Rheumatoid Arthritis: Breedveld F

Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C, Bolosiu HD, Breedveld F, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Klareskog L, Machold K, Martin-Mola E, Nielsen H, Silman A, Smolen J, Yazici H. · Immuno-Rhumatologie, Lapeyronie Hosp, Montpellier, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16396980 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To formulate EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis. METHODS: In accordance with EULAR's "standardised operating procedures", the task force pursued an evidence based approach and an approach based on expert opinion. A steering group comprised of 14 rheumatologists representing 10 European countries. The group defined the focus of the process, the target population, and formulated an operational definition of "management". Each participant was invited to propose issues of interest regarding the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen issues for further research were selected by use of a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature search was carried out. Evidence was categorised according to usual guidelines. A set of draft recommendations was proposed on the basis of the research questions and the results of the literature search.. The strength of the recommendations was based on the category of evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: 15 research questions, covering the entire spectrum of "management of early arthritis", were formulated for further research; and 284 studies were identified and evaluated. Twelve recommendations for the management of early arthritis were selected and presented with short sentences. The selected statements included recognition of arthritis, referral, diagnosis, prognosis, classification, and treatment of early arthritis (information, education, non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological treatments, and monitoring of the disease process). On the basis of expert opinion, 11 items were identified as being important for future research. CONCLUSIONS: 12 key recommendations for the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis were developed, based on evidence in the literature and expert consensus.

Breedveld F. · University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. · Autoimmun Rev. · Pubmed #15309774 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Bresnihan B, Tak PP, Emery P, Klareskog L, Breedveld F. · Department of Rheumatology, St Vincents University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. b.bresnihansvcpc.ie · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #10873958 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Breedveld F, Agarwal S, Yin M, Ren S, Li NF, Shaw TM, Davies BE. · Leiden University Medical Center, Rheumatology, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands. · J Clin Pharmacol. · Pubmed #17766699 No free full text.

Abstract: This study characterized the relationship between clinical response, serum rituximab concentrations, and peripheral B-cell levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab. Data were analyzed from a double-blind, phase IIa trial in which 161 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite continuing methotrexate were randomized to methotrexate alone (10-25 mg/wk), rituximab alone (single course: 1000 mg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15), rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (750 mg administered intravenously on days 3 and 17), or rituximab plus methotrexate. Serum samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected through 24 weeks, and peripheral circulating CD19+ B-cell levels were measured through 48 weeks. All treatments were generally well tolerated, with no clinically relevant excess of adverse events leading to withdrawal among patients who received rituximab compared with those who received methotrexate alone. The proportions of patients who achieved an American College of Rheumatology score of 50 at week 24 were 13% (methotrexate alone), 33% (rituximab alone), 41% (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide), and 43% (rituximab plus methotrexate). Peripheral B-cell depletion occurred by day 15 in all patients treated with rituximab. There was no relationship between B-cell depletion and clinical response. Recovery of peripheral B cells was variable and showed no relationship with return of disease activity in patients who responded to rituximab. The mean terminal half-life of rituximab was 19 to 22 days; pharmacokinetic parameters were similar whether rituximab was administered alone or with methotrexate or cyclophosphamide. Because the level of peripherally circulating B cells does not appear to correlate with a maintained clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the timing of rituximab retreatment should be based on clinical symptoms rather than peripheral B-cell levels.

de Vries-Bouwstra J, Le Cessie S, Allaart C, Breedveld F, Huizinga T. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16845710 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of a prediction model for making treatment decisions in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In 152 patients with early RA, progression of radiological damage during the first year [Sharp-van der Heijde (SH) score > 0] was assessed and used to define actual disease outcome. Available variables at baseline were entered in a multivariate regression analysis with progression score as dependent variable. This model was used to predict disease outcome in every patient. Using the standard deviations of the predicted disease outcome, patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) severe disease: high probability (> or = 0.8) for progression > 0, (2) mild disease: high probability (> or =0.8) for progression < or = 0, and (3) not classified: no high probability for either option. It was determined how many patients could be classified by using this model. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients (71.7%) showed joint damage progression during the first year. Baseline variables available were: age, sex, duration of symptoms, duration of morning stiffness, patient's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, swollen and painful joint count, bilateral compression pain in metatarsophalangeals, rheumatoid factor positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, shared epitope positivity, SH-score, and the presence of erosions. The R2 value (approximately variation explained) of the prediction model was 0.36. By using this model 46.3% of patients could be classified as having severe disease, 0% as having mild disease, and 53.7% could not be classified. CONCLUSION: To be able to make treatment decisions in early RA based on predicted disease outcome, a better prediction of disease outcome is needed, making the search for better prognostic variables urgent.

