. Experts agreed that it is important to observe a patient under leflunomide monotherapy for at least 3-4 months before assessing efficacy. It is possible to start maintenance therapy, with either a daily dose of leflunomide 10 mg, subsequently changing to 20 mg, or the reverse. The decision to use a loading dose when initiating leflunomide therapy depends primarily on the balance between the tolerability and rapid efficacy associated with a loading dose, and the balance desired for an individual patient. In general, the use of both maintenance and loading doses requires a flexible approach to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. During the first few weeks of leflunomide therapy, patient dropout can be avoided by using prednisolone rather than a loading dose. Moreover, to ensure good tolerability and compliance in patients receiving a loading dose, information and adequate support should be provided throughout treatment.

Breedveld FC, Kalden JR. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15140767 links to  free full text

Abstract: Early referral (at <3 months) and early DMARD treatment enable the course of RA to be changed. Once the disease has become aggressive it is much harder to treat and improvements will not be as great as they would have been with earlier treatment. The latest strategies and treatments enable remission to be achieved in many more patients than formerly.

van Aken J, van Bilsen JH, Allaart CF, Huizinga TW, Breedveld FC. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #14969059 No free full text.

Abstract: In 1993 a special Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) was established at the Department of Rheumatology of the Leiden University Medical Center in order to detect and treat inflammatory disorders early in the disease state, especially early rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with confirmed arthritis of recent onset (less than 2 years) were included by rheumatologists and trained research nurses. Parameters of first and follow-up visits (3, 6 and 9 months and yearly) that were entered in the EAC-database include the medical history, physical-diagnostic examination, laboratory tests, questionnaires, radiographic joint scores and diagnosis. This database enables us to conduct research on arthritis, with an emphasis on rheumatoid arthritis, in many ways. Physicians and basic scientists have studied cellular immunology and genetic, environmental and clinical risk factors in order to determine the pathophysiologic mechanisms of inflammatory arthritis. The present article is a review on reports published from the EAC. Over the past ten years, these reports have been highly relevant for both daily clinical practice and research. Present and planned future studies, as described in this article, reconfirm the importance of an EAC framework to ensure that research continues on this disease in the Leiden EAC area.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Emery P, Gibofsky A, Kavanaugh AF, Keystone EC, Klareskog L, Russell AS, van de Putte LB, Weisman MH, Kavenaugh AF. · University of California, UCLA, Rheumatology, Division Los Angeles, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #14532138 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Arend SM, Breedveld FC, van Dissel JT. · Department of Infectious Diseases (C5P), Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. · Neth J Med. · Pubmed #12852719 links to  free full text

Abstract: According to several reports, the risk of active tuberculosis in patients who are latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is increased after treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF)-blocking agents. These drugs have demonstrated effectiveness and are increasingly being used for treatment of several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. Specialists prescribing TNF-blocking agents should be aware of the risk of tuberculosis and other infections, the unusual and severe clinical presentations and the available preventive measures. In this review, we will weigh currently available data on the risk of infection with intracellular pathogens and in particular tuberculosis in patients treated with TNF-blocking agents, discuss the role of TNF in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis and describe the risk profile of this complication. Awaiting further consensus protocols, a provisional flow chart is presented that is based on dinical parameters to provide a logical framework to reduce and minimise the risk of tuberculosis during TNF blockade.

Breedveld FC. · University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #12817095 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Antoni CE, Bijlsma JW, Burmester GR, Cronstein B, Keystone EC, Kavanaugh A, Klareskog L. · University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12379612 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Simon LS, Smolen JS, Abramson SB, Appel G, Bombardier C, Brater DC, Breedveld FC, Brune K, Burmester GR, Crofford LJ, Dougados M, DuBois RN, Fitzgerald GA, Frishman W, García Rodríguez LA, Hochberg MC, Kalden JR, Laine L, Langman MJ, Prescott SM, van de Putte LB, Whelton A, White WB, Willaims GH. · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12136912 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Verburg RJ, Toes RE, Fibbe WE, Breedveld FC, van Laar JM. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Hum Immunol. · Pubmed #12121670 No free full text.

Abstract: A new treatment approach, involving intense immunosuppression and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT), has emerged in recent years for the treatment of severe, refractory rheumatic autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The rationale of this strategy is based on the concept of immunoablation by intense immunosuppression with subsequent regeneration of naïve T lymphocytes derived from reinfused hematopoietic progenitor cells. Patients with a therapy-refractory, progressively erosive disease who are at risk of functional disability and early mortality are considered eligible for treatment with autologous SCT. The goal is long-term improvement of disease activity and quality of life. However, when offering SCT to RA patients these benefits should be balanced against toxicities and treatment-related mortality. In several patients with intractable RA, long-term remissions were observed with this strategy, but failures have been reported as well. Only small numbers of RA patients have been treated thus far. Although different treatment protocols have been used, high dose chemotherapy as a means to achieve immunoablation has been invariably used in all studies. In this review we discuss background, clinical results, protocols, and future prospects of high dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT for RA.