Kalden JR, Schattenkirchner M, Sörensen H, Emery P, Deighton C, Rozman B, Breedveld F. · Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12794818 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide beyond 2 years in a multinational, open-label extension of 2 phase III double-blind studies. METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received leflunomide (100 mg/day for 3 days, 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day thereafter) in the 2 phase III studies and who completed 2 years of treatment were offered inclusion in the open-label extension phase and were maintained on the same dosage of leflunomide. The American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 response rates, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed. Safety measures included monitoring of adverse events and laboratory values. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients (mean age 57 years) were treated with leflunomide for >2 years; 74.8% of the patients were female. The mean disease duration was 4.1 years (range 0.1-26.6 years), and in 44% of patients, RA was first diagnosed within 2 years of entry into the phase III studies. The mean duration of leflunomide treatment was 4.6 years (range 2.8-5.8 years), and 32% of patients had received no previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates and HAQ scores at 1 year were maintained through year 4 or until the end point. No new types of adverse events were observed, and liver function was normal at baseline and at the end point in the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: The improvements in both functional ability and physician-based efficacy measures seen with leflunomide after 1 year were maintained for up to 5 years (maximum treatment duration 5.8 years), demonstrating that the early efficacy of leflunomide in patients with RA is sustained long-term, and that the long-term safety profile of leflunomide is no different from that observed in phase III trials.

Mason U, Aldrich J, Breedveld F, Davis CB, Elliott M, Jackson M, Jorgensen C, Keystone E, Levy R, Tesser J, Totoritis M, Truneh A, Weisman M, Wiesenhutter C, Yocum D, Zhu J. · GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Greenford, Middlesex, UK. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11838838 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Double blind studies were conducted with the anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (Mab) keliximab in patients with active, stable rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to confirm preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety from open. uncontrolled studies. METHODS: We enrolled 136 and 186 patients into 2 consecutive, randomized, double blind trials, with similar populations [apart from inclusion of disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients in Study 2]. Patients received 4 weeks intravenous placebo or keliximab [40, 80, 120, or 140 mg twice weekly (bw), or 240 mg once weekly (ow)].The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response criteria, one week after the end of treatment. RESULTS: ACR 20 response rates in Study I were 19%, 42%, 51%*, and 69%* (*p < 0.05 compared to placebo), with placebo, 40, 80, or 140 mg keliximab bw, respectively. The response rates in Study 2 were 30%, 39%, 46% and 47% with placebo, 80 or 120 mg bw, or 240 mg keliximab ow, respectively. In the 2 studies, there was a dose dependent increase in peripheral blood CD4+ T cell coating with keliximab, but a different pattern of CD4 depletion was seen. While only 12% of keliximab treated patients in Study I had CD4 counts below 250 cells/mm3 at the end of the treatment period, 47% fell below this level in Study 2. Clinical response was not correlated with CD4 depletion, but was correlated with CD4+ T cell coating with keliximab. CONCLUSION: Coating of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells with keliximab, but not CD4 depletion, is a determinant of clinical response.

van der Laan W, Molenaar E, Ronday K, Verheijen J, Breedveld F, Greenwald R, Dijkmans B, TeKoppele J. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11550961 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of doxycycline on disease activity and joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A 36 week double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial was conducted. Patients (n = 66) received 50 mg doxycycline or placebo twice a day during 12, 24, or 36 weeks. Patient assessments were performed before the treatment was administered, at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks of treatment, and finally at 4 weeks after cessation of treatment. Patient assessments, swollen and tender joint counts, duration of morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and Modified Disease Activity Score were used as measures of disease activity. Effects on joint destruction were assessed by urinary excretion of the pyridinolines hydroxylysylpyridinoline and lysylpyridinoline and by scoring radiographic damage of hands and feet before and after treatment. RESULTS: The changes of clinical or laboratory disease activity measures, pyridinoline excretion, or progression of radiographic joint damage during doxycycline or placebo treatment did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that 50 mg doxycycline twice a day provided no therapeutic benefit for patients with RA.

Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M, Smolen J, Emery P, Harriman G, Feldmann M, Lipsky P. · The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology and The Imperial College School of Medicine at Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK. · Lancet. · Pubmed #10622295 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Not all patients with rheumatoid arthritis can tolerate or respond to methotrexate, a standard treatment for this disease. There is evidence that antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is efficacious in relief of signs and symptoms. We therefore investigated whether infliximab, a chimeric human-mouse anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody would provide additional clinical benefit to patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving methotrexate. METHODS: In an international double-blind placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial, 428 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis, who had received continuous methotrexate for at least 3 months and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks, were randomised to placebo (n=88) or one of four regimens of infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Additional infusions of the same dose were given every 4 or 8 weeks thereafter on a background of a stable dose of methotrexate (median 15 mg/week for > or =6 months, range 10-35 mg/wk). Patients were assessed every 4 weeks for 30 weeks. FINDINGS: At 30 weeks, the American College of Rheumatology (20) response criteria, representing a 20% improvement from baseline, were achieved in 53, 50, 58, and 52% of patients receiving 3 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks, respectively, compared with 20% of patients receiving placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001 for each of the four infliximab regimens vs placebo). A 50% improvement was achieved in 29, 27, 26, and 31% of infliximab plus methotrexate in the same treatment groups, compared with 5% of patients on placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001). Infliximab was well-tolerated; withdrawals for adverse events as well as the occurrence of serious adverse events or serious infections did not exceed those in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: During 30 weeks, treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate was more efficacious than methotrexate alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis not previously responding to methotrexate.

van der Heijde D, Simon L, Smolen J, Strand V, Sharp J, Boers M, Breedveld F, Weisman M, Weinblatt M, Rau R, Lipsky P. · Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11954017 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Zanelli E, Vos K, Breedveld F, de Vries R, David C. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10765946 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.