Huizinga TW, Machold KP, Breedveld FC, Lipsky PE, Smolen JS. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12115216 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Breedveld FC. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Res. · Pubmed #12110153 No free full text.

Abstract: With the introduction of new disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other therapeutic agents, the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has shifted toward earlier, more aggressive therapy. The ultimate goal is to prevent structural joint damage that leads to pain and functional disability. Early diagnosis of RA is therefore essential, and early DMARD treatment combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended. Combination DMARD regimens and new biologic agents (anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] therapies [infliximab, etanercept] and the interleukin [IL]-1 antagonist [anakinra]) have emerged as viable options for early treatment of RA patients. These new biologic agents and future nonbiologic agents that target proteins in signaling cascades are likely to change the landscape of RA treatments.

Furst DE, Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Antoni CE, Burmester GR, Crofford LJ, Kavanaugh A. · Arthritis Clinical Research Unit, Virginia Mason Research Centre, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11890647 links to  free full text

Abstract: TNF blocking agents have proved to be effective DMARDs and they have been a major advance in the treatment of RA. Their use is expanding to other rheumatic diseases. However, rare to uncommon and unexpected toxicities have been found and others may yet be found during their use. Studies in selected areas of efficacy, toxicity, and general use of TNF blocking agents are needed to help further define the most appropriate use of these agents. Use of these drugs will require doctors experienced in the diagnosis, treatment, and assessment of RA and other rheumatic diseases. These doctors will need to make long term observations of efficacy and toxicity. Further considerations which must be made when using TNF blocking agents in this disease include the cost and a recognition that data in subgroups are still being acquired. It is hoped that this statement, which is based upon the best evidence available at the time of its creation, and modified by expert opinion, will facilitate the optimal use of these agents for our patients with RA and other rheumatic diseases.

Emery P, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Kalden JR, Schiff MH, Smolen JS. · Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, UK. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11874828 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires early diagnosis and early disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment to have an impact on long term morbidity and mortality. Clinical criteria would facilitate early referral of the patient with suspected RA to a rheumatologist for definitive diagnosis and initiation of DMARD treatment at that point in the disease most likely to have an impact on the long term outcome. OBJECTIVE: To develop a referral recommendation that may serve as a clinical guide for primary care doctors, enabling them to identify patients with suspected RA during the early inflammatory stages. METHODS: Key points of the referral criteria were formed based on a thorough literature review targeting early RA, early arthritis clinics, DMARD treatment for early RA, prognostic factors of disease progression, early RA clinical trials, and quality of life. Evidence was graded using the methods defined by Shekelle et al. A draft version of the criterion was circulated among the authors for critical evaluation. A consensus integrated these comments. RESULTS: Clinical evidence strongly supports the observations that structural damage occurs early in active RA and that early DMARD treatment improves the long term outcome of the disease. The observations indicate that rapid referral to a rheumatologist is advised when RA is suspected. This may be supported by the presence of any of the following: >or=3 swollen joints, metatarsophalangeal/metacarpophalangeal involvement, and morning stiffness of >or=30 minutes. CONCLUSION: The proposed early referral recommendation is a viable tool for primary care doctors to identify potential patients with active RA early in the disease. Early referral to a rheumatologist for definitive diagnosis and early DMARD treatment should improve the long term outcome of RA.

Tijhuis GJ, van de Putte LB, Breedveld FC. · Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Reumatologie, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #11605312 No free full text.

Abstract: The current pharmacotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) consists of non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as sulphasalazine, leflunomide and methotrexate. DMARDs can be given as monotherapy or in combination. However, not all patients show an adequate response due to toxicity or lack of efficacy. From animal studies and clinical studies in patients with RA, we know that tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is directly involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Two forms of TNF inhibition therapy have been extensively investigated in RA: anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (infliximab) and TNF receptor-Fc fusion protein (etanercept). Both types of TNF inhibition induce a rapid improvement in multiple clinical measures of disease activity and patient functional status. Furthermore, a beneficial effect was demonstrated on radiographic progression of joint damage. Etanercept and the combination infliximab-methotrexate are generally well tolerated.